Dynamic excels at providing a seamless, unified user experience by abstracting away wallet complexity. Its core strength is a multi-chain, multi-wallet orchestration layer that automatically creates and manages embedded wallets across chains like Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon. For example, its smart accounts enable features like social recovery and gas sponsorship, which are critical for mainstream adoption. This approach prioritizes developer control and a cohesive onboarding flow, often resulting in higher user conversion rates.
LABS
Comparisons
Dynamic vs web3auth: Embedded Wallet & Auth
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects evaluating non-custodial embedded wallet solutions, focusing on social login, multi-chain support, and developer customization.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Embedded Wallet Infrastructure Battle
Dynamic and Web3Auth represent two dominant philosophies for integrating user-friendly wallets and authentication into web3 applications.
Web3Auth takes a different approach by focusing on key management infrastructure that leverages familiar web2 logins. Its strategy is to use distributed key shares across user devices and trusted nodes, enabling logins via Google, Discord, or email without a single point of failure. This results in a trade-off: while it offers exceptional user familiarity and can achieve over 99.9% uptime for its network, the user's cryptographic key is not a native smart account, which can limit access to advanced account abstraction features natively on some chains.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing user familiarity and leveraging existing web2 identities with proven, non-custodial security, choose Web3Auth. If you prioritize full-stack control, native smart account capabilities (ERC-4337), and a branded, multi-chain wallet experience you fully manage, choose Dynamic.
tldr-summary
DYNAMIC vs WEB3AUTH
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for embedded wallets and authentication.
01
DYNAMIC: Best for Seamless Onboarding
Zero-friction user experience: Abstracts away seed phrases and gas fees for new users via social logins and sponsored transactions. This matters for mass-market consumer apps (e.g., gaming, social) where conversion rate is critical.
02
DYNAMIC: Superior Developer Abstraction
Unified multi-chain SDK: A single integration supports EVM chains, Solana, and Starknet, handling key management across networks. This matters for teams building on multiple L2s or appchains who want to avoid custom wallet logic for each ecosystem.
03
WEB3AUTH: Enterprise-Grade Security & Compliance
Non-custodial MPC architecture: Private keys are sharded, with no single point of failure, and supports enterprise SSO (Okta, Azure AD). This matters for regulated industries (DeFi, enterprise SaaS) requiring SOC 2 compliance and granular access controls.
04
WEB3AUTH: Battle-Tested at Scale
Proven infrastructure: Powers authentication for major players like Binance, Sky Mavis (Axie Infinity), and Ubisoft, processing billions of sessions. This matters for applications with >1M MAU where reliability, uptime, and security audits are non-negotiable.
EMBEDDED WALLET & AUTH COMPARISON
Head-to-Head Feature Matrix
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for developer authentication solutions.
| Metric | Dynamic | Web3Auth |
|---|---|---|
Auth Abstraction Model | MPC-TSS (Multi-Party Computation) | MPC-TSS & Social Logins |
User Key Custody | Non-custodial (User-held) | Non-custodial (Distributed) |
Native Social Logins (Google, Apple) | ||
Gas Sponsorship / Paymaster Integration | ||
Supported Chains (EVM & Non-EVM) | 15+ | 30+ |
Smart Wallet (ERC-4337) Integration | ||
SDK Bundle Size (approx.) | ~150 KB | ~250 KB |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Dynamic vs Web3Auth: Embedded Wallet & Auth
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading embedded wallet solutions at a glance.
01
Dynamic: Seamless Multi-Chain UX
Unified multi-chain onboarding: Users create a single smart account (ERC-4337) that works across 20+ EVM chains without switching networks. This matters for dApps targeting users on Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon who want a frictionless cross-chain experience.
02
Dynamic: Enterprise-Grade Security Model
Non-custodial smart accounts with policy controls: Admins can set transaction rules (spend limits, whitelists) via OpenZeppelin Defender. This matters for institutional DeFi or gaming guilds requiring compliance and asset protection without sacrificing self-custody.
03
Web3Auth: Massive Social Login Network
Direct integration with 10+ OAuth providers: Users sign in via Google, Discord, or Twitch, abstracting keys entirely. This matters for mass-market consumer apps and games where user acquisition and 1-click onboarding are critical metrics.
04
Web3Auth: Battle-Tested MPC Infrastructure
Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) with 8M+ wallets: Private keys are split using Multi-Party Computation, eliminating single points of failure. This matters for high-TVL DeFi protocols and exchanges needing audited, production-ready key management.
05
Dynamic: Potential Vendor Lock-in
Proprietary Relayer & Gas Abstraction: While convenient, your app's gas sponsorship and transaction bundling depend on Dynamic's infrastructure. This is a trade-off for teams who prioritize short-term speed to market over long-term infrastructure control.
06
Web3Auth: Chain Agnosticism Complexity
Modular but fragmented SDKs: Supporting multiple chains (EVM, Solana, Cosmos) requires integrating different provider plugins. This is a trade-off for protocols building on a single L2 who may not need this flexibility and prefer a unified stack.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Dynamic vs Web3Auth: Embedded Wallet & Auth
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading embedded wallet solutions. Choose based on your primary use case and technical requirements.
05
Dynamic's Trade-off: Protocol-Level Complexity
Abstracted chain support adds overhead: While powerful, the multi-chain abstraction layer can introduce latency and complexity for protocol-specific optimizations. This matters for high-frequency trading dApps or single-chain specialists (e.g., a pure Ethereum DeFi protocol) where direct RPC control is critical.
06
Web3Auth's Trade-off: Key Management Nuance
TSS introduces shared security model: While non-custodial, the private key is split between user, Web3Auth network, and user's own device. This matters for purists and maximal security applications where direct, single-device EOA ownership (like MetaMask) is a non-negotiable requirement.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Dynamic for Web2 Onboarding
Verdict: The superior choice for mainstream user acquisition. Strengths: Dynamic's core value proposition is frictionless onboarding via email/social logins, abstracting away seed phrases and gas fees. Its embedded wallets are non-custodial (leveraging MPC and account abstraction) and can be deployed across 20+ EVM chains. This is ideal for applications prioritizing user growth over immediate on-chain sovereignty. Key Metrics: Supports Google, Apple, Discord logins; sub-30-second wallet creation; gas sponsorship options.
Web3Auth for Web2 Onboarding
Verdict: A strong, modular alternative with a different architectural approach. Strengths: Web3Auth's MPC-based network distributes key shares, offering a familiar login experience. Its Plug & Play SDK is highly rated for ease of integration. However, its model can introduce dependency on its network of nodes, which is a different trust assumption than Dynamic's more direct MPC or smart account approach. Consideration: Better suited if you need granular control over the authentication flow or are building within the TSS/MPC ecosystem.
EMBEDDED WALLETS & AUTHENTICATION
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture and Security
A technical comparison of Dynamic and Web3Auth's core architectures, security models, and key differentiators for developers building secure, user-friendly onboarding.
Web3Auth's MPC-TSS architecture provides stronger cryptographic security for key management. It uses Multi-Party Computation (MPC) to split a private key into shares, eliminating single points of failure. Dynamic, while secure, primarily relies on a centralized key custodian model for its non-custodial wallets, placing more trust in its infrastructure. For applications requiring the highest security guarantees without seed phrases, Web3Auth's decentralized keygen is superior. Dynamic's model prioritizes developer simplicity and user experience, which is secure for most consumer dApps.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Recommendation
A decisive breakdown of when to choose Dynamic's unified wallet stack versus Web3Auth's key management infrastructure.
Dynamic excels at providing a seamless, all-in-one user onboarding experience because it bundles embedded wallets, social logins, and fiat on-ramps into a single SDK. For example, its integration with Magic Link and Stripe allows apps to achieve >80% onboarding conversion rates by abstracting seed phrases and gas fees entirely. This makes it the superior choice for consumer-facing dApps and NFT platforms prioritizing user acquisition and retention over granular key control.
Web3Auth takes a different approach by decoupling authentication from wallet creation, focusing on secure, non-custodial key management via MPC-TSS (Threshold Signature Scheme). This results in a trade-off: developers gain immense flexibility to plug in their own auth providers (like Auth0 or Firebase) and wallet connectors, but must assemble more infrastructure pieces themselves. Its architecture is proven at scale, securing over 10 million wallets for protocols like Sky Mavis (Ronin) and Animoca Brands.
The key trade-off is control versus convenience. If your priority is rapid deployment and a polished UX for mainstream users, choose Dynamic. Its turnkey solution minimizes development time and maximizes conversion. If you prioritize enterprise-grade security, existing auth stack integration, or need to support a vast array of existing EOA wallets (MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet) alongside embedded ones, choose Web3Auth. Its modular, non-custodial MPC infrastructure offers the flexibility required for complex, high-security applications.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall