QuickNode excels at providing a fully managed, audited HSM solution directly integrated into its global node infrastructure. This is because they partner with certified providers like AWS CloudHSM and Google Cloud HSM, offering a turnkey service with a 99.9%+ SLA. For example, their implementation is designed for protocols requiring regulatory compliance (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001) and offers automated key rotation and signing directly from the isolated HSM environment, reducing operational overhead for enterprise teams.
LABS
Comparisons
QuickNode vs Ankr: Hardware Security Module (HSM) Integration
A technical comparison of QuickNode and Ankr's support for Hardware Security Modules, focusing on key generation, signing operations, and enterprise-grade security compliance for institutional clients.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Enterprise HSM Imperative
A data-driven comparison of QuickNode and Ankr's approaches to HSM integration for securing blockchain node infrastructure.
Ankr takes a different approach by emphasizing flexibility and multi-cloud HSM orchestration through its RPC aggregator and distributed node network. This strategy results in a trade-off: while you gain the ability to leverage HSMs across AWS, Azure, and GCP for geographic redundancy, the configuration and security audit burden shifts more to your internal DevOps or security team. Ankr's strength is enabling custom, hybrid architectures where signing keys can be distributed across regions and cloud providers.
The key trade-off: If your priority is a fully-managed, compliance-ready HSM with minimal setup for core RPC and transaction signing, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize architectural flexibility and multi-cloud HSM orchestration for a bespoke, geo-distributed validator or relayer setup, choose Ankr.
tldr-summary
QuickNode vs Ankr: HSM Integration
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A direct comparison of hardware security module (HSM) offerings for enterprise-grade key management.
01
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade HSM Partnership
Specific advantage: Direct integration with Fortanix and Thales CipherTrust Manager, offering FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified hardware. This matters for financial institutions and protocols requiring regulatory compliance and auditable key management.
FIPS 140-2 L3
Certification
02
QuickNode: Seamless RPC Integration
Specific advantage: HSM-protected keys can be used directly with QuickNode's global RPC endpoints for signing transactions. This matters for dApps and services that need low-latency, secure transaction submission without managing separate signing infrastructure.
03
Ankr: Multi-Cloud HSM Flexibility
Specific advantage: Offers HSM integration across AWS CloudHSM, Google Cloud HSM, and Azure Dedicated HSM. This matters for teams with existing cloud vendor commitments or those requiring geographic redundancy and deployment flexibility.
3
Major Clouds
04
Ankr: Integrated with Ankr App Chains
Specific advantage: HSM services are natively designed to work with Ankr App Chains (NEAR, Polygon Supernets, Avalanche Subnets). This matters for projects building dedicated blockchains that prioritize sovereign security and chain-specific validator key management.
QUICKNODE VS ANKR
Head-to-Head: HSM Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of Hardware Security Module (HSM) integration for blockchain node providers.
| Feature / Metric | QuickNode | Ankr |
|---|---|---|
HSM Integration Type | AWS CloudHSM, Fortanix DSM | Native Ankr HSM, Key Management Service |
Key Management Standard | FIPS 140-2 Level 3 | FIPS 140-2 Level 3 |
Multi-Cloud HSM Support | ||
Dedicated HSM Hardware | ||
HSM Access via API | ||
Supported Chains (HSM) | Ethereum, Solana, Polygon | Ethereum, Avalanche, BNB Chain |
HSM Setup Time | < 24 hours | < 2 hours |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS
QuickNode vs Ankr: Hardware Security Module (HSM) Integration
A data-driven comparison of enterprise-grade key management solutions. Evaluate based on your protocol's security posture and operational needs.
01
QuickNode HSM: Enterprise-Grade Isolation
Dedicated, single-tenant HSM clusters (FIPS 140-2 Level 3). Each client's keys are physically and logically segregated. This matters for protocols handling > $100M TVL or subject to stringent regulatory compliance (e.g., MiCA, NYDFS).
FIPS 140-2 L3
Certification
02
Ankr HSM: Cloud-Native Flexibility
Multi-cloud HSM orchestration across AWS CloudHSM, Google Cloud HSM, and Azure Dedicated HSM. This matters for teams requiring geographic redundancy or those already deeply integrated with a specific cloud provider's IAM and KMS ecosystem.
3+
Cloud Providers
03
QuickNode Limitation: Vendor Lock-in & Cost
Proprietary integration layer ties key management directly to QuickNode's RPC and infrastructure stack. Migration is complex. Pricing is opaque and scales with enterprise sales, less suitable for bootstrapped protocols or those wanting modular architecture.
Enterprise
Pricing Tier
04
Ankr Limitation: Shared Tenant Model Risk
Software abstraction layer can introduce a broader attack surface versus pure hardware isolation. While using cloud HSMs, the control plane and some middleware components are shared. This matters for protocols where the threat model assumes supply chain attacks on service providers.
pros-cons-b
QuickNode vs Ankr
Ankr HSM: Strengths and Limitations
A direct comparison of Hardware Security Module (HSM) integration for private key management on blockchain nodes.
01
Ankr HSM: Key Strength
Integrated AppChain Stack: Ankr's HSM is part of a broader AppChain-as-a-Service offering. This provides a unified management console for your dedicated chain's RPC, validators, and HSM, reducing operational complexity. Ideal for projects launching a custom chain (e.g., using Polygon Supernets, Avalanche Subnets).
02
Ankr HSM: Key Limitation
Limited Chain Support: Primarily optimized for chains within Ankr's AppChain ecosystem. If your infrastructure relies on a broad, multi-chain RPC suite (e.g., supporting 30+ chains like Solana, Sui, Aptos), you may face integration hurdles compared to more RPC-agnostic HSM providers.
03
QuickNode HSM: Key Strength
RPC-Agnostic & Multi-Cloud: QuickNode's HSM is designed to work with any node infrastructure, including their own global RPC network (supporting 30+ chains) or your self-hosted nodes. Offers deployment on AWS, GCP, and Azure, providing flexibility for existing architectures.
04
QuickNode HSM: Key Limitation
Higher Operational Overhead: As a standalone security module, it requires more configuration and integration work with your node orchestration layer (e.g., Kubernetes, Terraform). Less "batteries-included" than a full-stack solution, which can increase time-to-deployment for greenfield projects.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
QuickNode for Security-First Protocols
Verdict: The definitive choice for applications where private key security is non-negotiable. Strengths: QuickNode's partnership with Fortanix provides FIPS 140-2 Level 3 certified HSM integration. This is the gold standard for regulated DeFi, institutional custody, and high-value bridge operators. Keys are generated, stored, and used entirely within the HSM, with no exposure to QuickNode's infrastructure. This is critical for protocols like Aave, Compound, or Chainlink oracle node operators managing substantial funds. Consideration: This enterprise-grade security comes with higher operational complexity and cost, which is justified for mitigating 8-9 figure TVL risks.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Recommendation
Choosing between QuickNode and Ankr for HSM integration depends on your operational scale, compliance needs, and desired level of infrastructure control.
QuickNode excels at providing a turnkey, enterprise-grade HSM solution, tightly integrated with its global node infrastructure. This is because QuickNode partners with certified, dedicated HSM providers like AWS CloudHSM and Fortanix, offering a managed service layer that abstracts key management complexity. For example, their solution is designed to meet stringent compliance requirements like SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA, making it a strong fit for institutional DeFi protocols or custodial services that require auditable, zero-trust key management without building it themselves.
Ankr takes a different approach by focusing on flexibility and decentralized infrastructure. Their HSM integration strategy is more aligned with their core offering of a decentralized node network, allowing users to potentially leverage a wider array of provider options or integrate with self-managed HSM appliances. This results in a trade-off: you gain more control and potential cost-optimization for bespoke setups, but you assume greater responsibility for the security configuration, compliance auditing, and integration work compared to QuickNode's packaged solution.
The key trade-off: If your priority is compliance assurance, rapid deployment, and a fully-managed security posture for high-value transactions or institutional assets, choose QuickNode. Its certified, integrated model reduces operational risk. If you prioritize infrastructure flexibility, deep customization, and are operating at a scale where managing HSM provider relationships directly is feasible, choose Ankr. Its decentralized ethos provides more levers to pull for teams with dedicated security engineering resources.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall