GetBlock excels at providing configurable data retention windows, allowing projects to define custom deletion schedules for logs and request metadata. This granular control is critical for protocols operating under strict data sovereignty regulations like GDPR, where the "right to be forgotten" is a legal requirement. For example, a dApp handling EU user data can programmatically enforce 30-day retention to minimize liability and storage costs, a level of policy automation not universally available.
LABS
Comparisons
GetBlock vs Infura: Data Retention & Deletion Policies
A technical analysis for CTOs on how GetBlock and Infura handle data lifecycle management, automated deletion schedules, and user data request procedures. This comparison focuses on compliance readiness and operational trade-offs.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: Why Data Lifecycle Policies Matter for RPC Providers
A deep dive into how GetBlock and Infura's data retention and deletion policies impact security, compliance, and operational resilience for enterprise applications.
Infura takes a different, more standardized approach by enforcing fixed, transparent retention periods aligned with its service tiers. This results in a trade-off: less flexibility for the user, but greater predictability and reduced operational overhead. Infura's policies are deeply integrated with its Consensys ecosystem tools like MetaMask and Truffle, ensuring consistent data handling for developers building across the stack, which simplifies compliance audits for large-scale deployments.
The key trade-off: If your priority is regulatory compliance and custom data governance—common in DeFi protocols like Aave or Compound handling sensitive financial data—choose GetBlock for its programmable policies. If you prioritize ecosystem integration and operational simplicity within the Ethereum and IPFS landscape, Infura's standardized, audited approach is the stronger choice.
tldr-summary
Data Retention & Deletion Policies
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A side-by-side comparison of GetBlock and Infura's approaches to data handling, privacy, and compliance.
01
GetBlock: Configurable Retention
Granular control over data lifecycle: Offers configurable data retention periods. This matters for GDPR/CCPA compliance and projects that need to minimize their data footprint for cost or privacy reasons.
02
GetBlock: On-Demand Deletion
User-initiated data purge: Provides tools for users to request or trigger the deletion of their historical data. This is critical for dApps handling sensitive user information or protocols with strict data sovereignty requirements.
03
Infura: Standardized Retention
Predictable, fixed data policies: Employs clear, standardized retention schedules for logs and transaction data. This matters for enterprise teams who require consistent, auditable data governance without managing configurations.
04
Infura: Compliance-First Architecture
Built for regulatory adherence: Policies are designed to align with major frameworks like GDPR by default. This is a key advantage for institutional clients and financial applications where proving compliance is non-negotiable.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Data Policy Feature Comparison: GetBlock vs Infura
Direct comparison of data retention, deletion, and privacy features for blockchain node providers.
| Data Policy Feature | GetBlock | Infura |
|---|---|---|
Data Retention Period | 30 days | 7 days |
Automatic Log Deletion | ||
GDPR Compliance | ||
CCPA Compliance | ||
Data Deletion Request SLA | 30 days | 45 days |
IP Address Anonymization | ||
On-Chain Data Persistence | Indefinite | Indefinite |
pros-cons-a
COMPLIANCE COMPARISON
GetBlock vs Infura: Data Retention & Deletion Policies
A side-by-side analysis of data handling policies for teams with strict regulatory requirements (e.g., GDPR, CCPA).
01
GetBlock: Configurable Data Retention
Explicit user control: GetBlock allows developers to configure data retention periods for their API logs and analytics. This granular control is critical for GDPR compliance, enabling teams to define and enforce data minimization principles specific to their application's jurisdiction.
02
GetBlock: On-Demand Data Deletion
Self-service deletion tools: Users can request immediate deletion of their historical usage data and logs via the dashboard or API. This provides a clear audit trail for data subject requests (DSARs) and reduces operational overhead for compliance teams managing user data rights.
03
Infura: Standardized, Fixed Policies
Consistent global policy: Infura operates with a single, well-documented data retention schedule (e.g., 7-day logs). This simplifies compliance for teams operating in a single primary jurisdiction, as the policy is predictable and uniformly applied across all users, reducing configuration complexity.
04
Infura: Enterprise-Grade Data Agreements
Custom terms for large clients: Enterprise-scale customers can negotiate specific Data Processing Addendums (DPAs) and data residency commitments. This is essential for institutional DeFi protocols or corporate NFT platforms that require contractual guarantees beyond standard terms of service.
pros-cons-b
COMPLIANCE COMPARISON
Infura vs. GetBlock: Data Retention & Deletion Policies
A side-by-side analysis of how each provider handles sensitive user data, a critical factor for protocols subject to GDPR, CCPA, or internal data governance.
01
Infura: Pros for Compliance
Enterprise-Grade Policy Framework: Infura's parent company, Consensys, provides a detailed, publicly available Data Retention Policy and Privacy Policy. This formal documentation is essential for enterprise audits and legal due diligence.
GDPR-Compliant Data Processing: Explicitly states compliance with GDPR, offering mechanisms for data subject access requests (DSARs) and data deletion. This is non-negotiable for applications serving EU users.
Established Legal Precedent: As the incumbent provider for major protocols like MetaMask and Uniswap, Infura's policies have been stress-tested by large-scale, real-world usage and regulatory scrutiny.
02
Infura: Cons for Compliance
Mandatory Data Collection: By default, Infura collects IP addresses and Ethereum wallet addresses associated with API requests. While used for abuse prevention, this creates a persistent data trail that must be managed.
Complex Opt-Out for Privacy: Users must manually enable Infura's "Privacy Mode" to anonymize their IP address. This places the compliance burden on the end-user, not the dApp developer.
Centralized Data Custodian: All collected data is managed by a single entity (Consensys). For teams requiring zero-trust or data localization mandates, this presents a single point of control and potential failure.
03
GetBlock: Pros for Compliance
Flexible Data Handling Tiers: Offers plans with "No Logs" policies, where request data is not stored. This is a direct solution for developers prioritizing user privacy by design.
Clear Retention Windows: Publicly states specific data retention periods (e.g., 30 days for access logs on standard plans), providing transparency that simplifies compliance mapping and data lifecycle planning.
Dedicated Node Option: Provides dedicated nodes where the client has exclusive access and greater control over the node environment and its logs. This is critical for financial institutions or protocols with strict internal data sovereignty requirements.
04
GetBlock: Cons for Compliance
Less Public Legal Scrutiny: As a smaller provider, its policies have not undergone the same level of public legal and community examination as Infura's. This may require more internal legal review.
Potential for Inconsistency: Supports 40+ blockchains. Data handling and compliance features may vary across these networks, requiring due diligence for each chain your application uses.
Resource-Intensive Configuration: Achieving the highest compliance level (e.g., using dedicated nodes with custom policies) requires more hands-on infrastructure management compared to Infura's standardized SaaS model.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose GetBlock vs Infura
Infura for Compliance
Verdict: The Enterprise Standard. Infura (Consensys) operates with a clear, GDPR-aligned data policy. It retains request logs for 7 days for operational purposes and anonymizes IP addresses. Data deletion requests are handled through formal processes, aligning with enterprise audit trails. For protocols like Aave or Compound requiring strict regulatory adherence, Infura's established, transparent policies provide a lower-risk foundation.
GetBlock for Compliance
Verdict: Requires Due Diligence. GetBlock's data retention and deletion policies are less explicitly documented in public-facing materials compared to Infura. While they offer data deletion upon request, the specific retention periods and anonymization practices for logs and metadata are not as prominently detailed. For projects in heavily regulated DeFi or institutional finance, this necessitates direct inquiry with their sales team to ensure alignment with specific compliance frameworks like MiCA.
GETBLOCK VS INFURA
FAQ: Data Retention & Deletion Policies
Understanding how blockchain node providers handle your data is critical for compliance and security. This FAQ compares the data retention and deletion policies of GetBlock and Infura.
Infura retains user data for a longer period than GetBlock. Infura's policy states it may retain certain data for up to 7 years for legal and operational purposes. GetBlock, in contrast, generally retains user data for a maximum of 90 days after account termination, as outlined in their privacy policy. This makes GetBlock's default retention window significantly shorter, which can be a key factor for projects prioritizing data minimization.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict: Choosing Based on Your Compliance Posture
A data-driven breakdown of GetBlock and Infura's policies for data retention and deletion, critical for protocols under GDPR, CCPA, or institutional mandates.
GetBlock excels at providing granular, user-configurable data controls, a direct response to the demands of DeFi protocols and institutional clients. Their policy explicitly supports on-demand data deletion for specific endpoints and user sessions, which is crucial for right to be forgotten requests under GDPR. For example, their API logs and analytical data can be purged upon request, offering a clear audit trail for compliance officers.
Infura takes a different, more standardized approach by aligning its data handling with ConsenSys's broader privacy policy and operational scale. This results in a trade-off: while Infura offers robust, enterprise-grade security and a clear data retention schedule (e.g., storing IP addresses for 7 days), the process for specific data deletion requests is more formalized and less instantaneously configurable via the dashboard compared to some competitors.
The key trade-off: If your priority is granular, self-service control over data lifecycle to satisfy strict regulatory requirements or user data sovereignty, choose GetBlock. If you prioritize a battle-tested, standardized policy from a market leader where formal requests are acceptable and the primary need is reliable uptime (99.9% SLA) and scale, choose Infura.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall