Indexing Mainnet Data (L1) excels at providing maximal security and finality because it operates on the canonical, battle-tested settlement layer. For example, indexing Ethereum mainnet ensures your data reflects the state secured by over 30 million ETH staked, making it the gold standard for protocols like Aave and Uniswap that require absolute trust in their financial logic. The trade-off is higher operational cost and lower throughput, with base fees averaging 5-50 Gwei and a hard throughput cap of ~15-30 TPS.
LABS
Comparisons
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s) vs Indexing Mainnet Data (L1): Layer Focus
A technical comparison for CTOs and architects on the architectural trade-offs, cost structures, and tooling required for indexing data on Ethereum L1 versus Optimistic and ZK Rollups.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The New Indexing Frontier
Choosing where to index blockchain data is a foundational architectural decision that defines your application's performance, cost, and scalability profile.
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s) takes a different approach by leveraging scalability-first execution environments like Arbitrum, Optimism, and zkSync. This results in dramatically lower costs (often <$0.01 per transaction) and higher potential TPS (2,000+), enabling data-rich applications like friend.tech or Hyperliquid. The trade-off is accepting the security and decentralization assumptions of the specific L2's fraud or validity proof system and its bridge to L1 for finality.
The key trade-off: If your priority is uncompromising security, maximal decentralization, and serving as the system of record, choose L1 indexing. If you prioritize low-cost, high-throughput data access for consumer-scale applications and are comfortable with shared security models, choose L2 indexing. Many sophisticated teams, like those behind dYdX, now operate a hybrid model, using L1 for final settlement data and L2 for real-time user activity indexing.
tldr-summary
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s) vs Indexing Mainnet Data (L1)
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for infrastructure architects.
01
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s)
Lower Cost & Higher Throughput: Indexing from Arbitrum, Optimism, or zkSync can be 10-100x cheaper per transaction than Ethereum mainnet. This matters for high-frequency dApps like perpetual DEXs (GMX, dYdX) or social graphs where user actions are frequent and low-value.
02
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s)
Faster Finality for UX: With block times of ~2 seconds (vs. ~12 sec on Ethereum), data finality is quicker. This enables near-real-time indexing for applications like live dashboards, gaming leaderboards, or instant notification systems that rely on The Graph or Subsquid.
03
Indexing Mainnet Data (L1)
Ultimate Security & Composability: Data is secured by Ethereum's ~$100B+ staked consensus. This is non-negotiable for high-value financial primitives like Aave's liquidity pools, MakerDAO's governance, or NFT blue-chip collections (BAYC) where settlement guarantees are paramount.
04
Indexing Mainnet Data (L1)
Universal State & Canonical Truth: All rollups eventually settle here, making it the single source of truth for cross-chain bridges (LayerZero, Wormhole), total value locked (TVL) calculations, and protocol treasury management. Indexers like Etherscan and Dune Analytics anchor here.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Matrix: L1 vs L2 Indexing
Direct comparison of indexing performance, cost, and data characteristics for Layer 1 mainnets versus Layer 2 rollups.
| Metric | Indexing L1 (e.g., Ethereum Mainnet) | Indexing L2 (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) |
|---|---|---|
Avg. Data Throughput (TPS) | 15-45 | 2,000-40,000+ |
Avg. Indexing Cost per 1M Events | $200-500 | $5-20 |
Data Source Complexity | Single chain | Multi-layer (L1 + L2 state) |
Native Access to MEV Data | ||
Time to Sync Full History | ~2 weeks | ~2-3 days |
Primary Data Standards | EVM Logs, Traces | EVM Logs, Compressed Batches |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose L1 or L2 Indexing
Indexing Mainnet (L1) for DeFi
Verdict: The default for ultimate security and composability. Strengths:
- Security & Finality: Direct access to Ethereum's battle-tested, canonical state. Critical for protocols like Aave, Uniswap, and Compound where value at risk is high.
- Full Composability: Seamless integration with the entire L1 ecosystem. Your indexer can query data from any mainnet contract without cross-layer bridging complexities.
- Rich Data Provenance: Access to the deepest liquidity (TVL), oracle price feeds (Chainlink), and governance events directly on the settlement layer. Trade-off: Higher gas costs for indexer operations and slower block times (~12s) can increase data latency.
Indexing Rollups (L2) for DeFi
Verdict: Ideal for cost-sensitive, high-frequency applications.
- Strengths:
- Low-Cost Data Ingestion: Drastically cheaper to index transaction logs and state changes on Optimism, Arbitrum, or Base. Enables real-time analytics on swaps and liquidations.
- High Throughput: Faster block times (e.g., 2s on Arbitrum) mean your indexer can provide near-instant data updates for frontends.
- Emerging Standards: Native support for L2-specific primitives like super-fast oracles (Pyth on zkSync) and account abstraction. Trade-off: Relies on the security and data availability of the underlying L1. Cross-chain composability adds complexity.
LAYER FOCUS
Technical Deep Dive: Finality & Data Availability
Choosing where to index data—directly on the base layer or from a rollup—fundamentally impacts your application's performance, cost, and security assumptions. This section breaks down the key trade-offs between indexing Layer 1 (L1) mainnet data and Layer 2 (L2) rollup data.
Yes, indexing rollup data is typically faster for end-user queries. Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism batch transactions and post compressed data to Ethereum, allowing their native sequencers to provide faster block times and state updates. Indexers like The Graph on Arbitrum Nova can serve queries in milliseconds. However, the ultimate finality and data availability depend on the slower L1 settlement, creating a two-tier speed model.
cost-analysis
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s) vs Indexing Mainnet Data (L1)
Cost Structure & Operational Overhead
A direct comparison of the financial and operational realities of indexing data on Layer 2 scaling solutions versus the Ethereum mainnet.
01
Indexing Rollup Data (L2s)
Radically lower data availability costs: Rollups like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base post compressed transaction data to L1, but indexing occurs on the L2 where gas fees are often <$0.01. This makes syncing and querying state orders of magnitude cheaper.
Faster sync times & simpler infrastructure: With smaller, more recent state histories (e.g., Optimism's archive node syncs in days vs. Ethereum's weeks), operational overhead for running indexers is significantly reduced. Ideal for rapid prototyping and cost-sensitive applications.
<$0.01
Typical L2 Tx Cost
Days
Node Sync Time
02
Indexing Mainnet Data (L1)
Predictable, high-value data access: Indexing Ethereum mainnet provides direct access to the canonical state and the deepest liquidity (e.g., $50B+ TVL in DeFi). Costs are high but stable and justified for protocols like Uniswap, Aave, or Compound that require ultimate security and composability.
No cross-chain risk or complexity: Your indexer logic interacts with a single, settled state. You avoid the operational overhead of managing multiple L2 RPC endpoints, bridge finality delays, or dealing with chain-specific quirks from StarkNet's Cairo or zkSync's ZK-circuits.
$50B+
Ethereum DeFi TVL
Canonical
State Guarantee
03
Choose L2 Indexing For
High-frequency, low-margin applications: SocialFi, gaming, and high-volume NFT marketplaces where user onboarding cost and transaction speed are critical. Examples: Friend.tech on Base, games on Immutable X.
Budget-constrained development & MVPs: Teams needing to iterate quickly without the capital outlay for mainnet gas and storage. Ideal for testing tokenomics or novel dApp mechanics before a mainnet launch.
04
Choose L1 Indexing For
Institutional DeFi & high-value settlements: Protocols managing significant capital that require the unconditional security and finality of Ethereum L1. This includes lending platforms, decentralized exchanges, and stablecoin issuers.
Cross-L2 aggregators & analytics: If your product (e.g., a portfolio dashboard like DeBank or a bridge aggregator like Socket) needs a single source of truth to reconcile activity across multiple rollups, the mainnet's data availability layer is your anchor point.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict & Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between indexing L2 rollup data and L1 mainnet data is a strategic decision that hinges on your application's core requirements for cost, performance, and data scope.
Indexing L2 Rollup Data excels at cost-efficiency and high-throughput analytics because it operates on a chain with significantly lower transaction fees and higher TPS. For example, indexing a day's worth of transactions on Arbitrum or Optimism can cost a fraction of the gas fees required for the same operation on Ethereum Mainnet, while handling thousands of transactions per second from protocols like Uniswap or Aave deployed on the L2.
Indexing L1 Mainnet Data takes a different approach by providing canonical, universal state and maximal security. This results in a trade-off of higher operational costs and lower throughput for guaranteed data finality and access to the entire DeFi ecosystem's primary liquidity and governance events, such as MakerDAO executive votes or Lido staking derivatives.
The key trade-off: If your priority is building a high-frequency, user-facing dApp (e.g., a real-time dashboard or a low-fee NFT marketplace) where cost and speed are critical, choose an L2-focused indexing strategy using tools like The Graph on Arbitrum or a dedicated rollup indexer. If you prioritize settlement assurance, cross-protocol arbitrage analysis, or compliance reporting where data canonicality is non-negotiable, choose mainnet indexing via services like Covalent, Alchemy, or a full node.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall