QuickNode excels at providing high-performance, dedicated infrastructure for demanding applications because of its focus on raw speed and reliability. For example, its global network of bare-metal servers and proprietary load-balancing technology consistently delivers sub-100ms latency and 99.9%+ uptime, making it the go-to for high-frequency trading dApps on Ethereum and Solana. Its enterprise-tier support and deep integrations with tools like The Graph and Alchemy further cement its position for teams where performance is non-negotiable.
LABS
Comparisons
QuickNode vs Ankr: Scalable RPC & Staking Infrastructure
A data-driven comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating high-performance node infrastructure and integrated staking services. We analyze performance, network architecture, cost, and ecosystem support.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Reliable Web3 Infrastructure
A data-driven comparison of QuickNode and Ankr, two leading providers of scalable RPC and staking infrastructure for enterprise-grade applications.
Ankr takes a different approach by building a decentralized, geographically distributed network of node operators. This strategy results in a highly resilient and cost-effective service, particularly for scaling to new chains. Ankr's public RPC service is a major differentiator, offering free tier access that powers discovery for wallets like MetaMask, while its Elastic RPC and staking solutions provide a flexible, pay-as-you-go model ideal for rapidly prototyping on emerging Layer 1s like Sui or Aptos.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximum performance, dedicated resources, and enterprise support for established ecosystems, choose QuickNode. If you prioritize cost-efficiency, decentralized resilience, and rapid deployment across a vast multi-chain landscape, choose Ankr.
tldr-summary
QuickNode vs Ankr
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
Core strengths and trade-offs for enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure.
01
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Performance
Superior global latency & uptime: 99.9% SLA across 20+ chains. This matters for high-frequency trading bots, NFT mints, and applications where sub-second global response is critical.
02
QuickNode: Advanced Developer Tooling
Deep observability & debugging: Features like GraphQL endpoints, real-time logs, and the QuickNode Marketplace for one-click tool deployment (e.g., Blockscout explorers). This matters for teams building complex dApps who need to monitor and diagnose issues beyond basic RPC calls.
03
Ankr: Cost-Effective Scale
Competitive pricing for high-volume workloads: Often 20-30% lower cost at scale for standard RPC requests. This matters for consumer-facing dApps, gaming protocols, and projects with predictable, high-throughput needs where cost-per-request is a primary constraint.
04
Ankr: Integrated Staking & DePIN
Unified infrastructure stack: Combines RPC, liquid staking (ankrETH), and a decentralized node network (DePIN). This matters for protocols like Avalanche, Polygon, BNB Chain that want to bundle node services with native token staking and delegation in a single provider relationship.
05
Choose QuickNode For
- Financial applications requiring the highest reliability (CeFi, DeFi aggregators).
- Teams needing advanced analytics and dedicated support.
- Enterprises with strict compliance and security requirements (SOC2 Type II).
06
Choose Ankr For
- Scalable Web3 gaming & social apps where cost optimization is key.
- Projects deeply integrated with specific L1/L2 ecosystems they support natively.
- Protocols seeking a bundled solution for RPC, staking, and node services.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
QuickNode vs Ankr: RPC & Staking Infrastructure
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure.
| Metric / Feature | QuickNode | Ankr |
|---|---|---|
Global RPC Endpoints | 40+ chains | 40+ chains |
Avg. RPC Response Time (p95) | < 300 ms | < 400 ms |
Staking APY (Ethereum) | 3.5% - 4.0% | 3.2% - 3.8% |
Dedicated Node Pricing (Entry) | $299/month | $199/month |
Enterprise SLA Guarantee | 99.99% | 99.95% |
Multi-Chain WebSocket Support | ||
Enhanced APIs (Debug/Trace) | ||
On-Chain Data Indexing | The Graph Integration | Built-in Ankr Scan |
PERFORMANCE & NETWORK BENCHMARKS
QuickNode vs Ankr: RPC & Staking Infrastructure
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure.
| Metric | QuickNode | Ankr |
|---|---|---|
Global RPC Endpoints | 20+ Networks | 40+ Networks |
Avg. RPC Response Time | < 50 ms | < 100 ms |
Staking APY (Ethereum) | 3.5% - 4.2% | 3.2% - 3.9% |
Enterprise SLA Guarantee | 99.99% | 99.9% |
Dedicated Node Pricing (Monthly) | $299+ | $199+ |
Supports Subgraphs (The Graph) | ||
Multi-Chain Staking Dashboard |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose QuickNode vs Ankr
QuickNode for Developers
Verdict: The enterprise-grade choice for production applications requiring reliability, advanced tooling, and dedicated support. Strengths:
- Superior Reliability & SLAs: Offers 99.9%+ uptime guarantees with detailed Service Level Agreements (SLAs), crucial for mainnet dApps.
- Advanced Developer Tooling: Deep integrations with Hardhat, Truffle, and Foundry. Provides enhanced APIs for debugging, tracing (
trace_transaction), and logs. - Dedicated Infrastructure: Options for dedicated RPC endpoints, reducing noise and improving performance for high-TPS applications like Uniswap or Aave front-ends. Consideration: Higher cost structure than shared plans.
Ankr for Developers
Verdict: The agile, cost-effective platform for prototyping, multi-chain development, and scaling quickly. Strengths:
- Rapid Multi-Chain Access: One-click deployment for RPC endpoints across 40+ chains, including Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, and BNB Chain.
- Free Tier & Predictable Pricing: Generous free tier (vs. QuickNode's credit-based trial) and simple, scalable pay-as-you-go plans.
- Built-in Staking & Node Services: Unified dashboard for RPC and node staking services (e.g., for Ethereum, Polygon). Consideration: Less emphasis on enterprise-grade SLAs and dedicated resource guarantees.
pros-cons-a
RPC & STAKING INFRASTRUCTURE
QuickNode vs Ankr: Pros and Cons
A data-driven breakdown of strengths and trade-offs for two leading infrastructure providers. Use this to align your choice with protocol requirements and budget.
01
QuickNode: Enterprise-Grade Reliability
Specific advantage: 99.9% SLA with multi-cloud, multi-region redundancy. This matters for high-frequency trading dApps and mission-critical DeFi protocols where downtime directly translates to lost revenue. Supports over 30 chains with dedicated, non-shared endpoints.
02
QuickNode: Advanced Developer Tooling
Specific advantage: Deep-dive analytics, GraphQL support, and Webhook alerts. This matters for teams building complex analytics dashboards or needing real-time event monitoring (e.g., NFT mint tracking, large wallet movements). Integrates with tools like The Graph and Dune Analytics.
03
QuickNode: Higher Cost for Premium Tier
Specific advantage: Entry-level plans start higher but offer more dedicated resources. This is a trade-off for bootstrapped projects or those with unpredictable, low-volume traffic where Ankr's free tier or usage-based model may be more cost-effective initially.
04
Ankr: Aggregated Public RPC & Free Tier
Specific advantage: Free public RPC tier and a unified endpoint (ankr.com) for 40+ chains. This matters for prototyping, hackathons, and applications with highly variable load where minimizing fixed costs is critical. Enables quick multi-chain development.
05
Ankr: Integrated Staking & App Chains
Specific advantage: One-click node deployment for 30+ PoS chains and dedicated AppChain infrastructure. This matters for protocols launching their own chain (e.g., on Polygon Supernets, Avalanche Subnets) or teams managing large validator operations alongside RPC needs.
06
Ankr: Performance Variability on Free Tier
Specific advantage: Public RPC endpoints can experience latency and rate limits during peak demand. This is a trade-off for production applications requiring consistent sub-second response times; upgrading to premium dedicated nodes is necessary, narrowing the cost gap with QuickNode.
pros-cons-b
QuickNode vs Ankr
Ankr: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for scalable RPC and staking infrastructure at a glance.
01
Ankr's Key Strength: Multi-Chain Staking & DePIN
Integrated staking infrastructure: Ankr operates a decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) with over 40,000 nodes, offering liquid staking for 15+ chains (e.g., Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon). This matters for protocols needing to bootstrap validator participation or offer native liquid staking tokens (LSTs) like ankrETH.
02
Ankr's Key Strength: Cost-Effective Public RPCs
Free public RPC tier: Ankr provides free, rate-limited RPC access for over 40 blockchains, serving as a popular entry point for developers. This matters for early-stage dApps, hackathon projects, and teams with unpredictable, low-volume traffic who need to minimize initial infrastructure costs.
03
Ankr's Trade-off: Premium Support & SLAs
Enterprise-grade support is a paid tier: While public RPCs are free, dedicated endpoints, higher rate limits, and guaranteed SLAs (e.g., 99.9%+ uptime) require a premium plan. This matters for production applications with strict reliability requirements, where QuickNode's core business focus on premium RPC may offer more robust support structures.
04
Ankr's Trade-off: Core RPC Performance Focus
Broader product suite dilutes RPC specialization: Ankr's focus is split between RPC services, staking, DePIN, and Web3 gaming tools. For teams whose primary need is ultra-reliable, high-performance RPC with advanced features like real-time analytics (QuickNode's xChain Studio) or dedicated global load balancers, a specialist provider may be preferable.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to help technical leaders choose the optimal infrastructure provider for their specific scaling and staking needs.
QuickNode excels at providing a high-performance, enterprise-grade RPC service with predictable performance and robust compliance. Its core strength is a meticulously managed, dedicated node infrastructure across 20+ chains, resulting in 99.9%+ SLA-backed uptime and sub-100ms global latency. For example, its tiered pricing model and advanced features like the GraphQL API, dedicated endpoints, and real-time analytics are tailored for high-throughput applications like NFT marketplaces and DeFi protocols that cannot tolerate downtime.
Ankr takes a different approach by leveraging a decentralized, crowdsourced node network to offer highly scalable and cost-effective access. This strategy results in a compelling trade-off: lower entry costs and rapid chain support (40+ networks) at the potential expense of the absolute performance consistency found in managed solutions. Ankr's strength is its integrated ecosystem, bundling RPC services with liquid staking solutions (ankrETH), developer tools, and its App Chains platform for custom blockchain deployment.
The key architectural trade-off is centralization for performance versus decentralization for cost and flexibility. QuickNode's vertically integrated model provides a controlled, premium experience. Ankr's distributed model prioritizes scalability and ecosystem synergy.
Consider QuickNode if your priority is maximum reliability for mission-critical applications, you require enterprise SLAs and dedicated support, and your budget supports a premium, performance-first model. This is ideal for established DeFi protocols (e.g., Aave, Uniswap) and trading platforms.
Choose Ankr when you need a cost-effective, scalable entry point, value an integrated staking and RPC suite, or are building applications that benefit from a decentralized infrastructure ethos. It's a strong fit for emerging dApps, multi-chain explorers, and projects leveraging liquid staking tokens.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall