Goldsky excels at low-latency, real-time data delivery by leveraging streaming-first architecture and Kafka-based pipelines. For example, its sub-second latency for on-chain events is critical for applications like live NFT mint dashboards or real-time trading analytics, where data freshness is paramount. This approach is built for high-throughput chains like Ethereum and Solana, ensuring developers can react to events as they happen.
LABS
Comparisons
Goldsky vs SubQuery: Real-time Streams vs Flexible Indexing
A technical analysis comparing Goldsky's high-performance, managed event streaming service with SubQuery's flexible, open-source indexing framework. This guide helps CTOs and protocol architects choose the right data pipeline for their dApp's performance, cost, and control requirements.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Data Pipeline Dilemma
Choosing between Goldsky and SubQuery hinges on a fundamental architectural choice: real-time event streaming versus flexible historical indexing.
SubQuery takes a different approach by providing a flexible, open-source indexing framework. This results in superior developer control and customization for complex historical queries, but with higher initial setup overhead. Developers define their own data schemas and transformation logic using GraphQL, making it ideal for building custom APIs that aggregate data across multiple contracts or chains, such as a cross-chain DeFi portfolio tracker.
The key trade-off: If your priority is sub-second event streaming for live applications, choose Goldsky. If you prioritize customizable historical data aggregation and full control over your data schema, choose SubQuery. The decision ultimately maps to your application's core requirement: real-time reactivity versus deep, tailored data analysis.
tldr-summary
Goldsky vs SubQuery
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Goldsky excels in real-time data, while SubQuery offers developer flexibility.
01
Goldsky: Real-Time Streaming
Sub-second event delivery: Processes blockchain data with latencies under 1 second. This matters for DeFi dashboards, live NFT mints, and real-time alerts where data freshness is critical. Built on Apache Flink for high-throughput, stateful stream processing.
02
Goldsky: Managed Infrastructure
Zero-ops data pipelines: Fully hosted service with automatic scaling, schema management, and multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon). This matters for teams wanting to avoid DevOps overhead and focus on building front-end applications.
03
SubQuery: Flexible Self-Hosting
Run anywhere indexing: Deploy your indexer on your own infrastructure (AWS, GCP) or use the managed service. This matters for protocols with custom security requirements, data sovereignty needs, or who want to avoid vendor lock-in.
04
SubQuery: Multi-Chain SDK
Unified GraphQL API: Write once, index across EVM, Cosmos, Polkadot, Algorand, and more. This matters for cross-chain dApps, portfolio aggregators, and teams building on multiple Layer 1s who need a consistent query layer.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Goldsky vs SubQuery: Real-time Streams vs Flexible Indexing
Direct comparison of core architecture, performance, and ecosystem features for blockchain data solutions.
| Metric / Feature | Goldsky | SubQuery |
|---|---|---|
Primary Architecture | Real-time Event Streams | Flexible Indexing Framework |
Data Latency (to Consumer) | < 1 second | ~1-5 seconds (configurable) |
Supported Chains (Native) | EVM (15+), Solana, Starknet | EVM, Cosmos, Polkadot, Algorand, NEAR (50+ total) |
Managed Service SLA | 99.9% uptime | 99.5% uptime |
Self-Hosted Option | ||
Native Subgraph Compatibility | ||
Free Tier | 5M events/month | Unlimited (self-hosted), 500k requests/day (managed) |
Pricing Model (Pro) | $0.50 per 1M events | $29/month per project (managed), usage-based (enterprise) |
PERFORMANCE & SCALABILITY BENCHMARKS
Goldsky vs SubQuery: Real-time Streams vs Flexible Indexing
Direct comparison of indexing speed, data delivery, and architectural trade-offs for blockchain data pipelines.
| Metric / Feature | Goldsky | SubQuery |
|---|---|---|
Data Delivery Latency | < 2 seconds | ~1-5 minutes (configurable) |
Indexing Model | Real-time streams (Firehose) | Flexible custom indexing |
Supported Blockchains | Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Solana | 100+ networks via SDK |
Managed Infrastructure | ||
Self-Host / On-Premise | ||
Native Substreams Support | ||
Primary Use Case | Real-time apps & dashboards | Custom APIs & historical analysis |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Goldsky vs SubQuery: Real-time Streams vs Flexible Indexing
A technical breakdown of two leading data indexing solutions. Choose based on your application's latency, flexibility, and infrastructure requirements.
01
Goldsky's Core Strength: Sub-Second Real-Time Streams
Ultra-low latency event streaming: Delivers blockchain data to your application in < 1 second via WebSockets or server-sent events. This is critical for high-frequency dashboards, live notifications, and trading interfaces where data freshness is paramount. Built on Apache Flink, it's engineered for stateful stream processing at scale.
02
Goldsky's Trade-off: Limited Query Flexibility
Schema-first, stream-oriented model: You define a GraphQL schema and get a continuous feed of matching events. This is less suitable for complex historical aggregations or ad-hoc analytical queries that require scanning large datasets. Think of it as a firehose of real-time data rather than a queryable database.
03
SubQuery's Core Strength: Flexible, Self-Hosted Indexing
Full control over indexing logic: Write custom mapping functions in TypeScript to transform on-chain data into any shape. This enables complex data relationships, multi-chain aggregation, and bespoke API endpoints for dApps like NFT marketplaces or advanced analytics platforms. You can host it yourself or use their managed service.
04
SubQuery's Trade-off: Higher Latency for Real-Time
Polling-based architecture: Indexers typically sync in batches, leading to latency of several seconds or more. While suitable for most consumer dApps, historical queries, and data backfilling, it is not ideal for use cases requiring instantaneous data propagation, such as live order book updates or real-time governance alerts.
pros-cons-b
Goldsky vs SubQuery
SubQuery: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for real-time streams vs. flexible indexing at a glance.
01
SubQuery's Strength: Flexible, Self-Hosted Indexing
Full control over data pipelines: SubQuery's open-source SDK allows you to define custom data transformations, aggregations, and cross-chain logic. This matters for protocols with complex business logic (e.g., DeFi yield aggregators, on-chain gaming) that need bespoke data models not served by generic APIs.
02
SubQuery's Strength: Multi-Chain & Cost Predictability
Unified indexing across 100+ networks including Polkadot, Cosmos, Ethereum, and Avalanche. Deploy with a fixed, predictable cost via the Managed Service or run it yourself. This matters for teams building cross-chain dApps or those with strict infrastructure budgets who need to avoid variable streaming costs.
03
Goldsky's Strength: Sub-Second Real-Time Streams
Millisecond-latency event streaming via Kafka/S3 sinks, enabling true real-time dashboards and trading interfaces. This matters for high-frequency applications like NFT marketplaces (Blur), perpetual DEXs, or live analytics where data freshness is critical (<1 sec lag).
04
Goldsky's Strength: Managed Firehose for Heavy Loads
Fully managed infrastructure scaling to handle 10M+ events per second without operational overhead. Integrates directly with tools like Snowflake and Databricks. This matters for enterprise data teams and high-TPS chains (Solana, Polygon) that need to pipe raw blockchain data into existing data warehouses.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Which: A Use Case Breakdown
Goldsky for Real-time Apps
Verdict: The definitive choice for sub-second, event-driven applications. Strengths: Goldsky's core competency is real-time data streams via Kafka or WebSockets. It provides sub-500ms latency from on-chain event to your application, making it ideal for live dashboards, trading bots, or interactive NFT minting experiences. It's built for high-throughput, low-latency use cases where data freshness is critical. For example, a DeFi frontend showing live liquidity changes or a gaming leaderboard updating instantly.
SubQuery for Real-time Apps
Verdict: A viable but less specialized option; better for near-real-time with complex transformations. Strengths: SubQuery offers GraphQL subscriptions for real-time updates, but with higher latency (typically 1-5 seconds). Its strength here is applying complex filtering or aggregation logic before the data reaches your app. Choose SubQuery if you need to combine real-time updates with heavy post-processing, like calculating a user's rolling portfolio value across multiple protocols as new trades occur.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
Choosing between Goldsky and SubQuery hinges on your project's primary need: real-time event streaming or flexible, developer-owned data indexing.
Goldsky excels at low-latency, high-throughput event streaming because its architecture is purpose-built for real-time data pipelines. For example, its sub-second latency and support for 10,000+ events per second make it the de facto choice for applications like live dashboards, on-chain trading bots, or NFT mint trackers where data freshness is critical. Its managed service abstracts away infrastructure complexity, providing a seamless stream to destinations like Kafka, Snowflake, or directly to your application.
SubQuery takes a different approach by offering a flexible, open-source indexing framework. This results in a trade-off: you gain complete control over your data schema and logic—enabling complex joins and transformations—but assume more operational overhead. Its strength lies in building custom APIs for dApps, with projects like Acala and Moonbeam using it to index parachain-specific data that generic services might miss. The SubQuery Network also introduces a decentralized data marketplace for long-term resilience.
The key architectural divergence is data delivery: Goldsky pushes streams, while SubQuery powers queryable endpoints. Goldsky's streams are ideal for event-driven architectures and data warehousing. SubQuery's indexed datasets are better for serving complex GraphQL queries to front-end dApps or back-end services.
Consider the total cost of ownership. Goldsky operates on a managed SaaS model with predictable pricing based on throughput, reducing engineering time. SubQuery's open-source version has no direct fee but requires you to host and maintain the indexer, aligning with teams that have DevOps capacity and prioritize cost control or decentralization.
The final decision: Choose Goldsky if your priority is real-time data ingestion for analytics, alerting, or syncing with external systems with minimal setup. Opt for SubQuery if you prioritize flexible, application-specific indexing, require complex data relationships, and have the resources to manage your indexer or leverage its decentralized network.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall