Chainstack excels at providing enterprise-grade, dedicated infrastructure with predictable performance and robust security. Its focus on high-availability deployments for protocols like Ethereum, Polygon, and Avalanche is backed by a 99.9% SLA and features like dedicated RPC endpoints, advanced monitoring, and SOC 2 compliance. This makes it a preferred choice for financial institutions and large-scale dApps where reliability and data sovereignty are non-negotiable.
LABS
Comparisons
Chainstack vs Ankr: Node Service for Enterprises vs Developers
A technical comparison of Chainstack and Ankr, analyzing their core focuses on enterprise-grade compliance versus developer-first tooling and staking services for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction
A data-driven comparison of Chainstack and Ankr, two leading node service providers, to help technical leaders choose the right infrastructure partner.
Ankr takes a different approach by prioritizing developer accessibility and a multi-chain future. Its strategy centers on a massive, distributed node network offering a free public RPC tier and competitively priced pay-as-you-go plans. This results in a trade-off: while it offers incredible flexibility and supports a vast array of over 40 chains, including Aptos and Sui, its shared infrastructure may not meet the stringent isolation requirements of the most demanding enterprise workloads.
The key trade-off: If your priority is guaranteed performance, enterprise support, and dedicated resources for a core set of major chains, choose Chainstack. If you prioritize cost-effective experimentation, rapid prototyping across a wide range of emerging chains, and a generous free tier, choose Ankr.
tldr-summary
Chainstack vs Ankr
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance. Choose based on your primary need: enterprise-grade SLAs or developer-first flexibility.
01
Chainstack: Enterprise-Grade SLAs
Guaranteed Uptime & Support: Offers formal Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with 99.9%+ uptime guarantees and dedicated account management. This matters for protocols handling high-value DeFi TVL or institutions requiring contractual reliability.
02
Chainstack: Advanced Security & Compliance
Dedicated, Isolated Infrastructure: Provides private, single-tenant nodes (dedicated) with advanced security features like VPC peering and audit trails. This is critical for regulated entities, financial services, and projects with strict data sovereignty requirements.
03
Ankr: Developer-First Flexibility
Rapid, Self-Service Deployment: Features a streamlined UI and API for spinning up nodes in minutes across 40+ chains. This matters for agile development teams, hackathon projects, and startups needing to prototype quickly without sales calls.
04
Ankr: Cost-Effective Scaling
Pay-As-You-Go & Shared Node Options: Offers highly competitive pricing with shared node plans and granular usage-based billing. This is ideal for bootstrapped projects, dApps with variable traffic, and developers managing multiple testnet deployments.
05
Chainstack: Deep Protocol Support
Specialized Infrastructure for L2s & AppChains: Provides enhanced services for networks like Polygon Supernets, Avalanche Subnets, and dedicated Archive nodes. This matters for teams building on or migrating to specialized Layer 2 and app-specific chain ecosystems.
06
Ankr: Extensive RPC & API Suite
Public & Enhanced RPC Endpoints: Maintains a massive global load-balanced RPC network with enhanced APIs (e.g., NFT, Token). This is key for dApps requiring high-availability public endpoints and developers integrating multiple data queries without running full nodes.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Chainstack vs Ankr: Node Service Comparison
Direct comparison of enterprise-grade and developer-focused node infrastructure metrics.
| Metric | Chainstack | Ankr |
|---|---|---|
Enterprise SLA Guarantee | ||
Dedicated Node Starting Price | $300/month | $49/month |
Supported Chains (Count) | 30+ | 40+ |
Global Edge Locations | 25+ | ~40 |
Archive Node Availability | ||
Free Tier (Daily Requests) | 3M | ~1.5M |
WebSocket Support |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS
Chainstack vs Ankr: Node Service for Enterprises vs Developers
A data-driven breakdown of strengths and trade-offs for enterprise infrastructure buyers. Based on public metrics for TPS, uptime, and supported protocols.
01
Chainstack: Enterprise-Grade SLA & Security
Specific advantage: Offers a 99.9% SLA with dedicated, single-tenant infrastructure. This matters for regulated DeFi protocols (e.g., Aave, Compound forks) and institutional custody solutions requiring strict compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001) and predictable performance.
99.9%
Uptime SLA
02
Chainstack: Multi-Cloud & Hybrid Flexibility
Specific advantage: Deploys nodes across AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, with support for private cloud/VPC peering. This matters for enterprises with existing cloud commitments or hybrid architecture needs, avoiding vendor lock-in and enabling complex network topologies.
3+
Major Clouds
03
Ankr: Developer-First UX & Rapid Prototyping
Specific advantage: Provides a simplified UI, one-click deployments, and a generous free tier. This matters for early-stage dApp teams and hackathon projects needing to spin up an Ethereum or Polygon RPC endpoint in <2 minutes without negotiating contracts.
< 2 min
Node Deployment
04
Ankr: Broad Protocol Support & Elastic Scaling
Specific advantage: Supports 40+ chains natively with elastic node scaling. This matters for cross-chain bridge operators (e.g., using LayerZero) and NFT marketplaces that need to quickly add support for trending chains like Aptos or Sui without infrastructure overhead.
40+
Supported Chains
05
Chainstack: Higher Cost for Premium Features
Specific trade-off: Enterprise SLAs and dedicated hardware come at a premium. This is a drawback for bootstrapped startups or projects with highly variable, low-volume traffic where Ankr's pay-as-you-go model is more cost-effective.
06
Ankr: Shared Resources on Lower Tiers
Specific trade-off: Entry-level plans use shared node infrastructure, which can lead to variable performance during peak loads. This is a drawback for high-frequency trading bots or mainnet DeFi protocols where latency and consistency are non-negotiable.
pros-cons-b
CHAINSTACK VS ANKR
Ankr: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for enterprise node infrastructure versus developer-first tooling.
01
Developer Experience & Tooling
Ankr's primary strength: Superior SDKs, CLI tools, and a unified API for 40+ chains. This matters for rapid prototyping and teams building multi-chain dApps who need to avoid managing disparate RPC endpoints.
02
Cost-Effective Scaling
Specific advantage: Pay-as-you-go pricing with a generous free tier (up to 250K requests/day). This matters for bootstrapped startups and projects with variable traffic, as it prevents over-provisioning and locks you into high fixed costs.
03
Enterprise-Grade SLAs & Compliance
Chainstack's primary strength: Guaranteed 99.9% uptime SLA, dedicated node instances, and SOC2 Type II compliance. This matters for regulated institutions (DeFi, TradFi) and applications where data consistency and audit trails are non-negotiable.
04
Advanced Node Configurations
Specific advantage: Full control over node type (archive, validator), client diversity (Geth, Erigon, Nethermind), and deployment region (AWS, GCP, Azure). This matters for protocols requiring specific data (e.g., indexers) or teams with strict infrastructure governance.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Chainstack vs Ankr
Chainstack for Enterprises
Verdict: The definitive choice for regulated, high-compliance workloads. Strengths: Chainstack is built for institutional-grade security and operational control. It offers dedicated node deployments with private VPCs, SOC 2 Type II compliance, and granular access controls via IAM. This is critical for DeFi protocols like Aave or Compound running on mainnet, or financial institutions interacting with permissioned networks like Hyperledger Besu. Support includes 24/7 SLAs and direct engineering contact, ensuring uptime for high-TVL applications.
Ankr for Enterprises
Verdict: A viable option for cost-sensitive teams needing broad chain support. Strengths: Ankr provides a massive network of public RPC endpoints and a streamlined platform for deploying nodes across 40+ chains, including Aptos and Sui. Its strength is operational simplicity and lower cost for non-critical, high-throughput data reads. However, for core settlement layers handling billions in assets, the shared infrastructure and less rigorous compliance framework (vs. Chainstack's SOC2) introduce operational risk.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide your choice between Chainstack's enterprise-grade reliability and Ankr's developer-first flexibility.
Chainstack excels at providing enterprise-grade reliability and predictable performance for high-stakes applications. This is achieved through a dedicated, single-tenant node architecture and a strong focus on compliance and SLAs, with a guaranteed 99.9% uptime for its premium tiers. For example, its infrastructure is trusted by major DeFi protocols and financial institutions requiring consistent, low-latency access to networks like Ethereum and Polygon for real-time settlement and data feeds.
Ankr takes a different approach by prioritizing developer accessibility and multi-chain scalability. Its strategy leverages a distributed, load-balanced network of nodes, resulting in a trade-off between absolute performance consistency and superior geographic distribution and cost efficiency. This model powers its public RPC service, which handles billions of requests monthly, and enables rapid provisioning across 40+ chains, including Aptos and Sui, making it ideal for prototyping and applications with variable demand.
The key architectural trade-off is between dedicated resources and shared, elastic ones. Chainstack's dedicated nodes offer superior performance isolation and security for predictable workloads, while Ankr's elastic model provides better cost efficiency and global reach for applications with spiky traffic or those needing broad chain coverage.
Consider Chainstack if your priority is production-grade stability, regulatory compliance (SOC2 Type II), and handling high, consistent transaction volumes for protocols in DeFi (Aave, Uniswap) or Enterprise Blockchain. Its predictable pricing model aligns with fixed infrastructure budgets.
Choose Ankr when your needs center on rapid development, cost-effective scaling, and accessing a vast array of chains through a unified API. It's the superior choice for Web3 gaming studios, dApp developers iterating quickly, and projects requiring elastic RPC services for user onboarding without upfront node commitments.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall