The Graph excels at providing a decentralized, fault-tolerant network for data availability. Its protocol incentivizes a global network of independent Indexers, creating inherent redundancy. For example, during a localized outage, queries can be automatically rerouted to other Indexers in the network, maintaining service. This design is backed by over 200 active Indexers and a staked value (TVL) exceeding $2.5B, which financially secures the network's commitment to uptime. The trade-off is a lack of direct control; you cannot mandate specific disaster recovery (DR) procedures for the nodes serving your subgraph.
LABS
Comparisons
The Graph's Data Availability During Outages vs Custom Indexer's Disaster Recovery Plans
A technical comparison for CTOs on ensuring subgraph and indexer uptime. Evaluates The Graph's decentralized network redundancy against the controlled disaster recovery of a self-hosted indexer stack.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The High Stakes of Indexer Uptime
A critical comparison of how The Graph's decentralized network and custom indexers handle service disruptions, with profound implications for protocol reliability.
A Custom Indexer takes a different approach by placing full architectural control in your hands. This allows for bespoke disaster recovery plans tailored to your specific RPC requirements, failover databases, and geographic redundancy. You can implement multi-region deployments on AWS or GCP, define precise RTO/RPO targets, and conduct controlled failover tests. This results in a trade-off of operational overhead and cost. You bear the full burden of building, monitoring, and maintaining this resilient infrastructure, which requires significant DevOps resources and cloud spend.
The key trade-off: If your priority is operational simplicity and cryptoeconomic security, choose The Graph. Its decentralized model abstracts away infrastructure DR. If you prioritize absolute control over recovery timelines, data consistency guarantees, and infrastructure design, choose a Custom Indexer, accepting the associated cost and complexity.
tldr-summary
The Graph vs. Custom Indexer
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for data availability during infrastructure failures.
01
The Graph: Decentralized Redundancy
Global Indexer Network: Queries are load-balanced across 200+ independent indexers. A single node outage has minimal impact on global data availability. This matters for protocols requiring 99.9%+ uptime for global users.
200+
Indexers
02
The Graph: Protocol-Level SLAs
Economic Guarantees: Indexers stake GRT as collateral. Poor performance or downtime leads to slashing and delegation withdrawal. This creates a crypto-economic incentive for reliability that a self-operated server lacks.
03
Custom Indexer: Full Control & Isolation
No Shared Risk: Your data pipeline is isolated from other protocols' traffic spikes or vulnerabilities (e.g., a surge in Uniswap queries won't affect you). This matters for highly sensitive or proprietary data workflows.
04
Custom Indexer: Tailored Disaster Recovery
Architect to Your RPO/RTO: Design multi-region failover, specific database snapshots, and backup subgraphs that match your exact Recovery Point/Time Objectives. Essential for financial applications with regulatory continuity requirements.
THE GRAPH VS CUSTOM INDEXER
Feature Comparison: Data Availability & Disaster Recovery
Direct comparison of data resilience and recovery mechanisms for blockchain indexing.
| Metric / Feature | The Graph (Decentralized Network) | Custom Indexer (Self-Hosted) |
|---|---|---|
Inherent Data Redundancy | ||
Subgraph Downtime (Historical) | < 0.1% | Varies (User-Managed) |
Disaster Recovery SLA | Network Uptime > 99.5% | Defined by Internal Team |
Cross-Region Failover | Manual Configuration Required | |
Data Recovery Point Objective (RPO) | Near-Zero | Depends on Backup Schedule |
Primary Data Source | Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, etc. | Single RPC Endpoint |
Operational Overhead for HA | Managed by Indexers | High (Engineering Team) |
pros-cons-a
DATA AVAILABILITY DURING OUTAGES
The Graph vs. Custom Indexer: Data Resilience
Comparing the decentralized network's fault tolerance against a self-managed infrastructure's recovery capabilities.
01
The Graph: Decentralized Redundancy
Network-wide uptime: Data is served by a global network of over 500 Indexers. A single provider outage has minimal impact on query availability. This matters for protocols requiring 99.9%+ uptime SLAs without managing infrastructure.
500+
Indexers
99.9%
Target Uptime
02
The Graph: Slashing & Incentives
Economic security: Indexers stake GRT and face slashing for poor performance or downtime, aligning incentives with data availability. This matters for mission-critical dApps like Aave or Uniswap that cannot afford silent failures.
03
Custom Indexer: Full Control & DR Planning
Tailored Recovery Objectives: You define your own RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective). Implement multi-region failover on AWS/GCP with automated snapshots. This matters for enterprise-grade applications with specific compliance or data sovereignty needs.
<5 min
Typical RTO
04
Custom Indexer: Cost & Complexity Trade-off
High operational burden: Requires engineering resources to build and maintain disaster recovery plans, monitor health, and manage failover processes. This matters for teams with dedicated DevOps/SRE and budgets exceeding $200K/year for infrastructure.
pros-cons-b
DATA AVAILABILITY & DISASTER RECOVERY
Custom Indexer: Pros and Cons
Evaluating uptime guarantees and recovery strategies for The Graph's decentralized network versus a self-hosted custom indexer.
01
The Graph: Decentralized Redundancy
Network-wide uptime: Data is served by ~200+ independent Indexers. A single node failure has minimal impact on global query availability. This matters for applications requiring continuous uptime without a single point of failure, like DeFi dashboards (e.g., Uniswap Analytics).
200+
Active Indexers
02
The Graph: Recovery Complexity
No operator control: During a network-wide outage (e.g., RPC provider failure), your team cannot directly intervene. Recovery depends on The Graph Council's governance and Indexer responses. This matters for mission-critical protocols where you need direct control over disaster recovery SLAs.
03
Custom Indexer: Full Control & Isolation
Infrastructure ownership: You control the entire stack—RPC nodes, database, and failover systems. You can implement multi-cloud redundancy (AWS + GCP) and instant hot-swaps. This matters for enterprise applications with strict compliance (e.g., private subgraphs) or those needing deterministic recovery under 5 minutes.
0 min
Governance Delay
04
Custom Indexer: Operational Burden
High DevOps overhead: You are responsible for 24/7 monitoring, backup strategies, and cross-region replication. A single configuration error can cause extended downtime. This matters for teams with limited SRE resources who cannot afford to manage another complex distributed system.
DATA AVAILABILITY & DISASTER RECOVERY
Technical Deep Dive: Failure Modes and Mitigations
When a blockchain indexing service fails, your dApp's data layer collapses. This section compares how The Graph's decentralized network and a custom indexer's private infrastructure handle outages, data corruption, and disaster scenarios.
Your dApp's queries will fail, but subgraph data remains recoverable. The Graph's hosted service is a centralized gateway, not the data source itself. The underlying decentralized network of Indexers continues to index and store historical data. To restore service, you must either wait for the hosted service to recover or manually reconfigure your dApp to point directly to a reliable Indexer's endpoint, which requires technical overhead and may incur GRT query fees.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
The Graph for Protocol Resilience
Verdict: Superior for maintaining data availability during upstream chain outages. Strengths: The Graph's decentralized network of Indexers and Curators operates independently of any single blockchain's uptime. If Ethereum mainnet experiences a halt, subgraphs can continue serving historical data and process new data once the chain resumes, preventing a total blackout for your dApp. This multi-chain support (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, etc.) provides inherent redundancy. Considerations: Your dApp's front-end must handle the underlying RPC provider's availability separately.
Custom Indexer for Protocol Resilience
Verdict: Requires significant engineering overhead to match The Graph's decentralized fault tolerance. Strengths: You control the entire disaster recovery (DR) plan. You can implement multi-region deployments, hot-standby databases, and custom snapshot/rollback procedures tailored to your exact data schema. For protocols with extreme, non-standard data processing needs, this control can be critical. Trade-off: Building and maintaining a production-grade DR plan for a self-hosted indexer is a major cost center, requiring automated failover, monitoring, and a dedicated SRE team.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between The Graph's decentralized network and a custom indexer's private infrastructure is a strategic decision between resilience through distribution and control through planning.
The Graph excels at providing resilient data availability during localized outages because its decentralized network of over 600 Indexers and 200+ Subgraphs creates inherent redundancy. For example, if an Indexer in one region fails, queries are automatically routed to others, maintaining service. This model leverages the network's 99.9%+ historical uptime and is battle-tested by major protocols like Uniswap and Aave, which rely on it for critical on-chain data feeds without managing infrastructure.
A Custom Indexer takes a different approach by prioritizing complete operational control over disaster recovery. This strategy results in a trade-off: you gain the ability to design bespoke failover clusters, implement custom backup schedules, and integrate directly with your DevOps stack (e.g., PagerDuty, Datadog), but you bear the full burden of engineering, testing, and maintaining these systems. The resilience is only as strong as your team's plan and execution.
The key trade-off: If your priority is operational simplicity and proven, hands-off resilience against third-party infrastructure failures, choose The Graph. Its decentralized network is a force multiplier for uptime. If you prioritize absolute control, regulatory compliance requiring data isolation, or have the engineering resources to build and validate a robust disaster recovery plan, choose a Custom Indexer. The decision hinges on whether you want to outsource or own your data availability risk.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall