POAP (ERC-721) excels at fungible user engagement because it leverages the mature, widely adopted NFT standard. Its strength lies in interoperability with the entire Web3 ecosystem—wallets like MetaMask, marketplaces like OpenSea, and tools like Etherscan. For example, with over 7 million POAPs minted across 1,000+ events, the network effect is undeniable. This makes POAPs ideal for marketing, community building, and creating tradable collectibles that drive organic discovery.
LABS
Comparisons
POAP (ERC-721) vs Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) for Event Attendance
A technical analysis comparing the established POAP standard for collectible proof-of-attendance against the emerging Soulbound Token paradigm, focusing on token design, user psychology, and ecosystem implications for protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle of Attestation Philosophies
Choosing between POAPs and SBTs for event attestation is a foundational decision that dictates your protocol's capabilities and constraints.
Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) take a different approach by enforcing non-transferability as a core primitive. This strategy results in a trade-off: you sacrifice secondary market liquidity to gain verifiable, sybil-resistant proof of unique identity and attendance. Protocols like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Sismo use this model to create on-chain credentials that are permanently tied to a wallet, making them superior for trust-minimized governance, reputation-based access, and compliance-heavy use cases.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing reach, user familiarity, and viral growth through a tradable asset, choose POAP. If you prioritize building a verifiable, non-financialized identity layer where proof of unique participation is the core value, choose SBTs via frameworks like EAS.
tldr-summary
POAP vs SBTs
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for event attendance use cases.
01
POAP: Battle-Tested Infrastructure
Specific advantage: 10M+ NFTs minted across 4,000+ events. This matters for real-world adoption and user familiarity. The ecosystem includes dedicated apps (POAP.fun), scanners, and wallet integrations, reducing development overhead for event organizers.
02
POAP: Flexible & Transferable
Specific advantage: Standard ERC-721 tokens can be traded or sold. This matters for collector markets and secondary utility (e.g., gated Discord roles, token-gated commerce). However, this undermines proof-of-attendance if tokens are resold.
03
SBTs: Non-Transferable Proof
Specific advantage: Soulbound property ensures the token is permanently bound to the recipient's wallet. This matters for verifiable credentials, reputation systems, and Sybil-resistant airdrops where proof-of-unique-person is critical.
04
SBTs: Richer On-Chain Identity
Specific advantage: Can be revoked or updated by the issuer (e.g., for multi-event loyalty tiers). This matters for building dynamic, long-term member profiles beyond a single event. Standards like ERC-4973 and ERC-5114 enable complex attestations.
05
POAP: Higher Gas Costs & Chain Limits
Specific drawback: Minting 10,000 ERC-721 tokens on Ethereum Mainnet can cost >$10K in gas. While sidechains (Gnosis Chain) are used, this fragments the attestation graph. This matters for large-scale, low-cost events.
06
SBTs: Immature Tooling & Standards
Specific drawback: No dominant standard yet; tooling (minters, verifiers, explorers) is fragmented across Ethereum, Polygon, Celo. This matters for developer velocity and user experience. The ecosystem is years behind POAP's.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Comparison: POAP (ERC-721) vs Soulbound Tokens
Direct comparison of token standards for representing event attendance and non-transferable credentials.
| Metric / Feature | POAP (ERC-721) | Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) |
|---|---|---|
Token Transferability | ||
Primary Standard | ERC-721 | ERC-5114 / ERC-4973 |
Primary Use Case | Event Attendance Proof | Reputation & Identity |
On-Chain Revocation | ||
Typical Mint Cost | $5 - $50 | $0.10 - $5 |
Wallet Integration | Universal | Emerging (Soul Wallet) |
pros-cons-a
TECHNICAL COMPARISON
POAP (ERC-721) vs SBTs for Event Attendance
Key strengths and trade-offs for two dominant approaches to on-chain attestations. Choose based on your protocol's requirements for permanence, utility, and user experience.
01
POAP (ERC-721) Pros
Proven Infrastructure & Liquidity: 10M+ badges minted across 4,000+ events. Fully compatible with all ERC-721 marketplaces (OpenSea, Blur) and wallets. This matters for events where attendees value collectible utility and optional tradability.
10M+
Badges Minted
4,000+
Events
02
POAP (ERC-721) Cons
Transferable & Non-Soulbound: Core ERC-721 standard allows resale, undermining proof-of-attendance integrity. Users can trade or sell badges, creating Sybil risks for gated communities and credential systems. This is a critical flaw for trust-minimized applications.
03
SBTs (Soulbound Tokens) Pros
Non-Transferable by Design: Built on standards like ERC-4973 or ERC-5114, ensuring tokens are permanently bound to a wallet. This matters for authentic credentialing, DAO voting rights, and building Sybil-resistant reputation systems like Gitcoin Passport.
04
SBTs (Soulbound Tokens) Cons
Immature Tooling & Fragmentation: No dominant standard yet, leading to wallet support gaps and integration complexity. Lower liquidity and discoverability versus NFTs. This matters for projects needing immediate, broad user adoption without custom development overhead.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
POAP (ERC-721) vs Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) for Event Attendance
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for protocol architects choosing attestation standards.
01
POAP: Proven Network Effects
Established ecosystem: Over 7 million POAPs minted across 1,000+ events. This matters for interoperability as wallets like MetaMask and platforms like Galxe natively support display, creating immediate user recognition and utility.
02
POAP: Flexible & Transferable
ERC-721 standard: Enables secondary market trading on platforms like OpenSea. This matters for user choice and liquidity, but introduces risks like attestation resale and Sybil attacks for gated communities.
03
SBTs: Non-Transferable Attestation
Soulbound by design: Tokens are locked to a wallet (e.g., via EIP-4973). This matters for authentic credentialing, ensuring proof-of-attendance is tied to the actual participant, crucial for DAO voting or airdrop eligibility.
04
SBTs: Richer On-Chain Identity
Composable data schema: Supports verifiable claims (VCs) via standards like EIP-712. This matters for building reputational graphs that can be queried by protocols like Galxe or Guild for complex, non-financial gating logic.
05
POAP: Higher Gas Costs & Spam Risk
Full on-chain storage: Each image/metadata minted on-chain (e.g., Ethereum mainnet) leads to ~$5-15 minting fees. Open transferability also increases susceptibility to spam mints and collection bloating.
06
SBTs: Immature Tooling & Adoption
Early-stage infrastructure: Few wallets (e.g., Rainbow) support native display. Requires custom integration using attestation registries like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) or Verax, increasing development overhead.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Use Which
POAP (ERC-721) for Event Organizers
Verdict: The default choice for most real-world events and marketing campaigns. Strengths:
- Proven Infrastructure: Seamless integration with POAP's minting platform, delivery APIs, and claim pages reduces dev time.
- User Familiarity: High recognition and demand; attendees actively collect them, driving engagement.
- Secondary Market (Pro/Con): Enables speculative value and collector communities, which can amplify event buzz.
- Interoperability: As a standard ERC-721, it's supported by every major wallet (MetaMask, Rainbow) and marketplace (OpenSea).
SBTs for Event Organizers
Verdict: A niche tool for exclusive, non-transferable credentialing. Strengths:
- Guaranteed Exclusivity: Soulbound nature prevents re-sale, ensuring only actual attendees hold the badge. Ideal for gated, high-value experiences (e.g., VIP conferences, alumni networks).
- On-Chain Reputation Foundation: Can be used as a verifiable input for future governance or access control within your ecosystem. Key Limitation: Immature tooling. You'll need custom smart contract development (ERC-4973, ERC-5114) and must build your own claim flow, as no turnkey platform like POAP exists.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between POAP and SBTs hinges on your event's need for permanence versus programmability.
POAP (ERC-721) excels at proven, permanent attestation because it leverages the mature, widely-adopted ERC-721 standard. This results in high composability with existing NFT marketplaces, wallets like MetaMask, and analytics tools. For example, with over 7 million POAPs minted across 2,000+ events, the network effect and user familiarity are immense, reducing onboarding friction. Its design as a non-transferable NFT ensures the badge is permanently tied to the recipient's wallet, providing a durable record of attendance.
Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) take a different approach by being intrinsically non-transferable at the protocol level (e.g., ERC-5114). This eliminates the need for off-chain blacklists or social consensus to enforce permanence, a core vulnerability in POAP's model. This results in a trade-off: superior cryptographic guarantees for identity and reputation at the cost of being a newer standard with less ecosystem tooling and wallet support compared to battle-tested ERC-721 infrastructure.
The key trade-off: If your priority is immediate user adoption, proven infrastructure, and a permanent collectible, choose POAP. Its ERC-721 foundation ensures seamless integration with the current Web3 stack. If you prioritize future-proof, cryptographically-enforced identity, advanced revocation logic, and building complex, programmable reputation systems, choose SBTs. They are the strategic choice for protocols like Galxe, Gitcoin Passport, or Optimism's AttestationStation that require verifiable, non-transferable credentials as primitive building blocks.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall