ImmutableX excels at providing a zero-gas, high-throughput environment for SBTs by leveraging StarkEx's ZK-rollup technology on Ethereum. This results in a user experience with 9,000+ TPS for NFT minting and trading, and zero gas fees for users, making it ideal for mass-scale credential issuance. For example, projects like Illuvium and GameStop leverage this for in-game assets, a model directly applicable to high-frequency SBT use cases.
LABS
Comparisons
ImmutableX for SBTs vs Polygon for SBTs
A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating Layer 2 solutions for high-volume Soulbound Token (SBT) minting and management, focusing on transaction cost, finality guarantees, and ecosystem-specific attestation tooling.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The High-Volume SBT Infrastructure Decision
Choosing between ImmutableX and Polygon for Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) is a foundational decision that balances extreme scalability against ecosystem breadth.
Polygon takes a different approach by offering a versatile, EVM-compatible ecosystem with multiple scaling solutions like PoS and zkEVM. This results in a trade-off: while its ~7,000 TPS and ~$0.01 average transaction fees are excellent, they don't match ImmutableX's absolute zero-fee guarantee. However, its strength lies in massive adoption, with a $1B+ DeFi TVL and deep integration with tools like Lens Protocol and Aavegotchi, providing a richer composability layer for SBTs.
The key trade-off: If your priority is uncompromising scalability and cost predictability for a dedicated, high-volume SBT application (e.g., gaming achievements, event tickets), choose ImmutableX. If you prioritize maximum ecosystem composability, developer familiarity with Solidity, and integration with a vast DeFi and social graph landscape, choose Polygon.
tldr-summary
IMMUTABLEX VS. POLYGON FOR SBTS
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for deploying Soulbound Tokens (SBTs).
01
Choose ImmutableX for...
Zero-Gas, Carbon-Neutral NFTs: Mint and transfer SBTs with no gas fees for users, powered by StarkEx validity proofs. This matters for mass adoption where user experience is paramount (e.g., gaming achievements, event tickets).
02
Choose ImmutableX for...
Native Gaming & High-Volume Ecosystem: Built for high-throughput applications with 9,000+ TPS and deep integrations with major studios (Illuvium, Gods Unchained). This matters for gamified SBTs requiring instant, free transactions for millions of users.
03
Choose Polygon for...
Maximum EVM Compatibility & Tooling: Full bytecode compatibility with Ethereum, supporting ERC-721, ERC-1155, and ERC-6551 standards out-of-the-box. This matters for protocols that need to integrate with a vast DeFi and tooling ecosystem (Aave, Uniswap, The Graph).
04
Choose Polygon for...
Established Web3 Identity Footprint: Home to major identity projects like Polygon ID and a large base of existing SBTs. This matters for interoperable identity systems that benefit from network effects and established verification frameworks.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
ImmutableX vs Polygon for Soulbound Tokens (SBTs)
Direct comparison of key infrastructure metrics for deploying and managing Soulbound Tokens (SBTs).
| Metric / Feature | ImmutableX (zkEVM) | Polygon (PoS Chain) |
|---|---|---|
Native Gas Fees for Minting | $0.00 | $0.01 - $0.10 |
Transaction Finality | ~2 seconds | ~3-5 minutes |
Throughput (Theoretical TPS) | 9,000+ | 7,000 |
EVM Compatibility | ||
Native Account Abstraction Support | ||
Primary Security Model | Ethereum L1 + zk-Proofs | Proof-of-Stake Validator Set |
NFT-Specific Tooling (e.g., Marketplaces) | Immutable Marketplace, GameStop NFT | OpenSea, Rarible, Magic Eden |
pros-cons-a
IMMUTABLEX VS. POLYGON
ImmutableX for SBTs: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for Soulbound Token (SBT) deployment at a glance.
01
ImmutableX: Zero Gas Fees
Specific advantage: Users pay zero gas fees for minting and transferring SBTs, as fees are covered by the project via IMX staking. This matters for mass adoption where user onboarding friction is critical, such as for event tickets, loyalty programs, or educational credentials.
02
ImmutableX: Built for Gaming/NFTs
Specific advantage: Native integration with StarkEx's validium scaling solution, offering 9,000+ TPS and instant trade confirmation. This matters for high-frequency, high-volume SBT ecosystems like in-game achievements, player profiles, or dynamic NFT-based identities that require fast, cheap state updates.
03
Polygon: EVM Native & Composability
Specific advantage: Full Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility, allowing SBTs to use existing standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155, ERC-20) and tools (MetaMask, Hardhat). This matters for protocols requiring deep DeFi integration or those already built on Solidity, enabling easy migration and interaction with protocols like Aave, Uniswap, or Lens Protocol.
04
Polygon: Broader Ecosystem & Liquidity
Specific advantage: $1B+ TVL and 400+ DApps, including major SBT projects like Aave's Lens Protocol. This matters for SBTs that need to tap into a mature, multi-faceted ecosystem with established identity, social, and financial primitives, offering greater network effects from day one.
pros-cons-b
IMMUTABLEX VS. POLYGON
Polygon for SBTs: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for deploying Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) at a glance.
01
ImmutableX: Zero Gas Fees for Users
Specific advantage: Minting and transferring SBTs incurs no gas fees for end-users, as transactions are settled via STARK proofs. This matters for mass adoption in gaming or credentialing where users are highly fee-sensitive. Protocols like Apeiron and Illuvium leverage this for in-game assets.
$0
User Gas Cost
02
ImmutableX: Built for High-Throughput NFTs
Specific advantage: Optimized for NFT-specific scaling, supporting ~9,000 TPS. This matters for high-frequency SBT interactions like real-time achievement updates or loyalty points in a live game. The ecosystem is tailored for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 standards with native tooling.
9k+
NFT TPS
04
Polygon: Lower Protocol & Liquidity Costs
Specific advantage: Protocol deployment and transaction costs are a fraction of Ethereum L1 (~$0.01-$0.10). This matters for bootstrapping projects with constrained budgets that still need access to DeFi liquidity on a mature L2 with ~$1B TVL. It's a balanced choice for SBTs that may interact with Aave or Uniswap V3.
<$0.10
Avg. Tx Cost
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
ImmutableX for Gaming SBTs
Verdict: The Superior Choice. ImmutableX's zero-gas, instant trade confirmation, and 9,000+ TPS are built for high-throughput gaming economies. Its StarkEx-based validity proofs ensure assets like player skill badges or in-game reputation tokens are secure and instantly tradable without user friction. The platform is purpose-built for web3 gaming, with native integrations for Unity and Unreal Engine.
Polygon for Gaming SBTs
Verdict: A Viable, Cost-Effective Alternative. Polygon's PoS sidechain offers sub-$0.01 transaction fees and ~2-3 second block times, suitable for many games. However, its ~7,000 TPS theoretical limit and the user's need to hold MATIC for gas create friction compared to ImmutableX's gasless model. Ideal for games with less frequent on-chain interactions or those already embedded in the Polygon ecosystem.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between ImmutableX and Polygon for Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) hinges on your protocol's core value proposition and target market.
ImmutableX excels at providing a premium, zero-fee user experience for high-value, brand-centric SBTs because of its ZK-rollup architecture built specifically for NFTs on Ethereum. For example, its gas-free minting and transfers are a critical advantage for protocols like Illuvium and GameStop that require mass distribution of in-game identity tokens without burdening users. Its Ethereum-level security and instant trade confirmation make it the definitive choice for SBTs representing significant reputation, access, or in-game assets where user friction must be eliminated.
Polygon takes a different approach by offering a versatile, EVM-compatible ecosystem with lower but non-zero transaction costs. This results in a trade-off between cost structure and ecosystem breadth. Its ~0.1-0.2 MATIC fees (a few cents) are acceptable for many applications, and its massive adoption by DeFi protocols (Aave, Uniswap V3) and major brands (Starbucks, Reddit) provides unparalleled composability. This makes it ideal for SBTs that need to interact with a wide array of DeFi primitives or serve as credentials across a fragmented dApp landscape.
The key trade-off: If your priority is eliminating all user-paid fees and maximizing security for a premium NFT/SBT experience, choose ImmutableX. Its dedicated infrastructure for non-financial assets is unmatched. If you prioritize deep ecosystem integration, lower developer friction via EVM compatibility, and SBT utility across DeFi and social graphs, choose Polygon. Its network effects and proven scale for diverse applications provide a more generalized, interoperable foundation for soulbound identity.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall