Solhint excels at enforcing code style and best practice consistency across a development team. It integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines and popular IDEs like VSCode, catching issues early in the development cycle. For example, its extensive, community-driven rule set can automatically enforce the Solidity Style Guide, preventing common anti-patterns and improving code readability for large teams working on protocols like Uniswap V4 or Aave.
LABS
Comparisons
Solhint vs 4naly3er: Linting & Gas Optimization
A technical comparison of two leading Solidity analysis tools, focusing on their approach to code quality, security best practices, and gas optimization for development teams with production deployments.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Solidity Code Quality
Choosing the right tool for Solidity analysis is a foundational decision impacting security, cost, and maintainability.
4naly3er takes a different, hyper-focused approach by specializing in gas optimization. It analyzes your contract's opcodes to provide specific, actionable suggestions for reducing deployment and transaction costs. This results in a trade-off: it offers less breadth in general linting but provides deeper, quantifiable savings. A single optimization it identifies, like converting a memory array to calldata, can save tens of thousands of gas per transaction in high-volume DeFi applications.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer experience and standardization for a large team, choose Solhint. If you prioritize minimizing on-chain execution costs and optimizing for production, choose 4naly3er. For a robust workflow, many professional teams use Solhint during development and 4naly3er during final audit and optimization phases.
tldr-summary
SOLHINT VS 4NALY3ER
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for choosing a Solidity analysis tool.
01
Solhint: Superior Developer Experience
Deep IDE Integration: Native plugins for VS Code, IntelliJ, and Sublime Text. This matters for teams prioritizing immediate, in-editor feedback and a smooth workflow without context switching.
Extensive Rule Customization: Supports .solhint.json configs with 50+ built-in rules for style, security, and best practices. This matters for enforcing consistent, project-specific coding standards across large teams.
02
Solhint: Ecosystem & Community Standard
Widely Adopted Baseline: Used by default in Hardhat and Foundry project templates, with 1.5k+ GitHub stars. This matters for developers seeking a well-supported, battle-tested linter that aligns with mainstream tooling.
Focus on Code Quality: Excellent for catching common bugs, enforcing naming conventions, and maintaining readability before gas optimization. This matters for establishing a robust codebase foundation.
03
4naly3er: Unmatched Gas Optimization
Specialized Gas Reports: Provides line-by-line gas cost estimates and identifies specific opcode inefficiencies (e.g., SLOAD vs. MLOAD). This matters for protocols where minimizing mainnet deployment and transaction costs is the #1 priority.
Integration with Profiling Tools: Works seamlessly with Hardhat Gas Reporter and forge snapshot. This matters for teams that require empirical, test-based gas tracking as part of their CI/CD pipeline.
04
4naly3er: Advanced Security & Best Practices
Beyond Basic Linting: Detects subtle vulnerabilities and anti-patterns often missed by standard linters, such as unsafe ERC20 approvals or expensive operations in loops.
Actionable Recommendations: Suggests concrete optimizations (e.g., using immutable/constant variables, packing storage slots). This matters for senior developers and auditors focused on maximizing security and efficiency in final production code.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Solhint vs 4naly3er: Head-to-Head Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of linting, security, and gas optimization features for Solidity developers.
| Metric / Feature | Solhint | 4naly3er |
|---|---|---|
Primary Focus | Code Style & Security Linting | Gas Optimization Analysis |
Gas Report Generation | ||
Custom Rule Configuration | ||
Plugin Ecosystem (ESLint) | ||
Integration with Foundry | Manual | Native ( |
Average Ruleset Size | 100+ | 30+ |
Open Source License | MIT | MIT |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Solhint vs 4naly3er: Linting & Gas Optimization
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for two leading Solidity analysis tools.
02
Solhint: Seamless CI/CD Integration
Plugin-first architecture: Native plugins for ESLint, Hardhat, Truffle, and Foundry. This matters for developers who want to integrate linting directly into their existing workflow without switching tools, ensuring pre-commit and CI pipeline enforcement.
03
Solhint: Limited Gas Optimization
Weakness in gas analysis: Primarily a linter, not an optimizer. Its gas-related rules are basic (e.g., gas-costs). This matters for protocols where minimizing on-chain execution cost is a primary concern, as you'll need a secondary tool.
05
4naly3er: Foundry-First, Standalone Tool
Optimized for Foundry ecosystem: Runs as a forge command (forge inspect) or script. This matters for teams fully committed to the Foundry toolchain, offering a native-feeling experience with deep integration into the build process.
06
4naly3er: Narrower Scope & Less Configurable
Weakness in style/security linting: Focus is almost exclusively on gas and efficiency. Offers minimal code style or security rule enforcement. This matters for teams that also need robust, configurable style guides and security pattern detection out of a single tool.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Solhint vs 4naly3er: Linting & Gas Optimization
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for two leading Solidity analysis tools.
01
Solhint: Superior Code Style & Consistency
Established style guide enforcement: Enforces Solidity Style Guide rules (e.g., naming conventions, ordering) with 50+ built-in rules. This matters for teams requiring strict, consistent code formatting across large repositories like Aave or Uniswap forks.
Deep IDE integration: First-class plugins for VS Code, IntelliJ, and Sublime Text provide real-time feedback, accelerating development velocity for engineers writing new contracts.
02
Solhint: Community & Extensibility
Large, mature ecosystem: Backed by 1.6k+ GitHub stars and Protocol Guild projects. This provides a wide array of community plugins and reliable long-term maintenance.
Custom rule creation: Allows teams to build project-specific linting rules (e.g., for internal security patterns), which is critical for protocol architects enforcing custom standards.
03
Solhint: Limited Optimization Focus
Gas analysis is not primary: While it has some gas-related rules, its core is code style. Teams focused purely on gas optimization (e.g., DeFi protocols like Trader Joe on Avalanche) will need a secondary tool, adding complexity to the CI/CD pipeline.
04
4naly3er: Unmatched Gas Optimization
Specialized for cost reduction: Provides detailed, line-by-line gas estimates and optimization suggestions (e.g., using unchecked blocks, memory vs. storage). This directly impacts bottom-line transaction costs for high-frequency protocols like DEX aggregators (1inch, 0x).
Actionable reports: Generates prioritized recommendations, allowing engineers to target the most expensive functions first for maximum ROI on refactoring time.
05
4naly3er: Security & Best Practice Insights
Beyond gas to security: Flags common vulnerabilities (e.g., reentrancy risks, unsafe ERC20 approvals) alongside gas issues. This integrated view is valuable for CTOs who want a single report covering both security posture and operational efficiency.
Real-world context: Suggestions reference known exploits and best practices from audits of major protocols like Compound and MakerDAO.
06
4naly3er: Less Focus on Code Style
Not a style enforcer: Lacks the comprehensive formatting and stylistic rules of Solhint. Teams must pair it with a dedicated linter to maintain code consistency, which can complicate toolchain setup for VPs of Engineering managing large teams.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Use Which Tool: A Scenario-Based Guide
Solhint for Speed & CI/CD
Verdict: The clear choice for rapid development cycles.
Strengths: Solhint is a pure linter focused on code style and best practices. It runs instantly (sub-second) on large codebases, making it ideal for pre-commit hooks and CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI). Its rules enforce consistency (e.g., func-visibility, const-name-snakecase) that prevents common bugs and keeps teams aligned. For projects like Aave or Compound with large, active teams, Solhint's speed ensures code reviews are about logic, not formatting.
Limitation: Provides zero gas optimization insights.
4naly3er for Speed & CI/CD
Verdict: A slower, more specialized tool for the optimization phase. Strengths: Not designed for speed. Its primary value is in-depth gas report generation, which is a heavier analysis process. Best run as a scheduled job or before major releases, not on every commit. It can be integrated into CI to fail builds if gas usage exceeds a threshold, but this adds significant time. Key Metric: Analysis time scales with contract complexity, often taking seconds to minutes.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A decisive breakdown of which tool to choose based on your team's primary objective: code standardization or gas cost minimization.
Solhint excels at establishing and enforcing a consistent, secure coding style across a development team. It provides a comprehensive rule set covering style guide adherence, security best practices, and best practices, making it the de facto standard for linting in the Solidity ecosystem. Its integration with popular IDEs and CI/CD pipelines ensures code quality is maintained from the first line written to deployment, reducing review time and preventing common vulnerabilities before they reach production.
4naly3er takes a different approach by focusing exclusively on gas optimization. This specialized tool analyzes your smart contract's bytecode to provide specific, actionable recommendations for reducing deployment and transaction costs. It identifies expensive patterns like redundant storage operations, inefficient loops, and suboptimal data types, often suggesting alternative implementations that can lead to significant savings. For example, a simple refactoring from a uint256[] to a uint256 mapping could save thousands of gas per transaction in a high-frequency contract.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer experience, code consistency, and catching security anti-patterns early in the development cycle, choose Solhint. It is the foundational tool for any professional Solidity team. If your priority is maximizing economic efficiency and minimizing on-chain operational costs for a production-ready contract, choose 4naly3er. The optimal strategy for a well-funded project is to integrate both: use Solhint during development and 4naly3er during the final audit and optimization phase before mainnet deployment.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall