DAOhaus vs Aragon Client: No-Code DAO Creation

Moloch V3 architecture: Built on a battle-tested, modular smart contract framework. This matters for protocols and DeFi projects needing deep, on-chain governance with custom voting and treasury logic.

Truly decentralized: No admin keys or central upgradeability. DAOs are fully autonomous. This matters for credibly neutral communities that prioritize sovereignty and resistance to censorship.

Broad chain support: Deploy on Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Base with a unified interface. This matters for brands and web2-native teams seeking low-cost, accessible DAO creation without deep blockchain expertise.

Built-in ecosystem: Access plugins for Sablier (streaming), Vocdoni (voting), and more from a curated marketplace. This matters for rapid feature deployment where you want pre-audited, plug-and-play functionality.

Specific advantage: Deeply integrated with the Moloch v2/v3 frameworks, offering battle-tested governance primitives like ragequit and guildkicks. This matters for protocol treasuries and investment DAOs prioritizing member liquidity and security over complex feature sets.

Specific advantage: Uses a proxy/forwarder architecture to minimize gas for recurring actions and supports deployment on 8+ chains including Arbitrum and Polygon. This matters for community DAOs with frequent proposals or those needing low-cost operations on L2s.

Specific trade-off: The Moloch-centric model is less flexible for non-standard governance. Customization requires forking the protocol, which matters for projects needing bespoke voting mechanisms or treasury structures beyond shares/loot systems.

Specific trade-off: Relies on the Aragon OSx protocol and its DAO factory, creating vendor lock-in and ongoing protocol fee exposure. This matters for budget-conscious or sovereignty-focused projects wary of external dependencies and future cost changes.

Specific advantage: Deploys fully on-chain DAOs using the Moloch v3 framework on Ethereum L2s (Polygon, Arbitrum, Gnosis Chain). This matters for teams requiring complete protocol autonomy and direct smart contract interaction, bypassing centralized front-end dependencies.

Specific advantage: Zero protocol fees and gas-optimized contracts reduce operational costs. This matters for community treasuries and small grants DAOs where minimizing overhead is critical. The Summoner UI is purpose-built for launching Moloch-based DAOs quickly.

Specific drawback: The Moloch framework's terminology (Shares, Tributes, GuildKick) is non-standard, requiring member education. This matters for organizations with non-technical stakeholders who expect familiar corporate governance models, potentially slowing adoption.

Specific drawback: Focused primarily on the Moloch model (member-managed, ragequit). This matters for DAOs needing complex, multi-sig treasury management, sub-DAOs, or custom voting mechanisms out-of-the-box, which may require custom development.

Specific advantage: Built on the Aragon OSx protocol, allowing plugin-based governance (e.g., Uniswap, Compound-style voting). This matters for protocol DAOs and DeFi projects needing to upgrade permissions and add functionality without migrating the entire DAO.

Specific advantage: Polished no-code interface with wizards for common structures (Company, Membership, Reputation). This matters for corporate entities and large communities prioritizing a smooth, guided onboarding experience for hundreds of members.

Specific drawback: Charges a 0.2-2% fee on treasury inflows and uses Aragon-managed registries. This matters for large-treasury DAOs where fees become significant and for teams prioritizing infrastructure sovereignty over convenience.

Specific drawback: Primarily optimized for Ethereum Mainnet and Polygon, with slower rollouts to other L2s. This matters for projects native to Arbitrum, Optimism, or other ecosystems where native tooling and community are stronger.