Boardroom excels at providing a unified, multi-chain dashboard for governance participants and DAO operators. Its core strength is aggregating proposals and voting power across a vast ecosystem, supporting over 100 protocols including Compound, Uniswap, and Aave. This makes it the go-to for users managing delegations or tracking votes across multiple treasuries from a single interface. Its enterprise-grade API and widget suite allow for deep, white-labeled integrations directly into a protocol's front-end.
LABS
Comparisons
Boardroom vs Tally: Governance Dashboard & Interface Focus
A technical comparison for CTOs and protocol architects evaluating unified governance dashboards, analyzing Boardroom's multi-protocol aggregation against Tally's native on-chain integration.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Governance Interface Supremacy
A data-driven comparison of Boardroom and Tally, the leading platforms for managing on-chain governance, focusing on interface design, protocol support, and integration depth.
Tally takes a different, protocol-first approach by offering deeply integrated, custom-built governance portals. This strategy results in a superior, native user experience for individual DAOs like Optimism and Nouns, but requires more bespoke development. Tally's architecture is built around its open-source Governor Standard, providing robust smart contract tooling and real-time vote data. The trade-off is a more focused, less aggregated experience compared to Boardroom's wide net.
The key trade-off: If your priority is ecosystem-wide engagement and a unified dashboard for users across many protocols, choose Boardroom. If you prioritize a deeply customized, branded governance portal with tight smart contract integration for a single, flagship DAO, choose Tally. The decision hinges on whether breadth of coverage or depth of native experience is more critical for your governance strategy.
tldr-summary
Boardroom vs Tally: Governance Dashboard & Interface Focus
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.
02
Boardroom: Advanced Delegate Tools
Deep delegate discovery and reputation scoring with metrics like voting history and proposal success rate. This matters for token holders seeking informed delegation and delegates building a verifiable track record to attract more voting power.
04
Tally: Developer-First SDK & API
Comprehensive TypeScript SDK and GraphQL API for programmatic governance data and interaction. This matters for developers integrating governance into dApps or analysts building custom dashboards, enabling automation beyond the UI.
05
Choose Boardroom for...
- Multi-chain DAO participation (e.g., Index Coop, Gitcoin).
- Professional delegate management and discovery.
- Aggregated view of disparate governance systems.
06
Choose Tally for...
- Building or deeply managing a single, major Ethereum/Optimism DAO (e.g., Uniswap, ENS).
- Requiring robust programmatic access via SDK/API.
- Prioritizing minimal, direct interaction with core governance contracts.
GOVERNANCE DASHBOARD & INTERFACE FOCUS
Feature Comparison: Boardroom vs Tally
Direct comparison of key features for DAO governance management.
| Metric / Feature | Boardroom | Tally |
|---|---|---|
Supported Chains (Primary) | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Gnosis Chain |
Proposal Creation UI | ||
Delegated Voting Interface | ||
Multi-DAO Aggregated Feed | ||
Gasless Voting via Snapshot | ||
On-Chain Execution | ||
Governance SDK / API | ||
Free Tier for DAOs |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Boardroom vs Tally: Governance Dashboard & Interface Focus
A data-driven comparison of leading governance dashboards for DAOs. Evaluate key strengths and trade-offs to choose the right platform for your protocol's needs.
01
Boardroom Pro: Multi-Chain & Multi-Protocol Aggregation
Unified governance across 20+ chains: Supports Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana. This matters for multi-chain DAOs (like Aave, Uniswap) needing a single interface to manage proposals and voting across all deployments. Aggregates data from Compound, Maker, and others into one dashboard.
02
Boardroom Pro: Advanced Delegate Features
Sophisticated delegate discovery and management: Features delegate profiles with voting history, statement of values, and performance metrics. This matters for large token-holder DAOs (e.g., ENS, Gitcoin) where informed delegation is critical. Provides tools for delegates to communicate with their constituents directly on-platform.
03
Tally Pro: Deep Ethereum Native Integration
Tight integration with Governor standards: Built specifically for OpenZeppelin's Governor contracts, offering flawless compatibility and real-time state tracking. This matters for EVM-native DAOs (like Nouns, Fei Protocol) that prioritize reliability and precision for on-chain execution and voting verification.
04
Tally Pro: Superior Proposal Creation UX
Streamlined, guided proposal builder: Reduces errors with step-by-step forms and live simulation of transaction calldata. This matters for technical and non-technical teams (e.g., Lido, PoolTogether) who need to create complex, multi-action proposals safely without deep smart contract knowledge.
05
Boardroom Con: Potential Interface Complexity
Feature-rich design can overwhelm: The aggregation of many protocols and chains may create a steeper learning curve for new users or single-protocol DAOs. This is a trade-off for simpler communities that don't require multi-chain views, where Tally's focused interface may be more efficient.
06
Tally Con: Limited Multi-Chain Scope
Primarily focused on Ethereum and L2s: While expanding, lacks native support for non-EVM chains like Solana. This is a critical limitation for cross-chain DAOs or Solana-native protocols (e.g., Marinade, Jupiter), making Boardroom the mandatory choice for those ecosystems.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Boardroom vs Tally: Governance Dashboard & Interface Focus
Key strengths and trade-offs for DAO leaders choosing a governance interface.
02
Boardroom's Weakness: Customization & Integration Depth
Primarily a read/write interface with less native tooling for deep DAO operations. While it connects to Snapshot and Tally, building custom workflows or deeply integrated treasury management requires external tools. This matters for protocol architects needing a fully embedded governance module.
04
Tally's Weakness: Chain & Protocol Scope
Heavily focused on Ethereum and its L2s. While expanding, its core strength and UI are optimized for governor contracts on EVM chains. This matters for multi-chain DAOs or those using non-EVM chains (e.g., Solana, Cosmos), where Boardroom's aggregation is a clearer fit.
05
Boardroom's Strength: Delegation & Reputation Features
Robust delegate discovery and reputation system with profiles, voting history, and communication tools. This matters for large token-holder DAOs (e.g., Uniswap, Compound) aiming to improve voter participation and informed delegation, reducing governance apathy.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
User Scenarios: When to Choose Which Platform
Boardroom for DAO Treasurers
Verdict: The comprehensive, multi-chain command center. Strengths: Unmatched for managing a diversified treasury across multiple chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Optimism. Its unified dashboard aggregates proposals, token holdings, and voting power from all connected DAOs into a single interface. Advanced delegation tools and detailed voter analytics (e.g., Snapshot space activity) are critical for governance professionals tracking participation. Native integration with Safe (formerly Gnosis Safe) makes it the go-to for secure, multi-sig treasury execution.
Tally for DAO Treasurers
Verdict: The streamlined, on-chain governance specialist. Strengths: Superior for DAOs whose governance is deeply rooted in on-chain execution via Governor contracts (OpenZeppelin, Compound). Its proposal lifecycle tracker provides crystal-clear status (Active, Succeeded, Queued, Executed) directly linked to the blockchain. The gasless voting feature via Tally API can significantly reduce voter friction. However, its focus is depth on a per-DAO basis rather than cross-DAO aggregation, making it ideal for managing a primary DAO's on-chain operations with precision.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict: Strategic Recommendations for Technical Leaders
A final breakdown of the governance dashboard trade-offs between Boardroom's integrated platform and Tally's open-source, community-first approach.
Boardroom excels at providing a turnkey, integrated governance experience because it bundles a secure wallet, multi-chain delegation, and proposal lifecycle management into a single, polished interface. For example, its support for over 50 protocols like Compound, Uniswap, and Lido, coupled with a unified delegation dashboard, reduces operational overhead for DAOs managing complex, cross-chain treasuries. This integrated approach prioritizes user experience and security for end-users and protocol teams seeking a managed solution.
Tally takes a fundamentally different approach by being fully open-source and community-owned, resulting in unparalleled transparency and customization. This strategy means the platform evolves directly with the needs of power users and developers, as seen with its deep integration of on-chain data and custom delegate profiles. The trade-off is a less polished, more technical interface that requires a higher degree of self-management but offers no vendor lock-in and aligns with decentralized ethos.
The key trade-off: If your priority is minimizing governance friction and providing a secure, managed experience for a broad community, choose Boardroom. Its all-in-one platform is ideal for established protocols like Aave or MakerDAO. If you prioritize protocol sovereignty, deep customization, and aligning your tooling with decentralized principles, choose Tally. Its open-source model is the definitive choice for communities like Optimism or Arbitrum that build their governance processes directly into the public infrastructure.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall