Loyalty is a data problem. Current Web2 programs rely on opaque, centralized data silos, forcing users to surrender full privacy for rewards. This creates a trust deficit that erodes long-term engagement and limits program sophistication.
Why Selective Disclosure Is Loyalty's Next Frontier
Loyalty programs are broken. They trade privacy for points. Selective disclosure, powered by ZK proofs, flips the model: users prove claims (age, status, purchase history) without exposing their full identity. This is the key to compliant, scalable, and user-centric loyalty.
Introduction
Selective disclosure is the technical mechanism that will move user loyalty from brands to protocols.
Blockchain inverts the model. Protocols like Worldcoin (with zero-knowledge proofs) and Sismo (with ZK badges) enable user-centric verification. Users prove specific credentials (e.g., 'I am human', 'I hold this NFT') without revealing their entire identity or transaction history.
This enables programmable loyalty. A protocol can trustlessly verify a user's eligibility for a reward based on a cryptographically proven trait, without needing custody of the underlying data. This shifts power from the data aggregator to the credential holder.
Evidence: The ERC-20 and ERC-721 token standards created digital property rights; emerging standards like ERC-7231 (bound identity) and ERC-7504 (dynamic ZK badges) are building the primitive for portable, private reputation.
The Core Thesis: From Data Silos to Verifiable Claims
Loyalty programs fail because they rely on opaque, siloed data; the solution is user-owned, selectively disclosed verifiable credentials.
Loyalty programs are broken because they operate on proprietary data silos. This creates a prisoner's dilemma where brands hoard engagement data and users cannot prove their cross-platform value, leading to inefficient rewards and missed personalization.
Verifiable credentials are the atomic unit of portable loyalty. Standards like W3C Verifiable Credentials and implementations by Spruce ID or Polygon ID allow users to cryptographically prove claims (e.g., 'Platinum Status') without revealing the underlying transaction history.
Selective disclosure enables trustless portability. A user proves a specific claim to a new dApp without exposing their entire wallet history or relying on a centralized API. This shifts power from data custodians to the individual.
Evidence: The growth of zero-knowledge proof tooling from zkSync and StarkWare demonstrates the market demand for proving specific facts without revealing underlying data, a pattern loyalty systems must adopt.
Key Trends Driving Adoption
Loyalty programs are broken. Selective disclosure, powered by zero-knowledge proofs, is the technical fix that aligns incentives and unlocks new business models.
The Problem: Data Silos & User Distrust
Current programs operate in walled gardens. Users can't port their loyalty graph, and brands can't verify cross-platform activity without invasive data sharing.
- Fragmented Identity: A user's Starbucks status is useless at Nike.
- Privacy Tax: To prove loyalty, you must surrender your entire purchase history.
- Missed Insights: Brands see only a sliver of a user's true brand affinity.
The Solution: Portable, Provable Reputation
ZK proofs let users cryptographically prove attributes (e.g., 'I am a top 10% spender') without revealing underlying transactions. This creates a portable loyalty passport.
- Selective Disclosure: Prove you're a 'Gold Member' without showing every receipt.
- Composable Programs: Your airline status can automatically unlock hotel perks via a shared proof.
- Sybil Resistance: On-chain verification prevents fake account farming that plagues Web2 programs.
The Business Model: Dynamic, On-Chain Incentives
Tokenized points and on-chain programs enable real-time, programmable rewards. Think UniswapX-style intents for loyalty, where solvers compete to offer the best reward swap.
- Capital Efficiency: Brands pay for proven engagement, not vague marketing spends.
- Secondary Markets: Liquid points markets (like LayerZero's OFT standard) create price discovery and user liquidity.
- Cross-Brand Auctions: Users can auction their provable loyalty to competing brands in a privacy-preserving way.
The Infrastructure: Privacy-Preserving Oracles
Bridging off-chain purchase data to on-chain proofs requires new infrastructure. Projects like Automata Network and HyperOracle are building ZK oracles for this exact use case.
- Data Attestation: Cryptographically sign real-world transaction data at source.
- Proof Generation: Efficiently generate ZK proofs of complex loyalty logic off-chain.
- Interoperability: Standards emerge for proof formats, enabling a universal loyalty layer akin to Across or LayerZero for intents.
The Disclosure Spectrum: From Leaky to Private
A comparison of data disclosure models for on-chain loyalty programs, highlighting the trade-offs between user privacy, program utility, and developer flexibility.
| Feature / Metric | Leaky (Public Graph) | Selective (ZK Proofs) | Private (FHE/MPC) |
|---|---|---|---|
Data Exposure | All user activity & graph links | Proven claims only (e.g., >1000 pts) | Fully encrypted, even during computation |
Loyalty Tier Verification | On-chain, readable by anyone | β Via ZK proof (e.g., Semaphore, Sismo) | β Via homomorphic computation (e.g., Fhenix, Zama) |
Cross-Protocol Portability | β Direct composability (e.g., EigenLayer restaking) | β Via verifiable credentials | β Limited; requires shared trust cluster |
User Gas Burden for Proof | 0 Gwei (data is public) | ~150k-500k gas per proof |
|
Programmable Logic Complexity | Unlimited (Turing-complete EVM) | Constraint-based (circuit logic) | Limited by FHE/MPC op support |
Trust Assumption | Trustless (code is law) | Trusted setup or transparent CRS | Trusted execution or committee |
Primary Use Case | Open reputation systems | Gated benefits & anonymous loyalty | Private bidding & sealed-bid auctions |
Architectural Deep Dive: How It Actually Works
Selective disclosure protocols use zero-knowledge cryptography to prove specific facts about private data without revealing the data itself.
Core Mechanism is ZK Proofs: The system generates a zero-knowledge proof that a user's private data satisfies a public rule. This allows a user to prove they are over 18 from a passport, or have a credit score above 700, without showing the document or score. The verifier checks the proof's cryptographic validity, not the raw data.
Data Stays Off-Chain: The sensitive data, like a KYC document or transaction history, never touches a public ledger. It remains encrypted in a user's local wallet or a private data vault like zkPass or Sismo. Only the compact proof is submitted on-chain, eliminating the primary data breach vector.
Contrast with Full Disclosure: Traditional attestations, like those from Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS), publish claims publicly. Selective disclosure is the cryptographic upgrade, moving from 'here is my data' to 'trust this proof about my data'. This shifts the trust from the data's exposure to the proof's soundness.
Evidence: Polygon ID uses this to issue reusable credentials. A user proves residency once to an issuer, then can selectively disclose just their country of residence to a dApp, generating a new ZK proof for each interaction without re-submitting documents.
Protocol Spotlight: Who's Building the Stack
The next loyalty battleground isn't points, it's privacy. These protocols are building the infrastructure to prove value without revealing everything.
Sismo: The Attestation Hub
Turns on-chain history into reusable, privacy-preserving badges. Users aggregate credentials (e.g., ENS holder, Gitcoin donor) into a single ZK-proof, revealing only what's needed.
- Key Benefit: Enables sybil-resistant airdrops and gated experiences without exposing wallet history.
- Key Benefit: ~2M+ ZK Badges minted, creating a portable, composable identity layer.
Worldcoin & Personhood Proofs
Solves the unique-human problem via biometric Orb verification, generating a ZK-proof of personhood. The protocol's core innovation is the ability to prove 'liveness' and uniqueness without linking to real-world identity.
- Key Benefit: Provides a global, sybil-resistant primitive for fair distribution (e.g., UBI, governance).
- Key Benefit: ~5M+ verified humans, creating a foundational credential for mass adoption.
Polygon ID & Verifiable Credentials
Enterprise-grade framework for issuing and verifying claims on-chain. Uses Iden3 protocol and zero-knowledge circuits to enable selective disclosure for KYC, credit scores, and professional credentials.
- Key Benefit: Institutions can issue reusable credentials, users control disclosure (e.g., prove age >18, not exact DOB).
- Key Benefit: Native integration with Polygon's $1B+ DeFi ecosystem, bridging TradFi and DeFi compliance.
The Problem: Data Silos vs. User Sovereignty
Today's loyalty is extractive. Protocols hoard user data to calculate points, creating locked-in silos. Users have no portability, and every new app demands full transaction history, a massive privacy leak.
- Consequence: Loyalty becomes a stickiness trap, not a user-centric reward.
- Consequence: >90% of users reflexively reject connecting wallets due to privacy concerns, stunting growth.
The Solution: Portable, Provable Reputation
Selective disclosure flips the model. Users cryptographically prove traits (e.g., 'Top 10% trader', 'Active for 2+ years') without revealing underlying data. Loyalty becomes a portable asset.
- Mechanism: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) and Verifiable Credentials (VCs) form the tech stack.
- Outcome: Protocols compete on utility, not data captivity. User acquisition cost plummets as trust becomes transferable.
Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS): The Schema Standard
The base-layer primitive for making attestations on-chain or off-chain. It doesn't enforce privacy itself but provides the universal schema registry and tracking that ZK-proofs like Sismo's can build upon.
- Key Benefit: Creates a standardized data layer for trust, making attestations composable across the stack.
- Key Benefit: Permissionless and schema-less, enabling infinite use cases from reviews to proof-of-attendance.
Risk Analysis: The Devil in the Details
Current loyalty programs leak user data and create systemic risk. Selective disclosure via zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) enables privacy-preserving, composable loyalty.
The Data Leak: Your Loyalty Program is a Liability
Centralized loyalty databases are honeypots for breaches, exposing purchase history, location data, and social graphs. This creates regulatory risk (GDPR/CCPA) and destroys user trust.\n- Attack Surface: Single point of failure for ~$200B+ in global loyalty points.\n- Business Cost: ~15-20% of program budgets spent on compliance & breach recovery.
ZK-Proofs: Prove Without Revealing
Zero-knowledge proofs (e.g., zk-SNARKs, zk-STARKs) allow users to cryptographically prove eligibility (e.g., "I am a Platinum member") without revealing underlying transaction data.\n- Privacy-Preserving: User identity and full history remain hidden.\n- Interoperability: Proofs are portable across chains and programs, enabling composable loyalty.
The On-Chain Abstraction: Privacy as a Feature
Protocols like Sismo, Semaphore, and Aztec provide the infrastructure for selective disclosure. Loyalty logic moves on-chain, but personal data stays off-chain.\n- User Sovereignty: Individuals own and control their proof-of-loyalty credentials.\n- Developer Primitive: Enables new apps like private airdrops, gated commerce, and Sybil-resistant governance.
The Network Effect: Composable Loyalty Graphs
Selective disclosure unlocks portable reputation. A proof from Starbucks can be reused at Nike without either company seeing the other's data. This creates a decentralized loyalty graph.\n- Cross-Brand Value: Increases point utility and customer lifetime value (LTV).\n- Anti-Sybil: Makes farming and fraud across programs computationally infeasible.
The Regulatory Arbitrage: GDPR by Design
Selective disclosure is privacy-by-design, making it the most compliant architecture by default. It minimizes data collection to only what's necessary for the transaction (data minimization principle).\n- Audit Trail: All disclosures are cryptographically verifiable and consent-based.\n- Future-Proof: Aligns with evolving global privacy frameworks beyond GDPR.
The Cold Start Problem & Incentives
Adoption requires solving coordination. Early movers must bootstrap the graph. Solutions include retroactive airdrops for early provers and shared liquidity pools for points redemption.\n- Bootstrapping: Use existing POAPs or NFT memberships as initial proof sources.\n- Economic Model: Protocols capture value via fee switches on proof verification and graph queries.
Future Outlook: The Loyalty Landscape in 2025
Loyalty programs will transition from data hoarding to user-controlled selective disclosure, enabled by zero-knowledge proofs and verifiable credentials.
Selective disclosure is inevitable because current programs are data liabilities. Brands collect excessive PII, creating honeypots for breaches. The future model uses zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to let users prove attributes like 'loyal customer for 5+ years' without revealing their identity or full transaction history.
Verifiable credentials (VCs) replace point balances. Instead of a centralized ledger, users hold portable, self-sovereign credentials like W3C VCs or Sismo badges. This shifts power, allowing users to prove loyalty across brands without vendor lock-in, similar to how Polygon ID manages decentralized identity.
Programmable privacy enables hyper-personalization. With ZK tech from Aztec or zkSync, users can disclose specific data for tailored rewards while keeping other details private. This creates a trustless value exchange, moving beyond the blunt instrument of total data surrender.
Evidence: Starbucks Odyssey's NFT-based program demonstrates the market pull for portable, on-chain loyalty assets, proving users value ownership over traditional locked-in points.
Key Takeaways for Builders
Static points and generic NFTs are dead. The future of on-chain loyalty is dynamic, data-rich, and privacy-preserving.
The Problem: Loyalty Data Silos
Current programs trap user data in centralized databases, creating a poor experience and limiting composability.\n- No Interoperability: Points from Protocol A are useless in Protocol B.\n- Zero Portability: Users lose their history and status when switching chains or dApps.\n- Stale Value: Static NFTs or points cannot reflect real-time engagement or reputation.
The Solution: Portable Attestations
Use verifiable credentials (like Ethereum Attestation Service or Verax) to create portable, granular proof of user actions.\n- Selective Disclosure: Users prove specific traits (e.g., "Top 10% trader") without revealing full history.\n- Chain-Agnostic: Attestations can be verified on any EVM chain, breaking silos.\n- Composable Building Blocks: Protocols like Galxe or Noox can build dynamic loyalty atop this primitive.
The Mechanism: Zero-Knowledge Loyalty
Leverage ZK proofs (via zkSNARKs or zkSTARKs) to enable trustless, private verification of complex user behavior.\n- Privacy-Preserving: Prove you qualify for a tier without exposing every transaction.\n- On-Chain Verifiable: Logic is cryptographically enforced, not run by an oracle.\n- Gas-Efficient: Proof verification is cheap, enabling micro-rewards and frequent updates.
The Business Model: Dynamic Yield & Airdrops
Shift from fixed rewards to algorithmic loyalty based on real-time contribution and reputation scores.\n- Sybil-Resistant Airdrops: Use on-chain history proofs to filter bots, as pioneered by EigenLayer and Optimism.\n- Variable APY: Lending protocols like Aave could offer better rates to loyal, long-term LPs.\n- Cross-Protocol Benefits: A high reputation in Uniswap governance could unlock perks in a Compound market.
The Infrastructure: Attestation Aggregators
New infra layer will emerge to index, score, and serve verifiable user reputation data. Think The Graph for social/behavioral data.\n- Reputation Oracles: Services that compute scores from raw attestations (e.g., Gitcoin Passport).\n- Standard Schemas: Widespread adoption requires shared data formats (see ERC-7232).\n- One-Click Integration: SDKs for dApps to query and honor portable reputation.
The Killer App: Intent-Based Loyalty
The endgame: loyalty that understands user goals, not just actions. Integrates with UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across.\n- Automatic Optimization: System routes your trade to get the best price and maximize your loyalty points across venues.\n- Loyalty-as-a-Service: Wallets like Rainbow or Safe bundle reputation to get users better deals.\n- User-Owned Algorithms: Users can deploy their own loyalty-strategy smart contracts.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.