Brand loyalty is broken data. Current programs trap user history in corporate silos, creating fragmented profiles that prevent unified customer understanding and devalue user engagement.
Why Attestation Markets Will Redesign Brand Loyalty
Traditional loyalty is a data leak. Decentralized attestation networks like EAS and Verax enable brands to purchase verified, private user claims, creating a market for intent over identity.
Introduction
Blockchain-based attestations are replacing opaque loyalty points with portable, composable proof of engagement.
Attestations are portable credentials. Standards like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Verax transform actions into on-chain, user-owned proofs, enabling a user to prove their Starbucks status to Nike.
This creates a new market. Decentralized networks like Galxe and Orange Protocol incentivize third-party verifiers to issue and validate these proofs, forming an attestation economy separate from any single brand's control.
Evidence: Galxe has issued over 20 million credentials to 11 million unique wallets, demonstrating the scale of demand for programmable, verifiable reputation.
The Core Argument
Attestation markets will replace opaque loyalty points by making brand interactions verifiable, portable, and tradable on-chain assets.
Loyalty points are dead capital. They are siloed, illiquid liabilities on corporate balance sheets, not user assets. An on-chain attestation—a cryptographically signed proof of a user's action or status—transforms this relationship. This proof becomes a portable asset the user owns, not a promise the brand controls.
Attestation markets create liquidity. Protocols like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Verax provide the standard rails for issuing these proofs. Once issued, these attestations can be aggregated, valued, and traded in secondary markets, similar to how Uniswap created liquidity for long-tail tokens. A Starbucks 'Gold Member' attestation gains a market price.
This inverts the marketing funnel. Traditional loyalty programs pay for attention. An attestation market pays users for their proof-of-engagement. Brands bid for the right to issue valuable attestations to high-signal users, turning CRM into a permissionless reputation layer comparable to how Gitcoin Passport scores identity.
Evidence: Starbucks Odyssey, built on Polygon, demonstrated that NFT-based rewards generate 5-10x higher engagement than traditional points. This is the primitive proof-of-concept for attestation-driven loyalty.
The Three Trends Killing Traditional Loyalty
Traditional loyalty programs are broken by data silos, high fraud costs, and zero user ownership. On-chain attestations create a portable, composable, and verifiable identity layer that flips the model.
The Problem: $100B+ Locked in Silos
Brands hoard loyalty points in proprietary databases, creating ~$100B in dead capital that users can't transfer or leverage. This kills utility and locks users in.
- Zero Interoperability: Starbucks points can't interact with Delta SkyMiles.
- High Operational Cost: Maintaining separate ledgers costs brands ~15-25% of program value.
- User Churn: >60% of loyalty members are inactive due to fragmented, low-value rewards.
The Solution: Portable Attestation Graphs
On-chain attestations (like Ethereum Attestation Service, Verax) turn loyalty actions into portable, verifiable credentials. Users own their proof-of-engagement graph.
- Composable Loyalty: A 'Top 1% Customer' attestation from Nike can unlock perks at Adidas via Smart Layer executable tokens.
- Sybil Resistance: Gitcoin Passport-style scoring prevents airdrop farming, cutting fraud costs by ~90%.
- New Markets: Attestations become collateral for under-collateralized loans or tradable assets in prediction markets.
The Catalyst: AI Agents Need Verifiable Reputation
Autonomous AI agents will execute commerce. They require a machine-readable, trust-minimized reputation layer to transact—something traditional CRM databases cannot provide.
- Agent-to-Agent Commerce: An AI shopper uses its owner's 'High-Value Shopper' attestation to negotiate bulk discounts automatically.
- Real-Time Auditing: Brands can verify the provenance and quality of on-chain engagement data in ~500ms, versus manual CRM audits.
- Protocols Win: Infrastructure like EigenLayer, Hyperlane, and Worldcoin will bootstrap these global attestation networks.
The Loyalty Tech Stack: Old vs. New
A feature and capability matrix comparing legacy loyalty program infrastructure against the emerging attestation-based model enabled by protocols like Ethereum Attestation Service, EAS, and Verax.
| Core Feature / Metric | Legacy Silos (e.g., Salesforce, Oracle) | Web2.5 Aggregators (e.g., Points, Miles) | Attestation Markets (e.g., EAS, Verax, EigenLayer) |
|---|---|---|---|
Data Portability & Ownership | |||
Composable On-Chain Actions | Limited (API-based) | ||
Cross-Brand Loyalty Proof | Centralized Custodian | Decentralized Graph | |
User Acquisition Cost | $50-100 | $20-40 | < $5 (via Sybil-resistant attestations) |
Fraud & Sybil Resistance | Manual KYC/AML | Heuristic Analysis | Cryptographic Proof-of-Personhood (e.g., Worldcoin, Gitcoin Passport) |
Programmable Reward Logic | Monolithic, Vendor-Locked | API-Driven, Limited | Smart Contract, Cross-Chain (via LayerZero, Axelar) |
Loyalty Asset Liquidity | None (Points are IOUs) | Opaque Secondary Markets | Open Secondary Markets (e.g., Pendle Finance) |
Audit Trail & Provenance | Private Database | Centralized Ledger | Public, Immutable Registry (Ethereum, OP Stack) |
How Attestation Markets Actually Work
Attestation markets create a decentralized system for proving and monetizing any claim, from credit scores to brand loyalty.
Attestations are portable proof. They are signed, verifiable statements issued by one entity about another, stored on-chain or in decentralized networks like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) or Verax. This creates a universal proof layer separate from the application consuming the data.
Markets price truth. Protocols like Karma3 Labs or OpenRank build decentralized reputation graphs where attestations are staked on and challenged. This creates a cryptoeconomic mechanism where the cost to corrupt a signal exceeds its value, aligning incentives for honest reporting.
Brands buy signals, not data. A company like Starbucks will not query raw attestations. Instead, a reputation aggregator (e.g., a protocol using HyperOracle) computes a trust score from thousands of attestations and sells the verifiable output. The brand purchases a proof of 'loyal customer', not personal data.
Evidence: The Ethereum Attestation Service has processed over 1.7 million attestations, demonstrating demand for this primitive. Projects like Worldcoin use it for proof-of-personhood, a foundational attestation for loyalty programs.
Protocol Spotlight: The Infrastructure Builders
Traditional loyalty programs are broken, trapped in walled gardens. On-chain attestations create portable, composable reputation that brands can compete to own.
The Problem: Walled Garden Loyalty Points
Air Miles, Starbucks Stars, and hotel points are illiquid, non-transferable, and siloed. This creates poor UX and zero network effects.\n- $200B+ in trapped, dormant value\n- Zero composability with other ecosystems\n- High fraud risk from centralized databases
The Solution: Portable Attestation Graphs
Protocols like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Verax turn loyalty into on-chain, verifiable credentials. This creates a universal reputation layer.\n- Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) for non-transferable proof\n- Cross-chain attestations via LayerZero or Hyperlane\n- ZK-proofs for selective privacy of purchase history
EigenLayer: The Economic Security Backstop
Restaking provides cryptoeconomic security for attestation validity. Operators slashed for fraud, making brand claims as secure as the Ethereum network itself.\n- $15B+ TVL securing external systems\n- Decentralized verification replaces centralized oracles\n- Enables high-value attestations (e.g., luxury goods provenance)
The New Business Model: Loyalty as a Service (LaaS)
Brands like Nike (with .Swoosh) or Starbucks Odyssey can now lease reputation from a user's graph. Competitors bid for attention, flipping the incentive model.\n- Dynamic NFT rewards based on attestation depth\n- Revenue sharing with users for data access\n- Inter-brand partnerships become programmable (e.g., "10 coffee stamps = 1 Uber ride")
The Privacy Paradox: Zero-Knowledge Loyalty
Users won't share full purchase history. ZK-proofs (via zkSNARKs or RISC Zero) allow proving traits ("Top 5% Spender") without revealing underlying data.\n- Selective disclosure for personalized offers\n- On-chain verification with off-chain computation\n- Compliance-ready for regulations like GDPR
The Killer App: Cross-Brand Credit Scores
A composable attestation graph becomes a decentralized FICO score. A user's loyalty history with Nike could underwrite a loan from Goldfinch or secure rental terms.\n- Sybil-resistant identity via Gitcoin Passport\n- Programmable trust for DeFi and real-world assets\n- Unlocks ~$1T in underserved credit markets
The Skeptic's Corner: Why This Might Not Work
Attestation markets face existential friction from legacy systems and user apathy.
Brands control the data. Existing loyalty programs are proprietary silos built on decades-old CRM software like Salesforce. Migrating to a decentralized, on-chain attestation layer like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) requires dismantling these moats, a costly and politically fraught endeavor for any enterprise.
Users are rationally apathetic. The marginal utility of a portable, composable loyalty point is negligible for most consumers. The switching cost from a simple Starbucks app to managing a crypto wallet and understanding ERC-20 tokens is prohibitive for mainstream adoption.
The Sybil attack is trivial. Without a robust, cost-prohibitive identity layer, attestation markets for loyalty are spam farms. Solutions like Worldcoin's Proof-of-Personhood or government KYC introduce centralization and privacy trade-offs that defeat the decentralized premise.
Evidence: The total value locked (TVL) in consumer-focused DeFi and social protocols is a fraction of speculative trading venues, demonstrating a clear market preference for financial yield over utility.
Critical Risks and Attack Vectors
Moving from centralized points to decentralized, composable attestations introduces new failure modes and attack surfaces that must be engineered against.
The Sybil Attack: The Core Economic Vulnerability
Attestations are worthless if cheaply forged. A Sybil attacker can generate infinite pseudonymous identities to farm loyalty rewards, draining program value. The solution is a robust Sybil resistance layer anchored in cost or social proof.
- Key Risk: Collapse of attestation value to zero.
- Key Mitigation: Integration with Proof of Humanity, BrightID, or high-cost ZK attestation proofs.
The Oracle Problem: Data Authenticity & Finality
Attestations about real-world actions (e.g., 'purchased product X') require a trusted bridge from off-chain to on-chain. A malicious or compromised oracle (like Chainlink or a custom relayer) can mint false attestations at scale.
- Key Risk: Systemic corruption of the attestation graph.
- Key Mitigation: Decentralized oracle networks, multi-sig attestation committees, and cryptographic receipts from verified merchants.
Composability Risk: The Poisoned Graph
An attestation's value derives from its place in a graph. A single, widely-trusted but corrupted attestation issuer (e.g., a major brand's protocol) can poison downstream applications (DeFi, governance, airdrops) that rely on it, creating cascading failures.
- Key Risk: Loss of trust in the entire attestation primitive.
- Key Mitigation: Graph-based reputation scoring, consumer-side attestation filters, and time-locked/revocable attestation schemas.
The Privacy Paradox: On-Chain Transparency vs. Consumer Data
Loyalty programs require personal purchase history—highly sensitive data. Fully on-chain attestations create permanent, public records. This deters adoption and violates regulations like GDPR. Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) are computationally expensive and complex.
- Key Risk: Low user adoption due to surveillance or legal non-compliance.
- Key Mitigation: ZK attestations (e.g., Semaphore), encrypted data blobs with selective disclosure, and layer-2 privacy enclaves.
Liquidity & Valuation: The Attestation Black Hole
Attestations must be liquid to have utility (e.g., traded, used as collateral). Without deep markets, they become illiquid points 2.0. Creating Automated Market Makers (AMMs) for non-fungible reputation is a novel, unsolved problem with extreme volatility risk.
- Key Risk: Attestations are worthless because they can't be sold or used.
- Key Mitigation: Bonding curve issuers, NFT fractionalization protocols, and integration with Uniswap V3 style concentrated liquidity for soulbound tokens.
Governance Capture: Who Controls the Schema?
The definition of a valuable attestation (its schema) is controlled by a governance process (e.g., a DAO). Adversaries can capture this process to devalue rival attestations or mint privileged status for themselves, corrupting the system's foundation.
- Key Risk: Centralization of trust under a new, unaccountable entity.
- Key Mitigation: Pluralistic funding (e.g., Gitcoin Grants), immutable base schemas, and conviction voting to prevent flash attacks.
The 24-Month Outlook
Attestation markets will replace opaque points systems with composable, on-chain reputation, forcing brands to compete on verifiable user value.
Brands become liquidity providers. Current loyalty programs are closed-loop data silos. Platforms like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Verax enable portable, user-owned attestations for purchases and engagement. Brands must now provide value—discounts, governance rights, exclusive access—to attract and retain this composable reputation as liquidity.
Loyalty migrates off-chain. The initial wave targets digital-native brands, but physical commerce integration via RWA attestation oracles like Chainlink is the 18-month inflection point. A coffee purchase generates a verifiable, tradable attestation, not just a star on an app.
Counter-intuitive insight: Loyalty becomes adversarial. Users will arbitrage their own reputation across competing attestation markets (0xPass, Gitcoin Passport). This flips the model: instead of locking users in, programmable loyalty forces brands to continuously bid for user attention and data.
Evidence: The composability multiplier. An attestation from brand A can unlock airdrops or credit from unrelated protocol B. This external utility, measurable in yield or access, creates a loyalty ROI that Starbucks Rewards cannot match, setting a new market price for user engagement.
TL;DR for Busy Builders
On-chain attestations transform brand loyalty from a database into a liquid, composable asset class.
The Problem: Loyalty Points Are Dead Capital
Brands issue $200B+ in points that are locked in proprietary databases, creating zero network effects and high customer acquisition costs.\n- No Interoperability: Points can't be used outside the brand's walled garden.\n- High Friction: Redemption is a one-way, value-destroying event.
The Solution: Portable Reputation as Collateral
Attestations (e.g., via EAS, Verax, Hyperlane) turn loyalty into a verifiable, on-chain credential. This unlocks DeFi primitives for consumer finance.\n- Underwrite Loans: Prove 5-year loyalty to Nike, get a lower-rate loan from Aave.\n- Trade Proof-of-Loyalty: Sell your Starbucks 'Gold Member' attestation on a marketplace.
The Mechanism: Programmable Attestation Markets
Protocols like EigenLayer for restaking or Union for attestation aggregation create liquid markets for trust. Brands become issuers, users become liquidity providers.\n- Dynamic Pricing: Attestation value fluctuates based on brand health and user behavior.\n- Composable Rewards: Earn yield by staking your 'Apple Superfan' attestation in a loyalty pool.
The Pivot: From CAC to LTV
Attestations invert the marketing funnel. Instead of paying for clicks, brands reward verifiable, on-chain engagement, turning customers into shareholders.\n- Sybil-Resistant Airdrops: Reward real users, not farmers, using attestation graphs.\n- Revenue Sharing: A portion of attestation market fees flows back to the issuing brand.
The Competitor: Web2 Loyalty Giants (RIP)
Platforms like Bond or SessionM manage points but own the data layer. On-chain attestations are user-owned, creating a $50B+ displacement opportunity.\n- Data Portability: Users take their loyalty graph across any app.\n- Zero Vendor Lock-in: Switch brands without losing your history or status.
The Build: Start with EAS & Hyperlane
Implement in two phases. First, issue attestations for on-chain actions via Ethereum Attestation Service. Second, make them chain-agnostic with a Hyperlane warp route.\n- Phase 1: Attest on-chain purchases, reviews, and referrals.\n- Phase 2: Let attestations flow to L2s and other ecosystems, maximizing utility.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.