Royalties are not enforced. The original ERC-721 standard lacks a native mechanism for royalty payments, making them an optional feature dependent on marketplace goodwill. This created a social contract that platforms like Blur and SudoSwap broke to gain market share by offering zero-fee trading.
The Future of Royalties: Permanent, Programmable, and Owned
An analysis of how smart contracts are transforming royalties from a fragile promise into a sovereign, programmable, and tradeable asset class, with deep dives on EIP-2981, enforcement models, and the emerging financialization stack.
The Royalty Lie
On-chain creator royalties are a social contract that marketplaces and traders have repeatedly broken, demanding a programmable and permanent technical solution.
Programmability is the only solution. The technical fix is on-chain enforcement via standards like EIP-2981 for fungible fees and EIP-5218 for transfer hooks. These standards allow creators to embed royalty logic directly into the NFT smart contract, making payments non-negotiable and automatic upon any transfer.
Permanent ownership of the fee stream. Protocols like Manifold's Royalty Registry and 0xSplits create permanent, ownable financial assets from royalty streams. Creators can tokenize, sell, or use future royalties as collateral, transforming a voluntary payment into a programmable financial primitive.
Evidence: After Blur's zero-royalty policy, creator earnings on major collections fell over 50%. In response, platforms like OpenSea now enforce royalties only for collections using on-chain enforcement tools, proving the market forces the technical hand.
Royalties as a Sovereign Asset Class
Royalties are evolving from ephemeral protocol fees into permanent, programmable, and tradable financial assets.
Royalties become permanent assets. On-chain royalties are no longer just a fee stream; they are a discrete, ownable financial primitive. Protocols like Manifold's Royalty Registry and standards like EIP-2981 create a persistent, non-custodial claim on future cash flows, decoupling value from the underlying asset's ownership.
Programmability enables financialization. This asset class is natively programmable, enabling automated distribution via Safe{Wallet}, collateralization in DeFi lending markets like Aave, and bundling into tradable indices. The securitization of cash flows transforms illiquid future revenue into present-day capital.
Sovereignty shifts to creators. The traditional intermediary model is obsolete. Smart contracts enforce automatic, immutable payouts, removing reliance on centralized platforms. This creates a direct, verifiable economic relationship between creator and collector, governed by code, not policy.
Evidence: The $100M+ in secondary sales royalties processed by Manifold's registry demonstrates the latent demand for this infrastructure, while the integration of royalty standards into major marketplaces like OpenSea and Blur validates the economic model.
The State of Play: From Optional to Enforced
The market is abandoning optional royalties for enforceable, on-chain mechanisms that guarantee creator compensation.
Optional royalties are dead. Marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea's Seaport 1.5 made royalties a suggestion, not a rule, leading to a 95%+ drop in creator fees on many collections.
Enforcement is now on-chain. Protocols like Manifold's Royalty Registry and 0xSplits create programmable payment rails that lock fees into the asset's transfer logic, making evasion impossible.
The new standard is EIP-2981. This NFT royalty standard provides a universal, on-chain lookup for fee recipients, allowing any marketplace or wallet to discover and respect the creator's terms automatically.
Evidence: Collections using EIP-2981 with on-chain enforcement on Manifold have maintained 100% royalty collection, while those relying on marketplace policy have seen near-zero fees.
Royalty Enforcement Models: A Technical Comparison
A technical breakdown of on-chain royalty enforcement mechanisms, comparing their architectural approach, security guarantees, and economic trade-offs.
| Enforcement Feature / Metric | Transfer Hook (e.g., ERC-721C) | Marketplace Policy (e.g., Blur) | Creator-Owned Market (e.g., Zora) |
|---|---|---|---|
Enforcement Layer | Token Contract | Marketplace Application | Market Contract |
Royalty Permanence | |||
Creator Control Over Rules | |||
Requires Marketplace Opt-In | |||
Royalty Bypass Possible via | Custom Receiver Contract | Alternative Marketplace | Direct P2P Transfer |
Typical Royalty Enforcement Gas Cost | ~50k-100k gas | 0 gas (off-chain) | ~30k-50k gas |
Primary Architectural Weakness | Limited by EIP-721 standard | Relies on cartel behavior | Liquidity fragmentation |
The Programmable Royalty Stack
Royalties are evolving from static fees into dynamic, on-chain programs that creators own and control.
Royalties are a protocol primitive. They are not a marketplace feature. This shift moves enforcement from application-layer policy to a settlement-layer guarantee, making royalties resistant to centralized delistings like those seen on Blur and OpenSea.
Programmability enables complex logic. Royalties can now be split automatically, vest over time, or fund community treasuries. Standards like EIP-2981 and EIP-5218 provide the on-chain hooks for this logic to execute during any transfer.
Creator-owned logic is the endgame. Projects like Manifold's Royalty Registry and 0xSplits demonstrate that the royalty contract itself is an asset. Creators deploy and own this code, making their revenue stream portable and permanent across any future marketplace.
Evidence: The Manifold Royalty Registry secures over 1.5% of all Ethereum NFT volume, proving demand for a canonical, on-chain source of truth that bypasses platform-specific policies.
Architects of the New Standard
On-chain royalties are broken. The new standard is permanent, programmable, and owned.
The Problem: Royalties Are a Social Contract
Enforcement on EVM chains is a permissioned afterthought, easily bypassed by marketplaces like Blur. This has led to ~80%+ royalty non-compliance on major collections, destroying creator revenue models.
- Social Enforcement Fails at scale
- Protocol-Level Abstraction is missing
- Value Leakage to arbitrageurs and aggregators
The Solution: Programmable Settlement Layer
Treat royalties as a first-class, non-bypassable primitive in the settlement logic, similar to how UniswapX handles intents. Royalty logic is executed atomically with the trade.
- Enforced at Protocol Level, not marketplace
- Dynamic & Context-Aware (time-based, holder tiers)
- Composable with other DeFi primitives
The Standard: ERC-7641 & ERC-7007
New token standards bake royalty logic directly into the asset. ERC-7641 (Intrinsic Royalty) makes royalties a stateful, on-chain claim. ERC-7007 (Programmable NFTs) enables dynamic behavior.
- Permanence: Logic lives with the token forever
- Ownership: Creators control the royalty contract
- Interoperability: Works across all compliant marketplaces
The Infrastructure: Royalty-Aware Indexers & Bridges
Infrastructure must evolve to query and respect intrinsic royalty states. This requires new indexers (like The Graph subgraphs) and intent-based bridges (like Across, LayerZero) that preserve royalty logic cross-chain.
- Universal State Queries for royalty info
- Cross-Chain Intent Preservation
- Settlement Guarantees for creator payouts
The Incentive: Aligned MEV & Fee Markets
Redirect value extraction. Royalty enforcement creates a new pro-social MEV stream. Searchers can bundle royalty payments for priority, and validators/protocols can take a fee for guaranteed settlement, aligning all parties.
- New Revenue Stream for network validators
- Searcher Competition for compliant bundles
- Protocol Revenue from fee switches
The Outcome: Creator-Owned Economies
The end state is assets that are their own sovereign economies. Royalties fund ongoing development, community rewards, and buybacks—moving beyond static JPEGs to self-sustaining digital organisms.
- Recursive Value Accrual to the asset itself
- On-Chain Business Models (subscriptions, dividends)
- Creator as Protocol
The Bear Case: Where This All Breaks
The push for permanent, programmable, and owned creator royalties faces fundamental economic and technical hurdles.
The Liquidity Problem
Enforcing royalties requires market fragmentation. If a major marketplace like Blur or OpenSea circumvents them for competitive advantage, liquidity follows the path of least resistance.\n- Zero-fee marketplaces create a dominant liquidity sink.\n- Royalty-enforcing chains become ghost towns, killing the value they aim to protect.
The Regulatory Blowback
Programmable royalties that act as perpetual revenue streams attract regulator scrutiny as unregistered securities. The SEC's Howey Test could be applied to NFT cash flows.\n- Permanent on-chain splits resemble dividend distributions.\n- Projects like Manifold or 0xSplits become compliance targets, not infrastructure.
The Technical Illusion
True 'permanent' ownership is a myth in a multi-chain world. Royalty logic baked into an ERC-721 on Ethereum is ignored on Solana, Bitcoin L2s, or private order books.\n- Cross-chain bridges and aggregators strip metadata.\n- Standards like ERC-7496 (NFT Rights) require universal adoption, which won't happen.
The Creator Apathy Reality
The vast majority of NFT projects fail. Enforcing royalties on worthless assets is pointless. Successful creators (e.g., Yuga Labs) can enforce terms off-chain via brand power, not code.\n- Royalty revenue for most collections trends to zero within 12 months.\n- The infrastructure built for the 1% ignores the 99%'s economic reality.
The Modular Stack Conflict
Royalty enforcement requires consensus-level validation, conflicting with modular blockchain design. Execution layers (OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit) and shared sequencers (like those from Espresso or Astria) optimize for throughput, not fee policing.\n- Adding royalty checks increases gas costs and latency for all users.\n- App-chains that enforce them become expensive and uncompetitive.
The Legal Ownership Mismatch
On-chain royalty code cannot override legal ownership transfer. A buyer owns the NFT; courts may not uphold a creator's claim to perpetual % of secondary sales. Precedents from software licensing and physical art resale rights (droit de suite) are weak.\n- Smart contract logic ≠enforceable contract law.\n- A single successful lawsuit invalidates the entire premise.
The Financialization Frontier
Royalties are evolving from static fees into programmable, tradable financial primitives that creators own.
Royalties become permanent assets. On-chain royalties are not just a fee; they are a persistent, ownable cash flow stream. This transforms a contractual obligation into a financial primitive that can be valued, traded, or used as collateral.
Programmability enables financialization. Protocols like Manifold's Royalty Registry and EIP-2981 standardize royalty logic, allowing for complex splits, vesting schedules, and automated distributions. This programmability is the prerequisite for secondary markets.
Creators own their revenue streams. Unlike Web2 platforms that control payout terms, on-chain royalties are creator-owned infrastructure. This shifts power from intermediaries to the asset originator, enabling direct monetization strategies.
Evidence: Platforms like Sound.xyz and Zora have pioneered immutable, on-chain royalties, demonstrating that enforceable creator fees are viable and demanded by artists when the infrastructure is transparent and user-owned.
TL;DR for Builders
Royalties are shifting from a social contract to an enforceable, programmable primitive. Here's what to build.
The Problem: Royalties Are Optional
On-chain royalties are a polite request, not a rule. Marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea have made them optional, slashing creator revenue by >90% on some collections. The social contract is broken.
- Market Pressure: Zero-fee marketplaces win volume, forcing others to follow.
- Creator Exodus: Top artists abandon chains where royalties aren't enforced.
- Protocol Risk: A core value proposition of NFTs is undermined.
The Solution: Programmable Enforcement Hooks
Embed royalty logic directly into the token contract via transfer hooks. Projects like Manifold's Royalty Registry and EIP-2981 set a standard, but true enforcement requires hooks that block non-compliant sales.
- On-Chain Policy: Royalty rate and recipient are immutable contract logic.
- Marketplace Agnostic: Any platform must comply to facilitate the trade.
- Dynamic Rules: Enable time-based rates, holder discounts, or DAO-controlled parameters.
The Future: Owned & Composable Revenue Streams
Royalties evolve into ownable, tradable financial assets. Protocols like Tessera (fractionalized NFTs) and Superfluid streams demonstrate the model. Future royalties are composable DeFi primitives.
- Tokenized Cash Flows: Royalty streams can be sold, borrowed against, or pooled.
- Cross-Chain Autonomy: LayerZero and Axelar enable enforcement across ecosystems.
- Automated Treasury: Funds flow directly to DAOs for instant governance-controlled deployment.
Build This: The Sovereign Creator Stack
Winners will be infra that lets creators own their entire economic layer. This isn't just about 5% fees; it's about building a creator's autonomous financial engine.
- Minting Tools: Default-on, programmable enforcement (see Zora, Manifold).
- Royalty Aggregators: Single dashboard to manage flows across chains and formats.
- Legal-Proof Mechanisms: Use on-chain enforcement to satisfy real-world licensing terms.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.