Public mempools are insecure by design. They broadcast pending transactions globally, creating a zero-latency race for searchers to extract value through front-running, sandwich attacks, and arbitrage.
venture-capital-trends-in-web3
Blog
Why Private RPC Providers Like Flashbots Are Critical Infrastructure
The public mempool is a security flaw. The migration to private orderflow channels isn't just an optimization—it's a fundamental architectural shift creating a new, VC-backed infrastructure layer. This analysis breaks down the market forces, key players, and investment thesis.
introduction
THE VULNERABILITY
Introduction: The Public Mempool is a Bug
Public mempools expose user transactions to front-running and MEV extraction by default, making privacy a required infrastructure layer.
Private RPCs are not a feature; they are a fix. Services like Flashbots Protect and BloXroute bypass the public mempool, sending transactions directly to block builders, which neutralizes most front-running.
This shifts security from the user to the infrastructure. Wallets like MetaMask and protocols like Uniswap now default to private RPCs, making transaction privacy a non-negotiable standard, not an optional add-on.
Evidence: Over 90% of Ethereum block space is built by builders using MEV-Boost, which relies on private order flow from these RPCs to function efficiently.
key-trends
INFRASTRUCTURE REALISM
Key Trends: The Private Orderflow Thesis
Public RPC endpoints are a critical vulnerability; private providers like Flashbots are becoming the new standard for performance and protection.
01
The Problem: Public RPCs Are a DDoS Magnet
Public endpoints like Infura and Alchemy are single points of failure for billions in DeFi TVL. They are routinely targeted, causing cascading failures across dApps.\n- Service Degradation: Latency spikes to >5s during congestion.\n- Censorship Risk: Centralized providers can technically censor transactions.
>5s
Peak Latency
100%
Failure Correlation
02
The Solution: Dedicated, Load-Balanced Nodes
Private RPC providers operate dedicated node clusters with global load balancing, isolating traffic from public noise. This is the baseline for professional infrastructure.\n- Guaranteed Uptime: >99.9% SLA for enterprise clients.\n- Predictable Performance: Sub-500ms latency even during market volatility.
99.9%
SLA
<500ms
Latency
03
Flashbots: Beyond Privacy, It's About Finality
Flashbots' SUAVE and private transaction bundling solve the core economic problem: transparent mempools are toxic. This creates a new stack for intent-based systems like UniswapX and CowSwap.\n- MEV Protection: Shielding from front-running and sandwich attacks.\n- Guaranteed Inclusion: Direct bundler-to-builder pipelines for reliable settlement.
~0%
Sandwich Risk
1-Block
Finality
04
The New Stack: RPC + Bundler + Builder
The future stack integrates private RPCs with specialized bundlers (like those from Across, Socket) and builders (like bloXroute, Builder0x69). This vertical integration maximizes extractable value for users.\n- Optimal Routing: Intelligently splits orders across chains and DEXs.\n- Cross-Chain Intents: Enables systems like LayerZero's Omnichain Fungible Tokens (OFT).
10-30%
Better Execution
Multi-Chain
Native Support
deep-dive
THE INFRASTRUCTURE LAYER
Deep Dive: From Vulnerability to Vertical
Private RPC providers evolved from a niche exploit mitigation tool into a foundational layer for user experience and application performance.
Private RPCs prevent frontrunning. Public mempools expose pending transactions, creating a toxic MEV environment where bots extract value from users. Flashbots' private transaction relay was the first major solution to this systemic vulnerability.
The vertical expands beyond MEV protection. Providers like Alchemy, QuickNode, and BlastAPI now offer bundled services including transaction simulation, gas optimization, and real-time data indexing, becoming the default gateway for dApps.
Performance is the new battleground. A private RPC's latency and reliability directly impact user retention. The 2022 Flashbots merger with COW Protocol demonstrated the strategic shift from pure protection to intent-based transaction flow.
Evidence: Over 80% of Ethereum's block space is filled via private relays. This centralization risk is the trade-off for the user experience imperative that now defines the space.
FEATURED SNIPPETS
Market Map: Private RPC & MEV Infrastructure Landscape
A comparison of core infrastructure providers enabling private transactions and MEV protection, critical for DeFi protocols and sophisticated users.
| Feature / Metric | Flashbots Protect RPC | BloXroute MEV-Share | Eden Network RPC |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Function | Private mempool & MEV protection for users | MEV revenue redistribution marketplace | Priority block space & private mempool |
MEV Extraction Model | First-price sealed-bid auction to builders | Proposer-Builder-Separation (PBS) with user rebates | Private orderflow auction to stakers |
User Transaction Privacy | |||
Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) Rebates to User | |||
RPC Latency (p95, ms) | < 500 | < 300 | < 700 |
Supported Chains | Ethereum Mainnet | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, BSC | Ethereum, Arbitrum |
Integration Complexity | Simple RPC endpoint swap | Requires SDK integration for rebates | Simple RPC endpoint swap |
Backrunning Protection |
investment-thesis
THE PRIVATE MEMPOOL
Investment Thesis: Defensibility in the Data Layer
Private RPC providers like Flashbots are critical infrastructure because they create defensible moats around transaction data and order flow.
Private RPC providers monetize information asymmetry. They sell access to a private mempool, allowing traders to bypass public congestion and front-running. This creates a direct revenue stream from MEV searchers and sophisticated users.
The moat is network effect liquidity. As more searchers use Flashbots, the private order flow attracts more block builders, which in turn attracts more searchers. This creates a virtuous cycle that public RPC endpoints cannot replicate.
Data ownership is the defensible asset. Providers like Alchemy and Infura commoditize public data access. Flashbots and BloxRoute own the exclusive right to sequence private transactions, a far more valuable and sticky product.
Evidence: Flashbots' SUAVE aims to institutionalize this moat by becoming a decentralized block-building marketplace, directly competing with the public mempool model of chains like Ethereum and Solana.
risk-analysis
THE RPC BOTTLENECK
Risk Analysis: Centralization and New Attack Vectors
Public RPC endpoints are a single point of failure, exposing users to censorship, data leakage, and MEV extraction.
01
The Public RPC Trap
Default public endpoints from providers like Infura and Alchemy are centralized chokepoints. They enable transaction censorship, leak user IPs and wallet metadata, and create a single point of failure for dApps.
- Censorship Risk: Providers can blacklist addresses or contracts.
- Privacy Leak: IP-to-address mapping enables targeted attacks.
- Reliability: Outages at centralized providers can cripple entire ecosystems.
>80%
dApp Reliance
1
Point of Failure
02
Flashbots & Private Transaction Routing
Private RPCs like those from Flashbots and BloxRoute bypass the public mempool, shielding transactions from front-running bots and generalized frontends (GFMs). This is critical for high-value DeFi operations and institutional adoption.
- MEV Protection: Transactions are submitted directly to block builders.
- Guaranteed Inclusion: Bypasses public auction, preventing sandwich attacks.
- Latency Edge: ~100-200ms faster than public broadcast for arbitrage.
~200ms
Latency Edge
$1B+
MEV Protected
03
The New Attack Surface: RPC Hijacking
Malicious or compromised RPCs can return spoofed data, enabling theft via fake approvals or drained wallets. This shifts the threat model from smart contract exploits to infrastructure trust.
- Spoofed State: Returning incorrect token balances or fake liquidity.
- Transaction Manipulation: Altering
toaddresses or calldata before signing. - Solution: Client-side verification, decentralized RPC networks like POKT, and wallet guardrails.
100%
Trust Assumed
0-Click
Attack Vector
04
Infrastructure as a Strategic Asset
Control over RPC infrastructure grants outsized influence, akin to controlling the internet's DNS. This creates geopolitical and regulatory risk, as seen with Tornado Cash sanctions compliance. Decentralized alternatives are not just nice-to-have; they are existential for credible neutrality.
- Sovereignty Risk: Jurisdictional takedowns become possible.
- Protocol Capture: A dominant RPC can favor certain L2s or dApps.
- Strategic Imperative: Building decentralized RPC networks like Chainscore is a public good.
Critical
Infrastructure
Existential
Risk Level
takeaways
BEYOND PUBLIC ENDPOINTS
Takeaways: The New Infrastructure Stack
Public RPCs are a liability. The new stack is about performance, privacy, and programmability.
01
The Problem: Public RPCs Are a Performance & Privacy Nightmare
Using a public endpoint like Infura or Alchemy's free tier exposes your users to censorship, frontrunning, and unreliable latency. It's a single point of failure for your application's UX and security.
- Latency spikes can exceed 2-5 seconds during congestion.
- Request throttling leads to failed transactions and lost users.
- Metadata leakage reveals user IPs and wallet activity to the provider.
2-5s
Latency Spikes
100%
Metadata Leak
02
The Solution: Dedicated Node Infrastructure (e.g., QuickNode, Alchemy Pro)
Private RPC endpoints provide dedicated, load-balanced node clusters. This is the baseline for any serious application, guaranteeing 99.9%+ SLA, sub-200ms global latency, and zero request limits.
- Guaranteed throughput for high-frequency trading and NFT mints.
- Geographic distribution reduces latency for a global user base.
- Direct access to archive data and trace calls for complex queries.
<200ms
Global Latency
99.9%
Uptime SLA
03
The Frontier: MEV-Aware RPCs (Flashbots Protect, bloXroute)
Standard private RPCs don't solve Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). Specialized providers bundle transaction privacy and optimal execution, routing orders through private mempools or SUAVE-like systems to prevent frontrunning.
- Backrun protection secures DEX swaps and large transfers.
- Bundle optimization can improve net execution price by 1-5%+.
- Integration with CowSwap, UniswapX, and Across for intent-based flows.
1-5%+
Better Execution
0%
Frontrun Risk
04
The Architecture: Multi-Provider Fallback & Geo-Routing
Reliance on a single provider, even a private one, is fragile. The robust stack uses multi-provider orchestration (e.g., via Chainstack, Pocket Network) with automatic failover and intelligent geo-routing.
- Eliminates single points of failure if a provider has an outage.
- Cost optimization by routing read calls to cheaper providers.
- Compliance by routing traffic through specific jurisdictional nodes.
100%
Uptime Target
-30%
Cost Variable
05
The Data Layer: Specialized Indexers (The Graph, Goldsky, Subsquid)
RPCs are for state queries and broadcasting. For complex historical data (e.g., "all Uniswap v3 swaps for Wallet X"), you need a dedicated indexing layer. This offloads heavy queries from your RPC, reducing costs and latency.
- GraphQL APIs for complex, nested data queries.
- Real-time streaming of on-chain events via WebSockets.
- Decentralized networks provide censorship-resistant data access.
1000x
Query Speed
-90%
RPC Load
06
The Bottom Line: RPC as a Competitive Moat
Your application's RPC strategy is no longer a commodity. It directly impacts user retention, revenue (via MEV capture/avoidance), and regulatory posture. Building a tiered, purpose-built RPC stack is a core competency, not an afterthought.
- Superior UX via speed and reliability wins markets.
- Protected margins by mitigating toxic MEV.
- Future-proofing for appchains, rollups, and new execution environments.
Core
Competency
Direct
P&L Impact
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall