Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
the-ethereum-roadmap-merge-surge-verge
Blog

Running Ethereum Nodes Without Full State

An analysis of the Stateless Ethereum paradigm, its necessity for solving state bloat, the shift to Verkle Trees, and the trade-offs between weak statelessness, state expiry, and the ultimate goal of full statelessness.

introduction
THE DATA BOTTLENECK

The State is the Problem

Ethereum's primary scaling constraint is not compute or bandwidth, but the exponential growth of its historical state, which makes running a full node increasingly prohibitive.

State growth is exponential. Each new smart contract and user account permanently bloats the global state, a dataset every full node must store and sync. This creates a centralizing force, pricing out individual operators.

Statelessness is the solution. The core roadmap shifts the burden of state storage from nodes to clients. Nodes verify blocks using cryptographic proofs (like Verkle Trees) instead of holding the entire state, radically reducing hardware requirements.

Erigon and Reth lead. Client teams are pioneering archive node pruning and flat storage models to mitigate the issue today. Their work proves state size, not chain throughput, is the real bottleneck for node decentralization.

Evidence: A full Ethereum archive node requires over 12 TB of SSD storage. Without statelessness, this cost will make solo staking and lightweight clients economically impossible within 5 years.

deep-dive
THE STATE CRISIS

From Bloat to Proofs: The Stateless Architecture

Statelessness is the only viable path to sustainable Ethereum scaling, replacing terabyte state storage with cryptographic proofs.

State growth is terminal. Ethereum's execution state grows ~40GB/year, making solo node operation a luxury. This centralizes the network and creates a hard scalability ceiling for all L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism.

Stateless clients verify, they don't store. A node validates blocks using a Verkle proof for each transaction, not a local database. This decouples validation cost from total state size, enabling light clients with full security.

The bottleneck shifts to proof generation. Provers like Risc Zero or Succinct Labs must generate these proofs, creating a new market for specialized hardware. This is the computational cost of eliminating state bloat.

Witness data is the new bandwidth tax. Nodes receive ~1MB of proof data per block instead of storing 1TB. This trade-off is mandatory; the network's security depends on widely distributable validation.

ETHEREUM NODE ARCHITECTURES

The Stateless Spectrum: Trade-Off Analysis

Comparing the technical trade-offs of running an Ethereum node without requiring a full copy of the chain state.

Feature / MetricFull Node (Baseline)Stateless Client (Verkle)Portal Network (Light Client)Erigon's Archive Node

Initial Sync Time

5-15 days

< 2 hours

< 10 minutes

7-30 days

Storage Requirement

1.2 TB+

< 100 GB

< 2 GB

12 TB+

State Witness Size per Block

N/A

1-2 MB

10-50 KB

N/A

Can Propose Blocks

Bandwidth per Day

10-50 GB

5-15 GB

1-5 GB

50-100 GB

Hardware Requirement

High-end SSD, 16+ GB RAM

Mid-tier SSD, 8 GB RAM

Consumer HDD, 4 GB RAM

Enterprise NVMe, 64+ GB RAM

Supports Historical Data (Archive)

Dependency on P2P Network

future-outlook
THE STATELESS FRONTIER

The Node Operator's New World

Ethereum's stateless client roadmap eliminates the need for nodes to store the entire chain state, fundamentally altering infrastructure economics.

Statelessness redefines node hardware. Full nodes no longer need terabytes of fast SSD storage for the world state, shifting the bottleneck to bandwidth and CPU for verifying proofs.

Verkle Trees enable this shift. They replace Merkle Patricia Tries with cryptographic proofs that are constant-sized, making witness data portable and verification efficient.

Light clients become first-class citizens. Protocols like the Portal Network allow resource-constrained devices to securely query and verify chain data without trusting centralized RPC providers.

The economic model inverts. Operational costs shift from capital expenditure on storage to operational expenditure on compute, lowering barriers for home operators and decentralizing the network.

takeaways
NODE OPERATIONS

TL;DR for Builders and Operators

Running a full Ethereum node is a resource-intensive commitment. Here are the practical alternatives for builders and operators.

01

The Problem: State Bloat

The Ethereum state grows by ~50 GB/year, requiring >1 TB SSDs and >16 GB RAM for a full archive node. This creates prohibitive hardware costs and sync times for many use cases.

  • Sync Time: Initial sync can take 5-7 days for a full node.
  • Operational Overhead: Requires constant maintenance and storage upgrades.
>1 TB
Storage
5-7 days
Sync Time
02

The Solution: Light Clients & Portal Network

Clients like Nimbus and Lodestar can run in light mode, syncing only block headers (~20 MB). The emerging Portal Network (e.g., Trin, Fluffy) uses a distributed hash table to serve state data on-demand.

  • Resource Footprint: Requires < 2 GB RAM and minimal storage.
  • Use Case: Ideal for mobile apps, wallets, and read-only services that don't need full state.
< 2 GB
RAM
~20 MB
Header Sync
03

The Solution: Erigon's MDBX & Staged Sync

Erigon (formerly Turbo-Geth) uses a custom database (MDBX) and a staged sync algorithm to drastically reduce resource consumption and sync time.

  • Storage Efficiency: Achieves ~400 GB for a full archive node, a ~60% reduction vs. Geth.
  • Faster Sync: Can complete an initial sync in ~2 days on performant hardware.
~400 GB
Archive Size
-60%
vs. Geth
04

The Solution: External RPC Providers

Services like Alchemy, Infura, and QuickNode abstract node operations entirely. This is the dominant model for dApp backends, trading decentralization for developer velocity.

  • Time-to-Market: Launch an application in minutes, not weeks.
  • Hidden Cost: Creates centralization risk and vendor lock-in; a single point of failure for your application.
Minutes
Setup Time
High
Centralization Risk
05

The Problem: MEV & Censorship Resistance

Relying on a centralized RPC provider means you inherit their transaction ordering and potential censorship. Builders needing credible neutrality must run their own infrastructure.

  • MEV Exposure: Your user transactions are visible to the provider's private mempool.
  • Regulatory Risk: Providers may be compelled to censor certain addresses or smart contracts.
Critical
For DeFi
High
Sovereignty Need
06

The Hybrid Future: Modular Stacks

The endgame is a modular node stack. Use a light client for consensus, a specialized prover (e.g., RISC Zero, Succinct) for execution verification, and a decentralized RPC network (e.g., POKT Network, Lava Network) for data availability.

  • Best of Both Worlds: Maintains self-sovereignty with cloud-like elasticity.
  • Emerging Standard: This is the architecture for rollup nodes, bridges, and oracles.
Modular
Architecture
Elastic
Resource Use
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected direct pipeline
Stateless Ethereum: Running Nodes Without Full State | ChainScore Blog