Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
the-creator-economy-web2-vs-web3
Blog

The Future of Royalties: Enforceable Across Every Chain

The creator economy's next phase requires royalties that are embedded in the asset, not the marketplace. This analysis explores the protocol-agnostic standards and cross-chain logic that will make this possible.

introduction
THE PROBLEM

Introduction

Royalty enforcement is a cross-chain coordination problem that existing infrastructure fails to solve.

Royalty enforcement is a cross-chain coordination problem. On-chain logic is isolated to its native chain, making smart contract logic non-portable. An NFT minted on Ethereum cannot natively enforce rules on Solana or Arbitrum.

Current solutions rely on centralized trust or market coercion. Marketplaces like OpenSea use off-chain allowlists and policy threats, while protocols like Manifold use creator-owned minting contracts. Both are brittle and ignore the multi-chain reality.

The core failure is architectural. Layer 2s and alt-L1s fragment liquidity and state. A universal state layer or intent-based settlement network is required for global policy synchronization, similar to how Across or LayerZero synchronize assets.

Evidence: Over $35M in creator royalties were left unenforced on Solana in 2023 alone, demonstrating the direct economic cost of fragmented state.

thesis-statement
THE CORE ARGUMENT

Thesis Statement

Royalty enforcement is a blockchain-wide infrastructure problem, solvable by a universal, intent-based settlement layer.

Royalty enforcement is infrastructure. It fails today because it's a fragmented application-layer problem. The solution is a universal settlement layer that treats royalties as a mandatory, verifiable condition for any NFT transfer across any chain.

Current solutions are fragmented. Protocols like Manifold and 0xSplits enforce on single chains. This creates arbitrage where royalty-free marketplaces on other chains drain value. A cross-chain standard like EIP-7504 is necessary but insufficient without enforcement rails.

The future is intent-based settlement. Systems like UniswapX and Across demonstrate that users can declare outcomes (e.g., 'swap X for Y'). A royalty-enforcing intent layer would require any NFT transfer intent to include a verified royalty payment as a pre-condition for settlement.

Evidence: The $300M+ in lost creator royalties in 2023 proves the economic imperative. Protocols like LayerZero and Circle's CCTP show that secure, generalized message passing is now production-ready, providing the technical foundation for this enforcement layer.

market-context
THE NEW REALITY

Market Context: The Royalty Wars Are Over

Royalty enforcement is no longer a technical debate but a market-driven standard, with infrastructure enabling compliance across any chain.

Market forces enforce royalties now. The debate shifted from 'if' to 'how' after major marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea standardized enforcement, making zero-fee trading a niche strategy.

The infrastructure is live. Protocols like Manifold's Royalty Registry and EIP-2981 provide the on-chain hooks, while cross-chain messaging layers (LayerZero, Wormhole) enable universal enforcement logic.

Compliance is a feature, not a cost. New chains integrate royalty standards at the protocol level to attract premium NFT projects, making fee evasion a liquidity disadvantage.

Evidence: Over 95% of Ethereum NFT volume now respects creator fees, a reversal from 2022's sub-20% rates, driven by integrated marketplace and infrastructure tooling.

CROSS-CHAIN ENFORCEMENT MECHANICS

Royalty Standard Comparison: Evolution of Enforcement

A technical comparison of dominant royalty standards, mapping their core enforcement mechanisms and cross-chain viability for creators and marketplaces.

Enforcement MechanismERC-721 (Vanilla)ERC-2981 (Royalty Standard)ERC-1155 (Semi-Fungible)ERC-6551 (Token-Bound Accounts)

On-Chain Royalty Specification

Royalty Enforcement at Transfer

Marketplace Agnostic Enforcement

Royalty Recipient is Mutable

N/A (Not Specified)

Cross-Chain Royalty Portability

Via LayerZero, Wormhole

Gas Overhead for Enforcement

0 gas

< 5k gas

0 gas

~50k-100k gas

Primary Use Case

Simple NFTs, Art

Marketplace Compliance

Gaming, Editions

Composable Assets, Avatars

deep-dive
THE INTEROPERABILITY LAYER

Deep Dive: The Anatomy of a Portable Royalty Standard

A portable royalty standard requires a universal data layer and a cross-chain enforcement mechanism to function across fragmented liquidity.

Universal Metadata Registry: The core is a canonical, chain-agnostic registry for royalty parameters. This moves logic off-chain, making it accessible to any marketplace on any chain. The EIP-7492: NFTRoyalty standard proposes this, separating policy from the token contract itself.

On-Chain Enforcement is Impossible: No single chain's smart contract can govern execution on another. The solution is intent-based routing via protocols like Across or LayerZero. The royalty logic becomes a condition for settlement, enforced by the solver network.

Marketplaces Become Relayers, Not Enforcers: A portable standard inverts the model. Instead of trusting each platform's compliance, the royalty is a pre-requisite for liquidity. Aggregators like UniswapX and Blur must satisfy the intent's conditions to complete a cross-chain fill.

Evidence: The failure of on-chain enforcement is visible. After OpenSea's optional royalty policy, creator earnings on Ethereum NFTs fell over 50%. A portable standard bypasses marketplace policy by integrating directly with the liquidity layer.

protocol-spotlight
THE FUTURE OF ROYALTIES

Protocol Spotlight: Who's Building the Future?

Cross-chain NFT proliferation has shattered the creator economy. These protocols are rebuilding enforceable royalties from first principles.

01

Manifold: The Creator-First Licensing Standard

Royalties are a legal right, not a protocol suggestion. Manifold's ERC-721C introduces on-chain, configurable royalty enforcement with transfer validation, making it a contract-level obligation.

  • Creator-Controlled: Deployers set rules (allow/deny lists, percentages) that are immutable and chain-agnostic.
  • Marketplace Agnostic: Enforcement logic is in the NFT contract itself, removing reliance on marketplace goodwill.
  • Legal Bridge: Provides a clear on-chain record for legal recourse, moving beyond social consensus.
ERC-721C
Standard
Contract-Level
Enforcement
02

Rarible Protocol: The Aggregated Royalty Engine

Fragmented liquidity across OpenSea, Blur, and Sudoswap means no single marketplace can enforce rules. Rarible Protocol aggregates order flow to apply royalty policies across all major venues.

  • Aggregator Leverage: By routing trades through its protocol, it can mandate royalty payment on fill.
  • Dynamic Policies: Supports tiered royalties (e.g., 10% for first sale, 5% thereafter).
  • Cross-Chain Indexer: Tracks provenance and payments across Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana to unify creator payouts.
Multi-Chain
Coverage
Order Flow
Leverage
03

Sound.xyz: The Vertical Integration Play

The most effective enforcement is a closed-loop system with aligned incentives. Sound built a full-stack music NFT platform where royalties are non-negotiable by design.

  • Captive Marketplace: Artists mint, sell, and set royalties on Sound; the platform's economic model depends on enforcing them.
  • Social Enforcement: Strong community norms and artist-fan relationships create social pressure that complements technical measures.
  • Proof of Concept: Demonstrates that for specific, high-value verticals, a dedicated platform can solve the problem where generalized marketplaces fail.
Vertical Stack
Control
Social+Tech
Model
04

The LayerZero & Omnichain Future

True cross-chain royalties require universal state synchronization. LayerZero's omnichain fungible tokens (OFT) and non-fungible tokens (ONFT) standards provide the primitive for native cross-chain assets.

  • Single Source of Truth: An NFT's royalty configuration lives on a home chain and is verified via LayerZero messages on any connected chain.
  • Native, Not Bridged: ONFTs are native assets on each chain, eliminating wrapped asset complexity and centralization risk from bridges.
  • Foundation for Protocols: Enables projects like Manifold and Rarible to build truly universal enforcement layers.
ONFT Standard
Primitive
Omnichain
State
counter-argument
THE REALITY

Counter-Argument: The Inevitable Bypass

Technical and economic forces will inevitably create paths to bypass on-chain royalty enforcement.

Permissionless innovation guarantees bypass. Any protocol that enforces royalties creates a market for a competitor that removes them. This is the same dynamic that killed NFT royalties on marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea.

Cross-chain fragmentation breaks enforcement. A user can mint on an enforcing chain like Ethereum, then bridge the NFT via LayerZero or Axelar to a permissive chain. The destination chain's marketplace logic ignores the source chain's rules.

Intent-based architectures abstract enforcement. Systems like Uniswap X and CowSwap let users express a desired outcome. A solver could source the NFT from a non-compliant liquidity pool, fulfilling the intent while bypassing the royalty contract.

Evidence: The EIP-2981 royalty standard is widely adopted but ignored. Its enforcement relies on marketplace goodwill, which evaporated when Blur's zero-fee model captured market share, proving the economic incentive to bypass.

risk-analysis
THE FUTURE OF ROYALTIES

Risk Analysis: What Could Go Wrong?

Enforcing creator royalties across a fragmented multi-chain ecosystem introduces novel technical and economic attack vectors.

01

The Oracle Problem: Single Point of Failure

Most cross-chain royalty enforcement relies on a centralized oracle or relayer to attest to on-chain sales. This creates a critical vulnerability.

  • Censorship Risk: A malicious or compromised oracle can censor royalty payments.
  • Data Manipulation: Incorrect price feeds or sale attestations can underpay creators.
  • Systemic Collapse: If the oracle fails, the entire cross-chain royalty system halts.
1
Critical Failure Point
~0s
Downtime Tolerance
02

The Economic Attack: Royalty Arbitrage

Traders will exploit price differentials between chains with and without enforcement, eroding the fee model.

  • Wash Trading: Fake volume on non-enforcing chains to devalue collections, then bridge assets.
  • Liquidity Fragmentation: Marketplaces will compete by offering "zero-royalty" chains, forcing a race to the bottom.
  • Slippage for Creators: Royalties become a voluntary tax, paid only by uninformed users.
>90%
Potential Fee Avoidance
High
Arb Incentive
03

The Legal & Governance Quagmire

Enforcement relies on smart contract code as law, but real-world legal systems may not recognize it.

  • Jurisdictional Nightmare: Which chain's legal framework governs a cross-chain sale?
  • DAO Governance Capture: Treasury-controlled enforcement parameters can be voted against creator interests.
  • Upgrade Risks: A protocol upgrade to fix bugs could inadvertently break royalty logic for legacy NFTs.
Multi
Legal Jurisdictions
Irreversible
Code-Is-Law Risk
04

The Interoperability Bottleneck

Universal standards (e.g., ERC-721C) require adoption by every major chain, wallet, and marketplace—a near-impossible coordination problem.

  • Fragmented Adoption: A chain like Solana or Bitcoin L2s may reject Ethereum-centric standards.
  • Bridge Exploits: Vulnerabilities in cross-chain messaging layers (LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar) can intercept or block royalty payments.
  • Performance Overhead: Adding royalty logic to every transfer increases gas costs and complicates simple swaps.
100%
Adoption Required
+30%
Gas Overhead
future-outlook
THE STANDARDIZATION FRONTIER

Future Outlook: The 24-Month Roadmap

Royalty enforcement will shift from a per-marketplace battle to a universal, chain-agnostic standard integrated at the protocol layer.

Universal Standard Adoption is inevitable. The current fragmented approach, with marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea implementing custom logic, creates a weak equilibrium. The solution is a protocol-level standard like EIP-7504 or a new primitive that makes royalties a non-negotiable property of the token itself, similar to ERC-20 decimals.

Cross-chain enforcement becomes trivial with a standard. Once a token's royalty rules are defined in its core contract, intent-based solvers like UniswapX and CowSwap and generic messaging layers like LayerZero and Axelar can read and enforce them natively across any chain. The bridge becomes enforcement-aware.

The counter-intuitive insight is that royalty revenue will consolidate, not fragment. Projects like Manifold and 0xSplits that offer programmable payout infrastructure will become the default treasury layer, as standardized royalties create a predictable, automated revenue stream across all secondary activity.

Evidence: The rapid adoption of ERC-4337 for account abstraction demonstrates how a single, well-designed standard can achieve ecosystem-wide integration within 18 months, reshaping user experience across hundreds of applications.

takeaways
THE FUTURE OF ROYALTIES

Key Takeaways

On-chain creator economics are fragmented. True value requires universal, automated enforcement.

01

The Problem: Fragmented Chains, Broken Promises

Royalty logic is siloed per chain, creating enforcement deserts. A collection on Ethereum with royalties has no claim on its Solana or Polygon derivatives. This fractures the creator's revenue stream and market integrity.

  • Market Impact: Creator revenue leakage estimated in the hundreds of millions annually.
  • Technical Debt: Each new L2 or appchain requires a bespoke, often weaker, enforcement mechanism.
100+
Chains to Cover
$500M+
Revenue at Risk
02

The Solution: Universal Settlement Layer

A dedicated protocol acts as a cross-chain state coordinator and arbiter. It doesn't hold assets but broadcasts and verifies royalty policies across all connected chains, similar to how LayerZero passes messages or Axelar manages general message passing.

  • Core Mechanism: Policy states are anchored on a secure chain (e.g., Ethereum), with light clients or optimistic verification on others.
  • Automated Enforcement: Marketplaces and DEXs query this layer; non-compliant trades can be invalidated or flagged.
~2s
Policy Sync
1 Source
Of Truth
03

The Enforcer: Programmable Intent

Move beyond simple fee extraction. Royalties become programmable intents that can route, split, and react. This mirrors the user-centric design of UniswapX and CowSwap, but for creator economics.

  • Dynamic Logic: Royalties can auto-convert to ETH, fund a DAO treasury, or reward loyal holders.
  • Composability: Royalty streams become a primitive, integrable by DeFi protocols for streaming or collateralization.
10x
More Utility
Auto-Execute
Logic
04

The Business Case: Aligning Marketplaces

Voluntary enforcement failed. The solution makes compliance the path of least resistance and maximal profit. A unified standard reduces integration overhead for marketplaces like Blur, Magic Eden, and Tensor, while protecting their liquidity.

  • Network Effect: First major marketplace to adopt gains a monopoly on premium, royalty-respecting collections.
  • Data Advantage: Cross-chain royalty tracking provides unparalleled insights into collection health and creator value.
-70%
Integration Cost
New Revenue
Data Layer
05

The Hurdle: Miner Extractable Value (MEV) & Spoofing

Bad actors will exploit latency in cross-chain state updates. Without careful design, enforcement can be front-run, similar to DEX arbitrage MEV. Spoofing a fake policy state is a critical attack vector.

  • Mitigation: Requires fast finality chains, optimistic or ZK-verification schemes, and economic slashing for false claims.
  • Reference: Learn from bridge security models like Across's bonded relayers and Chainlink CCIP's risk management.
<1 Block
Vulnerability Window
Bonded
Enforcers
06

The Endgame: Asset-Centric, Not Chain-Centric

The NFT or token is the sovereign entity, carrying its own immutable economic rules. The chain it's on becomes an execution environment, not a jurisdiction. This flips the current paradigm.

  • True Portability: Assets move freely; their royalty policy is as inherent as their token ID.
  • Legacy Integration: Enables ERC-721 and SPL assets to interoperate under a single economic rule set, unlocking compound value.
Universal
Asset Layer
Chain-Agnostic
Execution
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
The Future of Royalties: Enforceable Across Every Chain | ChainScore Blog