Staking is now governance. The primary function of staking capital has shifted from securing consensus to governing complex on-chain systems like Aave, Uniswap, and Lido DAO.
the-appchain-thesis-cosmos-and-polkadot
Blog
From Staking Pools to Governance Professionals
The Appchain Thesis demands specialized political agency. We analyze why generic staking delegation is failing and how a new class of accountable governance professionals is emerging on Cosmos and Polkadot.
introduction
THE EVOLUTION
Introduction
The role of the staker has evolved from a passive capital provider to an active governance professional.
Passive pools create misalignment. Delegating to a liquid staking token (LST) like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH outsources governance, creating a principal-agent problem where the staker's financial interest diverges from the protocol's health.
Active governance is a profession. Managing delegation, analyzing proposals, and voting requires specialized tools from Snapshot, Tally, and Boardroom. This professionalization creates a new layer in the crypto stack: the governance-as-a-service (GaaS) market.
Evidence: Over $30B in TVL across major DAOs is governed by fewer than 5% of token holders, highlighting the concentration and professionalization of this activity.
thesis-statement
THE EVOLUTION
Thesis Statement
Blockchain governance is professionalizing, shifting from passive staking to active, specialized management by dedicated professionals.
Governance is a profession. The complexity of managing multi-chain assets and protocol votes requires full-time expertise, not casual delegation. This creates a market for professional delegation services like Karpatkey and StableLab.
Passive staking pools are obsolete. Simple yield farming ignores the governance premium—the value extracted from directing protocol fees, treasury allocations, and technical upgrades. This premium accrues to active managers.
The market demands specialization. Managing votes across Compound, Aave, and Uniswap requires distinct technical and economic knowledge. Generalist token holders cannot compete with focused governance firms.
Evidence: Karpatkey manages over $500M in DAO treasuries, executing complex strategies that passive Lido or Rocket Pool stakers cannot replicate. This is the new benchmark.
market-context
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH
Market Context: The Appchain Governance Crisis
Appchain proliferation has created a governance labor shortage, shifting power from token-holding users to professionalized staking pools.
Delegation concentrates governance power. Appchains like dYdX v4 and Celestia rollups require active validator participation for upgrades and parameter changes, but most token holders delegate their votes to staking-as-a-service providers like Figment and Chorus One.
Staking pools are now governance professionals. These entities vote on behalf of millions in delegated tokens, creating a professional delegate class that votes across dozens of chains, unlike the user-focused governance of monolithic L1s like Ethereum.
This creates principal-agent problems. The incentives of a professional staker (maximize staking yield, minimize operational overhead) often diverge from the incentives of end-users seeking optimal chain performance or new features.
Evidence: On Cosmos Hub, the top 10 validators control over 45% of the voting power, with entities like Allnodes and SG-1 voting across 50+ appchains simultaneously.
key-trends
FROM STAKING POOLS TO GOVERNANCE PROFESSIONALS
Key Trends Driving the Shift
The rise of liquid staking tokens (LSTs) has decoupled capital efficiency from governance participation, creating a new market for specialized actors.
01
The Liquidity-Governance Divorce
Liquid staking protocols like Lido and Rocket Pool abstract staking yield into a tradable token (e.g., stETH, rETH). This creates a principal-agent problem: LST holders are economic participants, not governance participants.\n- Result: ~$40B+ in stETH is held by entities with zero incentive to vote.\n- Opportunity: A new class of professional voters can represent this dormant governance power.
$40B+
Idle Governance
0%
Voter Turnout
02
Delegated Voting as a Service (DVaaS)
Protocols like Agora, Tally, and Snapshot provide the infrastructure for professional delegation. This mirrors the rise of Coinbase Custody for assets, but for votes.\n- Mechanism: Token holders delegate voting power to experts via on-chain or off-chain attestations.\n- Metric: Professional delegates often manage >1M+ votes across dozens of proposals.
>1M+
Votes Managed
24/7
Coverage
03
The Rise of the Governance Cartel
Concentrated voting power in entities like a16z, Paradigm, and large DAOs creates centralization risks. Professional delegates act as a counterbalance or an extension of these blocs.\n- Dynamic: They provide research, signaling, and execution for a fee or a share of rewards.\n- Risk: This professionalization can lead to vote-buying and new forms of collusion, as seen in early Curve wars.
>60%
Vote Concentration
High
Collusion Risk
04
Economic Incentives for Professional Voters
Protocols are directly funding governance participation. Compound Grants, Uniswap's Delegate Incentives, and Optimism's Citizen House pay delegates for their work.\n- Model: Shift from altruism to a sustainable business model for governance.\n- Impact: Creates a competitive market for the best research and voter alignment, moving beyond whale-dominated politics.
$M+
Incentive Pools
Pro Market
Outcome
DECISION MATRIX
The Delegation Spectrum: Staking Pool vs. Governance Professional
A first-principles comparison of passive staking services versus active governance delegation for token holders.
| Feature / Metric | Traditional Staking Pool (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool) | Governance Professional (e.g., Karpatkey, StableLab) | Self-Custody & Manual Voting |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Function | Capital efficiency & yield generation | Active governance participation & voting | Direct protocol control |
Voting Power Delegation | |||
Average Fee (of rewards) | 5-10% | 10-20% | 0% |
Slashing Risk Mitigation | Pool-level insurance & diversification | Non-custodial; user retains slashing risk | Direct, unmitigated slashing risk |
Governance Strategy | Typically votes with majority or abstains | Proactive research, proposal drafting, delegation to sub-DAOs | Ad-hoc, based on holder's own research |
Liquidity Provided | Liquid staking token (e.g., stETH, rETH) | None | Illiquid staked assets |
Ideal User Profile | Yield-focused, passive capital | Aligned, long-term token holders seeking governance alpha | Protocol founders, core team, maximalists |
Key Trade-off | Yield for governance voice | Fee for expertise & time | Time & risk for sovereignty |
deep-dive
FROM DELEGATION TO PROFESSIONALIZATION
Deep Dive: The Mechanics of Political Agency
This section deconstructs how staking pools evolve into political power centers, creating a new class of governance professionals.
Delegation creates political agency. Token holders delegate voting power to staking pools like Lido or Rocket Pool for yield, not governance. This unintentionally centralizes decision-making power in a few entities, transforming them into de facto political parties.
Governance becomes a service. Entities like Gauntlet and Chaos Labs professionalize this power by offering risk-modeled, data-driven voting recommendations. Voters outsource complex analysis, trading direct control for perceived security and efficiency.
The principal-agent problem is institutionalized. The incentive misalignment between delegators (maximize yield) and delegates (maximize influence/power) creates systemic risk. This mirrors traditional finance's fund manager dilemma but on a transparent, on-chain ledger.
Evidence: Lido's stETH commands over 30% of Ethereum's staked supply, giving its Lido DAO outsized influence on core protocol upgrades like EIP-4844, despite most delegators being passive.
protocol-spotlight
FROM STAKING POOLS TO GOVERNANCE PROFESSIONALS
Protocol Spotlight: Early Leaders in Professional Governance
The next evolution in crypto governance is the rise of professional, capital-efficient delegation protocols that separate voting power from token ownership.
01
The Problem: Passive Capital is Lazy Capital
Proof-of-Stake chains lock up $100B+ in TVL, but most stakers are passive voters or delegate to validators with no governance expertise. This creates security-theater voting and low-quality decision-making.
- Voter apathy dilutes protocol direction.
- Validator concentration creates centralization risks.
- Misaligned incentives: Stakers prioritize yield, not governance quality.
<10%
Active Voters
$100B+
Idle TVL
02
The Solution: EigenLayer & Restaking
EigenLayer introduces restaking, allowing ETH stakers to delegate their cryptoeconomic security to other protocols (AVSs). This creates a market for professional operators who compete on performance and slashing risk.
- Unlocks latent security: Reuses staked ETH for multiple services.
- Creates a delegation market: Stakers choose operators based on track record.
- Professionalizes validation: Operators must run complex software for rewards.
$15B+
TVL Restaked
200+
Active Operators
03
The Solution: Karak & Generalized Restaking
Karak extends the restaking thesis beyond Ethereum to a multi-chain layer. It allows any asset (ETH, stablecoins, LP tokens) to be restaked to secure any network, creating a unified security marketplace.
- Asset-agnostic: Expands the security base beyond native staking tokens.
- Cross-chain security: One stake can secure protocols on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Solana.
- Yield aggregation: Combines base yield from staking with rewards from secured services.
Multi-Chain
Security Layer
$1B+
TVL
04
The Solution: Symbiotic & Intent-Centric Restaking
Symbiotic, built by the CowSwap team, introduces intent-based restaking. Users specify desired yields and risk profiles, and the network's solver ecosystem competes to fulfill them, abstracting operator selection.
- Intent-driven: Users declare 'what', solvers figure out 'how'.
- Capital efficiency: Enables complex, cross-asset restaking strategies.
- Solver competition: Professional operators (like MEV searchers) optimize for user intent.
Intent-Based
Delegation
Solver-Native
Architecture
counter-argument
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH
Counter-Argument: Isn't This Just More Centralization?
Professionalization is a market response to misaligned incentives, not a centralization vector.
Professionalization is inevitable. Amateur governance fails at scale. The economic reality of delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS) and liquid staking tokens (LSTs) creates a market for expertise, mirroring corporate shareholder services.
The alternative is worse. Without professionals, governance defaults to whales or apathetic tokenholders. Professional delegates like StakeWise Vaults or Rocket Pool oDAO members provide accountability that random delegators lack.
This creates a new market structure. It shifts power from capital (pure stake weight) to capital plus reputation. Systems like EigenLayer's Intersubjective Staking explicitly codify this, making slashing contingent on professional judgment.
Evidence: In Cosmos, professional validators like Figment and Chorus One consistently have higher voter participation rates (>95%) than the network average, directly improving chain security.
risk-analysis
FROM STAKING POOLS TO GOVERNANCE PROFESSIONALS
Risk Analysis: What Could Go Wrong?
The professionalization of staking introduces systemic risks beyond simple slashing.
01
The Centralization of Validation Power
Professional staking pools like Lido and Coinbase concentrate stake, creating a small group of super-validators. This undermines the Nakamoto Coefficient and creates censorship vectors.
- Lido commands ~30% of Ethereum stake, a critical threshold.
- MEV centralization follows stake concentration, as seen with Flashbots.
- Regulatory pressure can target these centralized points of failure.
~30%
Lido's Share
<10
Key Entities
02
The Rise of Governance Mercenaries
Delegated voting power attracts professional DAO voters (e.g., Gauntlet, Chaos Labs) who optimize for fee extraction, not protocol health. This creates misaligned incentives and governance capture.
- Vote-buying and bribery become rational, as seen in early Curve wars.
- Proposal spam increases as mercenaries create work to justify retainers.
- Long-term roadmap suffers vs. short-term tokenomics tweaks.
$10M+
Annual Retainers
>60%
Delegated Votes
03
Liquid Staking Derivative (LSD) Contagion
The $50B+ LSD sector (stETH, rETH) creates a fragile financial layer. A depeg or smart contract bug in a major provider could trigger a Lehman-style cascade across DeFi.
- DeFi protocols over-collateralize with LSDs, creating reflexive risk.
- Oracle failures during market stress exacerbate depegs.
- Lido's stETH dominance makes it a single point of systemic failure.
$50B+
LSD TVL
200+
Integrated Protocols
04
The Regulatory Kill Switch
Professional staking entities are KYC/AML compliant on-ramps, making them easy targets for regulators. A jurisdiction-based takedown could forcibly slash a significant portion of the network.
- OFAC-sanctioned relays already show regulatory reach into middleware.
- Geofencing staking services fragments network consensus.
- Legal reclassification of staking rewards as securities changes the economic model.
100%
KYC Entities
Major Jurisdiction
Single Point
05
Operator Cartels and MEV Cartels
Top-tier node operators (e.g., Figment, Chorus One) form implicit cartels through shared infrastructure and relay preferences. This collusion maximizes extractable value (MEV) at the expense of ordinary users.
- Censorship becomes profitable through exclusive orderflow deals.
- Relay monopolies like Flashbots centralize block building.
- Anti-competitive practices block new entrants, stifling innovation.
>80%
Relay Market Share
$1B+
Annual MEV
06
The Skill Gap & Key-Person Risk
Running enterprise-grade validators requires deep expertise, creating a critical talent bottleneck. The exit of a few key engineers or the failure of a major tool like DappNode or Teku could destabilize the network.
- Open-source client diversity relies on underfunded teams.
- Documentation and tooling lag behind mainnet complexity.
- A single bug in a dominant client (e.g., Prysm) can cause mass slashing.
<100
Core Devs
~65%
Prysm Usage
future-outlook
THE LABOR MARKET
Future Outlook: The Professionalization of Politics
Tokenized governance will create a new class of professional delegates and specialized service firms.
Delegation becomes a profession. Liquid staking tokens like Lido's stETH and Rocket Pool's rETH already separate economic interest from governance rights. This creates a market for professional delegates who compete for votes based on track records and specialized expertise, similar to asset managers in TradFi.
Governance-as-a-Service emerges. Protocols like Tally and Boardroom provide tooling, but the next step is full-service firms. These entities will offer proposal drafting, voter analysis, and execution for a fee, turning chaotic governance into a managed process for token-holding institutions.
The APY wars shift to governance yield. Staking pools compete on returns, but governance delegation will monetize voting power. Delegates will bundle votes and sell influence, creating a secondary yield stream that professionalizes the entire political layer of a protocol.
Evidence: Lido's stETH governs a $20B+ treasury. Its simple governance model is a precursor; future systems will require delegation to specialists managing complex treasury diversification and protocol parameter updates.
takeaways
FROM STAKING POOLS TO GOVERNANCE PROFESSIONALS
Key Takeaways for Builders & Voters
The shift from passive staking to active governance requires new infrastructure and incentives. Here's what matters.
01
The Problem: Staking is a Commodity, Governance is a Service
Passive staking pools like Lido and Rocket Pool solved delegation but created governance apathy. The real value is in professional, accountable voting.
- Key Benefit: Unlocks protocol-specific expertise as a service.
- Key Benefit: Shifts competition from yield to governance quality and alignment.
>90%
Voter Apathy
$30B+
Delegated TVL
02
The Solution: Specialized Delegation Vaults
Move beyond generic staking tokens. Build vaults that delegate to professional DAOs like Stakehouse or Karpatkey, with clear performance metrics.
- Key Benefit: Enables fee-for-performance models tied to governance outcomes.
- Key Benefit: Creates a liquid market for governance influence and responsibility.
10-100x
Voter Engagement
Transparent
Fee Structure
03
The Infrastructure: MEV-Resistant Voting & Execution
On-chain voting is frontrunable. The next stack requires private voting (e.g., Shutter Network) and intent-based execution (e.g., UniswapX, CowSwap).
- Key Benefit: Eliminates governance extractable value (GEV) and vote manipulation.
- Key Benefit: Ensures voter intent is executed at best price, not just first.
~0 GEV
Target Leakage
Secure
Execution
04
The Incentive: Skin-in-the-Game for Delegates
Delegates must be economically aligned. Implement bonded delegation with slashing for malicious votes or chronic absenteeism, akin to Cosmos validators.
- Key Benefit: Forces delegates to internalize the cost of poor governance.
- Key Benefit: Creates a credible signal of commitment, filtering out grifters.
Bonded
Capital
Slashable
Actions
05
The Metric: Move Beyond TVL to Governance Health
Total Value Locked (TVL) is irrelevant for governance. Builders must track Proposal Turnout, Delegate Concentration, and Vote Delay.
- Key Benefit: Provides real-time diagnostics for protocol political risk.
- Key Benefit: Allows voters to compare delegate performance on hard data.
New KPIs
Required
Real-Time
Analytics
06
The Endgame: Professional DAOs as Protocol Politicians
The future is not one delegate, one vote. It's professional DAOs (e.g., Llama, Gauntlet) that research, lobby, and vote across an entire portfolio, bringing institutional discipline.
- Key Benefit: Aggregates fragmented voter intelligence into coherent strategy.
- Key Benefit: Creates a career path for governance specialists, increasing talent density.
Portfolio
Management
Career Path
Established
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall