Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
solana-and-the-rise-of-high-performance-chains
Blog

Why Solana's Low Fees Intensify the MEV Race

Solana's core advantage—sub-cent fees—has an unintended consequence: it supercharges MEV. This analysis explores how cheap failure costs create a bot free-for-all, turning network speed into a double-edged sword.

introduction
THE FEE FRONTIER

Introduction

Solana's sub-penny transaction costs have transformed MEV from a niche concern into the primary competitive arena for block builders.

Sub-penny fees democratize MEV extraction. On Ethereum, high gas costs create a natural economic barrier, limiting MEV competition to large, sophisticated searchers. Solana's negligible base fee removes this barrier, allowing any actor with a profitable strategy to participate, exponentially increasing the pool of competitors.

The MEV race shifts from discovery to execution. The low-cost environment makes the discovery of new MEV opportunities trivial; the real competition is now in latency and infrastructure. This mirrors high-frequency trading, where success depends on colocation, optimized clients, and private mempool access, not just strategy.

Evidence: The rise of Jito's dominance exemplifies this shift. By offering a private order flow auction and optimized client, Jito Labs captured over 50% of Solana blocks, demonstrating that infrastructure, not just intelligence, dictates MEV profits in a low-fee world.

thesis-statement
THE ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE

The Core Thesis: Low Fees = High-Velocity MEV

Solana's sub-penny transaction costs transform MEV from a periodic extraction into a continuous, high-frequency competition.

Sub-penny fees eliminate friction for MEV bots, enabling strategies that are economically impossible on high-fee chains like Ethereum. On Ethereum, a failed arbitrage attempt incurs a $10+ gas loss. On Solana, the same attempt costs less than a cent, making thousands of speculative transactions per second viable.

This creates a hyper-competitive environment where latency and execution precision dominate. The MEV race shifts from competing for a few high-value blocks to capturing millions of micro-opportunities across every slot. This is the high-velocity MEV regime, analogous to high-frequency trading in traditional markets.

The result is a new infrastructure arms race. Projects like Jito (for searcher tooling and bundles) and Triton (for RPC performance) are essential because winning requires sub-millisecond advantages. The economic model of validators is also reshaped, with Jito's MEV-boosted rewards becoming a significant revenue stream.

Evidence: Solana validators processed over $40 million in MEV rewards in Q1 2024, with a significant portion from high-frequency arbitrage and liquidations enabled by its low-fee environment. This dwarfs the per-validator MEV opportunity on comparably sized L2s.

THE FEE PRESSURE COOKER

MEV Economics: Ethereum vs. Solana

A first-principles comparison of how base fee structures and block production mechanics create divergent MEV landscapes.

Economic & Technical FeatureEthereum (Post-Merge)Solana (POH + Gulf Stream)

Base Fee per Standard Swap (USD)

$1.50 - $15.00

< $0.001

Priority Fee (Tip) as % of Base Fee

50% - 500%

10,000%+

Block Producer Revenue Source

~90% Priority Fees

~100% Priority Fees

Block Time / Slot Time

12 seconds

400 milliseconds

Block Builder-Separator Enforcement

Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)

None (Integrated)

Arbitrage Profit Threshold (USD)

$100 to be viable

$0.10 to be viable

Dominant MEV Strategy

Liquidations, DEX Arbitrage (large)

JIT Liquidity, DEX Arbitrage (micro)

Searcher Infrastructure Cost

High (dedicated RPC, builders)

Low (public RPC, spam)

deep-dive
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH

The Slippery Slope: From Efficiency to Congestion

Solana's ultra-low transaction fees create a perverse incentive structure that intensifies MEV extraction and network congestion.

Fee-based security is absent. Solana's sub-penny fees fail to act as a meaningful economic barrier, making spam and MEV-sniping attacks trivial to execute at scale.

MEV becomes the primary revenue source. With block rewards and fees negligible, validators and searchers rely on extracted value from arbitrage and liquidations, creating a hyper-competitive, zero-sum race.

Jito's dominance proves the model. The Jito client and auction now processes ~90% of Solana blocks, formalizing MEV as the core validator incentive and centralizing block-building power.

Congestion is a feature, not a bug. The low-fee environment guarantees that during high demand, the network becomes a free-for-all, where only the most sophisticated MEV bots succeed, degrading user experience.

protocol-spotlight
WHY SOLANA'S LOW FEES INTENSIFY THE MEV RACE

Protocol Spotlight: The MEV Infrastructure Stack

Sub-penny transaction costs create a hyper-competitive, high-frequency environment where traditional Ethereum MEV strategies are compressed and accelerated.

01

The Problem: Jito's Dominance and the PBS Mandate

Solana's lack of a native proposer-builder separation (PBS) forced the ecosystem to standardize on Jito's client. This created a centralized MEV supply chain where >90% of blocks contain Jito bundles, making it the de facto PBS layer and the primary extractor of $30M+ monthly MEV.

>90%
Bundle Saturation
$30M+
Monthly MEV
02

The Solution: Hyper-Specialized Searchers & Bots

With fees measured in fractions of a cent, the barrier to spam the mempool is negligible. This enables high-frequency arbitrage and liquidation bots to operate at a scale impossible on Ethereum. The race is won by sub-millisecond latency and custom hardware, not just sophisticated logic.

<$0.001
Tx Cost
~200ms
Arb Window
03

The Consequence: MEV Democratization vs. Centralization

Low fees theoretically democratize access, but the reality is a winner-take-most market. The need for colocation, custom RPCs (e.g., Triton), and private transaction propagation (via blink) creates a tiered system where retail users are perpetual liquidity for sophisticated actors.

1-2s
Public Delay
0ms
Private Delay
04

The Infrastructure: MEV as a Core Protocol Service

Unlike Ethereum's adversarial model, Solana's stack bakes MEV capture into the client (Jito) and standardizes it via system programs. This turns MEV from a parasitic extractor into a protocol revenue stream (via tips) and a liquidity source for stakers, aligning incentives but cementing infrastructure dominance.

100%
Tip Capture
~5%
Staker Yield Boost
05

The Arb Landscape: DEX Concentration Fuels Efficiency

>85% of Solana DEX volume flows through Raydium and Orca. This extreme liquidity concentration, combined with the low-fee environment, creates near-perfect arbitrage efficiency. MEV becomes less about exotic strategies and more about nanosecond execution on a few key pools.

>85%
DEX Volume Share
~0.1%
Typical Arb Spread
06

The Future: Firedancer and the Endgame

The upcoming Firedancer client from Jump Crypto is the existential threat to Jito's monopoly. By building a high-performance, MEV-aware validator from scratch, it aims to decentralize block production and could reshape the entire extractable value supply chain, potentially reducing searcher margins through increased competition.

1M+
Target TPS
New Stack
Client Design
counter-argument
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH

Counterpoint: Isn't This Just Efficient Market Making?

Solana's fee structure transforms MEV from a tax into a hyper-competitive, zero-sum arms race for block space.

Fee compression eliminates the buffer. On Ethereum, high base fees act as a tax, absorbing some MEV profit and subsidizing user costs. Solana's sub-penny fees remove this buffer, forcing searchers and validators into direct, cutthroat competition for the same finite profit pool.

The race is for priority, not price. This creates a priority gas auction on steroids. Searchers must outbid each other for the top of the block, not with fees but with Jito tip auctions and sophisticated latency advantages, as the base fee provides no meaningful ordering signal.

Validators become extractive gatekeepers. With minimal fee revenue, validators' economic incentive shifts entirely to maximizing MEV capture via bundles. This centralizes power in entities like Jito Labs that operate the infrastructure for this extraction, creating a systemic reliance on a few players.

Evidence: Jito's Solana MEV revenue frequently surpasses its Ethereum counterpart in absolute terms, despite a ~20x smaller TVL, proving the intensity of the race. The ecosystem now depends on tools like the Jito Bundle and Mango Markets' priority fee system to function.

future-outlook
THE INCENTIVE SHIFT

Future Outlook: The Fee Pressure Cooker

Solana's sub-penny transaction fees fundamentally alter the MEV game, forcing searchers to operate at unprecedented scale and sophistication.

Low fees compress margins. On Ethereum, a successful arbitrage can justify a $100 gas fee. On Solana, the same trade pays $0.001, so profitability demands massive volume. Searchers must execute thousands of trades per second to match Ethereum-scale revenue, creating a high-volume, low-margin business model.

This necessitates hyper-optimized infrastructure. The race shifts from paying the highest priority fee to building the fastest, most efficient Jito-like searcher client. Winners will run custom Firedancer forks with direct memory access, not standard RPC nodes. Latency differences of microseconds determine profitability.

The MEV supply chain consolidates. Individual searchers get priced out. Specialized MEV firms like Jump Crypto or Citadel Securities, with colocated servers and private order flow, dominate. The ecosystem centralizes around a few entities that can amortize infrastructure costs over billions of micro-transactions.

Evidence: Jito's validator client already captures over 40% of Solana's stake weight by sharing MEV revenue. This model will expand as fee pressure intensifies, turning block production into a loss-leader for backend trading profits.

takeaways
THE FEE FRONTIER

Key Takeaways

Solana's sub-penny transaction costs have fundamentally reshaped the MEV landscape, turning every swap into a high-stakes, high-frequency competition.

01

The Problem: Jito's Dominance and the Bundling Arms Race

With fees near-zero, searchers must compete on speed and scale, not cost. Jito's ~$1.8B in extracted MEV shows the value of bundling transactions and controlling block space. This centralizes power in a few sophisticated actors who can afford the infrastructure.

  • Centralized Power: Top 5 searchers capture ~70% of MEV.
  • Infrastructure Barrier: Requires colocation, custom clients, and ~200ms latency tolerance.
~70%
Top Searcher Share
200ms
Latency Race
02

The Solution: In-protocol Auctions & Fair Sequencing

Protocols are moving MEV capture on-chain to democratize access and return value to users. This shifts the race from off-chain infrastructure to on-chain bidding.

  • Fee Recipients: Programs like Meteora's DLMM direct arbitrage profits back to LPs.
  • Order Flow Auctions: Mechanisms akin to CowSwap or UniswapX can be built natively, allowing searchers to bid for the right to execute.
  • Fair Sequencing: A validator-level primitive to order transactions by receipt time, not bid.
On-Chain
Auction Shift
LP Rebates
Value Redistribution
03

The Consequence: MEV as a Protocol Design Primitive

Low fees make MEV unavoidable, forcing it to be a first-class design constraint. The winning protocols will be those that internalize and productize extractable value.

  • Native Integration: Expect AMMs with built-in OFAs and Jito-like bundles as a service.
  • New Attack Vectors: Time-bandit attacks and latency arbitrage become more profitable than simple sandwiching.
  • Validator Economics: Stake-weighted MEV rewards could rival base inflation, altering consensus security assumptions.
Design-First
MEV Approach
New Vectors
Attack Surface
04

The Benchmark: Ethereum's PBS vs. Solana's Free-For-All

Ethereum's Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) via mev-boost formalizes the market. Solana's model is a raw, pre-PBS free-for-all where the fastest validator wins. This creates a natural experiment in MEV market structure.

  • Formalized vs. Ad-hoc: PBS creates clear roles; Solana's roles are blurred and contested.
  • Throughput Impact: ~3k TPS enables more complex, composite MEV strategies impossible on Ethereum.
  • Regulatory Clarity: Explicit auctions may face less scrutiny than opaque off-chain deals.
PBS vs. Raw
Market Structure
3k TPS
Strategy Scale
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team