Sub-penny fees democratize MEV extraction. On Ethereum, high gas costs create a natural economic barrier, limiting MEV competition to large, sophisticated searchers. Solana's negligible base fee removes this barrier, allowing any actor with a profitable strategy to participate, exponentially increasing the pool of competitors.
Why Solana's Low Fees Intensify the MEV Race
Solana's core advantage—sub-cent fees—has an unintended consequence: it supercharges MEV. This analysis explores how cheap failure costs create a bot free-for-all, turning network speed into a double-edged sword.
Introduction
Solana's sub-penny transaction costs have transformed MEV from a niche concern into the primary competitive arena for block builders.
The MEV race shifts from discovery to execution. The low-cost environment makes the discovery of new MEV opportunities trivial; the real competition is now in latency and infrastructure. This mirrors high-frequency trading, where success depends on colocation, optimized clients, and private mempool access, not just strategy.
Evidence: The rise of Jito's dominance exemplifies this shift. By offering a private order flow auction and optimized client, Jito Labs captured over 50% of Solana blocks, demonstrating that infrastructure, not just intelligence, dictates MEV profits in a low-fee world.
Executive Summary
Solana's sub-penny transaction fees have created a hyper-competitive environment where traditional revenue streams for validators are compressed, forcing a strategic pivot to MEV extraction as a primary economic engine.
The Fee Compression Problem
With fees averaging $0.0001-$0.001, Solana validators earn negligible revenue from base transaction processing. This makes block rewards and MEV the dominant income sources, intensifying the race to capture every cent of extractable value.
- ~$0.00025: Avg. priority fee per transaction.
- >90%: Validator revenue from MEV + inflation, not base fees.
Jito's Dominant Solution
The Jito Network introduced a formalized MEV supply chain with a permissionless mempool and auction mechanism. It redirects MEV profits from searchers back to validators and stakers via MEV-boosted staking rewards, creating a new, fee-critical revenue layer.
- ~$1.8B+: Total Value Locked in JitoSOL.
- ~8-15%: Historical APY boost from MEV rewards.
The Searcher Arms Race
Ultra-low fees enable high-frequency, low-margin MEV strategies (e.g., arbitrage, liquidations) that are uneconomical on higher-fee chains like Ethereum. This attracts sophisticated, well-capitalized players, raising the technical barrier to entry.
- Sub-second latency requirements for profitable arb.
- Flashbots SUAVE-like private order flow is emerging as a counter.
The Centralization Tension
Efficient MEV extraction favors large, co-located validator operations with custom hardware and direct peering. This creates a feedback loop where top validators earn more from MEV, can afford better infrastructure, and further centralize stake—directly opposing Solana's Nakamoto Coefficient goals.
- Top 10 validators control ~33% of stake.
- MEV rewards are a key driver of this concentration.
The Core Thesis: Low Fees = High-Velocity MEV
Solana's sub-penny transaction costs transform MEV from a periodic extraction into a continuous, high-frequency competition.
Sub-penny fees eliminate friction for MEV bots, enabling strategies that are economically impossible on high-fee chains like Ethereum. On Ethereum, a failed arbitrage attempt incurs a $10+ gas loss. On Solana, the same attempt costs less than a cent, making thousands of speculative transactions per second viable.
This creates a hyper-competitive environment where latency and execution precision dominate. The MEV race shifts from competing for a few high-value blocks to capturing millions of micro-opportunities across every slot. This is the high-velocity MEV regime, analogous to high-frequency trading in traditional markets.
The result is a new infrastructure arms race. Projects like Jito (for searcher tooling and bundles) and Triton (for RPC performance) are essential because winning requires sub-millisecond advantages. The economic model of validators is also reshaped, with Jito's MEV-boosted rewards becoming a significant revenue stream.
Evidence: Solana validators processed over $40 million in MEV rewards in Q1 2024, with a significant portion from high-frequency arbitrage and liquidations enabled by its low-fee environment. This dwarfs the per-validator MEV opportunity on comparably sized L2s.
MEV Economics: Ethereum vs. Solana
A first-principles comparison of how base fee structures and block production mechanics create divergent MEV landscapes.
| Economic & Technical Feature | Ethereum (Post-Merge) | Solana (POH + Gulf Stream) |
|---|---|---|
Base Fee per Standard Swap (USD) | $1.50 - $15.00 | < $0.001 |
Priority Fee (Tip) as % of Base Fee | 50% - 500% | 10,000%+ |
Block Producer Revenue Source | ~90% Priority Fees | ~100% Priority Fees |
Block Time / Slot Time | 12 seconds | 400 milliseconds |
Block Builder-Separator Enforcement | Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) | None (Integrated) |
Arbitrage Profit Threshold (USD) |
|
|
Dominant MEV Strategy | Liquidations, DEX Arbitrage (large) | JIT Liquidity, DEX Arbitrage (micro) |
Searcher Infrastructure Cost | High (dedicated RPC, builders) | Low (public RPC, spam) |
The Slippery Slope: From Efficiency to Congestion
Solana's ultra-low transaction fees create a perverse incentive structure that intensifies MEV extraction and network congestion.
Fee-based security is absent. Solana's sub-penny fees fail to act as a meaningful economic barrier, making spam and MEV-sniping attacks trivial to execute at scale.
MEV becomes the primary revenue source. With block rewards and fees negligible, validators and searchers rely on extracted value from arbitrage and liquidations, creating a hyper-competitive, zero-sum race.
Jito's dominance proves the model. The Jito client and auction now processes ~90% of Solana blocks, formalizing MEV as the core validator incentive and centralizing block-building power.
Congestion is a feature, not a bug. The low-fee environment guarantees that during high demand, the network becomes a free-for-all, where only the most sophisticated MEV bots succeed, degrading user experience.
Protocol Spotlight: The MEV Infrastructure Stack
Sub-penny transaction costs create a hyper-competitive, high-frequency environment where traditional Ethereum MEV strategies are compressed and accelerated.
The Problem: Jito's Dominance and the PBS Mandate
Solana's lack of a native proposer-builder separation (PBS) forced the ecosystem to standardize on Jito's client. This created a centralized MEV supply chain where >90% of blocks contain Jito bundles, making it the de facto PBS layer and the primary extractor of $30M+ monthly MEV.
The Solution: Hyper-Specialized Searchers & Bots
With fees measured in fractions of a cent, the barrier to spam the mempool is negligible. This enables high-frequency arbitrage and liquidation bots to operate at a scale impossible on Ethereum. The race is won by sub-millisecond latency and custom hardware, not just sophisticated logic.
The Consequence: MEV Democratization vs. Centralization
Low fees theoretically democratize access, but the reality is a winner-take-most market. The need for colocation, custom RPCs (e.g., Triton), and private transaction propagation (via blink) creates a tiered system where retail users are perpetual liquidity for sophisticated actors.
The Infrastructure: MEV as a Core Protocol Service
Unlike Ethereum's adversarial model, Solana's stack bakes MEV capture into the client (Jito) and standardizes it via system programs. This turns MEV from a parasitic extractor into a protocol revenue stream (via tips) and a liquidity source for stakers, aligning incentives but cementing infrastructure dominance.
The Arb Landscape: DEX Concentration Fuels Efficiency
>85% of Solana DEX volume flows through Raydium and Orca. This extreme liquidity concentration, combined with the low-fee environment, creates near-perfect arbitrage efficiency. MEV becomes less about exotic strategies and more about nanosecond execution on a few key pools.
The Future: Firedancer and the Endgame
The upcoming Firedancer client from Jump Crypto is the existential threat to Jito's monopoly. By building a high-performance, MEV-aware validator from scratch, it aims to decentralize block production and could reshape the entire extractable value supply chain, potentially reducing searcher margins through increased competition.
Counterpoint: Isn't This Just Efficient Market Making?
Solana's fee structure transforms MEV from a tax into a hyper-competitive, zero-sum arms race for block space.
Fee compression eliminates the buffer. On Ethereum, high base fees act as a tax, absorbing some MEV profit and subsidizing user costs. Solana's sub-penny fees remove this buffer, forcing searchers and validators into direct, cutthroat competition for the same finite profit pool.
The race is for priority, not price. This creates a priority gas auction on steroids. Searchers must outbid each other for the top of the block, not with fees but with Jito tip auctions and sophisticated latency advantages, as the base fee provides no meaningful ordering signal.
Validators become extractive gatekeepers. With minimal fee revenue, validators' economic incentive shifts entirely to maximizing MEV capture via bundles. This centralizes power in entities like Jito Labs that operate the infrastructure for this extraction, creating a systemic reliance on a few players.
Evidence: Jito's Solana MEV revenue frequently surpasses its Ethereum counterpart in absolute terms, despite a ~20x smaller TVL, proving the intensity of the race. The ecosystem now depends on tools like the Jito Bundle and Mango Markets' priority fee system to function.
Future Outlook: The Fee Pressure Cooker
Solana's sub-penny transaction fees fundamentally alter the MEV game, forcing searchers to operate at unprecedented scale and sophistication.
Low fees compress margins. On Ethereum, a successful arbitrage can justify a $100 gas fee. On Solana, the same trade pays $0.001, so profitability demands massive volume. Searchers must execute thousands of trades per second to match Ethereum-scale revenue, creating a high-volume, low-margin business model.
This necessitates hyper-optimized infrastructure. The race shifts from paying the highest priority fee to building the fastest, most efficient Jito-like searcher client. Winners will run custom Firedancer forks with direct memory access, not standard RPC nodes. Latency differences of microseconds determine profitability.
The MEV supply chain consolidates. Individual searchers get priced out. Specialized MEV firms like Jump Crypto or Citadel Securities, with colocated servers and private order flow, dominate. The ecosystem centralizes around a few entities that can amortize infrastructure costs over billions of micro-transactions.
Evidence: Jito's validator client already captures over 40% of Solana's stake weight by sharing MEV revenue. This model will expand as fee pressure intensifies, turning block production into a loss-leader for backend trading profits.
Key Takeaways
Solana's sub-penny transaction costs have fundamentally reshaped the MEV landscape, turning every swap into a high-stakes, high-frequency competition.
The Problem: Jito's Dominance and the Bundling Arms Race
With fees near-zero, searchers must compete on speed and scale, not cost. Jito's ~$1.8B in extracted MEV shows the value of bundling transactions and controlling block space. This centralizes power in a few sophisticated actors who can afford the infrastructure.
- Centralized Power: Top 5 searchers capture ~70% of MEV.
- Infrastructure Barrier: Requires colocation, custom clients, and ~200ms latency tolerance.
The Solution: In-protocol Auctions & Fair Sequencing
Protocols are moving MEV capture on-chain to democratize access and return value to users. This shifts the race from off-chain infrastructure to on-chain bidding.
- Fee Recipients: Programs like Meteora's DLMM direct arbitrage profits back to LPs.
- Order Flow Auctions: Mechanisms akin to CowSwap or UniswapX can be built natively, allowing searchers to bid for the right to execute.
- Fair Sequencing: A validator-level primitive to order transactions by receipt time, not bid.
The Consequence: MEV as a Protocol Design Primitive
Low fees make MEV unavoidable, forcing it to be a first-class design constraint. The winning protocols will be those that internalize and productize extractable value.
- Native Integration: Expect AMMs with built-in OFAs and Jito-like bundles as a service.
- New Attack Vectors: Time-bandit attacks and latency arbitrage become more profitable than simple sandwiching.
- Validator Economics: Stake-weighted MEV rewards could rival base inflation, altering consensus security assumptions.
The Benchmark: Ethereum's PBS vs. Solana's Free-For-All
Ethereum's Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) via mev-boost formalizes the market. Solana's model is a raw, pre-PBS free-for-all where the fastest validator wins. This creates a natural experiment in MEV market structure.
- Formalized vs. Ad-hoc: PBS creates clear roles; Solana's roles are blurred and contested.
- Throughput Impact: ~3k TPS enables more complex, composite MEV strategies impossible on Ethereum.
- Regulatory Clarity: Explicit auctions may face less scrutiny than opaque off-chain deals.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.