Batch economics are incompatible with stream reality. Blockchains like Ethereum and Solana optimize for discrete, high-value financial transactions, where finality and atomicity are paramount. DePIN networks from Helium and Hivemapper generate continuous telemetry and sensor data, which is low-value per unit but critical in aggregate.
solana-and-the-rise-of-high-performance-chains
Blog
Why DePIN Demands a Blockchain Built for Continuous Data Streams
Financial blockchains batch transactions. DePIN devices stream data. This post argues that Solana's architecture, optimized for constant throughput, is the necessary substrate for the next wave of physical infrastructure, while batch-oriented chains like Ethereum create systemic friction.
introduction
THE DATA
The Fatal Mismatch: Batch Economics vs. Stream Reality
Blockchains built for discrete transactions fail under the continuous, high-volume data streams that power DePIN networks.
Streaming data breaks consensus models. Traditional block production creates artificial latency and forces continuous data into discrete, expensive blocks. This imposes a gas fee per data point, a model that economically strangles applications requiring real-time state updates, unlike the batched settlements of UniswapX or Across.
The mismatch creates perverse incentives. Miners/validators prioritize fee-rich DeFi arbitrage over cheap sensor data, leading to network congestion and data loss. This is the exact opposite of DePIN's requirement for predictable, low-cost data finality to trigger real-world actions and oracle updates.
Evidence: A single Hivemapper dashcam generates ~4GB of data daily. On Ethereum, submitting this as calldata would cost over $1M at 10 gwei. Even L2s like Arbitrum, which batch transactions, are not designed for this data firehose, proving the need for a native stream layer.
key-trends
WHY GENERAL-PURPOSE CHAINS FAIL
The DePIN Data Reality: Three Unforgiving Trends
DePIN's value is in real-world data, not token transfers. Legacy blockchains built for discrete transactions crumble under the weight of continuous, high-frequency telemetry.
01
The Problem: Event-Driven Architecture vs. Data Streams
Ethereum and Solana are optimized for discrete, atomic events (e.g., a swap, an NFT mint). DePIN devices generate continuous, high-frequency telemetry (e.g., sensor readings, GPS pings). Forcing this into an event model creates massive inefficiency and cost.
- Inefficient State Bloat: Storing every data point as a transaction bloats state and kills sync times.
- Prohibitive Cost: Paying L1 gas for every 5-second sensor update is economically impossible.
- Latency Mismatch: Block times (2-12 seconds) are too slow for real-time control loops.
1000x
More Data Points
$1M+
Annual Gas Waste
02
The Solution: A Native Stream Processing Layer
The chain must treat data as a first-class primitive, not a transaction payload. This requires a dedicated data layer that can ingest, compress, and verify streams off-core before committing verifiable summaries.
- Stream Compression: Aggregate thousands of data points into a single, verifiable proof (think zk-proofs of data integrity).
- Off-Chain Computation: Perform filtering, aggregation, and ML inference at the edge, only committing results.
- Real-Time Subscriptions: Enable low-latency data feeds for applications, akin to Chainlink Functions but natively integrated.
-99%
On-Chain Footprint
<100ms
Feed Latency
03
The Problem: Monolithic State vs. Partitioned Reality
Every DePIN node validating the entire global state (like in Ethereum) is absurd. A Helium hotspot in Lisbon doesn't need the state of a weather sensor network in Tokyo. Monolithic state forces all devices to pay for storage and compute they never use.
- Unscalable Hardware Requirements: Light clients aren't enough; full nodes become impossible for resource-constrained devices.
- Cross-Subsidy Inefficiency: Device operators in one subnetwork subsidize the storage costs of unrelated networks.
- Slow Finality: Global consensus on local data introduces unnecessary latency.
10TB+
Useless State
~2s
Wasted Finality
04
The Solution: Intent-Centric, Sparse State Validation
The chain should validate only the state relevant to a specific intent or subnetwork. This is a shift from 'validate everything' to 'validate what you care about', enabled by fraud proofs and data availability sampling.
- Sovereign Subnets / Rollups: DePIN networks operate as their own execution environments (like Celestia rollups or Avail subnets), settling to a shared security layer.
- Proof-of-Location & Physical Work: Integrate cryptographic proofs of physical activity (like Proof of Location or Proof of Bandwidth) directly into consensus.
- Localized Finality: Achieve sub-second finality for actions within a local mesh network.
1000x
Throughput Gain
<1s
Local Finality
05
The Problem: Static Smart Contracts vs. Dynamic Oracles
DePIN logic must react to real-world conditions (temperature thresholds, grid load). Static smart contracts require constant, expensive oracle updates (e.g., Chainlink). This creates a critical dependency, latency, and a single point of failure for the entire economic model.
- Oracle Latency Bottleneck: The control loop speed is gated by oracle update frequency.
- Centralization Risk: Reliance on a handful of oracle nodes contradicts DePIN's decentralized ethos.
- High Operational Cost: Continuous data feeds from oracles are a major, recurring OPEX.
2-5s
Oracle Lag
$10K+/mo
Feed Cost
06
The Solution: Autonomous Agents & Verifiable Compute
Embed the 'oracle' and the logic into a single, verifiable autonomous agent that runs at the edge. The chain's role shifts to verifying the correct execution of off-chain compute over streamed data, not the data itself.
- On-Device Verifiable Compute: Devices run logic and generate zk-proofs or optimistic fraud proofs of correct execution.
- Conditional Micro-Payments: Stream payments automatically trigger based on verified proof of work/data (similar to Superfluid streams but for physical work).
- Resilient Mesh Logic: Agent-based coordination enables complex, offline-first network behavior.
Zero
Oracle Dependency
Auto-Exec
Payments
DEPIN INFRASTRUCTURE
Architectural Showdown: Batch vs. Stream-Optimized Chains
A first-principles comparison of blockchain architectures for DePIN data ingestion, highlighting the fundamental mismatch of batch-first designs.
| Core Architectural Feature | Batch-Optimized (e.g., Ethereum, Arbitrum) | Stream-Optimized (e.g., Solana, Monad) | DePIN-Specialized (e.g., peaq, IoTeX) |
|---|---|---|---|
State Update Latency | 12-15 seconds (L1), ~2 seconds (L2) | < 400 milliseconds | < 1 second |
Native Data Ingestion Model | Transaction-based, discrete events | Continuous ledger, global state stream | Device-native, sensor data primitives |
Cost Model for Micro-Data | Prohibitive ($0.10+ per tx) | Sub-cent per micro-transaction | Pre-paid data bundles, < $0.001 per event |
Throughput (TPS) for 1KB Payloads | ~15-100 TPS (theoretical) | 2,000-10,000+ TPS (sustained) | Configurable, 1,000-5,000 TPS target |
Finality for Sensor Consensus | Probabilistic (minutes to hours) | Deterministic (< 1 second) | Deterministic with device attestation (< 2 seconds) |
Native Oracle Integration | External required (Chainlink, Pyth) | First-class primitives (Pyth native) | Built-in hardware oracle modules |
State Bloat from IoT Data | Unbounded, user-pays storage | Prunable, protocol-managed state | Off-chain data lakes with on-chain proofs |
Sovereign Device Identity | Smart contract wallet (EOA/AA) | Program Derived Address (PDA) system | Decentralized Identifier (DID) standard |
deep-dive
THE DATA PIPELINE
Solana's Throughput Engine: More Than Just High TPS
DePIN's economic model requires a blockchain that functions as a deterministic, high-frequency settlement layer for continuous microtransactions.
DePIN's core mechanic is micropayments. Devices like Helium hotspots or Hivemapper dashcams generate a constant stream of verifiable data that must be settled on-chain. This creates a continuous data pipeline that demands predictable, low-cost finality, not just bursty transaction capacity.
Solana's architecture is a real-time ledger. Its single global state and parallel execution via Sealevel process transactions deterministically. This contrasts with the asynchronous execution models of Ethereum L2s like Arbitrum or Optimism, where sequencing and proving create latency unsuitable for real-time device coordination.
Throughput without finality is useless. A network like Solana, with 400ms block times and sub-second finality, provides the deterministic settlement DePINs require. This is why protocols like Helium and io.net migrated to Solana, trading modular flexibility for the raw performance their physical networks demand.
Evidence: The Helium Migration. Helium's move from its own L1 to Solana in 2023 proved the thesis. Its millions of devices now settle Proof-of-Coverage and data transfer transactions on a shared, high-throughput state machine, enabling an economic model impossible on slower, more expensive chains.
counter-argument
THE DATA MISMATCH
The L2 Copium: Why Rollups and Subnets Aren't a Panacea
DePIN's real-time data streams expose the fundamental architectural mismatch with batch-oriented L2s and subnets.
Batch processing is the bottleneck. Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism aggregate transactions into discrete blocks for settlement on Ethereum. This creates inherent latency that breaks real-time sensor updates and device coordination.
Subnets fragment liquidity and security. Avalanche subnets or Polygon Supernets silone data and value. A DePIN device on one subnet cannot natively interact with an oracle on another without a complex bridge like LayerZero.
Sequencer centralization creates a single point of failure. Most L2s rely on a single sequencer for ordering. This centralized component becomes a critical vulnerability for a global network of physical infrastructure.
Evidence: Helium's migration from its own L1 to Solana proves the cost of a poor architectural fit. Its original chain struggled with throughput for simple device onboarding, not continuous data.
takeaways
WHY DEPIN NEEDS A NEW STACK
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
DePIN's real-time, high-throughput data flows break the assumptions of general-purpose L1s and demand a purpose-built data layer.
01
The Problem: State Bloat from Sensor Spam
General-purpose chains treat every data point as immutable state, leading to unsustainable growth. A DePIN node streaming 1KB/sec generates 86MB/day of permanent, expensive chain bloat.
- Key Benefit 1: Separates ephemeral telemetry from permanent settlements.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables 1000x higher data throughput without proportional state growth.
86MB/day
Per Node Bloat
1000x
Throughput Cap
02
The Solution: Streaming Data Oracles
Architectures like Chainlink Functions or Pyth's high-frequency feeds show the way, but DePIN needs this as a first-class primitive, not an add-on.
- Key Benefit 1: Sub-second data attestation with ~500ms finality for real-time control loops.
- Key Benefit 2: Cryptographic proofs of data origin and sequencing, not just result delivery.
~500ms
Data Finality
ZK Proofs
Verification
03
The Problem: Unpredictable, Prohibitive Cost
Volatile gas fees on Ethereum or even Solana during congestion make operational costs for continuous data submission untenable. A sensor network cannot budget with 100x gas spikes.
- Key Benefit 1: Predictable, minimal fee market decoupled from L1 auction dynamics.
- Key Benefit 2: ~$0.001 per 1MB data batch, enabling micro-transaction economics.
100x
Fee Spikes
~$0.001
Target Cost/MB
04
The Solution: Sovereign Data Rollups
Adopt the Celestia modular thesis: a DePIN-specific execution layer (Rollup) for data processing, settling proofs to a parent chain. Similar to how Fuel optimizes for UTXO throughput.
- Key Benefit 1: Custom VM optimized for sensor data aggregation and proof generation.
- Key Benefit 2: Inherits base-layer security without its performance constraints.
Modular
Architecture
Custom VM
Execution
05
The Problem: Siloed Data, Lost Composability
Off-chain data lakes (AWS, centralized servers) kill network effects. DePIN data must be a programmable, trust-minimized asset for downstream dApps like dynamic Helium roaming, Hivemapper map markets, or Render job auctions.
- Key Benefit 1: On-chain data availability enables permissionless innovation atop the physical stream.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates a data liquidity layer, turning sensors into financial primitives.
Data Liquidity
New Primitive
Permissionless
Innovation
06
The Solution: Verifiable Compute at the Edge
Inspired by Espresso Systems' shared sequencer or RISC Zero's zkVM. Move computation to the data source (edge device), submitting only validity proofs. This is the zkML paradigm applied to physical infrastructure.
- Key Benefit 1: Reduces required bandwidth by 99%+ by sending proofs, not raw data.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables trustless automation (e.g., a turbine adjusting pitch based on proven wind speed).
99%+
Bandwidth Saved
zkVM
Edge Proof
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall