On-chain computation is the cost center. Every price update from an oracle like Chainlink or Pyth requires a validator to execute a transaction, paying gas for data verification and aggregation logic directly on the L1 or L2. This model linearly scales cost with update frequency and validator count.
smart-contract-auditing-and-best-practices
Blog
The Future of Oracles Demands Minimal On-Chain Computation
The current model of on-chain aggregation is unsustainable. Winning oracle designs will treat the blockchain as a final verification layer, not a computation engine. This analysis explores the architectural shift towards off-chain validation, spotlighting protocols like Chainlink CCIP and Pyth Network that are leading the charge.
introduction
THE COMPUTATION COST
The Gas Trap: Why Your Oracle is Burning Cash
Traditional oracle designs force expensive on-chain computation, creating a direct and unsustainable cost for every data update.
The future is minimal on-chain state. Modern oracles like Pyth push pull-based updates and low-latency attestations to minimize on-chain work. The protocol stores only a verified price and timestamp on-chain, moving the heavy lifting of data sourcing and consensus off-chain.
Proofs replace recomputation. Instead of having multiple nodes redundantly submit data, systems like EigenLayer AVS operators or Brevis coChain ZK coprocessors generate succinct cryptographic proofs off-chain. The on-chain contract only verifies a single proof, collapsing gas costs by orders of magnitude.
Evidence: Chainlink Data Streams reduced gas costs for perpetual protocols by ~90% by moving aggregation off-chain and posting only a final signed value. This shift from push to pull is the new baseline.
thesis-statement
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT
The Core Argument: Verification, Not Computation
The next generation of oracles will move expensive computation off-chain, delivering only cryptographic verification to the smart contract.
On-chain computation is a tax. Every gas unit spent on-chain is a direct cost to the user and a constraint on scalability. Oracle designs that push heavy data aggregation or model inference on-chain, like early Chainlink feeds, create unsustainable bottlenecks for high-frequency DeFi.
The future is ZK-verified states. Protocols like Chainlink Functions and Pragma demonstrate the model: compute off-chain, deliver a succinct proof. The smart contract's job is to verify the proof's validity, not recalculate the result, slashing gas costs by orders of magnitude.
This mirrors the L2 evolution. Just as Arbitrum and zkSync move execution off-chain and post validity proofs, modern oracles must adopt a similar verification-centric architecture. The oracle network becomes a verifiable compute layer, not just a data pipe.
Evidence: A basic Chainlink ETH/USD update costs ~150k gas. A zk-proof verification for a complex price feed, as demonstrated by Herodotus for storage proofs, can be under 50k gas while securing far more sophisticated data.
key-trends
THE FUTURE OF ORACLES
Three Architectural Shifts Defining the Next Era
The current oracle model of pushing raw data on-chain is a gas-guzzling relic. The next era demands minimal on-chain computation, shifting intelligence to the network edge.
01
The Problem: On-Chain Computation is a Bottleneck
Pushing raw price feeds and executing complex logic on-chain is prohibitively expensive and slow. Every data point and conditional check burns gas, limiting oracle utility to simple price feeds for DeFi.
- Cost: A single Chainlink update can cost $5-$50+ in gas, scaling linearly with data complexity.
- Latency: On-chain verification adds ~1-12 seconds of finality delay, making high-frequency data impossible.
- Capability: Complex computations (e.g., TWAPs, volatility indices) are economically unfeasible to run on-chain for each request.
$50+
Gas Cost
~12s
Added Latency
02
The Solution: Verifiable Off-Chain Computation (e.g., DECO, zkOracle)
Move the heavy lifting off-chain and submit only cryptographic proofs of correct execution. This leverages Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) or TLS-based attestations to guarantee data integrity without re-execution.
- Efficiency: Prove the result of a 1-hour TWAP calculation with a single ~45kb zk-SNARK, reducing cost by >99%.
- Privacy: Protocols like DECO can query private, permissioned data sources (e.g., bank APIs) without exposing raw data.
- Verifiability: The on-chain contract only verifies a proof, a constant-time operation, enabling complex data feeds and cross-chain states.
>99%
Cost Reduced
~45kb
Proof Size
03
The Shift: From Data Delivery to Attestation Networks
Oracles evolve from data pushers to decentralized attestation networks. Nodes become attestation producers, signing statements about real-world state or computation results.
- Scalability: Networks like HyperOracle and Brevis attest to historical states and custom computations, feeding AI inference or RWA collateral health to smart contracts.
- Composability: A single attestation (e.g., "Account X has credit score Y") can be reused across multiple protocols, creating a web of verifiable facts.
- Security: The security model shifts from costly on-chain aggregation to economic security and cryptographic fraud/validity proofs off-chain.
Unlimited
Data Types
Multi-Use
Attestations
ORACLE ARCHITECTURE
Gas Cost Analysis: On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Verification
Quantifying the on-chain gas overhead of different oracle verification models for a single price feed update.
| Verification Model | On-Chain (e.g., Chainlink Data Feed) | Optimistic (e.g., Pyth Network) | ZK-Verified (e.g., zkOracle) |
|---|---|---|---|
Typical Gas Cost per Update | 150k - 250k gas | 45k - 80k gas | 15k - 30k gas |
On-Chain Signature Verification | |||
On-Chain State Proof Verification | |||
Latency to Finality | < 3 sec | ~400 ms + challenge period | ~400 ms |
Trust Assumption | N-of-M Honest Committee | 1-of-N Honest Attester | Cryptographic Validity |
Primary Cost Driver | Multi-signature aggregation & storage | Single signature check & storage | ZK proof verification (~10k gas) |
Data Update Frequency Feasibility | ~12-15 sec (Ethereum) | < 1 sec | < 1 sec |
Example Protocols | Chainlink, WINkLink | Pyth, UMA Optimistic Oracle | Brevis, Herodotus, Lagrange |
deep-dive
THE ORACLE SHIFT
Deconstructing the New Blueprint: From Chainlink to Pyth
The next-generation oracle design moves critical computation off-chain to deliver faster, cheaper, and more complex data.
Pull-based architectures are winning. Protocols like Pyth and Chronicle use a pull model where data is stored on-chain and consumed on-demand. This eliminates the gas-intensive push model where every update is a transaction. The result is lower latency and cost for high-frequency data.
The oracle is becoming a verifier. Instead of performing complex calculations on-chain, new designs push computation to the client or a dedicated off-chain network. The on-chain component only verifies a cryptographic proof, a pattern seen with zkOracles and EigenLayer AVSs. This reduces on-chain load by orders of magnitude.
Specialization fragments the market. Chainlink's generalized network is being unbundled by hyper-specialized oracles for niches like derivatives (Pyth), forex (UMA), or low-latency sports data. The winner-take-all dynamic is over; the future is a multi-oracle ecosystem where applications compose the best data source for each function.
Evidence: Pyth's pull-update consumes ~50k gas, a 90%+ reduction versus traditional push models. This enables sub-second price feeds for perpetuals on Hyperliquid and Drift Protocol, which was previously impossible.
counter-argument
THE TRUST BOUNDARY
The Security Fallacy: Is Off-Chain Really Trustless?
On-chain computation is the only verifiable trust boundary; off-chain data must be minimized to reduce systemic risk.
On-chain verification is non-negotiable. Trustlessness requires deterministic, public verification of state transitions. Off-chain computation, as used by Chainlink Functions or Pyth's pull oracle, creates a trust boundary where the result is a black box. The system only trusts the attestation, not the computation itself.
Minimal on-chain footprints reduce attack surfaces. Protocols like dYdX v4 move order books off-chain but settle on a verifiable sequencer. The security model shifts from validating every trade to validating the sequencer's proof. This is the correct architectural trade-off.
The oracle's role is data attestation, not execution. Oracles like Pyth and Chainlink CCIP attest to data authenticity. The smart contract must perform the final computation. Delegating logic to an oracle, as seen in some DeFi options protocols, reintroduces the trusted intermediary.
Evidence: Chainlink's DECO protocol uses zero-knowledge proofs to cryptographically verify web data without revealing it, but the zk-SNARK verification still occurs on-chain. This proves the principle: trust is minimized by moving verification, not delegation, on-chain.
protocol-spotlight
THE FUTURE OF ORACLES
Protocols Architecting the Minimalist Future
The next generation of oracles moves computation off-chain, delivering verified outcomes with minimal on-chain footprint.
01
Pyth Network: The Pull Oracle Standard
Shifts the cost model from continuous on-chain pushes to on-demand pulls. Protocols request data only when needed, paying for finality.
- On-demand updates eliminate gas waste from unused data streams
- First-party publishers like CBOE and Binance provide signed data directly
- Wormhole cross-chain messaging enables a single source of truth for all chains
~400ms
Latency
$2B+
Secured Value
02
Chainlink CCIP: Programmable Off-Chain Computation
Extends the oracle model to arbitrary off-chain logic. Smart contracts request a computation, and CCIP returns a cryptographically verified result.
- Decouples complex logic from expensive on-chain execution
- Enables trust-minimized automation for cross-chain swaps and derivatives
- Leverages the existing decentralized oracle network for security
-90%
Gas Cost
100+
Services
03
API3 & dAPIs: First-Party Data Without Middlemen
Eliminates the intermediary node layer. Data providers operate their own oracle nodes, signing data directly for maximum transparency and minimal latency.
- No middleman markup reduces costs and points of failure
- Data provenance is cryptographically verifiable to the source
- Airnode architecture allows any API to become an oracle in minutes
1st Party
Source
<1s
Update Time
04
The Problem: On-Chain Oracles Are a Gas Guzzler
Traditional push oracles like Chainlink Data Feeds broadcast price updates to every chain continuously, regardless of demand.
- Wastes >70% of gas on updates no one uses
- Creates latency arbitrage opportunities for MEV bots
- Scales poorly with the number of supported assets and chains
$100M+
Annual Gas Waste
10s
Update Windows
05
The Solution: Verifiable Off-Chain Execution (VOE)
The end-state is a zero-knowledge oracle. Complex data aggregation and computation happen off-chain, with a succinct ZK proof posted on-chain.
- On-chain footprint is just a proof verification (~300k gas)
- Enables privacy-preserving data feeds (e.g., TWAPs, volatility)
- Projects like =nil; Foundation and Herodotus are pioneering this approach
~300k gas
On-Chain Cost
ZK Proof
Verification
06
Flare & Time-Weighted Avg. Prices (TWAPs)
Specializes in decentralized, high-frequency data. Uses a network of attestation providers to compute robust price averages directly on the Flare blockchain.
- Native oracle design integrates data acquisition into consensus
- Focus on TWAPs reduces vulnerability to flash loan manipulation
- FTSO system incentivizes honest reporting without centralized feeds
3-5s
Update Frequency
100+
Data Pairs
takeaways
THE NEW ORACLE STACK
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
The next generation of oracles will move computation off-chain to unlock new primitives and slash costs.
01
The Problem: On-Chain is a Bottleneck
Pushing raw data and complex logic on-chain is slow and expensive. Every price update or TWAP calculation consumes ~50k+ gas, limiting data freshness and protocol design.
- Cost Prohibitive: High-frequency data feeds are economically impossible.
- Latency Bound: Finality delays create arbitrage windows.
- Design Constraint: Complex derivatives and cross-chain logic are off the table.
50k+ gas
Per Update
~12s
Min Latency
02
The Solution: Off-Chain Proving & Attestation
Shift computation to high-performance off-chain networks (like Pythnet or Flare's FTSO) that produce verifiable attestations. On-chain contracts only need to verify a proof.
- Massive Throughput: Process 1000x more data points off-chain.
- Cost Collapse: On-chain verification can be ~90% cheaper than full computation.
- New Primitives: Enables verifiable VWAP, volatility feeds, and cross-chain state proofs.
90%
Cheaper
1000x
More Data
03
The Architecture: Layer-2 for Data
Oracles are becoming specialized data rollups. They batch attestations and settle finality on a base layer (Ethereum, Solana), inheriting security while operating at L2 speeds.
- Security Inheritance: Leverages base layer consensus for data finality.
- Modular Design: Decouples data sourcing, computation, and delivery.
- Interoperability: Can serve multiple chains from a single proving layer (see Wormhole, LayerZero).
L2 Speed
Execution
L1 Security
Settlement
04
The Endgame: Programmable Intent Fulfillment
Oracles evolve from data pipes to execution layers. They fulfill user intents (e.g., "swap at best price") by sourcing data, computing optimal routes, and proving correctness—all off-chain.
- Beyond Data: Becomes a verifiable solver for DeFi (akin to UniswapX, CowSwap).
- User Experience: Enables gasless, MEV-protected transactions.
- Protocol Synergy: Native integration with intent-based bridges like Across and Chainlink CCIP.
Intent-Based
Paradigm
Gasless UX
Enabled
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall