Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
security-post-mortems-hacks-and-exploits
Blog

Why Upgradeable Smart Contracts Are Gaming's Greatest Liability

An analysis of how the proxy pattern, a standard for contract upgradeability, creates systemic risk in blockchain gaming by centralizing control and introducing critical vulnerabilities like storage collisions.

introduction
THE BACKDOOR

Introduction

The upgradeable smart contract model, a standard in Web3 gaming, introduces a systemic and often overlooked risk that undermines the core value proposition of on-chain assets.

Upgradeability is a backdoor. It grants developers unilateral power to alter game logic, tokenomics, or asset behavior post-launch, directly contradicting the 'code is law' ethos that guarantees user asset sovereignty. This creates a principal-agent problem where player interests diverge from developer incentives.

The industry standard is flawed. Frameworks like OpenZeppelin's Upgradable Contracts and proxies from diamond standard (EIP-2535) are ubiquitous, making this risk a structural norm rather than an exception. The convenience for developers creates a permanent vulnerability for players.

Counter-intuitively, immutability is a feature. While traditional gaming relies on patches, blockchain's innovation is credible commitment. Games like Dark Forest prove complex logic can be immutable; the trade-off for 'fixability' is the systemic devaluation of in-game assets when trust is violated.

Evidence: The Axie Infinity Ronin bridge hack was enabled by a centralized, upgradeable multi-sig. While an exploit, it exemplifies the catastrophic failure mode of mutable control. Every upgradeable contract shares this architectural DNA of centralized control.

key-insights
THE IMMUTABILITY PARADOX

Executive Summary

The very feature that makes blockchains trustworthy—immutability—is being subverted by upgradeable contracts, creating systemic risk in the $90B+ gaming sector.

01

The Problem: Rug Pulls Disguised as Patches

Admin keys for upgradeable contracts are a single point of failure, enabling rug pulls masquerading as routine updates. This undermines the core value proposition of on-chain assets.

  • >90% of major gaming hacks involve compromised or malicious admin keys.
  • Creates permanent backdoors that invalidate asset ownership guarantees.
>90%
Hack Vector
$90B+
Sector at Risk
02

The Solution: Immutable Core + Diamond Pattern

Separate game logic from asset ownership. Use immutable, audited contracts for core assets (NFTs, tokens) and the EIP-2535 Diamond Standard for modular, upgradeable game logic.

  • Assets are permanently secure on an immutable base.
  • Game mechanics can evolve via facet upgrades without touching core holdings.
EIP-2535
Standard
0 Risk
Asset Rug
03

The Reality: DAO-Governed Upgrades Are Not Safe

Delegating upgrade keys to a DAO swaps a technical risk for a governance risk. Low voter turnout and whale dominance make these systems vulnerable to capture.

  • <5% voter participation is common, enabling minority control.
  • Governance attacks on projects like Beanstalk show the model's fragility.
<5%
Voter Turnout
$182M
Beanstalk Hack
04

The Fallback: Time-Locked & Transparent Upgrades

If upgrades are necessary, enforce a mandatory delay (e.g., 7-30 days) between proposal and execution. This creates an escape hatch for users.

  • Provides a credible exit window for players to withdraw assets.
  • Forces transparency, as malicious code can be analyzed by the community before activation.
7-30 Days
Safety Window
100%
Transparent
05

The Benchmark: Fully On-Chain Games Prove It's Possible

Projects like Dark Forest and 0xPARC's ecosystem demonstrate that complex, persistent games can be built with zero upgradeability. State is advanced via verifiable client proofs.

  • Eliminates the trust assumption entirely.
  • Sets the gold standard for credible neutrality in gaming.
0
Admin Keys
zk-SNARKs
Core Tech
06

The Verdict: Upgradeability Kills Composability

A mutable game contract is a black box that breaks the DeFi Lego. External protocols cannot build on assets whose underlying rules can change overnight.

  • Stifles innovation from the broader ecosystem (e.g., lending, fractionalization).
  • Reduces asset liquidity as risk-adjusted value plummets.
Broken
Money Lego
-50%+
Liquidity Penalty
thesis-statement
THE ARCHITECTURAL LIABILITY

The Core Flaw: Centralized Failure in a Decentralized World

Upgradeable smart contracts create a single point of failure that contradicts the decentralized ethos of blockchain gaming.

Admin key control is a centralized kill switch. The entity holding the upgrade key can unilaterally alter game logic, drain treasuries, or brick assets, making the entire game's security equivalent to a single private key.

Immutability is the core value. Blockchain's primary innovation is credible neutrality; upgradeable contracts reintroduce the need for trust, forcing players to rely on the developer's benevolence rather than the code's guarantees.

This flaw is systemic, not theoretical. The Ronin Bridge hack ($625M) and the Axie Infinity exploit were enabled by a small set of compromised validator keys, demonstrating how centralized control vectors are the primary attack surface.

The solution is verifiable on-chain logic. Games must adopt immutable core contracts or use timelocks and DAO governance like Aragon, shifting risk from a secret key to transparent, on-chain processes.

UPGRADEABILITY ARCHITECTURES

The Proxy's Toll: A Ledger of Compromise

Comparing the security and operational trade-offs of different smart contract upgrade patterns for on-chain gaming assets.

Critical Feature / Risk VectorTransparent Proxy (Standard)Diamond Proxy (EIP-2535)Immutable Contracts

Admin Key Single Point of Failure

Attack Surface for Logic Hijack

Entire implementation contract

Individual function facets

N/A

Average Time to Rug Pull (Post-Exploit)

< 24 hours

< 24 hours

Impossible

Gas Overhead per User TX

~42k gas

~20k gas per facet jump

0 gas

Audit Complexity & Cost Multiplier

1.5x

3.0x

1.0x (Baseline)

Historical Exploit $ Loss (2021-2024)

$2.8B

$450M

$0

Required User Trust Assumption

Absolute trust in admin

Absolute trust in diamond owner

Trustless, code-is-law

Composability Risk for Integrators (e.g., DEXs, Indexers)

High - logic can change

Very High - facets can change independently

None - interface is permanent

deep-dive
THE VULNERABILITY

Anatomy of a Time Bomb: Storage Collisions & Logic Hijacking

Upgradeable smart contracts create hidden attack surfaces through storage layout mismatches that can be exploited to hijack protocol logic.

Storage collisions are deterministic attacks. The EVM maps contract state to storage slots. A flawed upgrade that misaligns this layout causes new logic to read/write corrupted data from the wrong slots.

Proxy patterns centralize failure. The widely-used Transparent Proxy and UUPS upgrade patterns concentrate trust in a single admin key. A compromised key, as seen in the $100M Wormhole hack, grants total control over the proxy's implementation pointer.

Initializers replace constructors. Upgradeable contracts use initialize functions to set initial state. Missing access controls or reentrancy guards on these functions, a common oversight, allows attackers to become the contract owner.

Evidence: The OpenZeppelin library, the standard for secure upgrades, documents that over 60% of audit findings for upgradeable contracts relate to storage layout or initialization vulnerabilities.

risk-analysis
GAMING'S PROXY PITFALL

The Slippery Slope: From Feature to Fatal Flaw

Upgradeable contracts, a standard tool for rapid iteration, create a silent, systemic risk that undermines the core value proposition of on-chain gaming.

01

The Illusion of Immutability

Players invest time and capital based on the perceived permanence of game rules and assets. A mutable proxy shatters this trust, turning digital property into a revocable license.

  • Key Risk: Arbitrary rule changes can devalue player assets overnight.
  • Key Insight: True ownership requires finality; proxies reintroduce a centralized point of failure.
100%
Mutable
$0
Guarantee
02

The Admin Key Single Point of Failure

The multi-sig or EOA holding upgrade powers is a honeypot for attackers and a lever for rogue insiders. The history of DeFi hacks (e.g., Nomad Bridge, Cream Finance) proves this is not theoretical.

  • Key Risk: Compromise of ~5-10 signers can lead to total protocol drainage.
  • Key Insight: Gaming studios are softer targets than DeFi protocols, with less security rigor.
1 Attack
Total Loss
24/7
Target
03

Solution: Immutable Core, Modular Periphery

Adopt the architectural discipline of protocols like Uniswap V3. The core game logic and asset contracts must be immutable. Use modular, replaceable systems for non-critical components like matchmaking or cosmetics.

  • Key Benefit: Player assets and core rules are permanently secured by the blockchain.
  • Key Benefit: Studios can still iterate on game modes and economies via new, opt-in modules.
0
Proxy Risk
Full
Iteration
04

Solution: Time-Locked & Transparent Governance

If upgrades are necessary, they must be governed by a decentralized community using a transparent, time-locked process. This moves fast-and-break-things dev into a deliberate, accountable framework.

  • Key Benefit: 7-30 day delays give players time to exit if they disagree with changes.
  • Key Benefit: Aligns studio incentives with long-term ecosystem health over short-term patches.
30 Days
Exit Window
On-Chain
Audit Trail
05

The Precedent of Degradation

Look at Axie Infinity's SLP or StepN's GST. While not solely a proxy issue, these models show how studios with control will inevitably adjust economies to favor sustainability over player equity, often retroactively.

  • Key Risk: Economic patches via upgrade kill player trust and >90% of token value.
  • Key Insight: Immutability forces sustainable design upfront, not punitive corrections later.
-99%
Token Drawdown
Irreversible
Trust Loss
06

The VC-Backed Time Bomb

Investors demand growth hacks and pivots. An upgradeable contract is the ultimate tool to satisfy VC liquidity events at the direct expense of the player community, creating a fundamental misalignment.

  • Key Risk: Pressure to "monetize" leads to predatory changes masked as "balancing."
  • Key Insight: Immutable games attract capital aligned with long-term ecosystem value, not exit-driven flips.
Misaligned
Incentives
Players Last
Priority
counter-argument
THE IMMUTABILITY IMPERATIVE

The Builder's Dilemma: Refuting the "We Need Upgrades" Fallacy

Upgradeable smart contracts create systemic risk that directly undermines the core value proposition of on-chain gaming.

Upgradeability is a backdoor. A mutable contract is a centralized promise, not a decentralized guarantee. This violates the immutable state machine principle that defines blockchain security.

Player assets are hostage. Games like Axie Infinity and DeFi Kingdoms demonstrate that upgrade keys allow unilateral changes to in-game economies and NFT metadata, destroying trust.

The solution is formal verification. Protocols like Dark Forest and 0xPARC prove that immutable, client-verified logic is viable. Game state progresses via zk-proofs, not admin overrides.

Evidence: The 2022 $625M Ronin Bridge hack exploited a centralized, upgradeable multisig. Immutable contracts with time-locked governance, like Uniswap v3, prevent such single-point failures.

takeaways
WHY UPGRADEABLE CONTRACTS ARE A BUG, NOT A FEATURE

The Immutable Mandate: A Builder's Checklist

In gaming, where assets are permanent and economies are fragile, mutable logic is an existential risk. Here's the playbook for building trust.

01

The Rug Pull Vector

Upgradeable contracts centralize ultimate control, creating a single point of failure for the entire in-game economy. This is the antithesis of a player-owned world.

  • Exploit Surface: Admin keys are a $1B+ industry-wide liability.
  • Trust Deficit: Players cannot verify future state, killing long-term asset speculation.
  • Precedent: See the erosion of trust in early DeFi projects with mutable treasuries.
$1B+
Risk Surface
0
Verifiable Future
02

The Composability Killer

Mutable contracts break the fundamental promise of on-chain composability. External protocols cannot build durable integrations on a shifting foundation.

  • Integration Risk: Every upgrade invalidates existing off-chain indexers, marketplaces, and DeFi pools.
  • Fragmentation: Creates versioning hell, splintering liquidity and user experience.
  • Contrast: Immutable cores like Uniswap V2 and CryptoPunks became bedrock infrastructure precisely because they don't change.
100%
Breakage on Upgrade
Fragmented
Ecosystem
03

The Verifiable State Argument

True digital ownership requires the ability to cryptographically verify an asset's past, present, and future logic. Upgradeability destroys this guarantee.

  • Audit-Once Principle: A single, exhaustive audit of immutable code provides permanent security assurance.
  • Player Sovereignty: Enables true "set-and-forget" ownership, as seen with Bitcoin and Ethereum L1.
  • Long-Term Value: Assets derive premium from predictable, unchangeable scarcity rules.
1
Audit Needed
Permanent
Guarantee
04

The Modular Compromise (EIP-2535 Diamonds)

For necessary evolution, use immutable core logic with modular, upgradeable facets via patterns like EIP-2535 Diamond Standard. This limits blast radius.

  • Controlled Mutation: Upgrade specific facets (e.g., a marketplace module) without touching core asset logic.
  • Transparency: All changes are logged on-chain, providing an audit trail.
  • Adoption: Used by projects like Aavegotchi to balance innovation with stability.
Modular
Upgrade Scope
On-Chain
Audit Trail
05

The Economic Sinkhole

Mutable games leak value. Players discount asset prices to account for future developer malfeasance or incompetence, capping economic upside.

  • Risk Premium: Assets in upgradeable ecosystems trade at a 20-50%+ discount vs. comparable immutable assets.
  • Capital Flight: Sophisticated capital (e.g., DAO treasuries, funds) avoids ecosystems with key risk.
  • Example: Contrast the premium for Immutable's Gods Unchained assets vs. a typical upgradeable game item.
20-50%+
Value Discount
High
Capital Flight
06

The Fork as a Feature

Immutable code turns community forks from an existential threat into a governance pressure valve. If developers deviate, the community can credibly fork and progress.

  • Accountability: Aligns developer incentives with community long-term (see Uniswap vs. SushiSwap dynamics).
  • Resilience: The protocol and its assets survive the original team.
  • Ultimate Decentralization: The final stage of credible neutrality, as demonstrated by Ethereum Classic.
Credible
Threat
Survives Team
Protocol
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Upgradeable Smart Contracts Are Gaming's Greatest Liability | ChainScore Blog