Builder centralization is terminal. The competitive advantage from exclusive order flow and sophisticated JIT liquidity algorithms creates a self-reinforcing monopoly. Builders like Flashbots' SUAVE aim to democratize this, but the core problem remains: value flows to those who see the transactions first.
mev-the-hidden-tax-of-crypto
Blog
Confidential Transactions Will Democratize Block Building
The centralization of block building is a direct result of extractable MEV. By hiding transaction values, confidential transactions level the playing field, making block production accessible beyond elite searcher-builders.
introduction
THE CENTRALIZATION TRAP
The MEV Arms Race Has Broken Block Building
Specialized builders with private order flow have created an opaque, extractive market that centralizes chain control.
Confidential transactions invert the power dynamic. By encrypting transaction content until execution, protocols like Aztec and Fhenix strip builders of their information advantage. This forces competition on execution quality and fee minimization, not on who has the best private mempool.
The new bottleneck is computation. Encrypted execution shifts the competitive edge from data access to trusted execution environments (TEEs) and zero-knowledge proof generation speed. This creates a more commoditized, less extractive market for block production.
key-trends
CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTIONS
The Centralization Triad: Why Builders Win
MEV extraction and opaque order flow have created a cartel of dominant block builders. Confidential transactions are the cryptographic key to breaking their stranglehold.
01
The Problem: Opaque Order Flow
Traders signal intent to a handful of trusted searchers, creating a closed-loop system. This leads to frontrunning and value leakage of ~$1B+ annually.\n- Creates information asymmetry favoring insiders\n- Concentrates power in ~3-5 major builder entities\n- Forces protocols to rely on centralized MEV relays
~$1B+
Annual Leakage
3-5
Dominant Builders
02
The Solution: Encrypted Mempools
Transactions are encrypted until block inclusion, blinding searchers and builders to their content. This levels the playing field for all validators.\n- Enables fair, auction-based MEV redistribution\n- Protects against time-bandit attacks and frontrunning\n- Core tech behind Ethereum's PBS roadmap and Shutter Network
0ms
Frontrun Window
100%
Execution Privacy
03
The Builder's Edge: Fairer Auctions
With encrypted flow, builders compete on execution quality and fee distribution, not on stolen alpha. This commoditizes building and democratizes revenue.\n- Shifts profit from information arbitrage to service quality\n- Enables permissionless builder markets (e.g., Flashbots SUAVE)\n- Aligns with intent-based architectures like UniswapX and CowSwap
10x+
More Builders
-90%
Extractable MEV
thesis-statement
THE LEVELING MECHANISM
Opacity as the Great Equalizer
Confidential transaction mempools will dismantle the extractive MEV supply chain and redistribute power from professional searchers to end users.
The public mempool is obsolete. It functions as a free data feed for professional searchers who front-run and sandwich retail trades, extracting billions annually. This creates a centralized, extractive MEV supply chain dominated by entities like Flashbots.
Encrypted order flow democratizes block building. Protocols like SUAVE and FHE-based systems encrypt transaction intent before submission. This opacity prevents pre-execution extraction, forcing builders to compete on execution quality and fee efficiency rather than information arbitrage.
The builder market becomes commoditized. Without the informational edge, the value shifts from searchers to solvers. Systems like UniswapX and CowSwap already demonstrate this, using encrypted intents and batch auctions to neutralize MEV, returning value to users.
Evidence: Flashbots' dominance, which captured over 90% of Ethereum MEV post-Merge, is a direct artifact of transparent mempools. Confidential transactions eliminate this structural advantage, creating a market where any builder can win a block.
CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTIONS
The Builder Dominance Matrix
Comparing the impact of transaction privacy on block building centralization and MEV capture.
| Feature / Metric | Current State (Public Mempool) | With Confidential Transactions (e.g., Shutterized EVM) | Ideal End-State |
|---|---|---|---|
Builder Dominance (Top 3 Builders) |
| Projected: 40-60% | < 30% |
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) Leakage | High (Builders see all txns) | Eliminated (Encrypted until execution) | Eliminated |
Time-Bandit Attacks | Possible (Reorgs for MEV) | Impossible (No visibility) | Impossible |
User MEV Extraction (Sandwiching) | Prevalent | Technically Prevented | Eliminated |
Required Trust Setup | None (Permissionless) | Trusted DKG (e.g., Shutter Network) | Decentralized DKG / TEEs |
Latency Overhead | 0 ms | ~200-500 ms (Encryption/Decryption) | < 100 ms |
Integration Complexity | Native | Requires App & Wallet Support (e.g., Safe{Wallet}) | Protocol-Native |
deep-dive
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT
Mechanics of Democratization: From Secrecy to Sovereignty
Confidential Transactions dismantle the private mempool advantage, redistributing block building power from a few dominant players to a broader network of participants.
Private mempools centralize power. Builders with exclusive order flow from MEV searchers and applications like UniswapX create blocks with higher profits, starving public mempools of valuable transactions and creating an insurmountable data advantage.
Encryption is the equalizer. Confidential Transactions, using standards like EIP-7265, encrypt transaction content until inclusion. This neutralizes the front-running advantage and levels the information playing field for all builders.
Sovereignty returns to users. Protocols like Shutter Network and Fairblock enable conditional decryption, allowing users to define execution parameters. This shifts control from extractive builders back to the transaction originator.
Evidence: Flashbots' SUAVE explicitly designs for this future, creating a neutral marketplace where encrypted intents are matched, proving the economic model for decentralized block building post-confidentiality.
protocol-spotlight
CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTIONS
The Vanguard: Who's Building the Opaque Future
A new class of infrastructure is emerging to make private transactions a public good, shifting MEV power from centralized sequencers to users.
01
The Problem: Transparent Order Flow is a MEV Buffet
Today's mempools broadcast user intent, creating a $1B+ annual MEV market extracted by searchers and builders. This leads to:\n- Front-running and sandwich attacks on predictable swaps.\n- Censorship risk for sanctioned or competing transactions.\n- Centralization pressure as block builders consolidate to capture value.
$1B+
Annual MEV
>80%
Builder Market Share
02
The Solution: Encrypted Mempools & Commit-Reveal Schemes
Projects like Penumbra and FRAXfer implement encrypted mempools where transactions are hidden until inclusion. This enforces:\n- Execution fairness by preventing front-running.\n- Censorship resistance as the transaction content is unknown.\n- MEV democratization by allowing users to capture their own value via secure order flow auctions.
0ms
Public Visibility
T+1 Block
Reveal Delay
03
The Enabler: Threshold Encryption Networks
Decentralized key management systems, like the one proposed for Ethereum by Flashbots (SUAVE) or used by Aztec, are critical. They provide:\n- Trust-minimized decryption via distributed key shares.\n- Liveness guarantees independent of any single entity.\n- Cross-chain compatibility, enabling private intents to flow across rollups and L1s.
n-of-m
Key Security
~1-2s
Encryption Overhead
04
The Architect: Penumbra's ZK-Swap
Penumbra implements confidential transactions as a first-class primitive. Every action is a ZK-proof, enabling:\n- Private swaps and liquidity provision with hidden amounts and assets.\n- MEV-resistant DEX where the batch auction is the only mechanism.\n- Shielded governance with private voting power.
ZK-proof
Per Action
Batch Auction
Core DEX
05
The Integrator: Cross-Chain Private Intents
The endgame is intent-based, privacy-preserving cross-chain swaps. This combines confidential mempools with solvers from UniswapX or CowSwap and secure messaging from LayerZero or Axelar. It enables:\n- Route optimization across opaque liquidity pools.\n- No upfront capital for solvers, reducing barriers.\n- Universal privacy that persists across chain boundaries.
Multi-Chain
Privacy
Intent-Based
Execution
06
The Economic Shift: From Extractable to Capturable Value
Confidential transactions invert the MEV economy. Value once extracted by third parties can now be captured by users or shared via protocols. This requires:\n- Secure ordering rules enforced by the encryption network.\n- Fee mechanisms that reward users for private order flow.\n- New PBS designs where builders bid on the right to solve, not the right to see.
User-Owned
MEV Flow
Protocol Revenue
New Model
counter-argument
THE ARCHITECTURAL SHIFT
The Privacy-Performance Tradeoff Isn't What You Think
Confidential transactions will dismantle the centralized block building cartel by enabling a new, competitive market for private order flow.
The tradeoff is inverted. Current MEV-Boost relays create a performance bottleneck because they centralize order flow visibility. Confidential mempools like Ethereum's PBS with encryption eliminate this by hiding transactions from builders until commitment, forcing them to compete on execution quality, not information asymmetry.
Democratization requires opacity. Today's builders like Flashbots and bloXroute win by seeing the most transactions first. Encrypted order flow flips this: any builder can now win blocks by offering the best execution price for hidden bundles, breaking the searcher-builder vertical integration that defines the current cartel.
Evidence: The proliferation of SUAVE-like shared sequencers and encrypted mempool research from EigenLayer and Espresso Systems proves the market is shifting. These architectures treat privacy not as a tax, but as the prerequisite for a truly permissionless and performant block building layer.
risk-analysis
CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTIONS
The Bear Case: What Could Go Wrong?
While confidential transactions promise to democratize block building by hiding MEV, they introduce new attack vectors and systemic risks.
01
The Regulatory Kill Switch
Privacy is a red flag for global regulators. Confidential mempools could be deemed non-compliant with AML/KYC frameworks like FATF's Travel Rule, forcing validators to choose between censorship or legal jeopardy.
- Jurisdictional Arbitrage creates network fragmentation.
- Exchange Delistings for tokens using privacy tech.
- Protocol-level blacklisting becomes impossible, inviting state-level intervention.
100%
Non-Compliant
FATF
Regulatory Body
02
The Centralization Paradox
To prevent frontrunning, encrypted transactions must be revealed to a trusted set of block builders at the last second. This recreates the very centralization problem it aims to solve.
- Builder Cartels form around fast decryption hardware.
- Single Point of Failure: The decryption enclave (e.g., SGX, TEE) becomes a critical attack target.
- Worse UX: Users must trust a new, opaque intermediary layer.
<10
Dominant Builders
TEE/SGX
Trusted Hardware
03
The Liveness Attack
Encrypted transactions are inherently unobservable. A malicious actor can spam the mempool with encrypted junk, forcing builders to waste resources decrypting worthless payloads.
- Resource Exhaustion: Decryption is computationally expensive, creating a new DoS vector.
- Block Space Waste reduces network throughput and increases base fees.
- No Pre-Verification: Builders cannot filter spam before committing compute.
10x
Compute Cost
-30%
Throughput
04
The MEV Obfuscation Problem
Hiding transactions doesn't eliminate MEV; it obscures it, making it harder to detect and redistribute. This could lead to more sophisticated, covert extraction.
- Opaque Auctions: Fairness of the builder market becomes unverifiable.
- User Exploitation: Without visibility, predatory 'last-look' arbitrage is untraceable.
- Undermines PBS: The core premise of Proposer-Builder Separation relies on observable bids.
0%
Auditability
PBS
Protocol Weakened
05
The Interoperability Tax
Confidential state breaks cross-chain communication. Bridges, oracles (Chainlink, Pyth), and layer-2 sequencers cannot function if they cannot read on-chain state or verify transaction intent.
- Breaks DeFi Composability: Uniswap, Aave, and other primitives require transparent state.
- Oracle Failure: Price feeds cannot be reliably delivered to private systems.
- Fragments Liquidity into isolated, opaque pools.
Chainlink/Pyth
Oracles Broken
Uniswap/Aave
DeFi Impact
06
The Adoption Chasm
For privacy to democratize building, near-universal adoption is required. A partially adopted confidential mempool is worse than none, creating a two-tier system where transparent users are exploited.
- Negative Network Effects: Early adopters are penalized with higher fees and less protection.
- Complex UX: Key management and encryption steps deter mainstream users.
- Wallets & Infrastructure need costly, non-standard upgrades.
<5%
Initial Adoption
2-Tier
User System
future-outlook
THE PRIVACY PRIMITIVE
The Path to Sovereign Block Space
Confidential transactions will dismantle the MEV cartel by enabling private order flow, which democratizes block building.
Private mempools are the prerequisite for sovereign block space. Today's public mempools allow searchers and builders to front-run and extract value. Protocols like Shutter Network and EigenLayer's MEV Blocker encrypt transactions until block inclusion, preventing this information asymmetry.
Confidentiality shifts power to users. Encrypted intents allow wallets and applications to route orders directly to builders like Flashbots SUAVE or CowSwap solvers without revealing strategy. This breaks the builder-searcher cartel that currently dominates Ethereum block production.
The endgame is user-owned order flow. Applications will bundle encrypted transactions and auction the right to execute them. This model, pioneered by UniswapX and Across, transforms users from MEV victims into liquidity auctioneers who capture their own value.
Evidence: Flashbots' dominance, where two builders produce over 80% of Ethereum blocks, proves the centralized risk. Confidential transactions dissolve this by making the mempool a black box, forcing builders to compete on execution quality, not information theft.
takeaways
CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTIONS & MEV
TL;DR for Time-Poor Architects
Privacy in execution is the next frontier for fairer, more efficient blockchains, directly challenging the extractive MEV economy.
01
The Problem: Public Mempools are a Free-for-All
Every pending transaction is public, creating a zero-sum game for searchers and builders. This leads to:\n- Front-running and sandwich attacks on users\n- Centralization pressure on block building (e.g., Flashbots dominance)\n- Inefficient markets where value is extracted, not created
$1B+
Annual MEV
>80%
Builder Market Share
02
The Solution: Encrypted Order Flow
Protocols like Shutter Network and EigenLayer's MEV Blocker encrypt transactions until block inclusion. This shifts power by:\n- Enabling fair ordering via threshold decryption\n- Democratizing builder access—anyone can process encrypted bundles\n- Creating a new commodity: private execution as a service
0
Visible Txns
~500ms
Decryption Latency
03
The Architecture: SGX & FHE
Two dominant tech stacks are competing. Intel SGX (e.g., Oasis, Obscuro) offers high throughput but trusted hardware. Fully Homomorphic Encryption (e.g., Zama, Fhenix) is trust-minimized but computationally heavy. The trade-off is:\n- SGX: ~10k TPS, hardware root-of-trust\n- FHE: Cryptographic guarantees, ~100-1000x slower ops
10k TPS
SGX Throughput
100-1000x
FHE Overhead
04
The New Market: Intent-Based Systems
Confidential transactions enable intent-centric architectures (e.g., UniswapX, CowSwap, Across). Users submit private objectives, not public transactions. This allows:\n- Permissionless solver competition for best execution\n- Atomic cross-chain swaps without front-running risk\n- Native integration with RFQ systems and CEXs
$10B+
Intent Volume
-90%
Slippage
05
The Risk: Centralized Sequencers
Privacy creates a new centralization vector. If a single entity controls the decryption key or ordering logic (e.g., some Layer 2 sequencers), they become a super-extractor. The mitigation is:\n- Decentralized key management (DKG protocols)\n- Force inclusion lists and censorship resistance\n- Proof-of-stake slashing for malicious ordering
1-of-N
Trust Assumption
7 Days
Escape Hatch
06
The Outcome: MEV Redistribution
The endgame is not MEV elimination, but its democratization and redistribution. Value flows from predatory searchers to:\n- Users via better execution (e.g., MEV-Share)\n- Protocols as a sustainable revenue stream\n- Builders & Validators for providing privacy infrastructure
+30%
User Yield
New S-Curve
Adoption
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall