PBS creates a new insider class. The builder role, which assembles and orders transactions for profit, becomes the primary extractor of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). This shifts power from validators to sophisticated, capital-intensive actors.
Why PBS Creates a New Class of Protocol Insider
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) was meant to democratize MEV. Instead, it's creating a new privileged class of builders with exclusive order flow and market data, turning them into the exchange operators of the next era.
Introduction
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block production from consensus, creating a new class of protocol insider: the builder.
Builders are not neutral. Their profit motive directly conflicts with user experience, leading to censorship and front-running unless mitigated by systems like Flashbots' SUAVE or EigenLayer's shared sequencer.
The builder market centralizes. High-performance infrastructure and exclusive orderflow access create winner-take-most dynamics, concentrating power in entities like Jito Labs on Solana or bloXroute on Ethereum.
Evidence: Post-PBS, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by just five builders, demonstrating rapid market consolidation and the emergence of a protocol-critical oligopoly.
The Core Argument: PBS Didn't Eliminate Insiders, It Professionalized Them
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) transforms the MEV supply chain, creating a new, specialized, and powerful class of protocol insider.
PBS formalizes the MEV supply chain, creating distinct roles for builders and proposers. This professionalization replaces chaotic, permissionless MEV extraction with a structured market. The result is a new insider class of specialized builders like Flashbots and bloXroute, who control block construction.
Builders become the new gatekeepers. They have privileged access to order flow and sophisticated algorithms. This creates a centralization vector where a few builders, not validators, dictate transaction inclusion and ordering for the entire network.
The validator's role is commoditized. PBS reduces the validator to a passive block proposer, outsourcing the complex, value-extracting work. The economic power shifts from the capital holder (validator) to the intelligence holder (builder).
Evidence: Post-PBS, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by a handful of builders. This concentration mirrors the pre-PBS validator centralization problem, proving PBS rearranges power rather than eliminating it.
The Current State: Builder Dominance is Already Here
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) has already created a new, powerful class of protocol insider: the professional block builder.
Builder dominance is structural. PBS decouples block proposal from construction, creating a specialized market. This market rewards builders with the best MEV extraction and optimization skills, not just capital.
The market is already concentrated. A few entities like Flashbots SUAVE, BloXroute, and Titan Builder dominate Ethereum block production. Their sophisticated infrastructure and order flow access create a significant advantage.
This creates protocol insiders. These builders possess asymmetric information about pending transactions and network state. They use this to optimize their own blocks, influencing transaction ordering and finality for all users.
Evidence: Post-Merge, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by a handful of professional builders. This centralization of block construction power is the direct, measurable outcome of PBS implementation.
Three Trends Cementing Builder Privilege
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) doesn't just decentralize block production; it creates a new, privileged class of capital-intensive infrastructure operators.
The MEV Cartelization Problem
Without PBS, validators capture all MEV, creating a permissioned, opaque market. PBS externalizes block building to a specialized, competitive market of builders.
- Builder dominance: Top 3 builders often control >50% of blocks on Ethereum post-Merge.
- Capital barrier: Effective builders require $10M+ in bonded ETH and ultra-low-latency infrastructure.
- Insider access: Builders with private orderflow (e.g., from Flashbots Protect, CoW Swap) have a structural advantage in auction bids.
The Relayer as a Trusted Third Party
In intent-based architectures like UniswapX and Across, the relayer (a builder analogue) is the privileged resolver. They see the full transaction DAG, choose the optimal execution path, and guarantee settlement.
- Information asymmetry: The relayer sees all user intents and cross-chain liquidity, enabling optimal routing and MEV capture.
- Fee extraction: Relayers earn via priority fees and execution surplus (difference between quoted and actual cost).
- Protocol capture: Successful intent protocols become dependent on a few high-performance relayers, mirroring builder centralization.
The Cross-Chain Searcher Economy
Protocols like LayerZero and Axelar enable generalized cross-chain messaging, but execution is delegated to off-chain searchers or oracle networks. These entities become the privileged arbiters of cross-chain state.
- Execution monopoly: The searcher who fulfills the cross-chain request controls the timing, ordering, and finality of the transaction.
- Fee market dynamics: Searchers bid for the right to execute, creating a meta-MEV market for cross-chain arbitrage and liquidation opportunities.
- Infrastructure moat: Operating a competitive searcher requires globally distributed nodes and deep liquidity across 10+ chains, a barrier few can clear.
The Builder Hierarchy: A Snapshot of Centralization
Comparing the roles and powers of key participants in a PBS-enabled blockchain ecosystem, highlighting the emergent centralization vectors.
| Role / Metric | Validator / Proposer | Builder (e.g., Flashbots, bloXroute) | Searcher / MEV Bot | User |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Function | Propose block header, attest | Construct full block content | Extract value via transaction ordering | Submit transactions |
Required Capital | 32 ETH (Ethereum) |
|
|
|
Revenue Source | Consensus rewards, MEV tips | MEV extraction, transaction fees | Arbitrage, liquidations, frontrunning | N/A |
Access to Mempool | Indirect via builder | Full private mempool access | Private & public mempool access | Public mempool only |
Block Censorship Power | Can reject builder blocks (costly) | Direct control over tx inclusion/order | Can influence via bid | None |
Avg. Profit per Block | ~0.1 - 0.3 ETH (tips) | ~0.5 - 2+ ETH (MEV + fees) | Varies widely, often 0.01 - 0.5 ETH | N/A |
Reliance on Infrastructure | Execution client, relay network | Proprietary block-building software, data feeds | Searcher framework (e.g., Flashbots SDK) | RPC endpoint |
Risk of Centralization | High (Top 3 entities > 50% stake) | Extreme (Top 2 builders > 90% market share) | High (Economies of scale in data/execution) | N/A |
From Validator to Builder: How the Insider Profile Changed
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block production from validation, creating a new, specialized, and capital-intensive insider class.
PBS redefines protocol insiders. The monolithic validator role fragments into the proposer (staker) and the block builder (searcher). This specialization creates a new power center focused on pure economic optimization, not consensus.
Builders are the new insiders. They control transaction ordering and MEV extraction, wielding power previously held by validators. This role demands sophisticated infrastructure like Flashbots SUAVE and deep liquidity access, creating high barriers to entry.
The capital requirement shifts. Validator success requires staked ETH; builder success requires operational capital for pre-confirmation liquidity and bidding in builder markets. This favors entities like Jito Labs and professional trading firms.
Evidence: Post-PBS, over 90% of Ethereum blocks are built by a concentrated set of professional builders, not the validators who propose them, demonstrating the complete transfer of block construction influence.
The Rebuttal: Isn't This Just Efficient Market Making?
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) does not just optimize markets; it creates a new, privileged class of protocol insider with systemic influence.
PBS creates protocol insiders. Traditional market makers compete on a level exchange. Builders in PBS control the final transaction ordering and block composition, a position of direct protocol power that market makers never held.
This power is non-fungible. A DEX liquidity provider on Uniswap can be replaced by another. A dominant builder like Flashbots or bloXroute controls a unique, non-replicable pipeline for extracting MEV and censoring transactions.
The risk is systemic capture. If a few builders collude or are co-opted, they can enact soft finality rules, extract supra-competitive rents, or enforce OFAC compliance, undermining the credibly neutral base layer.
Evidence: Post-Merge Ethereum block data shows a persistent >80% builder market share for the top three entities, demonstrating rapid centralization of this critical role.
The Systemic Risks of Builder Oligopoly
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) outsources block production to specialized builders, creating a new, powerful, and opaque actor class within the protocol.
The MEV Cartelization Problem
PBS centralizes block-building power into a few entities like Flashbots, bloXroute, and Titan. This cartel can extract maximum value from users through orderflow auctions (OFAs) and censorship.\n- Top 3 builders control >80% of Ethereum blocks.\n- Creates a pay-to-play ecosystem for inclusion.
The Protocol Insider Threat
Builders become protocol insiders with privileged knowledge of pending transactions and execution strategies. This creates an information asymmetry that can be exploited for front-running or to disadvantage competing protocols like Uniswap or Aave.\n- Time-bandit attacks become feasible with advanced preview.\n- Undermines the credible neutrality of the base layer.
The Censorship Vector
A dominant builder can selectively exclude transactions based on origin (e.g., Tornado Cash) or content, acting as a centralized policy enforcer. This violates the permissionless principle and creates a single point of failure for regulatory pressure.\n- Relies on proposer vigilance to override censorship.\n- Centralizes protocol-level governance by proxy.
The Solution: Enshrined PBS & SUAVE
Mitigation requires protocol-level fixes. Enshrined PBS (ePBS) bakes builder roles into consensus, enforcing neutrality. SUAVE aims to decentralize the builder market itself by creating a shared mempool and execution environment.\n- ePBS eliminates trusted relayers.\n- SUAVE commoditizes block building.
What's Next: The Arms Race for Enclave-Builder Integration
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) shifts power from general validators to specialized builders, creating a new class of protocol insiders who control transaction ordering and MEV.
Builder specialization creates asymmetry. PBS decouples block building from block proposing, forcing builders to compete on execution quality. This requires advanced MEV extraction algorithms and real-time data pipelines that generalist validators cannot replicate.
The winner is the builder with the best data. Builders like Flashbots' SUAVE and BloXroute win by having superior visibility into the mempool, private order flows, and cross-chain arbitrage opportunities. Their enclave technology secures this proprietary data.
Integration is the new moat. Builders will vertically integrate with intent-based protocols like UniswapX and cross-chain messaging layers like LayerZero. This captures user intent at the source, bypassing public mempools entirely.
Evidence: Flashbots currently captures over 90% of Ethereum's MEV, demonstrating that a single, sophisticated builder can dominate a permissionless market through technical advantage and exclusive order flow.
TL;DR: Key Takeaways for Protocol Architects
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block production from block validation, creating a new competitive landscape for value extraction.
The New Insider: The Block Builder
Builders are the new arbitrageurs, competing for MEV via sophisticated order flow and cross-domain strategies. This creates a protocol insider with privileged execution knowledge.
- Key Benefit: Access to pre-confirmation transaction order for optimal MEV capture.
- Key Benefit: Ability to run private mempools like Flashbots Protect, extracting value from public mempools.
The Problem: Validator Centralization Pressure
Without PBS, the largest validators (e.g., Lido, Coinbase) inherently capture the most MEV, compounding their advantage and threatening decentralization.
- Key Benefit: PBS externalizes block building, decoupling staking power from MEV revenue.
- Key Benefit: Enables permissionless competition among builders, preventing a single entity from monopolizing the dark forest.
The Solution: Enshrined PBS & SUAVE
Fully enshrined PBS (e.g., Ethereum's roadmap) and shared sequencers like SUAVE formalize the builder role, creating a transparent marketplace for block space.
- Key Benefit: Credible neutrality for proposers, who simply accept the highest bid.
- Key Benefit: Cross-chain MEV unification via platforms like SUAVE, which can act as a meta-builder for Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism.
Architect for the Builder-Centric Future
Protocol design must now account for builders as first-class participants, not just validators or users.
- Key Benefit: Design MEV-aware application logic (e.g., CowSwap, UniswapX) to resist extraction.
- Key Benefit: Integrate with intent-based standards (ERC-4337, Anoma) where builders solve for user intents, not just executing raw transactions.
The Relayer is the New Critical Infrastructure
Entities that bundle and route user transactions to builders (e.g., BloXroute, Blocknative) gain immense influence over order flow and become prime acquisition targets.
- Key Benefit: Control over transaction latency and privacy determines MEV outcomes.
- Key Benefit: Vertical integration risk as builders (like Flashbots) operate their own relay networks, creating potential central points of failure.
Data is the Ultimate Asset
Builders and relays amass proprietary datasets on transaction patterns, creating a massive information asymmetry versus public RPC providers.
- Key Benefit: Predictive modeling of gas prices and network congestion for superior bidding.
- Key Benefit: Long-term strategic advantage in identifying nascent MEV opportunities across DeFi, NFTs, and bridges.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.