Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
liquid-staking-and-the-restaking-revolution
Blog

LSDs as the Dominant Collateral in Future Money Markets

An analysis of the economic and technical forces driving yield-bearing staked assets to replace static tokens like ETH as the primary backing for on-chain lending.

introduction
THE COLLATERAL SHIFT

Introduction

Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) are becoming the primary collateral asset in DeFi money markets, fundamentally altering capital efficiency and risk models.

LSDs are superior collateral because they generate native yield. Assets like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH accrue staking rewards while being used as loan collateral, creating a positive carry loop absent with static assets like ETH or stablecoins.

The composability of LSDs creates a flywheel for money markets. Protocols like Aave and Compound integrate yield-bearing collateral, which attracts deposits, increases TVL, and lowers borrowing costs for users seeking leveraged staking positions.

This dominance introduces new systemic risks. The rehypothecation of staked ETH across protocols like EigenLayer and money markets creates complex, interlinked dependencies, making the system vulnerable to correlated liquidations during validator slashing events or network instability.

thesis-statement
THE COLLATERAL SHIFT

The Core Thesis: Yield is Non-Negotiable

Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) will dominate DeFi money markets because they are the only collateral that pays users to borrow.

Yield-bearing collateral wins. In a competitive market, rational actors migrate capital to the highest utility asset. An LSD like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH provides staking yield and functions as collateral. Idle ETH in a vault is a wasted opportunity cost.

Negative-rate borrowing emerges. Protocols like Aave and Compound will see users borrow stablecoins against stETH to farm additional yield, accepting rates below the staking APR. This creates a perpetual borrowing demand that non-yielding collateral cannot match.

The flywheel is self-reinforcing. More LSD collateral increases protocol TVL and liquidity depth, which lowers borrowing rates and attracts more users. This dynamic starves traditional collateral types, cementing LSDs as the primary reserve asset for DeFi credit.

Evidence: Aave's Ethereum market already holds over 3M stETH as collateral, representing the largest single asset pool and demonstrating clear user preference for yield-bearing positions.

LSD COLLATERAL ANALYSIS

On-Chain Data: The Proof is in the TVL

Comparative analysis of LSDs as the dominant collateral type in major DeFi money markets, based on on-chain metrics.

Key MetricAave V3 Ethereum (wstETH)Compound V3 (cbETH)Euler (rETH, pre-hack snapshot)Morpho Blue (Generic LSD Market)

TVL in LSD Collateral

$6.8B

$1.1B

$160M (est.)

Market Dependent

Dominant LSD Asset

wstETH (Lido)

cbETH (Coinbase)

rETH (Rocket Pool)

Configurable

Weighted Avg. Loan-To-Value (LTV)

68.5%

67.0%

72.0%

Set by Risk Manager

Liquidation Bonus (Incentive)

5-10%

8%

5%

Set by Risk Manager

Oracle Security (Primary Source)

Chainlink w/ fallback

Chainlink

Chainlink

Pyth, Chainlink, or TWAP

Yield-Bearing to Lender

Isolated Risk (Contagion Barrier)

Avg. Utilization Rate (30d)

45%

62%

N/A

Varies by Market

deep-dive
THE LIQUIDITY TRAP

The Mechanics of Dominance

Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSDs) are becoming the primary collateral for DeFi money markets due to superior capital efficiency and composability.

LSDs are capital-efficient collateral because they accrue staking yield while simultaneously being lent out. This creates a dual-yield flywheel where the underlying asset (e.g., stETH) earns PoS rewards and the lent derivative earns borrowing interest. Native staked assets are idle and cannot be rehypothecated.

Composability drives network effects across protocols like Aave, Compound, and Euler. An LSD deposited in Aave can be borrowed to mint a stablecoin like MakerDAO's DAI, which is then deployed elsewhere. This creates a self-reinforcing liquidity loop anchored by the LSD.

The data confirms the shift. On Aave V3 Ethereum, wstETH comprises over 40% of the supply-side. This concentration creates a systemic dependency where the stability of major money markets is now directly tied to the security of Lido and Rocket Pool.

counter-argument
THE SYSTEMIC RISK

Counterpoint: Isn't This Just More Complexity Risk?

LSD concentration creates a fragile, recursive dependency that amplifies tail risks.

Concentrated failure vector is the primary risk. A critical bug or slashing event in a dominant Liquid Staking Token (LST) like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH would cascade through every major money market simultaneously, creating a systemic liquidity crisis.

Recursive leverage loops are inevitable. Protocols like Aave and Compound will accept stETH as collateral to borrow more ETH to stake, creating a reflexive dependency on the underlying validator set's security and the LST's peg stability.

Oracle risk is paramount. The entire system relies on price feeds from Chainlink and proof-of-solvency mechanisms to value staked assets. A manipulation or delay here would trigger mass, inaccurate liquidations.

Evidence: The 2022 stETH depeg event demonstrated this fragility. Aave's risk parameters and oracle configuration were the only barrier preventing a complete cascade; a more integrated system lacks these circuit breakers.

protocol-spotlight
LIQUID STAKING DERIVATIVES

Protocols Leading the Charge

LSDs are becoming the foundational collateral layer for DeFi, offering superior capital efficiency and stability over volatile assets.

01

Aave's GHO Strategy: Anchoring DeFi with Staked Collateral

Aave's native stablecoin, GHO, is designed to be primarily minted against LSD collateral like stETH. This creates a self-reinforcing flywheel where staking yields subsidize borrowing costs.\n- Yield-Backed Stability: Borrowing against yield-generating assets reduces liquidation risk.\n- Protocol-Owned Liquidity: Fees from GHO minting accrue to the Aave DAO treasury.

~$2B
GHO Capacity
>70%
LSD Collateral
02

Morpho Blue: The Capital-Efficient LSD Vault

Morpho Blue's minimalist design enables hyper-optimized, isolated markets for specific LSD collaterals like cbETH or rETH. This allows for risk-tailored lending pairs with maximized LTVs.\n- Isolated Risk: A default in one LSD market doesn't contagion others.\n- Optimal Rates: Competition among lenders drives borrowing rates toward the underlying staking yield.

90%+
Max LTV
$1B+
TVL
03

EigenLayer: The Restaking Primitive for Yield Amplification

EigenLayer transforms stETH into restaked collateral, enabling LSD holders to earn additional AVS (Actively Validated Services) rewards while still serving as DeFi collateral. This creates dual-layered yield.\n- Capital Multiplier: One asset secures both Ethereum and other protocols.\n- New Risk Markets: Enables lending markets specifically for restaked LSTs with novel risk parameters.

$15B+
TVL Restaked
2x
Yield Source
04

The Problem: Fragmented LSD Liquidity Across Chains

LSDs like stETH are native to Ethereum, but DeFi activity is multi-chain. Bridging introduces custodial risk and yield leakage, making them poor cross-chain collateral.\n- Siloed Markets: Lending protocols on L2s cannot natively access prime Ethereum collateral.\n- Bridge Dependency: Reliance on external bridges adds a critical failure point for money markets.

10+
Bridge Layers
High
Sovereignty Risk
05

The Solution: Native LSD Issuance on L2s (e.g., Mantle's mETH)

Protocols like Mantle Finance issue canonical LSDs directly on Layer 2s, using Ethereum L1 staking as the backing asset. This creates native, composable collateral without bridge risk.\n- Seamless Composability: mETH is a first-class asset within the Mantle DeFi ecosystem from day one.\n- Retained Yield: Staking rewards are accrued and distributed on the L2, optimizing capital flow.

0
Bridge Risk
Native
L2 Composability
06

Lybra Finance: LSDs as Direct Stablecoin Engines

Lybra bypasses the lending market entirely, allowing users to mint the stablecoin peUSD directly by depositing stETH or wBETH. This turns staking yield into a direct, auto-compounding rebase on the stablecoin.\n- Yield Automation: stETH rewards automatically pay down debt, increasing user collateral ratio.\n- Stability from Yield: The constant yield inflow provides a fundamental price support mechanism for the stablecoin.

8%+
Effective APY
$500M+
TVL
risk-analysis
LSD COLLATERAL RISKS

The Bear Case: What Could Break the Thesis

Liquid Staking Derivatives are poised to become the backbone of DeFi collateral, but systemic dependencies create new fragility.

01

The Slashing Cascade

A major slashing event on a foundational layer like Ethereum could trigger a death spiral across the LSD ecosystem.

  • Correlated Depeg: A large validator penalty causes the underlying LSD (e.g., stETH) to trade at a discount.
  • Margin Call Avalanche: Money markets (Aave, Compound) liquidate positions using the depegged LSD as collateral.
  • Liquidity Crunch: The rush to exit cascades through secondary LSTs (sfrxETH, rETH) and DeFi protocols.
>33%
Slashing Penalty
Multi-Billion
TVL at Risk
02

Regulatory Capture of Staking

Jurisdictional attacks on staking providers could fragment and devalue the LSD asset class.

  • OFAC-sanctioned Nodes: Regulations targeting entities like Lido or Coinbase could render their LSTs unusable in compliant DeFi.
  • Centralization Penalty: Protocols like Aave may be forced to de-list major LSTs, destroying their composability premium.
  • The Rise of 'Compliant LSDs': Fragmentation into regulated/offshore pools breaks the network effect of a unified collateral base.
~70%
Lido Dominance
High
Geo-Political Risk
03

Yield Compression & MEV Cannibalization

The economic model of LSDs relies on unsustainable yield sources vulnerable to market forces.

  • Staking Saturation: As Ethereum staking approaches ~30-40%, rewards diminish, reducing LSD attractiveness.
  • MEV Democratization: Protocols like MEV-Boost and SUAVE redistribute extractable value away from validators (and thus LSD holders).
  • Real Yield Scarcity: If LSD yield falls below Treasury bills, capital flees to traditional money markets, collapsing the collateral premium.
<3%
Projected Staking APR
Critical
MEV Dependency
04

Smart Contract & Oracle Failure

LSDs add a critical dependency layer; a failure there breaks all upstream money markets.

  • Bridge Risk: LSTs like stETH are bridge-wrapped assets on L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism); a bridge hack (e.g., Wormhole, LayerZero) destroys cross-chain collateral.
  • Oracle Attack: If Chainlink price feeds for stETH are manipulated, it enables instant, risk-free liquidation of billions in Aave.
  • Upgrade Risk: A bug in Lido's stETH contract or its upgrade mechanism could brick the asset's core functionality.
Billions
Bridge TVL
Single Point
Oracle Failure
future-outlook
THE LIQUIDITY LAYER

Future Outlook: The Endgame is Programmable Collateral

Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSDs) will become the primary collateral layer for DeFi, unlocking a new paradigm of capital efficiency.

LSDs are superior collateral. They provide native yield, which offsets borrowing costs, and are more capital efficient than idle ETH or stablecoins. This creates a self-reinforcing flywheel for protocols like Aave and Compound.

Programmability enables new primitives. LSDs like stETH and rETH are composable assets. This allows for recursive lending strategies and novel products like yield-backed stablecoins, moving beyond simple overcollateralization.

The network effect is decisive. Protocols that integrate LSDs first, like EigenLayer for restaking or MakerDAO for DAI backing, will capture the deepest liquidity. This establishes a winner-take-most market for collateral.

Evidence: Over 40% of all staked ETH is now in liquid form. Aave's wstETH market consistently maintains >90% utilization, demonstrating insatiable demand for yield-bearing collateral.

takeaways
LIQUID STAKING DOMINANCE

Key Takeaways

The convergence of Proof-of-Stake security and DeFi composability is funneling a $50B+ asset class into money markets, redefining collateral efficiency.

01

The Problem: Idle Capital in Staking

Traditional staking locks capital, creating a massive opportunity cost for validators and delegators. This is a $50B+ liquidity sink that cannot be leveraged in DeFi.

  • Opportunity cost for validators seeking yield
  • Capital inefficiency for large holders (e.g., whales, funds)
  • Hinders composability with the broader DeFi ecosystem
$50B+
Locked Capital
0%
DeFi Utility
02

The Solution: Programmable Yield-Bearing Tokens

LSDs like Lido's stETH, Rocket Pool's rETH, and Coinbase's cbETH transform static stake into a productive, liquid asset. They act as a native yield layer for money markets.

  • Unlocks staked capital for borrowing & lending
  • Provides inherent yield to lenders, improving rates
  • Creates a virtuous cycle of liquidity and security
3-5%
Native Yield
$30B+
LSD TVL
03

The Mechanism: Superior Collateral Economics

LSDs have better risk-adjusted profiles than volatile assets, allowing protocols like Aave and Compound to offer higher Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratios and lower liquidation risks.

  • Lower volatility vs. native tokens (e.g., ETH)
  • Yield-generating collateral reduces borrower cost
  • Enables safer, higher-capacity leverage cycles
~80%
Higher LTV
-30%
Borrow Cost
04

The Flywheel: Protocol-Owned Liquidity

Money markets using LSDs can bootstrap their own liquidity by directing protocol revenue to stake assets, as seen with EigenLayer's restaking and Maker's DSR. This creates a self-reinforcing capital base.

  • Revenue is reinvested into the security of the underlying chain
  • Increases TVL and protocol-owned equity
  • Aligns economic security of DeFi with Layer 1
10x
Capital Efficiency
$15B+
Restaked TVL
05

The Risk: Systemic Concentration & Slashing

Dominance by a few LSD providers (e.g., Lido) creates centralization vectors. Smart contract bugs or validator slashing events could cascade through integrated money markets.

  • Liquidation spirals if yield turns negative
  • Oracle risk for rebasing/staked value
  • Requires robust risk frameworks (e.g., Gauntlet, Chaos Labs)
>30%
Lido Dominance
High
Correlation Risk
06

The Future: LSTs as the Base Money Market

Liquid Staking Tokens will become the primary collateral and borrowing asset, enabling native yield strategies. Expect EigenLayer AVSs and cross-chain LSTs (via LayerZero, Wormhole) to expand the design space.

  • Money markets as yield aggregators and security coordinators
  • Cross-chain collateralization without bridging native assets
  • The endgame: a unified, yield-bearing global collateral network
$100B+
Projected TVL
New Primitive
Yield Layer
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team