Consensus is now a commodity. The core function of a blockchain—ordering and finalizing transactions—is being abstracted away from monolithic L1s. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon enable any network to rent the pooled security of Ethereum or Bitcoin validators, eliminating the need for a native validator set.
liquid-staking-and-the-restaking-revolution
Blog
Why Consensus Layers Are Becoming Commoditized by Restaking
Restaking frameworks treat blockchain security as a raw input to be packaged and resold, shifting value accrual away from the consensus layer and towards the restaking middleware. This is the core economic shift of the modular era.
introduction
THE COMMODITIZATION
Introduction
Restaking is transforming consensus security from a proprietary moat into a fungible commodity.
The moat is now the marketplace. The competitive advantage shifts from bootstrapping a token and validators to building the most efficient security marketplace. This mirrors the evolution from proprietary data centers (AWS) to cloud marketplaces, where EigenLayer and AltLayer compete on slashing conditions and operator tooling.
Evidence: EigenLayer has over $15B in TVL, demonstrating massive demand for reusable cryptoeconomic security. This capital is now available to new L2s, AVSs, and oracles like Eoracle, which bypass the years-long bootstrapping phase.
thesis-statement
THE COMMODITIZATION
The Core Argument: Security as a Commodity Input
Restaking transforms blockchain security from a bespoke capital expenditure into a fungible, on-demand resource.
Consensus is a commodity. The economic security of a blockchain is a function of its staked capital. EigenLayer demonstrates that this capital is fungible and can be rented by other protocols, turning a bespoke security budget into a shared utility.
New chains are capital-inefficient. Launching a new L1 or L2 requires bootstrapping a validator set from zero. This is a massive, redundant capital expenditure when Ethereum's $100B+ security pool already exists and is underutilized.
The market chooses efficiency. Protocols like AltLayer and EigenDA already purchase security from EigenLayer's pooled validators. This creates a liquid market for cryptoeconomic security, where cost is determined by supply/demand, not by individual fundraising.
Evidence: The $15B+ in assets restaked on EigenLayer represents capital that would otherwise be siloed, proving the demand for security-as-a-service. This capital now secures AVSs like oracles and data layers at a fraction of the standalone cost.
key-trends
WHY RESTAKING IS DISRUPTING THE STACK
Key Trends Driving Commoditization
The core security and consensus layer is shifting from a bespoke product to a fungible resource, driven by the economic gravity of restaking.
01
The Problem: Expensive, Fragmented Security
New L1s and L2s must bootstrap their own validator sets, a capital-intensive and slow process that fragments security. This creates a winner-take-most dynamic for established chains.
- $1B+ security budget required for a top-tier L1.
- Months to years to achieve credible decentralization.
- Security is non-portable, locking value in silos.
$1B+
Security Budget
Months
Bootstrap Time
02
The Solution: EigenLayer & the Security Marketplace
EigenLayer transforms Ethereum's $100B+ staked ETH into a reusable security primitive. Protocols can rent this validated security via restaking, commoditizing the consensus layer.
- ~$20B TVL in restaked assets demonstrates demand.
- Actively Validated Services (AVS) like AltLayer and EigenDA are early buyers.
- Security becomes a liquid commodity, traded on cost and performance.
$20B+
Restaked TVL
Commodity
Security Model
03
The Catalyst: Hyper-Specialized Execution Layers
The rise of app-specific rollups (dYdX, Lyra) and modular stacks (Celestia, EigenDA) shifts competitive focus. The battle moves up the stack to execution and application logic.
- Consensus is outsourced to a provider (Ethereum, Celestia, EigenLayer).
- Innovation accelerates on execution (Parallel EVM, SVM, Move).
- The base layer becomes a cost center to be optimized, not a moat.
App-Specific
Focus Shift
Optimized
Base Layer
04
The Consequence: The Rise of the AVS Operator
A new professional class emerges: AVS Operators running nodes for multiple services (e.g., Espresso, Omni). They arbitrage hardware and expertise across protocols, driving efficiency.
- Operator sets become the new battleground for decentralization.
- Slashing risk is managed via diversification across AVSs.
- Infrastructure becomes a yield-bearing asset class.
Professional Class
New Entity
Diversified
Risk Profile
05
The Risk: Systemic Slashing Contagion
Commoditization introduces new systemic risks. A critical failure in one AVS could trigger slashing cascades across the restaking pool, threatening the entire ecosystem's security.
- Correlated slashing risk is the new "smart contract risk".
- Risk modeling becomes a core competency for operators and restakers.
- EigenLayer's "Intersubjective Forks" are an untested mechanism for social consensus.
Cascading
Failure Mode
Untested
Social Consensus
06
The Endgame: The Cost of Trust Approaches Zero
In a mature market, the cost of decentralized trust is driven to its marginal cost—hardware and bandwidth. This mirrors the commoditization of cloud compute (AWS).
- Consensus-as-a-Service (CaaS) becomes a standardized utility.
- Protocol moats shift entirely to application logic, UX, and liquidity.
- The final barrier for new chains collapses, unleashing hyper-competition.
~$0
Trust Cost Target
Utility
Consensus Model
THE COMMODITIZATION OF SECURITY
The Value Flow: Consensus Layer vs. Restaking Middleware
This table compares the economic and technical value capture between dedicated consensus layers (L1s) and restaking middleware (e.g., EigenLayer, Babylon) that leverages existing validator security.
| Core Metric | Dedicated L1 (e.g., Solana, Avalanche) | Restaking Middleware (e.g., EigenLayer) | Hybrid Sovereign (e.g., Celestia, EigenDA) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Revenue Source | Block Rewards + MEV + Base Fees | Service Fees (AVS Revenue Share) | Data Availability Fees + Service Fees |
Capital Efficiency for Validators | 1x (Security siloed to one chain) |
| 1x (Security for DA) + >1x (for AVSs) |
Time to Bootstrap Economic Security | 3-5 years (billions in market cap) | ~1 year (leverages Ethereum's $90B+ stake) | 1-2 years (leveraged bootstrapping) |
Validator Slashing Risk Surface | Single protocol ruleset | Multi-protocol slashing (correlated risk) | Modular slashing (isolated to module) |
Protocol Development Complexity | Full-stack (Consensus, Execution, DA) | Minimal (Focus on service logic only) | Focused (Consensus/DA or Execution only) |
Exit Liquidity / Unbonding Period | Protocol-specific (e.g., 2-21 days) | Ethereum-native (~7 days for withdrawals) | Varies by stack component |
Inherent Value Accrual to Native Token | High (Captures all chain activity) | Medium (Captures AVS fees, not base layer) | Segmented (DA token vs. AVS token) |
deep-dive
THE COMMODITIZATION
Deep Dive: The Mechanics of the Take
Restaking protocols are abstracting consensus security into a fungible resource, eroding the core value proposition of standalone L1s.
Consensus is now a commodity. EigenLayer's restaking model allows Ethereum stakers to rehypothecate their ETH security to new networks. This creates a liquid market for decentralized trust, where new chains like AltLayer or Lagrange buy security instead of bootstrapping it.
The L1 moat is evaporating. A new rollup no longer needs its own validator set or token. It rents economic security from Ethereum via EigenLayer's Actively Validated Services (AVS). This reduces launch costs by orders of magnitude compared to a traditional L1 like Avalanche or Solana.
Proof-of-Stake is the bottleneck. Traditional L1s compete on tokenomics and validator incentives. Restaking bypasses this by outsourcing consensus. The competition shifts from staking yields to execution performance and developer experience.
Evidence: EigenLayer has over $15B in TVL, demonstrating massive demand for pooled security. Projects like Near's DA layer and Celestia's modular data availability face direct competition from AVSs built on restaked ETH.
counter-argument
THE COMMODITY TRAP
Counter-Argument: Is This Just a Fee Switch?
Restaking commoditizes consensus by decoupling security from protocol-specific tokenomics, turning staked ETH into a universal utility.
Commoditization is structural. A fee switch is a revenue lever for a single protocol. Restaking, via EigenLayer and Babylon, creates a wholesale market for pooled security. This separates the act of validation from the economic design of the consumer chain.
The moat evaporates. A chain's native token no longer needs to bootstrap its own validator set. This reduces the primary utility of new L1 tokens, shifting competition to execution performance and developer experience. Avalanche and Polygon must now compete on throughput, not just security promises.
Evidence: EigenLayer's TVL exceeds $15B, demonstrating massive latent demand for reusable cryptoeconomic security. This capital will flow to the highest-bidding, most efficient consensus consumers, creating a race to the bottom on security costs.
risk-analysis
THE UNBUNDLING OF SECURITY
Risk Analysis: The Bear Case for Commoditization
Restaking protocols like EigenLayer are decoupling consensus security from execution, threatening the core value proposition of monolithic L1s.
01
The Commoditization of Nakamoto Consensus
EigenLayer's pooled security model allows new chains (AVSs) to lease Ethereum's $50B+ validator set for a fee. This turns the most expensive R&D problem—bootstrapping decentralized trust—into a cheap, on-demand service.\n- Marginal Cost Security: New chains pay only for the security they need, not the full cost of a sovereign validator set.\n- Zero-to-One Problem Solved: Removes the biggest barrier to launching a new blockchain, flooding the market with viable competitors.
$50B+
Security Pool
~100
Active AVSs
02
The L1 Valuation Trap
Monolithic L1s like Solana and Avalanche derive value from capturing fees and securing their own ecosystem. With restaking, their native token's security premium evaporates as developers opt for shared, cheaper security.\n- Fee Market Collapse: Why pay Solana's high validator costs when you can deploy an SVM rollup secured by Ethereum?\n- Capital Efficiency Arbitrage: Stakers chase highest yield, moving capital from native staking to higher-yielding restaking opportunities on EigenLayer.
-90%
Security Cost
>50%
Yield Premium
03
The Interoperability Standard (LayerZero)
Universal interoperability protocols are the final nail. They abstract away chain-specific nuances, making the underlying consensus layer irrelevant to users and developers. The battle shifts from L1 supremacy to best-in-class execution environments.\n- Intent-Centric Future: Users express desired outcomes (via UniswapX, Across); routing happens automatically across the cheapest/fairest chain.\n- Execution as a Commodity: With shared security and seamless bridging, the only differentiation left is raw performance and cost, a race to the bottom.
50+
Chains Connected
~2s
Finality
future-outlook
THE COMMODITIZATION OF TRUST
Future Outlook: The Post-Commodity Stack
Restaking transforms consensus security into a fungible resource, decoupling it from monolithic L1s and enabling a new wave of specialized execution layers.
Consensus is now a commodity. EigenLayer's restaking model abstracts Ethereum's validator set into a reusable security service. This creates a liquid market for cryptoeconomic security, where new chains like EigenDA or Near's Data Availability layer purchase it on-demand.
Monolithic L1s lose their moat. The primary value of chains like Solana or Avalanche shifts from their bespoke validator networks to their execution environments and throughput. Their native security becomes a cost center, not a differentiator.
The stack specializes aggressively. We see the rise of hyper-specialized rollups (e.g., a rollup for RWA settlement, another for gaming) that all lease security from Ethereum via restaking. The modular stack's bottleneck moves from security to interoperability layers like Polygon AggLayer or Avail Nexus.
Evidence: EigenLayer has over $15B in restaked ETH, demonstrating massive demand to commoditize Ethereum's trust. This capital will fund thousands of sovereign AVS (Actively Validated Services), not just a few dozen L1s.
takeaways
THE RESTAKING IMPERATIVE
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
Restaking is abstracting consensus security into a commodity, forcing a fundamental re-evaluation of layer-1 and appchain value propositions.
01
The Problem: The $100B+ Security Tax
Launching a new L1 or rollup requires bootstrapping a new validator set, a capital-intensive and slow process that creates fragmented, suboptimal security.\n- EigenLayer TVL exceeds $15B, proving demand for pooled security.\n- New chains pay a security tax in token inflation instead of renting established trust.\n- This model is as inefficient as every website running its own data center.
$15B+
EigenLayer TVL
>90%
Cost Inefficiency
02
The Solution: Security-as-a-Service (SaaS)
Restaking transforms Ethereum's validator set into a reusable security primitive. Builders can launch a chain by renting cryptoeconomic security, not minting it.\n- Babylon and EigenLayer enable Bitcoin and Ethereum stakers to secure other chains.\n- Near DA and Avail use restaking for data availability layers.\n- Outcome: Faster launches, stronger security from day one, and capital efficiency.
~0 Days
To Bootstrap
Eth Sec
Base Layer
03
The New Moats: Execution & Settlement
With consensus commoditized, the competitive battleground shifts. Value accrual moves to layers offering superior execution environments and finality.\n- Monolithic chains (Solana) compete on raw throughput and state management.\n- Settlement layers (Celestia, Ethereum L1) compete on neutrality and proof verification speed.\n- App-specific rollups must now compete on user experience and fee markets, not just security claims.
Execution
New Battleground
Settlement
Critical Layer
04
The Investor Lens: Bet on Abstractors, Not Commodities
Invest in protocols that abstract and productize the consensus commodity, not those selling undifferentiated security.\n- EigenLayer is the canonical abstractor, but watch for restaked rollups (e.g., leveraging AltLayer).\n- Avoid L1s with "yet another token" security models unless they have unassailable execution advantages.\n- The real value is in the middleware and AVS (Actively Validated Services) ecosystem built atop restaking.
AVS Ecosystem
Growth Vector
Middleware
Value Accrual
05
The Builder Playbook: Launch Fast, Specialize Hard
Use restaking to bypass the security bootstrap phase. Your resources should focus on creating a superior application-specific environment.\n- Pick your stack: EigenLayer for security, Celestia/EigenDA for data, a shared sequencer for ordering.\n- Specialize aggressively: Your VM (WASM, SVM, EVM++), fee model, and privacy features are your differentiators.\n- This is the rollup-as-a-service (RaaS) endgame: infrastructure is leased, innovation is focused.
RaaS
Operational Model
Weeks → Days
Launch Time
06
The Systemic Risk: Correlated Slashing
Commoditization creates systemic fragility. A catastrophic bug in a major AVS could trigger mass slashing across the restaking ecosystem, creating a "Lehman Brothers" moment.\n- EigenLayer's slashing committees and Babylon's Bitcoin timelocks are untested at scale.\n- Builders must audit their AVS dependencies as critically as their own code.\n- Investors must model tail risk from security concentration, not just upside.
Tail Risk
Critical Factor
Untested
At Scale
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall