EIP-4844 introduces blob-carrying transactions, creating a new, cheap data market separate from Ethereum's execution layer. This directly targets the primary cost driver for ZK-Rollups: publishing state diffs and validity proofs as expensive calldata.
layer-2-wars-arbitrum-optimism-base-and-beyond
Blog
Why EIP-4844 Is a Boon for ZK-Rollups
EIP-4844's blobspace creates a new L1 fee market. ZK-rollups, with their smaller proof sizes and efficient data compression, are structurally positioned to dominate it, gaining a long-term cost advantage over Optimistic rollups.
introduction
THE COST BREAK
Introduction
EIP-4844 introduces a dedicated data channel that slashes transaction costs for ZK-Rollups by an order of magnitude.
Blobs are ephemeral and not EVM-accessible, which is the key to their low cost. Unlike calldata, which is stored forever, blobs are pruned after ~18 days. This trade-off is viable because ZK-Rollups like zkSync Era and StarkNet only need data for short-term fraud-proof windows or state synchronization.
The cost reduction is not marginal; it is structural. Pre-4844, over 90% of a ZK-Rollup's operational cost was calldata. Post-4844, blob data is priced by a separate fee market, decoupling rollup costs from mainnet congestion and speculative NFT mints. Early data shows Arbitrum and Optimism posting blobs for ~0.001 ETH, a >10x reduction.
key-trends
ZK-ROLLUP DOMINANCE
The Post-Dencun Fee Landscape: Three Key Trends
EIP-4844's blobspace has fundamentally altered the L2 cost equation, making ZK-Rollups the primary beneficiaries and reshaping infrastructure priorities.
01
The Problem: Data Availability Was the Bottleneck
Pre-Dencun, ZK-Rollups like zkSync Era and Starknet paid ~$0.25 per transaction to post calldata to Ethereum L1. This was the dominant cost, often dwarfing compute expenses. The high, volatile cost of L1 calldata made predictable, ultra-low fees impossible, capping ZK-Rollup adoption.
- Cost Structure: >80% of tx cost was L1 data posting.
- Volatility: Fees spiked with L1 congestion, breaking UX.
- Scalability Ceiling: Economic model limited TPS growth.
>80%
Cost Was Data
~$0.25
Avg. Tx Cost
02
The Solution: Blobspace Cuts Costs 10-100x
EIP-4844 introduces blob-carrying transactions, a dedicated data marketplace with a separate fee market. Blobs are cheap, ephemeral storage (~18 days), perfect for ZK-proof verification data. This decouples ZK-Rollup costs from mainnet gas auctions.
- Cost Drop: Transaction fees on zkSync, Starknet, and Polygon zkEVM fell to ~$0.01-$0.05.
- Predictability: Separate fee market insulates from L1 NFT mint mania.
- Throughput: Enables 100+ TPS per rollup economically.
10-100x
Cheaper
~$0.01
New Floor
03
The Trend: ZK > OP in the Long-Term Fee War
While Optimistic Rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism) also benefit, ZK-Rollups gain a structural advantage. Their proofs are smaller and more compressible than Optimistic fraud-proof data, making them more efficient blob consumers. This accelerates the "validity proof" endgame, reducing withdrawal times from 7 days to minutes.
- Efficiency Edge: ZK proofs are ~5-10x smaller than Optimistic dispute data.
- UX Unlock: Instant finality becomes economically viable.
- Market Shift: Incentivizes projects like Linea and Scroll to prioritize ZK-tech.
5-10x
More Efficient
Minutes
Withdrawal Time
thesis-statement
THE COST CURVE
The Core Argument: Efficiency Wins in Blobspace
EIP-4844's blob-carrying transactions create a dedicated, low-cost data lane for rollups, fundamentally altering their economic model.
Blobs are a dedicated data lane. EIP-4844 introduces a new transaction type that carries large data 'blobs' separate from standard calldata. This creates a distinct market for rollup data, insulating it from mainnet congestion and speculative gas auctions. The result is a predictable, low-cost data channel for ZK-rollups like zkSync and StarkNet.
Cost reduction is structural, not marginal. Blob data is priced by a separate fee market and is ephemeral, deleted after ~18 days. This design acknowledges that historical data storage is a L1 execution burden, while rollups only need short-term data availability for state verification. The cost per byte for a blob is orders of magnitude cheaper than calldata.
The ZK-rollup advantage compounds. While Optimistic rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism) post full transaction data, ZK-rollups post succinct validity proofs and minimal state diffs. Blobs make this already efficient data footprint drastically cheaper, accelerating the economic flywheel where lower fees drive more users to ZK-based L2s.
Evidence: The data speaks. Post-EIP-4844, the cost to post data for a rollup dropped by over 90%. For a protocol like StarkNet, this translates to sub-cent transaction costs becoming structurally sustainable, not just a temporary subsidy. The efficiency gain is permanent and market-based.
EIP-4844 IMPACT ANALYSIS
Architectural Data Footprint: ZK-Rollups vs. Optimistic Rollups
A data-driven comparison of how EIP-4844's blob-carrying transactions fundamentally alter the cost and scalability calculus for different rollup architectures.
| Architectural Metric | ZK-Rollups (e.g., zkSync, StarkNet) | Optimistic Rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) | EIP-4844 Blob Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
Data Published per Batch (Typical) | ~0.5 KB (State Diff + ZK Proof) | ~50 KB (Full Transaction Calldata) | Replaces calldata with ~128 KB blobs for ~$0.01 each |
Finality to L1 (Time) | < 10 minutes | ~7 days (Challenge Period) | No direct impact on finality times |
Primary L1 Cost Driver Pre-4844 | Proof Verification Gas | Calldata Storage Gas | N/A |
Primary L1 Cost Driver Post-4844 | Proof Verification Gas | Blob Fee (Temporary, ~18 days) | Shifts cost from permanent storage to temporary bandwidth |
Inherent Trust Assumption | Cryptographic (ZK Validity Proof) | Economic (Fraud Proof w/ Watchers) | Reduces economic security cost for Optimistic chains |
Data Availability Reliance | High (for state reconstruction) | Absolute (for fraud proofs) | Switches dependency to a cheaper, ephemeral resource |
Max Theoretical TPS (Post-4844 Estimate) | ~9,000 | ~3,000 | Enables scaling limited by blob count/sec (~3 blobs/block), not gas |
Long-Term Data Storage Burden on L1 | None (State diffs prunable) | Permanent (All tx data kept forever) | Eliminates permanent storage for both; historical blobs are pruned |
deep-dive
THE DATA
The Mechanics of the Advantage
EIP-4844's blob transactions provide ZK-rollups with a dedicated, low-cost data channel, fundamentally altering their scaling and economic calculus.
Blobs are a dedicated highway. EIP-4844 introduces a new transaction type carrying large data 'blobs' that are cheap and ephemeral. This creates a separate lane for rollup data, eliminating competition with standard Ethereum transactions for block space and directly reducing L2 posting costs by over 90%.
ZK-rollups are the primary beneficiary. Unlike Optimistic rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism, which post full transaction data for fraud proofs, ZK-rollups like zkSync and Starknet post succinct validity proofs. Their primary cost is data availability for the proof's public inputs; blobs are the perfect, cheap substrate for this, making their cost structure superior.
The fee market decouples. Blob fees are governed by a separate EIP-1559-style mechanism, insulating rollup costs from mainnet NFT mints and token swaps. This predictable, low-cost data layer enables ZK-rollups to offer stable, ultra-low transaction fees, a critical advantage for mass adoption.
Evidence: Post-EIP-4844, Arbitrum's L1 data posting costs dropped from ~$0.40 to ~$0.01 per transaction. For ZK-rollups, which post less data, the cost reduction is even more pronounced, pushing their end-user fees toward the theoretical minimum of the underlying proof verification cost.
protocol-spotlight
ZK-ROLLUP DOMINANCE
Protocol Implications: Who Benefits Most?
EIP-4844's blob space is a direct subsidy for data availability, disproportionately accelerating ZK-rollup scaling and economics.
01
The StarkNet & zkSync Era Advantage
Pure ZK-rollups like StarkNet and zkSync Era see an immediate ~10-100x cost reduction for posting state diffs. Their architecture is optimized for posting succinct validity proofs, making cheap blobs a perfect fit.\n- Finality Speed: Proof verification is already fast; now data posting is cheap, enabling near-instant economic finality.\n- Developer Onboarding: Drastically lowers the cost barrier for deploying complex, state-heavy dApps, directly competing with Solana and Avalanche.
~100x
Cheaper Data
< 10 min
Finality Target
02
The Arbitrum & Optimism Scaling Multiplier
While initially using fraud proofs, Arbitrum One and OP Mainnet are rapidly integrating ZK-proofs (e.g., Arbitrum BOLD, OP Stack's Cannon). Blobs provide the cheap DA layer required for their hybrid future.\n- Path to Validity Proofs: Removes the last major cost obstacle for their planned ZK transitions.\n- Superchain Economics: Enables Base, Blast, and other L2s to scale horizontally without congesting Ethereum calldata, protecting the EigenLayer restaking security model.
> 90%
Fee Reduction
Unlimited
Chain Scalability
03
The Polygon zkEVM & Scroll Data Cost Floor
EVM-equivalent ZK-rollups like Polygon zkEVM and Scroll benefit from a predictable, low-cost data floor, making their user experience directly competitive with L1s.\n- Gas Cost Predictability: Blob pricing is decoupled from mainnet execution gas, eliminating fee volatility spikes from NFT mints or meme coin frenzies.\n- Interop Leverage: Cheap data supercharges native bridges and layerzero-style omnichain interoperability, as cross-chain messaging becomes trivial.
$0.001
Avg. Tx Cost
~3 sec
Proof Time
04
The dYdX & ImmutableX Vertical Rollup Play
App-specific ZK-rollups for exchanges (dYdX v4) and gaming (ImmutableX) achieve true scalability. High-throughput, low-latency applications are now economically viable on Ethereum.\n- Capital Efficiency: Near-zero data costs free up capital for deeper liquidity pools and more aggressive incentive programs.\n- Regulatory Clarity: Sovereign data chains with Ethereum security provide a clear compliance path versus opaque sidechain models.
10k+ TPS
App Capacity
L1 Security
Inherited
counter-argument
THE DATA AVAILABILITY BOTTLENECK
The Optimistic Counter-Punch (And Why It's Limited)
EIP-4844's blobspace is a temporary reprieve for Optimistic Rollups, but their fundamental security model remains a long-term scaling constraint.
EIP-4844 blobs are a boon for all rollups, but Optimistic Rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism benefit most immediately. Their proof system requires publishing all transaction data to Ethereum for a 7-day fraud proof window, making cheap data via blobs a direct cost reduction.
The fraud proof window is the bottleneck. Even with cheap data, the one-week finality delay for cross-chain asset transfers persists. This creates a poor user experience compared to ZK-Rollups like zkSync and Starknet, which offer near-instant finality.
Security scales with capital. The economic security of an Optimistic Rollup depends on the value of bonded assets (like ETH) that can be slashed during fraud proofs. This creates a scaling ceiling; securing a $100B chain requires proportionally massive, idle capital.
Evidence: The Arbitrum One bridge still enforces a 7-day withdrawal delay despite EIP-4844. In contrast, ZK-Rollups using validity proofs, like those built with Polygon zkEVM, provide cryptographic finality in minutes, decoupling security from capital lockups.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Frequently Challenged Questions
Common questions about why EIP-4844 (Proto-Danksharding) is a boon for ZK-Rollups.
EIP-4844 introduces 'blobs,' a dedicated, low-cost data space for rollups on Ethereum. This separates rollup data from expensive mainnet calldata, drastically reducing transaction costs for L2s like zkSync, Starknet, and Arbitrum. It's the foundational step towards full Danksharding.
takeaways
WHY EIP-4844 IS A BOON FOR ZK-ROLLUPS
TL;DR: The Structural Shift
EIP-4844 introduces proto-danksharding, a dedicated data availability layer that structurally reduces L2 costs and unlocks new scaling paradigms.
01
The Problem: Data Blobs vs. Calldata
ZK-rollups like zkSync Era and Starknet historically posted transaction data to Ethereum as expensive calldata. This was the primary bottleneck for cost reduction.
- Calldata cost: ~$0.25 per transaction on L1.
- Data availability consumed ~80-90% of total rollup operating costs.
- High costs limited L2 throughput and user adoption.
~90%
Cost Was DA
$0.25
Per Tx Cost
02
The Solution: Dedicated, Cheap Data Channels
EIP-4844 creates blob-carrying transactions, a new transaction type with data that is cheap and automatically pruned after ~18 days.
- Blob data is ~10-100x cheaper than equivalent calldata.
- Enables L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism to pass >90% of savings directly to users.
- Fundamentally shifts the cost structure, making sub-cent transactions viable.
10-100x
Cheaper Data
>90%
Savings Passed On
03
The Catalyst: Enabling Hyper-Scalable ZK L2s
With data costs minimized, the focus shifts to proving efficiency. This is a structural win for ZK-rollups like zkSync, Scroll, and Polygon zkEVM.
- ZK-proofs become the dominant cost, incentivizing faster prover hardware and recursive proof aggregation.
- Unlocks massive throughput for privacy-focused chains like Aztec and application-specific rollups.
- Creates a clear path to full danksharding and >100k TPS for the Ethereum ecosystem.
100k+
Future TPS
Proof-Bound
New Bottleneck
04
The Network Effect: A Rising Tide for All L2s
Cheap, abundant data availability creates a positive-sum environment for the entire L2 stack, from general-purpose rollups to LayerZero-enabled omnichain apps.
- Arbitrum Orbit and OP Stack chains see immediate cost reductions.
- Validiums and EigenDA gain a credible, cheap alternative for high-throughput apps.
- Reduces the economic moat for emerging Alt-DA solutions, forcing competition on performance.
All L2s
Benefit
Alt-DA
Pressure
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall