Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
layer-2-wars-arbitrum-optimism-base-and-beyond
Blog

The Future of L2s: Monetizing State Access and Indexing

Transaction fees are a volatile, zero-sum game. The next L2 war will be won by protocols that build sustainable moats through premium data services—selling efficient, reliable read access to indexed chain state.

introduction
THE SHIFT

Introduction

The next phase of L2 competition moves from cheap execution to monetizing data access and state verification.

L2s are commoditizing execution. The race for the cheapest transaction is a race to zero, with OP Stack, ZK Stack, and Polygon CDK creating a sea of near-identical rollups.

Sustainable revenue requires new primitives. Protocols like EigenLayer and AltLayer demonstrate that restaking and shared security are the first step, but the endgame is selling verified state.

The real value is the state root. A proven, real-time state is the ultimate oracle, enabling trust-minimized indexing and data feeds that outcompete Chainlink or The Graph for on-chain applications.

Evidence: Arbitrum's BOLD consensus and Espresso Systems' shared sequencer focus on state finality, not just transaction ordering, to create a sellable data product.

thesis-statement
THE NEW STACK

The Fee Fallacy

L2 revenue models will shift from simple transaction fees to monetizing state access and data indexing.

Sequencer fees are a commodity. Every L2 offers cheap execution, making this revenue stream a race to the bottom. The real value is not in processing transactions but in providing permissionless access to the state they produce.

The new revenue stack is data. Protocols like The Graph and Covalent already monetize indexing. L2s will embed this capability natively, charging for real-time state queries and historical data access via services like EigenLayer AVS operators.

Indexing is the new RPC. The demand for structured, queryable blockchain data outpaces raw transaction volume. L2s that expose a standardized indexing marketplace, akin to Espresso's shared sequencer for data, will capture developer mindshare and sustainable fees.

Evidence: Arbitrum processes ~1M daily transactions but its ecosystem generates billions of data points. Monetizing this via a native data layer, not just gas, is the inevitable pivot.

BEYOND SEQUENCER FEES

L2 Revenue Model Comparison

Comparative analysis of emerging revenue streams for Layer 2s, focusing on monetizing state access, data services, and protocol-owned liquidity.

Revenue StreamArbitrum (Status Quo)zkSync (Emerging Model)Starknet (Full-Stack Vision)

Sequencer Fee Margin

~80% of L1 gas cost

~85% of L1 gas cost

~90% of L1 gas cost

State Access Fees (RPC)

Proposer/Prover MEV Capture

Partial (via sequencer)

Theoretical (future)

Active (SHARP prover network)

Protocol-Owned Liquidity (e.g., STRK)

Native token (ZK) for gas

Native token (STRK) for gas & staking

Data Indexing/Query Fees

Third-party (The Graph)

Planned (ZK Stack)

Native (Starknet SQL)

Cross-Chain Messaging Tax

None (third-party bridges)

Potential (native bridge)

Yes (StarkGate fee share)

Developer Subscription (e.g., APIs)

Planned (ZK Portal)

Yes (Starknet API services)

Annualized Revenue Run Rate (Est.)

$120-150M

$40-60M

$20-30M

deep-dive
THE MONETIZATION LAYER

Architecting the State Marketplace

Layer 2s will evolve from transaction processors into platforms that monetize access to their canonical state and execution history.

State is the new asset. The canonical state of an L2—its account balances, smart contract code, and historical execution traces—is a unique, high-fidelity data asset. Protocols like EigenLayer and Espresso Systems are building the rails to turn this state into a tradable commodity, enabling restaking and shared sequencing.

Indexing becomes a core primitive. Fast, reliable access to historical and real-time state is a bottleneck for applications. L2s will expose paid APIs, creating a market where services like The Graph or Covalent compete to serve the lowest-latency queries, moving indexing from a public good to a revenue stream.

Execution and data markets converge. The separation between execution layers (Arbitrum, Optimism) and data availability layers (Celestia, EigenDA) blurs. An L2's business model shifts from sequencer MEV and gas fees to selling verifiable state proofs and execution attestations to rollups, bridges, and oracles.

Evidence: Arbitrum processes over 1 million transactions daily, generating a state delta that applications and analysts pay to access. The demand for specialized RPC endpoints from providers like Alchemy and QuickNode proves the latent market for premium state access.

protocol-spotlight
THE FUTURE OF L2S: MONETIZING STATE ACCESS AND INDEXING

First Movers & Enablers

The next L2 battleground shifts from cheap execution to profitable data services, turning on-chain state into a monetizable asset.

01

The Problem: L2s Are Data Silos

Rollups publish cheap data blobs to L1 but create fragmented, inaccessible state. This forces dApps to run their own nodes, a $50k+/year operational burden, and cripples cross-chain UX with ~10s latency for state proofs.

$50k+
Annual Node Cost
~10s
Proof Latency
02

The Solution: RPC-as-a-Service (RaaS)

Infra players like Alchemy and QuickNode abstract node operations, but the frontier is indexing-specific RPCs. Think The Graph for L2s, where protocols pay for sub-second access to indexed, queryable state, creating a $100M+ service market.

Sub-Second
Query Speed
$100M+
Service Market
03

The Enabler: Verifiable State Proofs

Projects like Brevis and Herodotus enable trust-minimized state access across chains. L2s can monetize this by becoming the canonical source of verifiable proofs for their domain, charging fees for cross-chain attestations used by UniswapX and Across.

Trust-Minimized
Proof Security
New Revenue
Fee Stream
04

The First Mover: EigenLayer AVS for State

Restaking turns L2 sequencers into Actively Validated Services (AVS). They can offer guaranteed state availability and fast finality as a service, backed by $15B+ in restaked ETH slashing risk. This creates a cryptoeconomic moat for early adopters.

$15B+
Securing Capital
Fast Finality
Service Guarantee
05

The Metric: Revenue per GB of State

Future L2 valuation will track Revenue/GB not just TVL. By selling indexed access, verifiable proofs, and guaranteed availability, L2s transform from cost centers (paying for L1 blobs) to profit centers. Expect 10-100x multiplier on data revenue vs. pure sequencer fees.

Revenue/GB
New Metric
10-100x
Revenue Multiplier
06

The Endgame: L2 as a State Co-processor

The ultimate abstraction: L2s aren't just execution layers but general-purpose state co-processors for L1. Every L1 smart contract can rent L2 state for complex computations (e.g., AI inference, game logic), paid via micro-transactions. This mirrors AWS Lambda for blockchain.

Co-Processor
Architecture
Micro-Tx
Payment Model
counter-argument
THE MONETIZATION ENGINE

The Commoditization Counter-Punch

L2s will pivot from competing on cheap execution to monetizing exclusive access to their state and data.

Execution is a commodity. The core EVM opcode processing will become a low-margin utility, as seen with the convergence of L2 gas fees and the proliferation of OP Stack and ZK Stack forks.

The real moat is state. A rollup's unique application state and transaction history are proprietary assets. Protocols like The Graph index public chains, but L2s control direct, low-latency access to their own data.

Monetization shifts to data access. Future revenue comes from premium RPC endpoints, real-time event streams for traders, and custom indexing APIs, not from base fee margins. This is the AWS for blockchain state.

Evidence: Arbitrum's BOLD consensus and zkSync's Boojum prover are infrastructure investments that secure proprietary state, enabling services that generic RPC providers like Alchemy cannot replicate.

takeaways
MONETIZING STATE ACCESS & INDEXING

Strategic Imperatives for L2 Teams

As L2s commoditize, the next frontier is building sustainable revenue models by controlling and selling access to the most valuable asset: real-time state data.

01

The Problem: RPCs as a Cost Center

Public RPC endpoints are a massive, unmonetized cost sink for L2 teams, with traffic from free-tier users and indexers like The Graph and Covalent consuming resources.\n- Cost: Teams spend millions on infra for public goods.\n- Inefficiency: No QoS tiers or usage-based billing.\n- Missed Revenue: No capture of value from high-frequency data consumers.

$10M+
Annual Cost
0%
Revenue Capture
02

The Solution: Premium State Access APIs

Monetize real-time state and historical data through tiered API services, directly competing with centralized providers like Alchemy and Infura.\n- Tiered Access: Free public tier, paid tiers for low-latency, high-throughput queries.\n- Direct Monetization: Charge for archival data, event streams, and sub-second finality reads.\n- Strategic Control: Own the primary data pipeline for your ecosystem's apps.

~100ms
Guaranteed Latency
$50M+
Potential ARR
03

The Problem: Fragmented Indexing Layer

Apps rely on external indexers (The Graph, Goldsky) to query complex state, creating a fragmented, slow data layer outside the L2's control.\n- Speed Lag: Indexing adds ~2-10 second latency to on-chain data.\n- Revenue Leakage: Indexing fees flow to third parties, not the L2.\n- Sovereignty: Critical app logic depends on external, potentially unreliable services.

2-10s
Indexing Latency
100%
Revenue Leak
04

The Solution: Native, Verifiable Indexing

Bake a high-performance, verifiable indexing engine directly into the node client, offering sub-second data queries as a native L2 service.\n- Native Speed: Serve complex queries directly from sequenced data with <500ms latency.\n- Verifiable Proofs: Provide ZK or fraud proofs for query results, enabling trust-minimized data feeds.\n- Revenue Capture: Charge a premium for fast, provable data, capturing value from DeFi and gaming apps.

<500ms
Query Latency
30-50%
Take Rate
05

The Problem: MEV as the Only Revenue

Sequencer MEV/priority fees are volatile and politically toxic, creating an unsustainable and reputationally risky primary revenue model.\n- Volatility: Revenue swings with market conditions and MEV activity.\n- Community Distrust: Seen as a tax on users, leading to backlash.\n- Single Point of Failure: Over-reliance on one income stream.

>80%
Revenue from MEV
High
Reputation Risk
06

The Solution: Diversify with Data SaaS

Build a predictable, high-margin Software-as-a-Service business by selling structured data feeds and analytics to institutions, protocols, and traders.\n- Predictable ARR: Recurring subscriptions for real-time treasury dashboards, risk analytics, and compliance feeds.\n- High Margin: Software margins (70%+) vs. volatile transaction-based revenue.\n- Strategic Moats: Proprietary data insights become a defensible competitive advantage.

70%+
Gross Margin
Predictable
Revenue Stream
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team