TradFi prime brokerage is obsolete. It centralizes custody, credit, and execution, creating single points of failure like FTX. On-chain finance disintermediates these functions into separate, specialized protocols like EigenLayer for restaking and Aave for credit.
institutional-adoption-etfs-banks-and-treasuries
Blog
The Future of Prime Brokerage: Disintermediation and Re-bundling
DeFi's unbundling of financial services was a necessary purge. For institutional adoption, a new class of compliant, integrated on-chain prime brokers will re-bundle custody, lending, and execution. This is the infrastructure for the next wave.
introduction
THE DISINTERMEDIATION CYCLE
Introduction
Prime brokerage is being unbundled by modular protocols and will re-bundle as a permissionless, on-chain service.
The end-state is re-bundled, not unbundled. Protocols like dYdX and Hyperliquid demonstrate that permissionless composability re-aggregates services. The future prime broker is not a firm, but a smart contract orchestrating modular components.
This shift is measurable. The total value locked in DeFi lending and restaking protocols, which form the backbone of this new stack, exceeds $50B. This capital is the raw material for on-chain prime services.
thesis-statement
THE PRIME BROKERAGE CYCLE
The Core Thesis: The Inevitable Re-bundle
Prime brokerage will not be disintermediated into a thousand protocols; it will be re-bundled into a new, programmable financial stack.
Disintermediation is a trap. The initial wave of DeFi fragmented services across isolated protocols like Aave (lending) and Uniswap (trading). This created a terrible user experience, forcing manual capital management across dozens of interfaces. The cost is operational friction and fragmented liquidity.
Re-bundling is the solution. Protocols like EigenLayer and Across Protocol demonstrate the trend. EigenLayer re-bundles cryptoeconomic security into a single marketplace. Across re-bundles bridging and execution via intents. The next layer aggregates these primitives into a unified execution layer.
The new prime broker is an API. This re-bundled stack is not a single entity but a programmable interface. It abstracts away the underlying complexity of ZK-proof verification, intent-based routing, and cross-chain settlement. The user interacts with a single liquidity endpoint.
Evidence: Intent Architectures. The rise of UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across proves the demand for bundled execution. These systems don't just swap tokens; they source liquidity across venues, manage MEV, and settle across chains in a single transaction. This is the blueprint.
key-trends
THE FUTURE OF PRIME BROKERAGE
Key Trends Driving the Shift
The monolithic prime broker is being unbundled by on-chain primitives and re-bundled by intent-based architectures.
01
The Problem: Opaque Counterparty Risk
Traders are blind to their ultimate counterparty in CeFi, exposing them to contagion risk like the FTX collapse. On-chain, risk is transparent but fragmented.
- Key Benefit: Real-time visibility into collateral health and lender concentration.
- Key Benefit: Programmatic risk management via oracles and on-chain liquidation engines.
100%
Transparent
~0s
Settlement Finality
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Abstraction (UniswapX, CowSwap)
Users declare what they want, not how to achieve it. Solvers compete to source liquidity across venues, abstracting execution complexity.
- Key Benefit: Optimal price discovery across DEXs, private pools, and OTC desks.
- Key Benefit: Gasless UX and protection from MEV via batch auctions.
$10B+
Volume Routed
-90%
User Complexity
03
The Problem: Fragmented Liquidity Silos
Capital is trapped in isolated lending markets (Aave, Compound) and CEXs. Cross-margin and portfolio-level leverage are impossible.
- Key Benefit: Unified cross-margin accounts using smart contract wallets (e.g., Safe).
- Key Benefit: Portfolio-wide health scores enabling efficient capital utilization.
$50B+
Trapped Liquidity
3-5x
Capital Efficiency
04
The Solution: Universal Settlement Layers (LayerZero, Chainlink CCIP)
Cross-chain messaging protocols enable atomic composition of services (lending on Chain A, trading on Chain B) within a single transaction.
- Key Benefit: Native multi-chain prime brokerage without wrapped asset bridges.
- Key Benefit: Reduced settlement latency from days to seconds, cutting funding costs.
~3s
Message Latency
-99%
Settlement Time
05
The Problem: Manual, High-Touch Operations
Institutional onboarding, KYC, and compliance are manual processes taking weeks. On-chain activity lacks the legal and operational wrappers institutions require.
- Key Benefit: Programmatic KYC/AML via zk-proofs (e.g., zkKYC) and on-chain credential attestations.
- Key Benefit: Automated tax reporting and compliance modules built into the wallet layer.
6-8 weeks
Current Onboarding
<1 day
Target Onboarding
06
The Re-bundle: Smart Contract Wallets as Prime Brokerage Accounts
Wallets like Safe, with modular signing and plugin architecture, become the new prime brokerage interface. Plugins for execution, lending, and risk create a personalized stack.
- Key Benefit: Non-custodial control with institutional-grade security (multi-sig, MPC).
- Key Benefit: Composable DeFi Lego where users assemble their own prime services from best-in-class protocols.
$100B+
TVL in Smart Wallets
Unlimited
Plugin Configurations
DISINTERMEDIATION AND RE-BUNDLING
The Prime Brokerage Stack: TradFi vs. Emerging On-Chain
A feature and capability matrix comparing the monolithic TradFi prime brokerage model against the fragmented on-chain landscape and emerging re-bundled solutions.
| Core Function | TradFi Prime Broker (e.g., Goldman Sachs) | Fragmented On-Chain (Current State) | Re-bundled On-Chain (Emerging) |
|---|---|---|---|
Custody & Settlement | Centralized, Proprietary Ledger | Self-Custody via Wallets (MetaMask, Ledger) | Smart Contract Vaults (Safe, EigenLayer) |
Credit & Margin | Bilateral Lines, OTC, >24h Settlement | Isolated Pools (Aave, Compound), <1 sec | Cross-Margin Portfolios (Morpho Blue, Gearbox) |
Execution & Liquidity | Internalization, Dark Pools, Single Counterparty | Fragmented DEXs (Uniswap, Curve), MEV | Intent-Based Aggregation (UniswapX, 1inch Fusion) |
Cross-Chain Operations | Internal Netting, Custodian Bridges | Native Bridges & Messaging (LayerZero, Wormhole) | Unified Intent Layer (Across, Socket) |
Capital Efficiency | High (Netting, Rehypothecation) | Low (Overcollateralization, Silos) | Moderate (Shared Collateral Pools) |
Counterparty Risk | Single Entity (Prime Broker) | Protocol & Oracle Risk (Chainlink) | Smart Contract & Aggregator Risk |
Regulatory Compliance | KYC/AML, Licensed Entity | Permissionless, Pseudonymous | Licensed Front-ends, On-Chain Attestations |
Fee Structure | Bundled, Negotiated, ~20-50 bps | Transparent, Unbundled, ~1-30 bps per action | Subscription/Performance-based, ~5-15 bps |
deep-dive
THE RE-BUNDLING
Anatomy of an On-Chain Prime Broker
On-chain prime brokerage is the re-bundling of fragmented DeFi services into a single, programmable credit and execution layer.
Credit is the core primitive. Traditional prime brokers bundle custody, leverage, and execution. On-chain, programmable credit accounts replace custody, enabling non-custodial, cross-margin positions across protocols like Aave and Compound.
Execution becomes an intent. Users express desired outcomes, not transactions. The broker's intent-solving engine routes orders through the optimal venue—be it a Uniswap pool, a CowSwap batch, or a 1inch aggregation—maximizing fill and minimizing cost.
The network is the balance sheet. Unlike a single entity, an on-chain broker sources liquidity from a permissionless lender marketplace. Protocols like Maple Finance and Goldfinch provide institutional-grade pools, while EigenLayer restakers offer novel yield sources.
Evidence: Morpho's MetaMorpho vaults demonstrate this model, automating capital allocation to the highest-yielding lending markets, creating a passive, optimized credit backend for active strategies.
protocol-spotlight
THE FUTURE OF PRIME BROKERAGE
Protocol Spotlight: Early Architectures
The monolithic prime broker is being unbundled into composable, on-chain primitives, only to be re-bundled by user-centric protocols.
01
The Problem: Opaque, Custodial Silos
Traditional prime brokerage locks capital and positions in opaque, custodial silos, creating systemic counterparty risk and preventing capital efficiency across venues.\n- $10B+ in assets frozen during the FTX/Alameda collapse\n- 0% composability with DeFi yield strategies\n- Days-long settlement and withdrawal times
0%
Composability
Days
Settlement
02
The Solution: Non-Custodial Clearing Networks
Protocols like dYdX and Aevo pioneered the model: a central limit order book matched off-chain, with non-custodial settlement and asset custody on a dedicated L1 or L2.\n- ~500ms latency for institutional-grade trading\n- Self-custody of all assets, eliminating principal risk\n- Native cross-margin across perpetuals and spots
~500ms
Latency
100%
Self-Custody
03
The Problem: Fragmented Liquidity and Margin
Capital is stranded across isolated venues (CEX, DEX, perps, options), forcing over-collateralization and missing cross-margin efficiency.\n- 200%+ collateral requirements on isolated AMM perps\n- Zero netting of CEX spot balances against DEX borrowing\n- Manual, slow rebalancing across platforms
200%+
Collateral
$0
Netting
04
The Solution: Universal Margin Hubs
Architectures like Marginly (by Enso) and Contango abstract collateral into a unified pool, enabling cross-margin and leverage across any integrated venue.\n- Portfolio Margin: Single collateral backing multiple positions\n- Venue Agnostic: Leverage spot on Uniswap, perps on GMX\n- Risk Engine: Isolated vaults with dynamic liquidation parameters
1x
Collateral Pool
N Venues
Leverage Sources
05
The Problem: Manual, Costly Execution
Traders manually route orders, paying gas and slippage at each step, while missing optimal cross-chain opportunities.\n- $50+ in gas for a multi-step DeFi trade\n- >2% slippage on large orders via AMMs\n- No atomicity for cross-chain arb strategies
$50+
Gas Cost
>2%
Slippage
06
The Solution: Intent-Based Order Flow
Solving for user intent ("get me the best price") not transactions, protocols like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across use solvers and fill-or-kill auctions.\n- Gasless Signatures: Users sign intents, solvers compete to fulfill\n- MEV Protection: Order flow auctions redirect extractable value\n- Cross-Chain Native: Solvers use LayerZero and CCIP for fulfillment
$0
User Gas
Best Price
Execution
counter-argument
THE ARCHITECTURAL DIFFERENCE
Counter-Argument: Isn't This Just Recreating CeFi?
On-chain prime brokerage unbundles and re-bundles services via open protocols, creating a fundamentally different structure than opaque, custodial CeFi.
The core difference is custody. Traditional prime brokerage is a custodial bundle where a single entity (Goldman Sachs, Galaxy) controls assets, credit, and execution. On-chain PB is a non-custodial mesh where users retain asset ownership while protocols like Aave (credit) and UniswapX (execution) compete on composable service layers.
Re-bundling occurs via user intent. Instead of a bank's internal ledger, aggregation occurs in the user's wallet or intent solver. Projects like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across Protocol compete to fulfill complex cross-chain trades, creating a competitive market for service bundling that no single entity controls.
The settlement layer is public. Every transaction, margin call, and liquidation is verifiable on-chain. This transparency eliminates the counterparty risk opacity inherent in CeFi, where rehypothecation and hidden leverage caused collapses at firms like FTX and Celsius.
Evidence: DeFi's composable leverage. A user can today use MakerDAO to mint DAI against ETH, supply it to Aave as collateral to borrow more ETH, and loop that position via Gearbox Protocol. This multi-protocol credit stack is impossible in a walled CeFi garden.
risk-analysis
THE DISINTERMEDIATION TRAP
Risk Analysis: What Could Go Wrong?
The unbundling of prime brokerage creates new attack vectors and systemic risks that could undermine the entire thesis.
01
The Smart Contract Risk Black Hole
Disintermediation shifts counterparty risk from regulated entities to immutable, often unaudited, code. A single exploit in a core settlement contract or cross-chain bridge (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar) could vaporize billions. The lack of legal recourse and slow, fragmented governance for upgrades creates a systemic fragility that traditional finance's legal frameworks were built to prevent.
- $3B+ in cross-chain bridge hacks since 2021
- Irreversible losses vs. insured/tradfi bailouts
- Composability multiplies attack surface
$3B+
Bridge Hacks
0%
Legal Recourse
02
Liquidity Fragmentation Death Spiral
Re-bundling requires deep, aggregated liquidity. If protocols like UniswapX (intents) or 1inch (aggregation) fail to achieve critical mass, the user experience collapses. Traders face slippage death by a thousand pools, while lenders on isolated money markets like Aave or Compound suffer from capital inefficiency. This recreates the very problem disintermediation aimed to solve.
- >60% TVL concentrated in top 3-5 DeFi protocols
- High volatility triggers mass withdrawal events
- Oracle manipulation risks in fragmented markets
>60%
TVL Concentration
High
Slippage Risk
03
Regulatory Re-bundling by Force
Regulators (SEC, EU's MiCA) will target the new 'prime-like' aggregators (Frax Finance, EigenLayer). Compliance costs and KYC/AML requirements will force re-centralization, creating licensed walled gardens. This kills permissionless innovation and could lead to a two-tier system: compliant, slow 'clean' DeFi vs. offshore, risky 'shadow' DeFi.
- MiCA licensing live in 2024
- VASP registration requirements for liquidity hubs
- Geo-blocking fragments global liquidity pools
2024
MiCA Live
High
Compliance Cost
04
The MEV Cartel Endgame
Maximal Extractable Value becomes the new rent-seeking intermediary. Sophisticated searchers and builders (Flashbots, Jito Labs) with proprietary order flow agreements could form de facto cartels, front-running retail intent transactions and capturing the value meant for users. Protocols relying on SUAVE or other MEV solutions merely change the extractor, not the extraction.
- $675M+ in MEV extracted in 2023
- Centralization risk in builder/relay markets
- Intents shift, but don't eliminate, MEV
$675M+
MEV Extracted
Cartel Risk
Builder Market
future-outlook
DISINTERMEDIATION AND RE-BUNDLING
Future Outlook: The 24-Month Horizon
Prime brokerage will fragment into specialized protocols before re-aggregating into new, capital-efficient super-apps.
Specialized protocols will dominate. The monolithic prime broker model fragments into best-in-class, permissionless components for custody (like Safe), execution (like 1inch Fusion), and cross-chain settlement (like LayerZero). This disintermediation reduces systemic risk and vendor lock-in.
Re-bundling creates capital efficiency. After fragmentation, protocols like Aevo and dYdX will re-aggregate these services into unified interfaces. This creates a new competitive landscape where the best UX wins, not the deepest proprietary liquidity.
The winner is the best aggregator. The future prime broker is not a single entity but a capital-efficient routing layer. It will programmatically source liquidity from UniswapX, leverage from Aave, and cross-chain intent fulfillment from Across Protocol.
Evidence: The 2023-24 rise of intent-based architectures (UniswapX, CowSwap) proves demand for abstracted, optimized execution. This is the foundational layer for the next generation of brokerage.
takeaways
THE FUTURE OF PRIME BROKERAGE
Key Takeaways for Builders and Allocators
The monolithic prime broker is being unbundled by DeFi and re-bundled by intent-based architectures, creating new battlegrounds for liquidity and user ownership.
01
The Problem: The $10B+ Custody Tax
Traditional prime brokerage locks capital in custodial silos, creating massive opportunity cost and counterparty risk. DeFi's native composability is the antidote.
- Key Benefit: Unlock cross-margining across protocols (e.g., Aave, Compound, dYdX) without asset movement.
- Key Benefit: Eliminate counterparty risk by replacing broker balance sheets with smart contract logic.
$10B+
Locked Capital
0
Counterparty
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Abstraction (UniswapX, CowSwap)
Users express desired outcomes, not transactions. Solvers compete to source liquidity across venues, abstracting away fragmentation.
- Key Benefit: Optimal execution achieved automatically across DEXs, bridges (Across, LayerZero), and private pools.
- Key Benefit: Gasless UX where the solver bundles and pays for execution, lowering the barrier to complex strategies.
~30%
Better Price
Gasless
User Experience
03
The New Bundle: Modular Risk & Credit Networks
Re-bundling occurs at the risk layer, not the custody layer. Protocols like Maple, Goldfinch, and Clearpool underwrite credit, while EigenLayer restakes security.
- Key Benefit: Modular risk-taking: Allocators can underwrite specific yield strategies (e.g., LP positions, RWA pools) without operating full-stack infra.
- Key Benefit: Capital efficiency through generalized collateral and cross-protocol reputation systems.
100x
More Markets
Programmable
Risk
04
The Infrastructure Play: Universal Settlement Layers
The winning stack will be the neutral settlement layer that orchestrates this modular system—think Anoma, Hyperliquid, or a supercharged SUAVE.
- Key Benefit: Atomic composability ensures complex cross-chain strategies (borrow on Aave, hedge on GMX) either succeed fully or fail fully.
- Key Benefit: MEV capture redirection turns a systemic cost into a revenue stream for users and protocols via auction mechanisms.
Atomic
Settlement
MEV+
Revenue
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall