Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
green-blockchain-energy-and-sustainability
Blog

The Future of Infrastructure Ownership Is Fractional and Liquid

DePIN protocols are dismantling the trillion-dollar 'illiquid capital trap' by tokenizing physical assets. This analysis explores how fractional ownership rewires infrastructure finance, using energy networks as the primary case study.

introduction
THE SHIFT

Introduction

Blockchain infrastructure is moving from monolithic, illiquid ownership to a composable market of fractionalized assets.

Infrastructure is becoming an asset class. The monolithic model where a single entity owns and operates a validator or sequencer is obsolete. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon enable the fractionalization of staked capital, turning idle security into a tradable commodity.

Liquidity unlocks capital efficiency. A validator's stake is no longer a sunk cost. Projects like Symbiotic and Karak create secondary markets for restaked assets, allowing capital to secure multiple networks simultaneously. This mirrors the evolution from dedicated servers to cloud computing.

The market demands composability. Just as Uniswap composable liquidity, infrastructure assets must be programmable. The EigenDA data availability layer demonstrates how restaked ETH can be rehypothecated, creating a flywheel where security begets utility.

thesis-statement
THE FRACTIONAL FUTURE

The Core Thesis: Liquidity Unlocks Alpha

Infrastructure ownership is shifting from illiquid equity to liquid, tradable tokens, creating new alpha vectors for capital allocators.

Infrastructure is the new asset class. The value accrual of protocols like EigenLayer and Lido demonstrates that staked capital and network security are monetizable commodities. This transforms passive infrastructure into a yield-bearing, composable financial primitive.

Liquidity fragments governance and risk. A liquid token like LDO separates economic interest from validator operation. This enables specialized capital allocation, where funds can arbitrage yield across EigenLayer AVSs without running nodes.

The model outcompetes venture capital. Traditional VC equity in an infra startup is illiquid for 7-10 years. A liquid token provides immediate price discovery and exit liquidity, attracting a larger, more efficient capital base.

Evidence: EigenLayer's TVL surpassed $15B in under a year, proving demand for tokenizable restaking yield. This capital was previously trapped in illiquid equity or idle ETH.

market-context
THE LIQUIDITY PARADOX

The $100T Illiquid Capital Trap

Blockchain's core value proposition is liquidity, yet the infrastructure securing it remains locked in a pre-modern ownership model.

Infrastructure is illiquid equity. The capital securing networks like Ethereum and Solana is trapped in staking contracts, generating yield but lacking a secondary market. This creates a massive opportunity cost for validators and delegators who cannot hedge or leverage their position.

Fractional ownership unlocks capital efficiency. Projects like EigenLayer and Babylon are creating primitive markets for staked capital, allowing it to be rehypothecated for other services. This turns a static asset into a productive input for restaking and Bitcoin security.

Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) are the first step. Protocols like Lido (stETH) and Rocket Pool (rETH) tokenize staked ETH, but they only solve for Ethereum. The next wave, led by EigenLayer's AVS ecosystem, creates a generalized marketplace for cryptoeconomic security.

The $100T figure represents global real-world assets. The endgame is using this newly liquid crypto-native capital to underwrite tokenized bonds, real estate, and commodities. Ondo Finance's OUSG and similar products are early proofs-of-concept for this convergence.

CAPITAL FORMATION

DePIN Capital Stack vs. Traditional Project Finance

A comparison of funding, ownership, and liquidity models for physical infrastructure projects.

Feature / MetricTraditional Project FinanceDePIN Capital Stack

Minimum Investment Ticket Size

$1M+

< $100

Investor Liquidity Horizon

5-10 years (Locked)

< 24 hours (via DEX/CEX)

Capital Deployment Speed (to first asset)

6-24 months (Feasibility, Permits, Financing)

< 30 days (via token sale to community)

Fractional Ownership of Physical Assets

Secondary Market for Project Equity

Private, OTC, Illiquid

Public, On-Chain, Liquid (e.g., Helium IOT, Hivemapper)

Capital Stack Composition

70% Senior Debt, 30% Equity

100% Tokenized Equity (Network Token)

Investor Base

Banks, Pension Funds, Private Equity

Global Retail, DAOs, Crypto-Native VCs

Default Governance Mechanism

Bank Covenants & Board Seats

On-Chain Voting & Delegation (e.g., Solana, Ethereum)

protocol-spotlight
FRACTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Energy DePINs: From Theory to Grid

Tokenization is unbundling the trillion-dollar energy sector, turning centralized assets into liquid, programmable capital.

01

The Problem: Stranded Capital in Physical Assets

A $10B solar farm is a financial black hole for retail investors. The capital lock-up period is 10+ years, and secondary markets are illiquid. This creates a massive barrier to entry and misallocates global capital.

  • Asset Illiquidity: No secondary market for fractional ownership.
  • High Minimums: Typical entry is $500k+ for institutional funds.
  • Operational Opaqueness: Investors have zero real-time insight into asset performance.
10+ years
Capital Lockup
$500k+
Min. Entry
02

The Solution: Tokenized RWAs and On-Chain Cash Flows

Projects like Helium and React demonstrate the model: mint an NFT representing a physical asset (solar panel, battery), then stream its revenue as tokens. This creates a liquid secondary market for infrastructure equity.

  • Fractional Ownership: Buy a $100 slice of a Texas wind farm.
  • Real-Time Yield: Earn ~8-12% APY in stablecoins from energy sales.
  • Programmable Finance: Use yield-bearing RWA tokens as DeFi collateral on MakerDAO or Aave.
~10% APY
On-Chain Yield
-99%
Entry Cost
03

The Mechanism: Verifiable Oracles and Proof-of-Physical-Work

Trustless asset backing requires cryptographic proof of real-world operation. This is the oracle problem for DePINs. Solutions like Chainlink Functions and custom hardware attestations (e.g., Helium Proof-of-Coverage) verify energy output and mint rewards.

  • Data Integrity: Oracles attest to MWh produced and grid demand.
  • Sybil Resistance: Hardware fingerprints prevent fake node spoofing.
  • Automated Payouts: Smart contracts distribute revenue without intermediaries.
100%
Uptime Proof
<60s
Payout Latency
04

The Network Effect: Composability Beats Monolithic Utilities

A tokenized, interoperable energy grid outcompetes siloed utilities. A solar DePIN in Arizona can automatically sell excess power to a battery DePIN in California via a smart contract, optimizing for price and grid stability. This mirrors Uniswap's liquidity pool model for electrons.

  • Cross-Asset Synergy: Solar + Storage + EV Chargers form a resilient mesh.
  • Dynamic Pricing: Real-time auctions replace fixed-rate tariffs.
  • Global Capital Pool: Attract liquidity from Curve pools and EigenLayer restakers.
10x
Liquidity Access
-70%
Transmission Loss
05

The Regulatory Hurdle: Navigating the Howey Test

Tokenized energy assets are securities in most jurisdictions. The winning protocols will be those that architect around this, not ignore it. This means qualified custodians, KYC'd pools, and on/off-ramps compliant with MiCA and SEC regulations.

  • Compliant Primitive: Use Ondo Finance's model for institutional RWAs.
  • Permissioned Pools: Separate accredited investor and retail liquidity.
  • Legal Wrappers: Issue tokens through Swiss Fondation or Singapore VCC structures.
100%
KYC Coverage
$0
SEC Fines
06

The Endgame: Energy as a Tradable, Programmable Commodity

The final state is a global energy spot market running on-chain. Every kWh is a tradable token with a verifiable origin (solar, wind, nuclear). DeFi protocols like dYdX will offer perpetual futures on Texas power prices, and DAOs will manage local microgrids. This reduces systemic waste by ~30%.

  • Spot Trading: Trade kWh tokens on DEXs like Uniswap.
  • Derivatives Market: Hedge volatility with energy futures.
  • DAO Governance: Communities vote on grid upgrades and revenue allocation.
24/7
Market Hours
-30%
Grid Waste
deep-dive
THE ARCHITECTURE

The Mechanics of Fractional Ownership

Fractional ownership transforms infrastructure assets into tradable, programmable financial primitives.

Tokenization is the atomic unit. It converts physical server racks, validator stakes, or GPU clusters into on-chain tokens like EigenLayer LSTs or io.net $IO. This creates a standardized financial primitive for capital efficiency and composability.

Liquidity fragments governance power. Platforms like Karak Network or Symbiotic separate economic stake from operational control. A fractional owner holds yield-bearing exposure without running node software, decoupling investment from execution.

Secondary markets price risk. Fractional tokens trade on DEXs like Uniswap, establishing a real-time market price for infrastructure reliability. This creates a capital efficiency feedback loop where high-performing assets attract more stake at lower yields.

Evidence: EigenLayer's TVL exceeded $15B by enabling the fractional re-staking of ETH, proving demand for yield-generating infrastructure exposure without operational overhead.

risk-analysis
WHY FRACTIONALIZATION IS INEVITABLE

The Bear Case: Regulatory Friction & Physical Reality

Centralized ownership of critical infrastructure creates single points of failure for regulators and physics, making liquid, fractional ownership a defensive necessity.

01

The SEC's Hammer: Staking-as-a-Service is a Security

The Kraken settlement set the precedent: centralized staking services are securities. This creates an existential risk for any monolithic infrastructure provider.

  • Regulatory Arbitrage: Fractional, decentralized ownership via liquid staking tokens (LSTs) like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH diffuses this liability.
  • Compliance Burden: Shifts from a single corporate entity to a decentralized network of node operators and token holders.
~$40B
LST TVL at Risk
100%
Monolithic Risk
02

Geographic Centralization Breeds Censorship

~60% of Ethereum validators are hosted in US/EU AWS/GCP data centers. This creates a fatal vector for OFAC compliance demands and geographic blackouts.

  • Physical Decentralization: Fractional ownership incentivizes global, home-staking operations, reducing jurisdictional attack surface.
  • Fault Tolerance: A network of ~1M distributed validators (vs. a few hundred institutional clusters) is politically and physically resilient.
60%
Cloud Concentration
1M+
Target Node Count
03

Capital Inefficiency Kills Innovation

Locking 32 ETH ($100k+) in a single validator is prohibitive. This stifles participation and centralizes hardware capex to a few large players.

  • Liquid Capital: Fractionalization via Lido, SSV Network, or Obol unlocks staked capital for DeFi, creating a flywheel.
  • Distributed Capex: Shifts hardware investment from centralized funds to a global network of operators, funded by liquid token flows.
32 ETH
Monolithic Barrier
$100K+
Capital Locked
04

The MEV Cartel Problem

Top 5 validator clients control >66% of stake. This centralization allows for predictable, exploitable MEV extraction and chain censorship.

  • Fractionalized Validation: Technologies like DVT (Distributed Validator Technology) from Obol and SSV shard a single validator key across multiple nodes, breaking cartel control.
  • Credible Neutrality: Makes the chain's physical and economic layer resistant to coercion by any single entity.
>66%
Client Concentration
4-of-7
DVT Fault Tolerance
05

Hardware Fragility & The Slashing Nightmare

A single data center outage can slash hundreds of validators simultaneously, creating catastrophic, correlated financial penalties for a monolithic operator.

  • Risk Distribution: Fractional, geographically distributed ownership via DVT pools makes correlated slashing events statistically improbable.
  • Insurance via Design: The financial risk of downtime is borne by a diversified set of node operators and token holders, not a single balance sheet.
32 ETH
Max Slash per Val
~0.01%
DVT Correlated Risk
06

Exit Queue Centralization

During a crisis or regulatory event, a mass validator exit is rate-limited. Large, centralized staking providers would be stuck, while liquid token holders can sell instantly on secondary markets.

  • Liquidity as a Hedge: LSTs and LRTs provide an immediate exit liquidity layer detached from the chain's consensus mechanics.
  • Strategic Advantage: Fractional token holders can react in seconds; monolithic validators are trapped in a ~45-day queue.
45 days
Exit Queue Max
Seconds
LST Exit Time
future-outlook
THE LIQUIDITY FRONTIER

Convergence: DePIN Meets TradFi & AI

DePIN's physical asset tokenization creates a new asset class, merging infrastructure ownership with global capital and computational demand.

Tokenization unlocks institutional capital. DePIN protocols like Render Network and Helium convert physical hardware into on-chain yield-bearing assets. This creates a standardized, auditable investment vehicle for TradFi funds seeking real-world yield, bypassing traditional infrastructure funds.

AI is the ultimate demand sink. The insatiable compute needs of AI training and inference create a predictable, high-margin revenue stream for DePIN networks. Projects like Akash Network and io.net are positioning as the spot market for GPU compute, directly competing with AWS and Azure.

Liquidity fragments then consolidates. Early fragmentation across Solana, Ethereum L2s, and Avalanche will converge as cross-chain asset standards mature. Interoperability protocols like LayerZero and Wormhole will enable unified liquidity pools for DePIN tokens and their underlying yield.

Evidence: Render Network's RNDR token appreciated over 1000% in 2023, directly correlated with the AI compute boom and its migration to the Solana blockchain for higher throughput and lower fees.

takeaways
FRACTIONAL OWNERSHIP THESIS

TL;DR for Builders and Allocators

Infrastructure is shifting from monolithic, capital-intensive models to composable, liquid asset classes.

01

The Problem: $100M+ Validator Stakes Are Illiquid

Running a major L1 validator or a high-performance sequencer requires massive, locked capital. This creates centralization pressure and inefficient capital allocation for operators.

  • Capital Barrier: Solo staking on networks like Ethereum or Solana requires 32 ETH or ~$1M+ in SOL.
  • Opportunity Cost: Billions in capital is trapped, unable to be used for DeFi or other yield strategies.
32 ETH
Min. Stake
$1M+
Barrier
02

The Solution: Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) & Restaking

Tokenize validator equity into fungible assets (e.g., stETH, SOL staking receipts). This unlocks liquidity and creates a new primitive for DeFi composability.

  • Capital Efficiency: Stake once, use the derivative across Aave, Compound, and Uniswap.
  • Protocol Security as a Service: EigenLayer and Babylon enable these LSTs to be restaked to secure new networks, generating additional yield.
$50B+
LST TVL
2x+
Yield Stack
03

The Problem: RPC & Sequencer Nodes Are Opaque Silos

Providing core infrastructure like RPC endpoints or rollup sequencing is a black-box business. Revenue and ownership are not accessible to passive capital.

  • High OpEx: Running global, low-latency node fleets costs $100k+/month.
  • Zero Liquidity: There's no market to buy/sell a stake in the cash flow of an Alchemy or a Blockdaemon.
$100k+
Monthly OpEx
0%
Liquidity
04

The Solution: Node Operators as DAOs (e.g., Lava Network)

Modular networks like Lava fractionalize RPC provisioning. Anyone can stake to become a provider, and users pay for API calls. Revenue is distributed to stakers.

  • Permissionless Participation: Earn yield by staking to provide services for Cosmos, Ethereum, or Solana.
  • Market-Driven Quality: Performance (uptime, latency) directly impacts rewards, creating a competitive, decentralized market.
~200ms
Target Latency
10k+
Potential Nodes
05

The Problem: MEV is Extracted, Not Shared

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) from block production and arbitrage is captured by a small group of searchers and validators. The underlying capital providers (stakers) see none of this multi-billion dollar revenue.

  • Opaque Extraction: $500M+ in MEV is captured annually with minimal redistribution.
  • Protocol Risk: Inefficient MEV markets lead to network congestion and poor user experience.
$500M+
Annual MEV
<10%
Shared
06

The Solution: MEV-Smoothing & Auction Markets

Protocols like CowSwap, Flashbots SUAVE, and Osmosis's Threshold Encryption aim to democratize MEV. They create transparent auction markets where value is captured at the protocol level and redistributed.

  • Fair Redistribution: MEV profits can be returned to users as better prices or to stakers as additional yield.
  • Efficiency Gains: Coordinated auction mechanisms reduce network waste and gas spikes.
90%+
Efficiency Gain
Pro Rata
Redistribution
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team