On-ramps are the bottleneck. A user needs a bank account, KYC verification, and a custodial exchange like Coinbase to acquire USDC. This recreates the exact barriers stablecoins aim to bypass.
global-crypto-adoption-emerging-markets
Blog
Why Stablecoins Alone Cannot Solve Informal Economy Inclusion
A technical analysis arguing that while stablecoins like USDC and USDT solve currency volatility, they fail to address the core constraints of the informal economy: the inability to tokenize local assets and create on-chain credit histories, which are the true barriers to financial growth.
introduction
THE INFRASTRUCTURE GAP
The Digital Dollar Mirage
Stablecoins fail to onboard the informal economy because they require a sophisticated financial and technical stack the unbanked do not possess.
The wallet is the new bank. Self-custody via MetaMask or a hardware wallet demands seed phrase management and gas fee comprehension, imposing an impossible operational burden on first-time users.
Informal transactions require cash. Daily commerce relies on physical cash settlement. Bridging to local currency via off-ramps like Transak incurs fees and delays that destroy the utility of peer-to-peer digital cash.
Evidence: Visa processes 65,000 TPS globally. The Ethereum L1 handles ~15 TPS. This throughput chasm makes stablecoins unusable for high-frequency, low-value informal economy transactions.
thesis-statement
THE ON-CHAIN CASH FLOW PROBLEM
Thesis: Volatility is a Symptom, Not the Disease
Stablecoins address price risk but fail to solve the fundamental mismatch between on-chain settlement and off-chain operational cash flows.
Stablecoins are settlement assets, not operational cash. They solve for finality and price stability at the point of transaction, but a merchant's real-world expenses—rent, payroll, supplies—require off-chain fiat conversion. This creates a persistent liquidity bridge tax via CEX spreads or services like MoonPay.
The core disease is asynchronous settlement. A business operates on net-30/60 day terms, but blockchain demands real-time, prepaid gas. Protocols like Sablier and Superfluid attempt to model streaming payments, but they cannot interface with the informal economy's invoice-based reality.
Evidence: Over 90% of USDC volume is on Ethereum and its L2s, yet the median transaction size exceeds $10k, indicating institutional settlement, not micro-transactions for daily commerce. The on-ramp/off-ramp bottleneck remains the primary point of failure for inclusion.
key-trends
BEYOND STABLECOIN RAILS
The Three Real Constraints to Informal Economy Growth
Stablecoins provide digital dollars, but fail to address the core infrastructural and behavioral barriers preventing informal economy integration.
01
The Problem: Off-Ramp Friction
Converting digital stablecoins to spendable local cash is the critical failure point. It's a fragmented, high-fee process dominated by opaque OTC desks and predatory exchanges.
- Cost: Off-ramp fees can exceed 5-10%, negating the benefit of cheap on-chain transfers.
- Access: Requires KYC at centralized exchanges, which many informal workers cannot or will not complete.
5-10%
Off-Ramp Tax
>24h
Settlement Lag
02
The Problem: Smartphone Sovereignty
Informal workers often share devices, use low-end hardware, or fear device seizure. Crypto's self-custody model is a liability, not a feature.
- Risk: Loss of a single device means total loss of funds; no social recovery fallback.
- Complexity: Managing seed phrases, gas fees, and wallet addresses is a non-starter for daily commerce.
1 Device
Single Point of Failure
0%
Adoption Hurdle
03
The Problem: The Trust Graph Gap
Informal economies run on localized, reputational trust (e.g., knowing your supplier). Anonymous, global blockchains provide zero context for credit, dispute resolution, or community enforcement.
- Credit: No system for the short-term, reputation-based lending that fuels small trade.
- Disputes: Immutable ledgers cannot reverse a mistaken or fraudulent payment to a pseudonymous address.
$0
On-Chain Reputation
100% Final
Irreversible Risk
deep-dive
THE ACCESS GAP
Beyond the Peg: The Asset and Credit Chasm
Stablecoins provide a dollar-denominated asset but fail to address the core financial needs of the informal economy: credit and productive asset ownership.
Stablecoins are inert assets. They replicate the function of a dollar in a wallet, not a dollar in a bank. The informal economy's primary constraint is not currency volatility but the inability to collateralize future earnings or existing, non-standard assets for credit.
Credit requires on-chain identity. Lending protocols like Aave and Compound require overcollateralization with crypto assets the unbanked lack. The missing layer is a verifiable, portable reputation graph that translates off-chain economic activity into on-chain creditworthiness, a problem projects like Spectral and Cred Protocol are tackling.
The real asset gap is off-chain. A merchant's inventory or a farmer's future harvest cannot be tokenized and used as collateral today. Oracles like Chainlink provide price feeds, but the legal and technical frameworks for real-world asset (RWA) tokenization remain fragmented and inaccessible at the individual level.
Evidence: DeFi's Total Value Locked (TVL) is ~$90B, dominated by speculative crypto assets. The RWA sector, led by protocols like Centrifuge and Maple, holds only ~$5B, highlighting the structural chasm between digital finance and physical economic value.
WHY DIGITAL MONEY IS NOT ENOUGH
The Inclusion Gap: Stablecoins vs. Required Infrastructure
Comparing the isolated capabilities of a stablecoin against the essential infrastructure layers required for real-world economic inclusion.
| Critical Inclusion Feature | Stablecoin (e.g., USDC, USDT) | On/Off-Ramp Layer | Local Liquidity & FX Layer | Compliance & Identity Layer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Settlement Finality | ~15 sec (L1) / ~2 sec (L2) | 1-3 Business Days (Bank ACH) | < 1 sec (Local P2P) | N/A |
On-Ramp Cost for $100 | $1-3 (DEX Fee) | $2-5 + 1-4% (Processor Fee) | 5-15% (Informal FX Spread) | $0.5-2 (KYC Verification) |
Off-Ramp to Local Currency | ||||
Local Legal Tender Liquidity Pools | ||||
Regulatory Compliance (Travel Rule, AML) | ||||
Non-Custodial for End-User | ||||
Requires Bank Account | ||||
Primary Failure Mode | Smart Contract Risk | Banking Choke Point | Liquidity Fragmentation | Identity Exclusion |
protocol-spotlight
BEYOND STABLECOINS
Building the Next Layer: Protocols Tackling Asset & Credit
Stablecoins provide dollar-denominated rails but fail to address the core credit and asset needs of the informal economy, which operates on trust, reputation, and illiquid collateral.
01
The Problem: Stablecoins Are Just Better Wires
They digitize the dollar but ignore local economic reality. A street vendor needs credit for inventory, not just a volatile-free store of value. Stablecoins like USDC and USDT solve the 'what' of money, not the 'how' of economic agency.\n- No Credit Creation: Cannot be minted against local, non-standard collateral.\n- Identity-Oblivious: Provide no framework for building transactional trust or reputation.
>90%
Informal Loans
0%
On-Chain
02
The Solution: On-Chain Reputation as Collateral
Protocols like Getline and Spectral are building primitive credit scores from on-chain activity. This transforms a user's transaction history into a borrowable asset, bypassing traditional credit bureaus.\n- Non-Custodial Underwriting: Lend based on provable cash flow, not government ID.\n- Progressive Decentralization: Start with OTC pools, evolve to permissionless lending markets.
<24h
Approval
0
KYC Required
03
The Solution: Fractionalizing Illiquid Real-World Assets
Platforms like Centrifuge and Goldfinch tokenize invoices, revenue streams, and physical assets. This creates the collateral base for local-currency stable assets and credit, moving beyond the dollar hegemony.\n- Local Currency Stability: Mint stablecoins pegged to NGN or PHP against local cash flows.\n- De-Risked Capital: Global lenders access diversified pools of real-world yield, funding local growth.
$500M+
RWA TVL
8-12%
APY
04
The Problem: The Oracle Gap for Informal Data
Smart contracts are blind to off-chain reality. A farmer's harvest yield or a merchant's sales ledger is invisible, creating a collateral desert. Current oracles like Chainlink serve DeFi, not micro-economies.\n- High Cost: Verifying small-ticket, high-frequency data is economically unviable.\n- Centralized Points of Failure: Reliance on a few attested data sources recreates the old gatekeepers.
$10+
Min. Oracle Cost
>1B
Unverified Assets
05
The Solution: Light Client & ZK-Verified Data Attestation
Networks like Brevis and Hyperoracle use ZK coprocessors to verifiably compute on any data source. A community can run a light client verifying a local mobile money ledger, creating a trust-minimized data feed for underwriting.\n- Cost Collapse: Batch-proof thousands of micro-transactions for pennies.\n- Sovereign Verification: Communities can define and verify their own creditworthiness signals.
~$0.01
Per Proof
1000x
Data Scale
06
The Meta-Solution: Composable Credit Stacks
The end-state is not a single protocol, but a stack: RWA collateral + on-chain reputation + ZK-verified data feeding into lending markets like Maple or Euler. This creates a parallel, inclusive financial system.\n- Composability: Credit score used across multiple apps without re-submission.\n- Progressive Permissioning: Start with community-curated pools, evolve to algorithmic risk models.
10x
Capital Efficiency
-90%
Origination Time
counter-argument
THE ON-RAMP FALLACY
Steelman: "But Stablecoins Are the Necessary First Step"
Stablecoins provide monetary stability but fail to address the systemic barriers that keep informal economies excluded from formal financial rails.
Stablecoins are just digital cash. They replicate the function of physical dollars or euros on-chain, solving for volatility and unit of account. This is necessary but insufficient for inclusion, as it ignores the legal identity and credit history requirements of formal finance.
The real barrier is KYC/AML, not currency. Informal workers lack the documented income and identity verification that protocols like Circle (USDC) or MakerDAO (DAI) require for compliant on/off-ramps via exchanges. A stablecoin wallet without a fiat exit is a dead end.
Compare this to mobile money (M-Pesa). M-Pesa succeeded by building a closed-loop, identity-light system using phone numbers as proxies. Current stablecoin infrastructure, reliant on centralized exchanges and banking partners, enforces the same exclusionary gates it claims to bypass.
Evidence: In Venezuela, USDT adoption on Tron boomed for peer-to-peer value transfer, but users remain locked in the crypto ecosystem, unable to access mortgages or business loans without converting to bolivars through informal, high-fee channels.
takeaways
BEYOND PAYMENTS
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Stablecoins are a necessary but insufficient on-ramp for the informal economy. True inclusion requires composable, trust-minimized infrastructure.
01
The Problem: The Collateral Trap
Overcollateralized stablecoins like MakerDAO's DAI require capital the unbanked don't have. Algorithmic models like Terra's UST fail under stress. This creates a fundamental liquidity barrier for informal workers.
- Requires ~150%+ collateral for credit
- Exposes users to depeg and liquidation risk
- Fails to leverage informal sector's primary asset: reputation and future cash flow
150%+
Collateral
$40B+
Stablecoin TVL
02
The Solution: On-Chain Credit & Identity
The real unlock is portable, programmable credit built on verifiable data. Protocols like Goldfinch (off-chain underwriting) and Circles UBI (web-of-trust) point the way.
- Sovereign credit scores via on-chain transaction history
- Sybil-resistant attestations using Worldcoin or BrightID
- DeFi composability allows credit to be used for micro-loans, insurance, and more than just payments
0%
Upfront Collateral
100M+
World ID Users
03
The Problem: The Infrastructure Gap
Informal economies run on cash, barter, and local trust networks. A stablecoin wallet alone doesn't solve for off-ramps, feature phones, or regulatory opacity.
- ~70% of emerging markets use 2G/3G feature phones
- High-cost fiat gateways like MoonPay are prohibitive
- Lack of legal wrappers for dispute resolution and taxation
70%
Feature Phone Use
3-5%
Gateway Fees
04
The Solution: Layer 2s & Intent-Based UX
Adoption requires abstracting away blockchain complexity. zkSync Era and Arbitrum enable low-fee microtransactions. ERC-4337 Account Abstraction and intent-based systems like UniswapX let users specify what, not how.
- Gas sponsorship models eliminate upfront crypto needs
- Social recovery wallets solve key loss
- Cross-chain intents via Across or LayerZero unify fragmented liquidity
<$0.01
L2 Tx Cost
~2s
Finality
05
The Problem: The Sovereignty Paradox
Censorship-resistant money is useless if the underlying social and legal framework doesn't recognize it. Informal workers need enforceable contracts and access to formal markets.
- Off-chain agreements (e.g., labor contracts) remain unenforceable
- Stablecoin holdings are invisible to local credit bureaus
- Regulatory uncertainty creates adoption friction for businesses
0
Legal Precedent
High
Regulatory Risk
06
The Solution: Hybrid Legal-Tech Stacks
The endgame is a mesh of verifiable credentials, on-chain attestations, and smart legal contracts. Projects like Kleros (dispute resolution) and OpenLaw are building the connective tissue.
- zk-proofs of income for loan applications without exposing all data
- DAO-based community courts for local dispute resolution
- Programmable compliance for automated tax withholding and reporting
zk-Proofs
Privacy Tech
DAO Courts
Dispute System
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall