Rollups are the new app chain. The monolithic L1 model is obsolete for serious builders; the modular thesis won. A dedicated rollup provides predictable fees, custom gas tokens, and protocol-owned MEV capture that shared chains like Solana or Avalanche cannot offer.
gaming-and-metaverse-the-next-billion-users
Blog
Why Rollups-as-a-Service is the Only Viable Path for Indies
The dream of on-chain gaming is dying on congested, expensive L1s. For independent studios, Rollups-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms are not a luxury—they are the only viable path to a sovereign execution environment, abstracting away the devops hell of blockchain deployment.
introduction
THE COST OF SOVEREIGNTY
Introduction
Independent projects cannot compete with vertically-integrated Layer 1 ecosystems without a dedicated, cost-effective execution environment.
The operational burden is prohibitive. Managing a sovereign chain's sequencer, prover network, and data availability layer requires a DevOps team, not a founding team. This is the core failure of the first-generation 'app-chain' thesis championed by Cosmos and Polkadot.
RaaS providers abstract the hard parts. Platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and Gelato reduce launch time from months to hours. They handle node infrastructure, bridging to Ethereum via AltLayer or Espresso, and integration with EigenDA or Celestia for data.
Evidence: The total value locked in app-specific rollups and Layer 3s grew 300% in 2023, while general-purpose L1 market share stagnated. The economic model is proven.
thesis-statement
THE ARCHITECTURAL IMPERATIVE
The Core Thesis: Sovereignty or Bust
Independent application chains are an operational black hole, making Rollups-as-a-Service the only viable path for serious builders.
Sovereignty is non-negotiable for applications requiring custom execution, fee markets, or governance. A shared L2 like Arbitrum or Optimism forces compromises on throughput and economics that break product-market fit.
Bootstrapping a chain is a trap. The capital and devops overhead for sequencing, proving, and bridging infrastructure like Celestia and EigenDA consumes resources better spent on product. This is the core failure of the appchain thesis.
RaaS providers like Conduit and Caldera abstract the chain. They deliver a sovereign rollup with a one-click deployment, handling node ops, prover coordination, and bridge integrations to Ethereum and Alt-L1s. The developer owns the state.
The cost of failure plummets. Experimenting with a custom gas token or a novel DA scheme on a managed rollup costs thousands, not millions. This enables the rapid iteration that protocols like Lyra and Aevo used to find traction.
key-trends
WHY INDIE ROLLUPS ARE NOW POSSIBLE
The Three Trends Making RaaS Inevitable
The convergence of three macro-trends has shifted the cost-benefit analysis from 'why' to 'why not' for launching an application-specific rollup.
01
The Problem: The Shared Sequencer Bottleneck
General-purpose L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism are congested by competing applications, creating unpredictable fees and latency. Your app's UX is held hostage by the worst-behaved dApp on the chain.
- MEV extraction from your users by public mempools.
- Unpredictable latency spikes during network congestion.
- No sovereignty over transaction ordering or fee markets.
~500ms
Base Latency
10x+
Fee Spikes
02
The Solution: Modular Stack Commoditization
The core components of a rollup—execution, settlement, data availability, and proving—are now standardized, pluggable services. This turns a 2-year engineering project into a 2-week configuration.
- Data Availability: Choose Celestia, Avail, or EigenDA for ~$0.001 per tx.
- Proving: Leverage Risc Zero or Espresso for shared ZK proving.
- Settlement: Inherit security from Ethereum, Bitcoin, or Celestia via rollup frameworks like Arbitrum Orbit and OP Stack.
-90%
Dev Time
$0.001
DA Cost/Tx
03
The Catalyst: Economic Alignment via MEV Capture
A dedicated rollup allows the application to internalize and redistribute the value extracted from its own economic activity, turning a cost center into a revenue stream.
- Capture & Redistribute MEV: Use private mempools (e.g., Flashbots SUAVE) to capture value for the protocol treasury or users.
- Custom Fee Tokens: Implement gas subsidies or transaction fee burning to enhance token utility.
- Sovereign Revenue: Monetize block space and sequencing rights directly, unlike paying rent to a shared L2.
7-Figure
Annual MEV
100%
Value Capture
WHY RAAS IS THE ONLY VIABLE PATH FOR INDIES
The Build vs. Buy Matrix: RaaS vs. Traditional Paths
A first-principles comparison of infrastructure strategies for launching an application-specific rollup, quantifying the operational and financial reality for independent teams.
| Feature / Metric | Build In-House (DIY) | Use a General-Purpose L2 (e.g., Arbitrum, OP Stack) | Use a Rollup-as-a-Service (e.g., Conduit, Caldera, AltLayer) |
|---|---|---|---|
Time to Mainnet (Dev Hours) |
| ~ 1,000 hours (for app logic) | < 100 hours (configuration only) |
Upfront Capital Cost | $200K - $500K+ (devs, audits, security) | $50K - $150K (audits, deployment) | $0 - $50K (service tier) |
Sequencer Operation & Maintenance | |||
Prover Setup & Key Management | |||
Data Availability (DA) Flexibility | |||
Custom Precompiles / Opcode Support | |||
Protocol Revenue Capture (MEV, Fees) | 100% (minus costs) | ~0-10% (shared with L2) | 70-90% (shared with RaaS provider) |
Exit to Full Independence (No Vendor Lock) |
deep-dive
THE INFRASTRUCTURE SHIFT
Beyond Deployment: The RaaS Stack is the Game Dev Stack
Rollups-as-a-Service platforms like Caldera and Conduit are not just deployment tools; they are the new, full-stack game engine for indie studios building onchain.
RaaS abstracts core infrastructure complexity. Indie studios cannot afford to manage sequencer operations, data availability layers, or cross-chain messaging. Platforms like AltLayer and Gelato provide these as managed services, turning a multi-engineer DevOps burden into a simple API call.
The stack enables rapid iteration cycles. Traditional L1 deployment is a monolithic, slow process. A RaaS stack with Espresso for shared sequencing and EigenDA for cheap data lets studios test new game mechanics and tokenomics in isolated rollups within hours, not months.
This creates a new economic model. The cost structure shifts from speculative gas fees on Ethereum mainnet to predictable SaaS-style pricing. Studios using a stack like Caldera + Celestia pay for proven scalability, freeing capital for game development instead of infrastructure gambling.
Evidence: The migration is already happening. Games like Pixels migrated to a dedicated Skale chain, and AI Arena launched on its own Hyperbolic rollup, demonstrating that performance-critical applications choose sovereignty over shared chain congestion.
protocol-spotlight
THE INFRASTRUCTURE STACK
RaaS Provider Breakdown: Who Solves What?
Building a sovereign rollup from scratch is a multi-year, multi-million dollar engineering quagmire. RaaS providers abstract the core complexities into modular services.
01
The Problem: The Multi-Chain Liquidity Desert
Your new rollup launches with zero users and zero capital. Bridging is slow, expensive, and fragments liquidity. This is the cold start problem that kills adoption.
- Solution: RaaS providers integrate native bridging stacks like LayerZero and Axelar.
- Result: Instant access to $10B+ in cross-chain liquidity from day one, with canonical security.
$0
Bridge Dev Cost
~2s
Finality
02
The Problem: The $2M+ DevOps Black Hole
A production-grade rollup requires a dedicated team for sequencer nodes, RPC endpoints, indexers, and block explorers. This is a massive capital and operational sink.
- Solution: Providers like Conduit and Caldera offer managed node infrastructure.
- Result: Launch with enterprise-grade uptime (99.9%+) and global RPC coverage, turning a cost center into a fixed monthly fee.
-90%
OpEx
24/7
Monitoring
03
The Problem: The Modular Config Paradox
Choosing a DA layer, prover network, and settlement chain involves navigating trade-offs between cost, security, and speed. One wrong choice cripples the chain.
- Solution: Platforms like Gelato and AltLayer provide no-code configurators for stacks like EigenDA, Celestia, and Arbitrum Orbit.
- Result: Optimize for <$0.001 per tx data costs or Ethereum-level security with a few clicks, no PhD required.
1 hr
To Configure
10x
Config Flexibility
04
The Problem: The Bespoke Security Nightmare
Auditing a novel fraud/validity proof system and a custom bridge is a multi-million dollar, time-consuming process that introduces existential risk.
- Solution: RaaS providers deploy battle-tested, audited frameworks like the OP Stack or Arbitrum Nitro.
- Result: Inherit the security assumptions of Ethereum or another established L1, with zero custom cryptographic risk.
$0
Audit Cost
L1 Grade
Security
05
The Problem: The Protocol-Locked Future
Early stack choices (like a specific proving network) create permanent vendor lock-in. Migrating later is a hard fork-level event.
- Solution: Providers like Eclipse and Sovereign Labs champion sovereign rollups with swappable components.
- Result: Future-proof your chain. Switch your DA layer from Celestia to EigenDA post-launch without a community revolt.
0
Lock-in
Modular
By Design
06
The Conduit & Caldera Play: Time-to-Market as a Weapon
While others sell flexibility, these leaders sell velocity. They provide the fastest path from idea to live, custom-branded chain.
- Key Move: One-click deployment with pre-configured, opinionated stacks for gaming or DeFi.
- Real Result: Teams like Apex and Kinto went from zero to mainnet in under 30 days, capturing first-mover advantage.
<30 days
To Mainnet
1-Click
Deployment
counter-argument
THE NETWORK EFFECT
The Counter-Argument: Isn't This Just More Fragmentation?
RaaS accelerates fragmentation to achieve the critical mass required for sustainable, application-specific liquidity.
Fragmentation is the prerequisite for consolidation. The current multi-chain landscape with Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon is a temporary, inefficient state. RaaS platforms like Conduit and Caldera enable a Cambrian explosion of purpose-built chains, creating the raw material for future aggregation layers.
Application-specific liquidity outperforms shared liquidity. A dedicated rollup for a DeFi protocol optimizes MEV capture and fee markets, unlike competing for blockspace on a general-purpose L2. This creates stronger economic alignment between the app and its underlying chain.
Aggregation layers are inevitable. The proliferation of rollups creates demand for intent-based solvers (UniswapX), shared sequencing (Espresso), and universal liquidity layers. RaaS doesn't prevent consolidation; it manufactures the fragments that future AltLayer or Avail will unify.
Evidence: The Celestia DA adoption metric shows this is not theoretical. Over 50 rollups have already launched using its data availability, proving the demand for sovereign, modular execution environments over monolithic L1s.
risk-analysis
THE INDIE'S DILEMMA
The Bear Case: Where RaaS and Appchains Can Fail
Building a sovereign rollup is a technical and economic minefield for independent teams. Here are the critical failure modes that make Rollups-as-a-Service the only viable path.
01
The Multi-Sig Moat
Sovereignty requires a decentralized sequencer and governance. Most indie chains default to a centralized multi-sig, creating a single point of failure and regulatory liability.\n- Security Risk: A 5-of-9 multi-sig is not a decentralized network.\n- Exit Scam Vector: Users and VCs are betting on team integrity, not protocol security.\n- Regulatory Target: Clearly identifiable controllers attract scrutiny.
>90%
Centralized
High
Liability
02
The Liquidity Death Spiral
A new chain is a barren liquidity desert. Bootstrapping a native token and attracting capital requires unsustainable incentives and bridges.\n- Cold Start Problem: No TVL means no users, which means no TVL.\n- Bridge Dependency: Reliance on LayerZero, Axelar, or Wormhole creates systemic risk.\n- Incentive Drain: Emission-based farming attracts mercenary capital that exits post-rewards.
<$50M
Typical TVL
~3 months
Farm Cycle
03
The Protocol Ossification Trap
Once live, upgrading core infrastructure (prover, DA layer, bridge) is a high-stakes coordination game. Teams get stuck with outdated, expensive tech.\n- Fork Lock-In: Custom fork of an OP Stack or Arbitrum Nitro version becomes unmaintainable.\n- DA Migration Hell: Switching from Celestia to EigenDA or Avail requires a hard fork and community vote.\n- Innovation Lag: Miss out on new primitives (e.g., shared sequencers from Espresso, AltLayer).
6-12 months
Upgrade Cycle
High
Coordination Cost
04
The Talent Black Hole
Hiring and retaining specialized rollup engineers (consensus, cryptography, MEV) is impossible for most indie budgets. The talent is at OP Labs, Arbitrum, and zkSync.\n- Niche Skillset: Requires deep knowledge of fraud proofs, ZK circuits, and peer-to-peer networking.\n- Cost Prohibitive: A senior rollup dev commands $300k+ in a bull market.\n- Operational Overhead: Team spends cycles on infra, not on core application logic.
$300k+
Dev Cost
~50
Global Experts
05
The Shared Sequencer Illusion
Outsourcing block production to Espresso or Astria seems smart but creates new centralization and MEV risks. You're trading one bottleneck for another.\n- Latency Tax: Adding a middleware layer increases time-to-finality.\n- MEV Cartel Risk: Sequencer set can collude to extract value from your chain's users.\n- Unproven at Scale: No major production chain runs on a decentralized shared sequencer yet.
~500ms
Added Latency
New Risk
MEV Vector
06
The Economic Sinkhole
Revenue must cover Data Availability costs (from Celestia, EigenDA), sequencer ops, and security audits. Most appchains never achieve positive unit economics.\n- DA Burn: $0.10 - $1.00+ per MB, a direct cost against transaction fees.\n- Audit Cycle: A full security review costs $50k - $500k and must be repeated for upgrades.\n- Negative Carry: Burns venture capital for 18+ months before possible sustainability.
$0.10+/MB
DA Cost
$500k+
Audit Cost
future-outlook
THE DEFAULT PATH
The Future: RaaS as the Default SDK
Rollup-as-a-Service providers will become the foundational SDK for application-specific chains, abstracting away the untenable complexity of sovereign infrastructure.
Indie teams cannot compete on core infrastructure. The operational overhead of running a sequencer, prover, and data availability layer is a capital and talent drain that distracts from product-market fit.
RaaS is the abstraction layer that matters. Platforms like Conduit, Caldera, and AltLayer commoditize the stack, letting developers focus on state transitions while outsourcing consensus and execution to specialized providers.
The future is multi-RaaS. Applications will compose services from EigenDA for data, Espresso for shared sequencing, and AltLayer for restaking-secured validation, creating resilient, modular rollups without vendor lock-in.
Evidence: The 50+ rollups launched on Conduit and Caldera in 2024 demonstrate that developer demand exists for turn-key chains, not for the raw components of the OP Stack or Arbitrum Nitro.
takeaways
ECONOMICS OF SCALE
TL;DR: The Indie Studio's RaaS Mandate
Building a sovereign rollup from scratch is a capital-intensive, multi-year R&D project. For an indie studio, it's a death sentence.
01
The $10M+ Sunk Cost Fallacy
Bootstrapping a rollup requires a full security team, devops engineers, and months of battle-testing. RaaS providers like Conduit, Caldera, and Gelato commoditize this.\n- Eliminates $5M+ in initial engineering costs\n- Reduces time-to-launch from 18 months to ~4 weeks\n- Transforms capex into predictable, usage-based opex
-$5M
Capex
4 weeks
Launch Time
02
The Shared Sequencer Arbitrage
Running a dedicated sequencer is expensive and creates MEV leakage. Shared sequencer networks (Espresso, Astria) provide instant finality and cross-rollup composability.\n- Cuts operational overhead by >70%\n- Enables atomic cross-rollup transactions with near-zero latency\n- Future-proofs against EigenLayer's hyperscale economic security
-70%
Ops Cost
~500ms
Finality
03
Modular Escape Velocity
Monolithic chains lock you into one tech stack. A RaaS-built rollup on Celestia or EigenDA can swap data availability layers overnight. This is critical for adapting to new cryptographic primitives like danksharding.\n- Maintains sovereignty while avoiding vendor lock-in\n- Allows cost optimization as DA pricing evolves (e.g., from $0.10 to $0.001 per MB)\n- Future-proofs integration with AltLayer's restaked rollups for enhanced security
1 day
DA Swap
100x
Cost Flex
04
The Interop Trap & Native Bridge Solution
Relying on third-party bridges like LayerZero or Axelar introduces existential risk and poor UX. A RaaS rollup can deploy a native, canonical bridge as a first-class citizen.\n- Eliminates bridge hack risk (see: Wormhole, Ronin) for core assets\n- Enables custom fee models and governance for bridge liquidity\n- Integrates intent-based routing (Across, Socket) as a feature, not a dependency
0
Bridge Risk
Native
Sovereignty
05
From Cost Center to Revenue Engine
A custom rollup isn't just infrastructure; it's a business model. You control the fee switch, sequencer revenue, and premium feature monetization.\n- Capture 100% of sequencer/MEV revenue instead of paying it to L1\n- Implement app-specific gas tokens (like dYdX's USDC)\n- Monetize chain space via partnership whitelists (see: Arbitrum Stylus)
100%
Revenue Capture
App-Specific
Tokenomics
06
The Talent Multiplier
Hiring Solidity devs is hard. Hiring Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus engineers is impossible for a studio. RaaS abstracts the distributed systems complexity, letting your team focus on product.\n- Allocates 90% of engineering bandwidth to game logic, not infra\n- Leverages provider ecosystems (Optimism's OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit) for tooling and grants\n- Attracts top web3 talent by working on the application layer, not plumbing
90%
Product Focus
0
Consensus Hires
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall