Public mempools are a vulnerability. Every unconfirmed trade on Ethereum or Solana broadcasts its intent, creating a free option for MEV bots to front-run or sandwich the transaction.
future-of-dexs-amms-orderbooks-and-aggregators
Blog
The Unseen Cost of MEV on Public DEXs and the Privacy Solution
MEV isn't just profit redistribution; it's a structural tax on transparency. This analysis argues privacy-preserving DEXs attack the root cause—intent leakage—offering a more fundamental fix than MEV auctions or PBS.
introduction
THE UNSEEN COST
Introduction: The Transparency Tax
Public blockchain transparency creates a quantifiable, exploitable cost for traders, which privacy-centric DEXs eliminate.
This is the Transparency Tax. It is the difference between your intended entry price and your executed price, siphoned by searchers via protocols like Flashbots. It functions as a hidden fee layer atop gas costs.
Traditional DEXs like Uniswap V3 are leaky. Their open order-book model and public transaction flow make optimal execution impossible for retail and institutional traders alike.
Privacy is the countermeasure. Protocols like Penumbra and Shutter Network encrypt orders until settlement, removing the informational asymmetry that MEV extraction relies upon. This restores price integrity.
key-insights
THE HIDDEN TAX
Executive Summary
MEV is not a bug but a structural inefficiency of public mempools, imposing a multi-billion dollar tax on DeFi users and distorting market fairness.
01
The Problem: Front-Running as a Service
Public mempools broadcast intent, turning every trade into a signal for sophisticated bots. This creates a negative-sum game where value is extracted from retail users.
- Cost: Sandwich attacks alone extract >$1B annually.
- Impact: Guaranteed slippage and failed transactions for end-users.
- Result: DEXs become inefficient price discovery venues.
>$1B
Annual Extract
~90%
Bot Traffic
02
The Solution: Encrypted Mempools & Private Order Flow
Privacy is the prerequisite for fairness. Encrypted transaction pools, like those pioneered by Flashbots SUAVE and EigenLayer, decouple execution from disclosure.
- Mechanism: Orders are encrypted until inclusion, blinding searchers.
- Outcome: Eliminates front-running and sandwich attacks at the source.
- Ecosystem Shift: Moves value from extractors back to users and validators.
0s
Front-Run Window
100%
Execution Certainty
03
The Architecture: Intent-Based Solving
The endgame is moving from transaction broadcasting to declarative intent. Systems like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across demonstrate this shift.
- User Benefit: Post only the desired outcome, not the execution path.
- Solver Competition: Solvers compete privately to fulfill intent, improving price.
- Integration: Becomes the default UX layer, abstracting MEV away from users.
10-50 bps
Price Improvement
1
Transaction Sign
04
The Trade-Off: Censorship Resistance vs. Efficiency
Privacy enhancements introduce centralization vectors. Encrypted mempools and solvers become trusted intermediaries.
- Risk: Reliance on a smaller set of block builders or solver networks.
- Mitigation: Cryptographic proofs (TEEs, ZK) and decentralized solver sets.
- Balance: The goal is practical finality without sacrificing credibly neutral inclusion.
~3s
Proposer Time
N of M
Trust Model
05
The Metric: Realized Spread vs. Quoted Spread
The true cost of trading is not the DEX fee, but the difference between the expected price and the execution price after MEV. Privacy infrastructure closes this gap.
- Current State: Realized spread can be 2-5x the quoted spread on high-volatility assets.
- Target: Align realized spread with quoted spread through guaranteed execution.
- Measurement: This is the key KPI for any privacy-focused DEX infrastructure.
2-5x
Spread Inflation
~0
Target Gap
06
The Pragma: MEV is Inevitable, Redistribution is Not
MEV cannot be eliminated, only managed. The core debate is who captures the value: public good funding, validators, or users.
- Status Quo: Value captured by proprietary searcher networks.
- Future State: Protocols like EigenLayer and Flashbots aim to democratize and redistribute MEV.
- Conclusion: Privacy is the tool that enables equitable redistribution.
$10B+
Annual MEV
>50%
Redistributable
thesis-statement
THE UNSEEN COST
The Core Argument: Privacy as Pre-Match
Public mempools expose user intent, creating a multi-billion dollar MEV tax that privacy-centric DEXs eliminate.
Public mempools are toxic. Every pending transaction on Ethereum or Solana broadcasts user intent, creating a free option for searchers and validators to extract value via front-running, sandwiching, and arbitrage.
Privacy is pre-execution security. Protocols like Shutter Network and Fairblock encrypt orders pre-match, preventing intent leakage. This shifts the MEV game from extraction to competition on execution quality alone.
The cost is quantifiable. Over $1.2B in MEV was extracted from DEX traders in 2023. This is a direct tax on users of public AMMs like Uniswap V3 and PancakeSwap, paid for the privilege of transparent order flow.
Evidence: A 2023 Flashbots study showed over 90% of profitable MEV opportunities on Ethereum originated from observable DEX liquidity. Privacy breaks this causal chain at its source.
PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE DEX EXECUTION
The MEV Tax: A Comparative Cost Analysis
Quantifying the hidden cost of frontrunning, sandwich attacks, and arbitrage extraction on public liquidity, and the economic benefit of private execution.
| Cost / Feature | Public DEX (e.g., Uniswap) | Private DEX (e.g., CowSwap) | Intent-Based Bridge (e.g., Across) |
|---|---|---|---|
Avg. Slippage from MEV | 0.5% - 3.0% | 0.0% (Guaranteed) | 0.0% (Guaranteed) |
Sandwich Attack Risk | |||
Frontrunning Risk | |||
Required Gas Auction (RGA) Cost | $10 - $500+ | N/A | N/A |
Time to Finality (User POV) | ~12 sec (Ethereum) | ~1-5 min (Batch) | < 1 min (Optimistic) |
Solver/Relayer Competition | Mempool (Adversarial) | Batch Auction (Cooperative) | RFQ Auction (Competitive) |
Cross-Chain MEV Protection | |||
Fee Model | LP Fee + Gas + MEV Tax | Solver Fee (No Gas) | Relayer Fee + LP Fee |
deep-dive
THE VULNERABILITY
Anatomy of a Leak: How Public Mempools Fuel MEV
Public mempools broadcast user intent, creating a free-for-all for MEV searchers to extract value from DEX trades.
Public mempools are a free data feed for MEV searchers. Every pending transaction on Ethereum or Solana reveals price, size, and slippage tolerance before execution. This creates a predictable profit opportunity for bots.
Front-running is the primary attack vector. A searcher sees a large DEX swap, replicates it first with higher gas, and sells the output back to the original user at a worse price. This exploits the time delay between broadcast and block inclusion.
The cost is a hidden tax on users. MEV extraction from sandwich attacks and arbitrage reduces effective swap rates. This adversarial reordering degrades the performance of public DEXs like Uniswap and Curve versus private systems.
Private transaction pools are the solution. Protocols like Flashbots Protect, Taichi Network, and Shutter Network encrypt orders or use private RPCs. This breaks the information asymmetry that defines public mempool MEV.
protocol-spotlight
THE UNSEEN COST OF MEV
Architectures of Opacity: The Privacy DEX Landscape
Public mempools are a free-for-all for extractive bots, turning every trade into a potential loss. Privacy DEXs rebuild the stack to eliminate this tax.
01
The Problem: The Public MemPool as a Hunting Ground
On-chain DEXs like Uniswap and Curve broadcast intent, creating a predictable revenue stream for searchers and validators. The cost is paid by every user.
- Front-Running: Bots copy and execute your trade first, moving the price against you.
- Sandwich Attacks: Your large swap is bracketed by two bot trades, capturing the spread.
- Cost: MEV extraction totals $1B+ annually, a direct tax on DeFi liquidity.
$1B+
Annual MEV
>90%
User Loss Rate
02
The Solution: Encrypted Mempools & Threshold Decryption
Protocols like Penumbra and Aztec use cryptographic schemes to hide transaction details until execution. This breaks the MEV supply chain at its source.
- FHE/Threshold Encryption: Trades are encrypted, only decrypted by the validator set post-inclusion.
- No Leakage: Searchers cannot see price, size, or direction, making front-running impossible.
- Architecture: Requires a dedicated chain or L2 with a modified consensus layer.
0ms
Arb Window
TEE/MPC
Core Tech
03
The Solution: Commit-Reveal Schemes & Batch Auctions
Systems like CowSwap and Hashflow separate intent submission from execution, aggregating liquidity and settling in discrete, non-exploitable batches.
- Intent-Based: Users submit signed orders, not transactions, breaking the predictable tx chain.
- Batch Settlement: Trades execute at a single clearing price, eliminating in-block arbitrage.
- CoW Magic: 'Coincidence of Wants' allows peer-to-peer matching off-chain, minimizing fees.
~$500M
Saved to Date
Batch
Settlement
04
The Trade-Off: Liquidity Fragmentation vs. User Protection
Privacy architectures inherently fragment liquidity from the transparent DEX ecosystem. This is the core design tension.
- New Liquidity Silos: Penumbra, Shutter Network, and Diva cannot share pools with Uniswap.
- Capital Efficiency: Requires bootstrapping new, isolated TVL, a significant cold-start problem.
- Future State: Cross-chain privacy layers (e.g., zkBridge) may eventually connect these opaque pools.
New Silos
Liquidity Model
High
Bootstrap Cost
05
The Hybrid: Private Aggregation on Public Chains
Protocols like RAILGUN and Tornado Cash Nova add a privacy layer atop existing DEXs using zero-knowledge proofs, offering a pragmatic middle ground.
- zk-Proofs of Balance: Users prove they hold assets in a private pool without revealing history.
- Public Execution: Trades execute via standard DEX routers (Uniswap, 1inch) but with shielded addresses.
- Limitation: Relies on underlying DEX liquidity but obscures the user's trail and intent.
zk-SNARKs
Core Tech
L1/L2 Agnostic
Deployment
06
The Verdict: Privacy is an Execution Layer Primitive
True MEV resistance requires redesigning the transaction lifecycle, not just patching it. The winning architecture will be the one that balances strong guarantees with liquidity access.
- Winner Take Most: Network effects in liquidity are powerful; the best tech may not win alone.
- Regulatory Overhang: Privacy remains a legal gray area, impacting adoption and integration.
- Endgame: MEV-free execution will become a premium feature, segmented by user sophistication and asset size.
Execution
Core Primitive
High Stakes
Regulatory Risk
counter-argument
THE DATA LEAK
The Steelman: Isn't Privacy Just Obfuscated Centralization?
Public mempools expose user intent, creating a multi-billion dollar MEV industry that extracts value from every trade.
Public mempools are toxic. Every pending transaction broadcasts user intent, creating a free-for-all for searchers and validators to extract value through front-running and sandwich attacks.
Privacy enables fair execution. Obfuscating transaction details via private mempools (e.g., Flashbots SUAVE, Taiko) or intent-based systems (e.g., UniswapX) neutralizes predatory MEV by hiding the signal from public view.
The centralization risk is real. Relying on a single, trusted sequencer for privacy (like early Flashbots) creates a centralized point of failure and censorship, which is the core of the steelman argument.
The solution is decentralized privacy. Protocols like Shutter Network use threshold cryptography (tEEs) to decentralize the sequencer role, ensuring no single entity controls the private transaction flow.
Evidence: MEV extraction on Ethereum exceeded $1.3B in 2023, with DEX swaps being the primary target, proving the systemic cost of transparent mempools.
takeaways
THE UNSEEN COST OF MEV
TL;DR: The Privacy Pivot
Public mempools expose every trade, turning user intent into a free option for extractive bots. Privacy is the new performance frontier.
01
The Problem: The Public Mempool Tax
Broadcasting transactions to a public mempool is like announcing your poker hand. It enables front-running, sandwich attacks, and arbitrage extraction that silently drain user value. On Ethereum, this MEV tax can cost users 5-50+ basis points per trade, a multi-billion dollar annual drain.
5-50+ bps
MEV Tax
$1B+
Annual Drain
02
The Solution: Encrypted Mempools
Protocols like Shutter Network and EigenLayer's MEV Blocker encrypt transaction bundles off-chain. This prevents bots from seeing or interfering with orders until they are finalized, effectively eliminating front-running and sandwich attacks at the protocol level. It's a cryptographic firewall for user intent.
0 bps
Sandwich Cost
~500ms
Added Latency
03
The Architecture: Commit-Reveal Schemes
Privacy isn't about hiding forever; it's about hiding during the vulnerable execution phase. Commit-reveal schemes (used by CowSwap and intent-based systems like UniswapX) let users commit to a trade with a hash. The transaction details are only revealed after the block is built, decoupling broadcasting from execution and neutralizing time-based attacks.
100%
Attack Neutralized
Batch
Execution
04
The Trade-Off: Latency for Fairness
Privacy introduces a fundamental latency trade-off. Encrypted mempools or commit-reveal schemes add ~500ms to 2s of delay for order matching and decryption. This is the cost of fairness—sacrificing a marginal speed for guaranteed protection against predatory MEV, making it optimal for large, vulnerable orders.
~1s
Added Latency
100%
Fairness
05
The Ecosystem: MEV-Boost++
The future is proposer-builder separation (PBS) with privacy. Builders like Flashbots SUAVE aim to become decentralized block builders that process encrypted orders, creating a competitive market for fair inclusion. This shifts the power from searcher bots back to users and ethical builders, realigning economic incentives.
PBS
Architecture
Market
For Fairness
06
The Bottom Line: Privacy as a Primitve
Privacy is no longer a niche feature for coins; it's a critical infrastructure primitive for fair exchange. The next generation of DEXs and cross-chain bridges (like Across with encrypted fills) will bake in privacy by default. User experience will be defined by what you don't see—the attacks that never happen.
Default
Future State
Core Primitive
Infra Layer
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall