Protocols are becoming commodities. The basic mechanics of issuing and distributing points are trivial; the defensible value shifts to the standardized data layer that aggregates user activity across protocols like Pendle and EigenLayer.
e-commerce-and-crypto-payments-future
Blog
The Coming Standardization War for Loyalty Token Protocols
Loyalty points are moving on-chain, but a critical infrastructure battle is brewing. This analysis dissects the coming war between protocols vying to set the de facto standard for tokenized loyalty, focusing on metadata, redemption hooks, and cross-chain interoperability.
introduction
THE BATTLEFIELD
Introduction
Loyalty token protocols are entering a phase of aggressive standardization, where the winning design will define user ownership for the next decade.
The war is for the settlement primitive. This is not a feature competition but a fight to become the default settlement layer for loyalty, akin to how Uniswap dominates DEX liquidity. The winner captures network effects and protocol rents.
Evidence: The rapid adoption of ERC-20 and ERC-721 demonstrates that the first widely adopted standard becomes infrastructure. The same gravitational pull applies to loyalty data, with protocols like EigenLayer already creating de facto standards for restaking points.
thesis-statement
THE STANDARDIZATION WAR
The Core Thesis
Loyalty token protocols will converge on a dominant standard, and the winner will be the one that best abstracts away blockchain complexity for brands.
Winner-Takes-Most Dynamics define protocol wars. The EVM won because it created a composable developer ecosystem, not because it was technically superior. The same network effects will consolidate loyalty token infrastructure around a single dominant standard.
Abstraction is the Battleground. Protocols like Particle Network and Thirdweb are competing to become the Stripe for Web3 loyalty. The winner will not be the most decentralized protocol, but the one that provides the simplest API for brands to issue and manage tokens.
Interoperability is Non-Negotiable. A winning standard must be chain-agnostic and integrate with existing loyalty rails. It will need native bridges to Ethereum L2s and Solana, and plug into point-of-sale systems like Square or Shopify.
Evidence: ERC-20 and ERC-721 dominance shows that a single, simple standard captures 95% of developer mindshare. The loyalty token standard that achieves similar adoption will capture the economic value of trillions of future loyalty points.
market-context
THE STANDARDS WAR
The Current Battlefield
Loyalty token protocols are converging on a handful of competing technical standards, creating a winner-take-most dynamic.
The ERC-20 vs. ERC-1155 schism defines the initial front. ERC-20's simplicity and liquidity make it the default for standalone points programs like Blast's Gold. ERC-1155's batch efficiency and metadata flexibility are favored by composable ecosystems like Layer3's CUBE for multi-chain campaigns.
The composability trap is the critical trade-off. A proprietary, feature-rich standard creates a walled garden with superior UX but locks out external DeFi. An open, minimal standard like ERC-20 enables instant integration with Uniswap and Aave but sacrifices programmability.
Interoperability protocols are the arbiters. The winning standard will be the one most easily bridged and interpreted by LayerZero and CCIP. Protocols that build native cross-chain messaging, like Axelar, gain a structural advantage in this war.
Evidence: The ERC-7641 (Native Yield) proposal demonstrates the direction. It bakes yield-bearing logic directly into the token standard, a move that could obsolete wrapper-based systems used by EigenLayer and Symbiotic.
key-trends
LOYALTY TOKEN PROTOCOLS
Three Fronts of the Standardization War
The battle for the $200B+ loyalty market will be won by the protocol that best standardizes the core primitives of issuance, distribution, and utility.
01
The Problem: Fragmented Issuance
Every brand builds its own token contract, creating security vulnerabilities and insolvency risk for users. This fragmentation kills composability and liquidity.
- $1B+ in value locked in isolated, unaudited contracts.
- ~30% of programs fail due to smart contract bugs or economic flaws.
- Zero interoperability between rival brand ecosystems.
$1B+
At Risk
30%
Failure Rate
02
The Solution: ERC-20 or ERC-1155?
Standardized token issuance via battle-tested contracts like ERC-20 (for fungible points) or ERC-1155 (for multi-token programs). This enables shared security and instant liquidity.
- ERC-20 enables direct DEX listing and integration with Uniswap and Aave.
- ERC-1155 allows a single contract for tiers, badges, and points, reducing gas by -70%.
- Audits become a public good, not a per-brand cost.
-70%
Gas Cost
ERC-20/1155
Standards
03
The Problem: Walled-Garden Utility
Loyalty points are trapped in single-brand silos. Users can't trade, stake, or use them as collateral, destroying 90%+ of their potential economic value.
- Points are a non-productive asset with zero yield.
- No secondary market exists, forcing users into vendor lock-in.
- Redemption options are limited to overpriced brand merchandise.
90%+
Value Lost
0%
Yield
04
The Solution: Programmable Settlement Layers
Protocols like LayerZero and Axelar enable cross-chain loyalty points, while intent-based solvers (like UniswapX) can find optimal redemption paths across brands and chains.
- Points become cross-chain collateral for lending on Aave.
- Users can swap Starbucks points for Delta miles via a CowSwap order.
- ~500ms finality for cross-chain point transfers.
~500ms
Settlement
Cross-Chain
Utility
05
The Problem: Opaque Distribution & Sybils
Brands lack on-chain identity graphs, making targeted rewards impossible and leaving programs vulnerable to sybil attacks that drain ~15% of program budgets.
- Rewards go to bots, not loyal customers.
- No proof-of-personhood or Sybil-resistance.
- Marketing spend efficiency is below 20% ROI.
15%
Budget Drained
<20%
ROI
06
The Solution: On-Chain Reputation Graphs
Integrate with Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) and Worldcoin to create portable, privacy-preserving reputation proofs. This enables hyper-targeted rewards.
- Issue attestations for purchase history and engagement.
- Use zero-knowledge proofs to verify loyalty without exposing data.
- Increase marketing ROI to 300%+ by targeting real users.
300%+
Targeting ROI
EAS/Worldcoin
Stack
LOYALTY TOKEN INFRASTRUCTURE
Protocol Battle Matrix: Standardization Contenders
Comparison of competing frameworks for standardizing on-chain loyalty and reward points.
| Feature / Metric | ERC-20 (Status Quo) | ERC-1155 (Semi-Fungible) | ERC-7007 (AI-Generated Content) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Token Standard | Fungible (ERC-20) | Semi-Fungible (ERC-1155) | Non-Fungible (ERC-721 Extension) |
Native Multi-Tier Support | |||
On-Chain Metadata for Points | |||
AI/Verifiable Proof Integration | |||
Gas Cost per Batch Mint (10k units) | $50-100 | $5-15 | $75-150 |
Interoperability with DeFi (e.g., Uniswap, Aave) | |||
Native Composability with Gaming (e.g., Immutable) | |||
Major Adopter Examples | Traditional Brand Migrations | TreasureDAO, Gaming Ecosystems | AI Art Platforms, Novelty Use |
deep-dive
THE STANDARDIZATION BATTLE
The Interoperability Trilemma: Why No One Has Won Yet
Loyalty token protocols face a fundamental trade-off between security, decentralization, and capital efficiency that no single solution has resolved.
Security is non-negotizable. A loyalty token's value collapses if users doubt its redemption guarantees. Native bridging (e.g., LayerZero's OFT) offers canonical security but locks liquidity into siloed chains, creating capital inefficiency.
Decentralization creates friction. Trust-minimized bridges like Across or Chainlink CCIP use optimistic or cryptographic verification. This increases security but introduces latency and complexity, a poor fit for instant point redemption.
Capital efficiency demands centralization. Fast, cheap solutions like Stargate or Socket rely on centralized liquidity pools and relayers. This optimizes user experience but reintroduces custodial risk and protocol dependency.
Evidence: The dominant model today is fragmentation. Projects deploy separate, non-fungible loyalty tokens on each chain (Ethereum, Polygon, Base) because no bridge solves all three constraints, forcing a suboptimal trade-off.
risk-analysis
THE COMING STANDARDIZATION WAR
The Bear Case: Why Standardization Could Fail
The race to define the universal loyalty token standard will trigger a multi-front conflict that could fragment the ecosystem.
01
The Protocol Land Grab
Major ecosystems like Solana, Polygon, and Arbitrum will push proprietary standards to lock in developers and liquidity. This creates a classic winner-takes-most dynamic where the best tech doesn't win—the deepest pockets and strongest network effects do.\n- Risk: Balkanization into 3-4 incompatible standards.\n- Outcome: Developers forced to choose sides, increasing integration overhead by ~300%.
3-4
Major Standards
+300%
Dev Overhead
02
The Oracle Problem 2.0
Standardized loyalty requires standardized, high-fidelity on-chain data. Reliance on oracles like Chainlink or Pyth introduces a critical centralization vector and cost barrier. Disputes over data quality or liveness could render tokens worthless.\n- Risk: Single oracle failure collapses multi-chain loyalty states.\n- Cost: Oracle fees could consume >15% of small transaction rewards, killing micro-loyalty models.
>15%
Fee Overhead
1
Single Point of Failure
03
Regulatory Arbitrage Creates Fragility
Jurisdictions will classify loyalty tokens differently—as securities, utility tokens, or points. Protocols will engage in regulatory arbitrage, creating a patchwork of compliance. A single enforcement action (e.g., SEC vs. a major protocol) could invalidate the token model for entire chains.\n- Risk: Protocol design dictated by the most restrictive regulator.\n- Result: Innovation stifled; protocols retreat to permissioned, centralized models.
Global
Patchwork Compliance
1
Enforcement Trigger
04
The Composability Trap
Standardization aims for composability, but it creates systemic risk. A vulnerability in a widely adopted standard (see ERC-4626 or ERC-777 reentrancy) becomes a contagion vector across $10B+ in aggregated loyalty value. Security becomes a lowest-common-denominator game.\n- Risk: One bug, every protocol.\n- Dilemma: Fast innovation vs. brittle monostandard.
$10B+
Contagion Risk
1
Bug To Break All
05
User Abstraction Backlash
Fully abstracted, intent-based loyalty (via UniswapX, CowSwap) removes user agency. Black-box aggregation and settlement can lead to worse points accrual or hidden costs. Users rebel against losing visibility and control, fracturing adoption.\n- Risk: Loyalty becomes a rent-extractive layer for solvers.\n- Evidence: Early pushback against Across and LayerZero 'unfair' bundling.
Black-Box
Settlement
High
User Rebellion Risk
06
Economic Incentive Misalignment
Standardization is driven by infra providers, not loyalty issuers. Protocols like EigenLayer or Celestia seek to commoditize the loyalty application layer to sell more blockspace or security. This misalignment leads to standards optimized for infra profit, not issuer or user value.\n- Result: Issuers reject the standard, building custom solutions, perpetuating fragmentation.\n- Metric: <20% adoption rate of the 'winning' standard after 24 months.
<20%
Adoption Rate
Infra vs. App
Incentive Split
future-outlook
THE STANDARDIZATION WAR
The Endgame: Predictions for 2025
Loyalty token protocols will converge on a single dominant standard, creating winner-take-most markets for the underlying infrastructure.
ERC-6551 becomes the de facto standard for non-financialized loyalty tokens. Its ability to turn any NFT into a token-bound account creates a composable identity layer that protocols like Friend.tech and Farcaster Frames will build upon, making competing standards obsolete.
The real battle is for the settlement layer. Protocols like Aevo and Hyperliquid that currently power points will pivot to become generalized loyalty engines, competing directly with Layer 2s like Base and Arbitrum for programmatic reward distribution.
Interoperability will be non-negotiable. The winning stack will feature native ERC-4337 account abstraction and CCIP/ LayerZero-style cross-chain messaging, forcing a consolidation where only 2-3 loyalty-specific rollups survive by 2025.
Evidence: The 500% growth in ERC-6551 accounts in Q1 2024 demonstrates the market's rapid convergence on a single technical primitive for on-chain identity and state.
takeaways
THE LOYALTY STANDARDS BATTLE
Key Takeaways for Builders and Investors
The race to define the foundational infrastructure for on-chain loyalty will create winners and losers. Here's where to focus.
01
The Problem: Fragmented, Illiquid Points
Current loyalty points are trapped in siloed databases, creating poor user experience and zero secondary market value. This kills program utility and limits issuer balance sheet optionality.
- User Lock-In: Points are non-transferable and non-composable.
- Issuer Burden: Managing redemption logistics and liability is costly and complex.
- Wasted Capital: Billions in unredeemed points sit as dead weight on corporate ledgers.
$100B+
Trapped Value
<1%
Redemption Rate
02
The Solution: ERC-20 as the Unifying Rail
Tokenizing points as standard ERC-20s is the inevitable endgame. It unlocks liquidity, composability, and programmable utility, turning a cost center into a revenue-generating asset.
- Instant Liquidity: Points become tradable on DEXs like Uniswap, creating a price discovery mechanism.
- Composability Layer: Enables integration with DeFi (staking, lending) and other loyalty programs.
- Reduced Issuer Overhead: Smart contracts automate issuance, burns, and complex reward logic.
10x
Utility Surface
-70%
Ops Cost
03
The Battleground: Settlement vs. Application Layer
The war won't be about the token standard itself, but over who controls the critical infrastructure layer that sits between issuers and the chain.
- Settlement Dominance: Protocols like LayerZero and Axelar compete to be the canonical cross-chain messaging layer for point transfers and burns.
- Application Dominance: Protocols like Galxe and RabbitHole aim to own the issuer dashboard, analytics, and campaign management suite.
- Winner-Take-Most Dynamics: The layer that captures the most issuer relationships and transaction flow will extract the most value.
2-3
Winners Emerge
$1B+
Protocol Revenue
04
The Investor Play: Back Infrastructure, Not Programs
Investing in individual loyalty token issuers is a commodity bet. The asymmetric opportunity is in the picks-and-shovels providers that enable the entire ecosystem.
- Protocol Fee Models: Look for protocols with clear value capture via transaction fees or SaaS subscriptions from issuers.
- Technical Moats: Prioritize teams solving hard problems like privacy-preserving proofs for off-chain activity or secure cross-chain state synchronization.
- Avoid 'Feature' Protocols: Many will be front-ends built on top of dominant settlement layers; assess genuine technical differentiation.
100x
Multiple Potential
>50%
Gross Margin
05
The Builder Mandate: Own a Critical Primitive
To win, builders must create an indispensable, hard-to-replicate primitive. Don't build another points dashboard; solve a foundational bottleneck.
- Oracle for Off-Chain Data: Build a robust oracle (like Chainlink) that verifies real-world purchase and engagement data for on-chain point minting.
- Intent-Based Redemption: Architect systems (inspired by UniswapX or CowSwap) that allow users to express redemption intents, with solvers finding the best liquidity path.
- Regulatory Wrapper: Develop compliant issuance frameworks and KYC/AML tooling that let traditional enterprises participate without legal risk.
Defensible
Business Model
24-36 mo.
Lead Time
06
The Endgame: Loyalty as a DeFi Yield Source
The final convergence sees loyalty points becoming a fundamental yield-bearing asset class within DeFi, decoupled from their original issuer.
- Points-as-Collateral: Protocols will accept high-quality loyalty tokens as collateral for borrowing, creating a new monetary layer.
- Yield Aggregation: Vaults will automatically stake, lend, and trade points portfolios to optimize APR for holders.
- Corporate Treasury Tool: Issuers will use their own token treasuries for on-chain liquidity provisioning and revenue generation.
New Asset Class
Market Creation
5-15%
Base Yield
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall