Attribution is broken. On-chain analytics from Nansen or Dune Analytics track addresses, not users. A single user operating ten wallets across Arbitrum and Base appears as ten distinct, low-value entities, obscuring their true engagement and capital.
The Future of Attribution in a Multi-Wallet, Multi-Chain Ecosystem
Current attribution models are shattered by multi-chain users. We analyze the identity mapping problem, spotlight protocols like Safe and Across building connective tissue, and outline the new stack for revenue tracking.
Introduction: The Attribution Black Hole
Current analytics tools fail to map user activity across wallets and chains, creating a blind spot for protocols and investors.
Protocols misallocate resources. Without cross-wallet identity, airdrops and incentives target sybils over real users. This inefficiency drains protocol treasuries and distorts growth metrics, making projects like Uniswap and Aave overpay for illusory engagement.
The multi-chain reality exacerbates this. A user bridging USDC via Circle's CCTP from Ethereum to Avalanche and swapping on Trader Joe creates a fragmented journey. Current tools see three isolated transactions, not one cohesive user intent.
Evidence: Over 30% of active DeFi addresses are potential sybils, yet protocols allocate billions in incentives based on this flawed data layer.
The Three Trends Shattering Simple Attribution
Simple on-chain attribution is dead. The rise of multi-wallet strategies, cross-chain activity, and intent-based execution has fragmented user identity, rendering last-click analytics useless.
The Problem: The Multi-Wallet User is Unknowable
Users fragment capital across 5-10+ wallets for security, airdrop farming, and experimentation. Legacy analytics track addresses, not humans, missing the complete financial graph.\n- ~70% of active users employ multiple wallets\n- $1B+ in airdrop value distributed to sybils annually\n- Attribution models fail, rewarding empty wallets over real users
The Problem: Cross-Chain Activity Breaks the Ledger
User journeys span Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, and Base. A deposit on L1, swap on a DEX aggregator, and bridge to an L2 gaming app creates an attribution black hole.\n- 40% of DeFi users interact with 3+ chains monthly\n- LayerZero, Axelar, Wormhole process millions of cross-chain messages daily\n- No single chain holds the complete story, crippling LTV calculations
The Solution: Intent-Based Graphs & Abstracted Transactions
The future is tracking user intent, not transactions. Systems like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across use solvers to fulfill complex orders. Attribution must map the declarative intent to its multi-step, multi-protocol fulfillment.\n- Solvers abstract the execution path from the user\n- ERC-4337 Account Abstraction enables sponsored transactions\n- Attribution shifts from 'who signed' to 'who intended' and 'who paid'
Anatomy of the Identity Graph: Wallets, Bridges, and Smart Accounts
User identity is a composite signal assembled from fragmented on-chain activity across wallets and chains.
The identity graph is probabilistic. No single identifier like an EOA address is definitive. Attribution requires stitching activity from smart accounts (ERC-4337), bridged transactions (LayerZero, Wormhole), and intent-based swaps (UniswapX, Across) to form a cohesive user profile.
Smart accounts fragment the signal. ERC-4337 enables one user to deploy hundreds of counterfactual smart wallets. This breaks naive EOA-based tracking, forcing analysts to cluster accounts via social recovery modules and shared on-chain behavior patterns.
Cross-chain activity is the primary attribution tool. A user bridging from Arbitrum to Base via Stargate creates a deterministic link. Aggregators like Zerion and Arkham use these bridge events as anchor points to unify a user's multi-chain financial footprint.
Evidence: Over 5.6 million smart accounts have been deployed since ERC-4337's launch, but fewer than 15% are active, highlighting the noise in raw deployment data that must be filtered for meaningful attribution.
The Attribution Stack: Protocol Solutions Compared
Comparison of technical approaches for tracking user acquisition and rewards in a fragmented multi-chain, multi-wallet environment.
| Core Feature / Metric | On-Chain Native (e.g., EigenLayer, EAS) | Off-Chain Aggregator (e.g., Hypernative, Gauntlet) | Intent-Based Hybrid (e.g., UniswapX, Across) |
|---|---|---|---|
Attribution Granularity | Wallet address only | Device ID, IP, wallet cluster | User intent signature |
Cross-Chain Proof Portability | |||
Real-Time Fraud Detection | Next block | < 1 sec | < 500 ms |
Gas Cost per Attribution Event | $2-5 | $0 | $0.10-0.50 |
Requires Off-Chain Trust Assumption | Minimal (Solver) | ||
Integration Complexity for dApps | High (new contracts) | Low (API/SDK) | Medium (intent standards) |
Resistance to Sybil Attacks | Capital-based (stake) | Heuristic-based | Intent-graph analysis |
Native Support for Multi-Wallet Users |
Builder Spotlight: Protocols Weaving the Identity Fabric
In a world of multi-wallet users and fragmented chains, proving consistent identity and reputation is the new moat.
Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS): The Schemaless Reputation Primitive
EAS is not an identity protocol; it's a decentralized registry for any statement. Its power is in off-chain schemas, enabling custom attestations for DAO membership, credit scores, or KYC proofs without on-chain bloat.\n- Permissionless Schemas: Any entity (e.g., Optimism, Gitcoin) can define and issue attestations.\n- Portable Verifiability: Attestations are cryptographically signed, enabling trustless verification across dApps.
World ID: Proof-of-Personhood as a Global Sybil Resistance Layer
Worldcoin's core innovation is biometric proof of unique humanness, creating a global privacy-preserving identity layer. It solves the fundamental attribution problem of distinguishing one user from a million bots.\n- Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Users prove uniqueness without revealing biometric data.\n- Cross-Application Graph: A single proof can be reused across DeFi, governance (like Aave), and airdrops, collapsing user acquisition costs.
Lens Protocol: The Social Graph as Portable Identity
Lens reframes identity as a user-owned social graph. Your followers, posts, and interactions are composable NFTs that travel with you, making social capital a verifiable on-chain asset.\n- Composable Reputation: DApps can query the graph to gauge influence or trust, enabling under-collateralized lending or curated access.\n- Native Monetization: Identity is directly tied to creator economies, flipping the Web2 platform-owned model.
Gitcoin Passport: Aggregating Web2 & Web3 Credentials
Passport tackles the cold-start problem for reputation by aggregating stamps from both worlds (e.g., BrightID, POAP, Twitter, Github). It uses a scoring mechanism to compute a trust score without a central authority.\n- Plural Identity: Resilience comes from multiple attestations, not one silver bullet.\n- Defense-in-Depth: Actively used by Gitcoin Grants and protocols like Uniswap for sybil-resistant quadratic funding and governance.
The Intractable Problem of Multi-Chain Reputation Aggregation
No single chain holds a user's complete history. True cross-chain reputation requires secure, trust-minimized state attestation between ecosystems.\n- The Oracle Problem: Bridging reputation requires oracles like Chainlink or light clients to attest to off-chain state, introducing new trust assumptions.\n- Fragmented Liquidity: A user's DeFi history on Arbitrum is invisible to a lender on Base, creating systemic inefficiency.
ERC-4337 & Smart Accounts: The Wallet as Your Identity Hub
Account Abstraction shifts identity from key pairs to smart contract wallets. This enables transaction-level attestations, social recovery, and sponsored gas—fundamentally changing how users are identified and onboarded.\n- Session Keys: Users can grant temporary, scoped authority to dApps (e.g., a gaming session), creating a richer interaction graph.\n- Bundler & Paymaster Graphs: Stackup or Biconomy infrastructure creates new data layers for analyzing user intent and reliability.
The 2025 Attribution Stack: Predictions and Open Problems
A technical forecast of how user attribution will evolve to track value across wallets, chains, and abstracted transactions.
Universal Identity Graphs will win. Current attribution is siloed by wallet addresses. The 2025 standard is a cross-chain identity layer linking all user-controlled addresses (EOAs, AA wallets, L2s) into a single entity. This solves the multi-wallet problem for protocols like Jupiter and Uniswap.
Intent-based attribution creates new metrics. Abstracted transactions via UniswapX or CowSwap shift attribution from on-chain settlement to off-chain intent expression. The key metric becomes intent-to-fill rate, not final swap volume, requiring new data pipelines.
Cross-chain attribution demands new standards. Bridging via LayerZero or Axelar fragments user journeys. The solution is a canonical attribution event standard, similar to IBC's packet model, that propagates a source attribution tag through every hop and settlement.
Evidence: The rise of ERC-4337 Account Abstraction and EIP-6963 multi-wallet discovery are precursors to this graph. Without them, L2 growth fragments user data by 10x.
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Current attribution models are broken. The future is a standardized, privacy-preserving, and chain-agnostic system that captures the full user journey.
The Problem: Wallet-Centric Attribution is Dead
Tracking a single address is futile. Users have multiple wallets (e.g., MetaMask, Rabby, Phantom) and use intent-based solvers (e.g., UniswapX, CowSwap) that abstract the user. You're missing >80% of the journey.
- Key Benefit 1: Acknowledges the reality of fragmented user identity.
- Key Benefit 2: Forces a shift from address-based to behavior-based analytics.
The Solution: Universal Attribution Graphs
A shared, open graph that links pseudonymous identities across wallets and chains via behavioral fingerprints and zero-knowledge proofs. Think EigenLayer AVS for attribution.
- Key Benefit 1: Enables cross-DApp, cross-chain loyalty and rewards programs.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates a new data primitive for underwriting and on-chain credit.
The Business Model: Sell the Shovel, Not the Gold
The winning protocol will be infrastructure, not an analytics dashboard. It will offer a standardized SDK (like Segment for web3) and monetize via micro-transactions for graph queries and attestations.
- Key Benefit 1: Captures value from all builders needing attribution, not just one vertical.
- Key Benefit 2: Aligns with the modular stack; integrates with oracles (Chainlink), rollups (Arbitrum, Optimism), and bridges (LayerZero, Across).
The Privacy Mandate: ZK-Proofs or Bust
Raw transaction graphs are a privacy nightmare and regulatory liability. The only viable solution uses zero-knowledge proofs to attest to behavior (e.g., "user bridged >$1k") without revealing the full history.
- Key Benefit 1: Enables compliance-ready analytics (e.g., proof of human, proof of jurisdiction).
- Key Benefit 2: Prevents the system from becoming a surveillance tool, preserving crypto's ethos.
The Killer App: On-Chain AdTech & Referrals
The first major use case is rebuilding digital advertising without platforms. Smart contracts can pay out fees automatically based on proven attribution, enabling trustless affiliate programs and performance-based ad auctions.
- Key Benefit 1: Unlocks $10B+ in ad spend currently inaccessible to on-chain apps.
- Key Benefit 2: Removes intermediaries, driving >50% more value to creators and referrers.
The Protocol to Watch: EigenLayer & AVS Dynamics
Don't build the graph from scratch. The winning team will deploy an Actively Validated Service (AVS) on EigenLayer, leveraging restaked ETH to secure the attribution graph and bootstrap cryptoeconomic security from day one.
- Key Benefit 1: Instant security with $15B+ in restaked TVL.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates a powerful flywheel: more usage -> more fees -> more operators -> more security.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.