Individual node security fails at scale. A DePIN network is only as strong as its weakest operator, creating a lowest common denominator security model. This is unacceptable for infrastructure managing physical assets or high-value data streams.
depin-building-physical-infra-on-chain
Blog
Why Shared Security Models Are the Only Way to Secure Critical M2M Infra
DePIN projects building physical infrastructure face an impossible security trilemma. This analysis argues that leveraging pooled security from established chains like Ethereum via restaking or Cosmos via Interchain Security is not an optimization—it's a fundamental requirement for credible, long-term operation.
introduction
THE FLAWED PREMISE
Introduction: The DePIN Security Mirage
DePIN's reliance on individual node security creates systemic risk for machine-to-machine value transfer.
Shared security is non-negotiable. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon demonstrate that pooling cryptoeconomic security from established chains is the only viable model. This moves risk from individual operators to a collective slashing pool.
The counter-intuitive insight: A DePIN secured by Ethereum's validators is more resilient than one with its own dedicated, but undercapitalized, token. Dedicated tokens create security budgets that attackers can directly price and overwhelm.
Evidence: The Helium Network's 2022 migration to Solana was a tacit admission that its native security model was insufficient for its scale and ambition, trading sovereignty for shared chain security.
thesis-statement
THE ARCHITECTURAL IMPERATIVE
The Core Argument: Security Is a Non-Delegable Public Good
Critical machine-to-machine infrastructure cannot outsource its security without creating systemic risk.
Security is a public good for cross-chain infrastructure. The failure of a single bridge like Wormhole or Nomad compromises the entire ecosystem, not just its users. This creates a tragedy of the commons where no single application bears the full cost of a breach.
Shared security models are non-negotiable. Protocols like EigenLayer and Babylon are attempts to pool cryptoeconomic security for validators and oracles. A standalone bridge's security budget is inherently limited by its own fees, creating a weakest-link vulnerability.
Proof-of-Stake economics fail at scale for M2M infra. The $1B TVL securing Ethereum cannot be replicated by every new rollup, bridge, and oracle network. This leads to security fragmentation and predictable attacks on undercapitalized chains.
Evidence: The $2B+ in bridge hacks since 2020 demonstrates the model is broken. Secure systems like Cosmos IBC and Polkadot XCM use shared validator sets, proving the architectural principle works.
key-trends
SECURING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
The Inevitable Shift: Why DePIN is Moving to Shared Security
Isolated validator sets for critical M2M infrastructure are a single point of failure. Shared security from established layers is the only viable model.
01
The Economic Attack Surface
A standalone DePIN chain with a $50M token cap securing $1B+ of physical assets is a lopsided honeypot. Shared security flips the model: you inherit the economic security of a $50B+ base layer like Ethereum or Celestia.
- Eliminates the 51% attack vector for pennies on the dollar.
- Unlocks capital efficiency; tokenomics shift from security subsidy to utility and rewards.
1000x
Security Premium
$50B+
Borrowed Security
02
The Liveness Guarantee
A power outage in a single-validator-set region can halt an entire global sensor network. Shared security leverages a globally distributed, 24/7 live validator set of thousands of nodes.
- Guarantees finality and data availability under local failures.
- Enables true hyper-scalability; spin up a dedicated execution environment without bootstrapping liveness from zero.
>10k
Global Nodes
99.99%
Uptime SLA
03
The Interoperability Mandate
A siloed DePIN chain cannot programmatically settle payments on Ethereum or verify proofs on Solana. Shared security, via rollups or app-chains, provides native, trust-minimized bridges to the entire ecosystem.
- Enables atomic DePIN service <> payment swaps (e.g., via UniswapX, Across).
- Future-proofs integration with AI agents and other L2s (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism).
0
New Trust Assumptions
~2s
Cross-Chain Settle
04
The Validator Quality Problem
Bootstrapping a high-quality, decentralized validator set from scratch is impossible for a niche hardware project. Shared security delegates to professional, slashable operators with proven track records.
- Access to institutional-grade infrastructure (e.g., Figment, Chorus One).
- Removes the operational overhead of node recruitment, slashing, and governance.
-90%
Ops Overhead
Institutional
Node Quality
05
Celestia & EigenLayer: The New Security Primitives
Modular shared security is now a commodity. Celestia provides plug-and-play data availability for ~$0.01 per MB. EigenLayer enables re-staking economic security from Ethereum.
- DePINs can mix-and-match these primitives (e.g., Celestia for DA, EigenLayer for settlement).
- Creates a security stack where each layer is optimized and battle-tested.
$0.01/MB
DA Cost
Modular
Security Stack
06
The Capital Formation Flywheel
VCs and token holders will not fund insecure infrastructure. Adopting shared security signals technical maturity, attracting institutional capital and higher valuations.
- Turns security from a cost center into a growth lever.
- Aligns DePIN with the dominant L2/L3 architectural trend, ensuring developer and investor mindshare.
10x+
Valuation Premium
Institutional
Capital Inflow
M2M INFRASTRUCTURE
Security Model Showdown: Solo Chain vs. Shared Security
A quantitative comparison of security models for critical machine-to-machine infrastructure like oracles, bridges, and sequencers.
| Security Metric | Solo Chain (e.g., Alt-L1) | Shared Security (e.g., EigenLayer, Babylon) | Superchain (e.g., OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit) |
|---|---|---|---|
Economic Security (TVL) | $100M - $2B | $10B+ (EigenLayer) | $5B+ (Base) |
Slashable Capital | Native token only | Restaked ETH + LSTs | Native token + sequencer fees |
Time to Finality (L1) | 3-6 seconds | 12 minutes (Ethereum) | 12 minutes (Ethereum) |
Validator Decentralization | 50-100 nodes | 200,000+ operators (EigenLayer) | 5-10 sequencer nodes |
Cost to Attack (51%) | ~$50M - $1B |
|
|
Censorship Resistance | |||
Protocol Upgrades | Hard fork required | Smart contract upgrade | Governance vote |
Cross-Domain Slashing |
deep-dive
THE ECONOMIC PRIMITIVE
Architectural Deep Dive: How Shared Security Works for Machines
Shared security models are the only viable economic primitive for securing critical machine-to-machine infrastructure at scale.
Shared security is a non-negotiable requirement for M2M infra because individual machines cannot economically bootstrap their own validator sets. A single-purpose rollup for a DeFi protocol cannot compete with Ethereum's $100B+ economic security for liveness and data availability.
The security model shifts from consensus to verification. Machines do not participate in consensus; they inherit it. A rollup's state transitions are valid only if the underlying Ethereum or Celestia data availability layer attests to the data. This is the core of modular security.
This creates a stark cost/security trade-off. A sovereign chain using EigenLayer for restaking achieves high security at lower cost than a standalone PoS chain, but inherits the systemic risks of its underlying restaking pool. The alternative is expensive, fragmented security.
Evidence: The Celestia modular DA layer secures over 50 rollups, proving the economic scaling of shared security. Conversely, a standalone app-chain with a $10M token securing $1B in TVL presents a trivial attack vector.
protocol-spotlight
FROM THEORY TO PRODUCTION
In Practice: Protocols Leading the Shared Security Charge
These protocols are operationalizing shared security, proving its necessity for securing high-value, machine-driven infrastructure.
01
EigenLayer: The Restaking Primitive
EigenLayer transforms Ethereum's validator set into a reusable security marketplace. It solves the bootstrapping problem for new networks by allowing ETH stakers to opt-in and secure other systems (AVSs).
- Key Benefit: $18B+ TVL secured for Actively Validated Services (AVSs).
- Key Benefit: Unlocks pooled cryptoeconomic security without launching a new token.
$18B+
TVL Secured
40+
AVSs
02
The Problem: Isolated Rollup Security
Individual rollups must bootstrap their own validator sets, creating fragmented security and high capital costs. This leads to weaker, more expensive security for critical cross-chain bridges and oracles.
- Key Consequence: A $2B+ bridge hack is often due to a weakly secured, proprietary validator set.
- Key Consequence: New chains face a massive capital efficiency hurdle.
$2B+
Bridge Hack Risk
10-100x
Capital Cost
03
Babylon: Bitcoin-Staked Security
Babylon enables Bitcoin, the most secure asset, to be used as staking collateral. It solves the idle capital problem of Bitcoin by extending its proof-of-work security to PoS chains and rollups.
- Key Benefit: Taps into $1T+ of previously non-yielding Bitcoin security.
- Key Benefit: Provides timestamping and checkpointing services with Bitcoin-finality guarantees.
$1T+
Security Pool
PoW+PoS
Hybrid Model
04
The Solution: Shared Sequencers (Espresso, Astria)
Shared sequencers decouple block production from execution, creating a neutral, high-throughput layer for rollups. This solves the MEV centralization and liveness risk of solo-sequencer rollups.
- Key Benefit: Interoperability through atomic cross-rollup composability.
- Key Benefit: Censorship resistance via a decentralized, staked operator set.
~500ms
Finality
-90%
Liveness Risk
05
Omni Network: Ethereum as the Hub
Omni is a modular interoperability layer secured by restaked ETH. It solves the fragmented liquidity problem by enabling native access to all rollups, secured by Ethereum's validators.
- Key Benefit: Unified security from EigenLayer operators for cross-rollup messaging.
- Key Benefit: Developers build one dapp that operates across all rollups natively.
Ethereum
Security Root
All
Rollup Access
06
The Verdict: Inevitable Consolidation
The economic and security logic is undeniable. For any critical M2M infra—bridges, oracles, sequencers, co-processors—shared security is not optional. The future is a hierarchy: Bitcoin/Ethereum at the base, with EigenLayer, Babylon, and shared sequencers as the security providers for everything else.
- Result: Higher security floor for all applications.
- Result: Capital efficiency drives innovation to the application layer.
10x
Security/Capital
App-Layer
Innovation Focus
counter-argument
THE REALITY CHECK
Counterpoint: The Sovereignty and Cost Trade-Off
Sovereignty is an expensive luxury that critical infrastructure cannot afford.
Sovereignty is a liability for M2M infrastructure. Every independent chain must bootstrap its own validator set, creating a security budget problem where costs scale linearly with the number of chains. This model is unsustainable for thousands of specialized, low-fee application chains.
Shared security is non-optional. Protocols like Celestia, EigenLayer, and Cosmos prove that security is a commodity best aggregated. A rollup secured by Ethereum or a consumer chain secured by a shared validator set eliminates the existential risk of a 51% attack on a small chain.
The cost trade-off is definitive. Running a sovereign chain with $10M in staked value costs more in annual security than using a shared sequencer like Espresso or a rollup framework like Arbitrum Orbit. The math forces consolidation onto a few, massively capitalized security layers.
takeaways
THE SECURITY IMPERATIVE
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
Shared security is not a feature; it's a non-negotiable requirement for securing the machine-to-machine financial infrastructure of the future.
01
The Problem: Fragile, Isolated Security
Rollups and app-chains bootstrap security individually, creating single points of failure. A $100M chain secured by a $10M staking pool is an arbitrage opportunity for attackers. This model fails at scale for critical infra like bridges and sequencers.\n- Attack Surface: Each chain is its own security silo.\n- Capital Inefficiency: Security costs scale linearly with chain count.\n- Systemic Risk: A compromise on one weak link can cascade.
100+
Isolated Chains
>90%
Under-Capitalized
02
The Solution: Re-staking & Shared Sequencers
Protocols like EigenLayer and Espresso Systems pool security from a base layer (e.g., Ethereum) and re-apply it to middleware. This creates cryptoeconomic security for AVSs (Actively Validated Services) like bridges and DA layers.\n- Capital Leverage: Reuse $50B+ of Ethereum stake.\n- Unified Slashing: Misbehavior is punished across the shared set.\n- Faster Bootstrapping: New infra inherits battle-tested security instantly.
$50B+
Securing Pool
10-100x
Security Boost
03
The Model: Why It's the Only Way
For high-value, trust-minimized M2M communication (e.g., cross-chain swaps via LayerZero, Axelar, Wormhole), security must be a public good, not a competitive moat. Shared security aligns economic security with the total value secured (TVS) across the entire ecosystem.\n- Network Effects: Security improves as more critical infra opts-in.\n- Cost Synergy: Marginal security cost for new service approaches zero.\n- Inevitable Standard: Just as AWS won over private data centers.
$1T+
Future TVS
~0%
Marginal Cost
04
The Investment Thesis: Security as a Layer
The winning stack separates execution from security. Invest in protocols that provide security-as-a-service (EigenLayer, Babylon) or build critical middleware (Across, Succinct) on top of them. Avoid chains that try to be their own security island.\n- Moats: Deep liquidity of stake and validator trust.\n- Revenue: Fees from securing billions in cross-chain value flow.\n- Defensibility: First-mover advantage in staking ecosystems is immense.
100x
TAM Expansion
Protocol Revenue
Business Model
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall