Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
depin-building-physical-infra-on-chain
Blog

Why We Need a 'TCP/IP Stack' for Physical Infrastructure on Chain

DePIN networks are isolated islands. Without a universal protocol suite for device discovery, attestation, data formatting, and incentive settlement, the sector cannot achieve internet-scale adoption. This is the critical path.

introduction
THE INFRASTRUCTURE GAP

Introduction

Blockchain's digital-first design creates a fundamental disconnect with the physical world, requiring a new architectural layer.

Blockchains are data silos. They excel at managing internal state but lack native protocols to verify and transact over real-world assets and events, creating a hard boundary between on-chain and off-chain.

The current patchwork fails. Oracles like Chainlink and Pyth provide data feeds, but they are point solutions, not a generalized framework for trust-minimized physical interaction, akin to the early internet's proprietary networks.

We need a TCP/IP equivalent. A standardized interoperability stack for physical infrastructure will define common layers for attestation, data transport, and settlement, enabling composable systems like Helium for connectivity or DIMO for vehicle data.

Evidence: The oracle market exceeds $10B TVE, yet remains fragmented; a unified standard would collapse integration costs and unlock new asset classes.

thesis-statement
THE INTEROPERABILITY IMPERATIVE

The Core Argument: Silos Kill Scale

Fragmented physical infrastructure protocols create unsustainable overhead, preventing the composability required for global-scale applications.

Siloed infrastructure protocols force developers into vendor lock-in. A DePIN for compute cannot natively trigger a storage protocol like Filecoin or Arweave, requiring custom, insecure bridges for every integration.

The composability tax is the overhead of integrating N siloed systems, which scales quadratically. This is the opposite of Ethereum's smart contract model, where one integration unlocks thousands of applications.

Evidence: Current DePINs operate like early proprietary networks (AOL, CompuServe). The TCP/IP standard abstracted physical cables, enabling the internet; we need an equivalent intent-based settlement layer for physical resources.

WHY WE NEED A 'TCP/IP STACK' FOR PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ON CHAIN

The DePIN Interoperability Gap: A Protocol Matrix

Comparison of interoperability approaches for DePIN protocols, highlighting the fragmented state of cross-chain data and asset movement for physical infrastructure.

Core Interoperability CapabilityApplication-Specific Bridge (e.g., Helium IOT, Hivemapper)General-Purpose Messaging (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar)Intent-Based Settlement (e.g., UniswapX, Across, CowSwap)

Native Asset Transfer

Arbitrary Data/State Sync

Protocol-Specific Logic Execution

Settlement Finality

~1 hour (PoS checkpoint)

2-5 minutes

< 1 minute

Typical Cost per Cross-Chain TX

$0.01 - $0.10

$5 - $25

$1 - $15 (incl. gas + solver fee)

Requires Native Token for Security

Supports Multi-Hop Device-to-DApp Workflows

deep-dive
THE INTEROPERABILITY IMPERATIVE

Blueprint for a DePIN Protocol Stack

DePIN's fragmentation demands a standardized protocol stack to unlock network effects and composability.

DePIN is currently Balkanized. Each project builds its own vertical stack for hardware, data, and payments, creating isolated islands. This prevents the composability that defines crypto's value, unlike the standardized layers of TCP/IP that created the internet.

A modular stack separates concerns. A physical resource layer (sensors, GPUs), a data availability layer (like Celestia for DePIN), and a settlement layer (Ethereum, Solana) must be distinct. This mirrors how Arweave separates storage from compute, enabling specialized optimization.

Standardized APIs are the bridge. Without common interfaces like The Graph for querying or Chainlink CCIP for cross-chain messaging, DePINs cannot interoperate. The Helium IOT migration to Solana demonstrated the cost of a monolithic, non-portable state.

Evidence: The Helium Network required a complex, one-off migration to Solana because its state and economics were locked to a custom L1. A standard stack would have enabled a seamless, multi-chain deployment from day one.

protocol-spotlight
THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE STACK

Early Movers Building the Primitives

Blockchain's killer apps require real-world inputs. These protocols are building the TCP/IP layer for physical infrastructure.

01

Chainlink Functions: The HTTP for Web2 APIs

The Problem: Smart contracts are isolated. They can't natively fetch weather data, process payments, or verify KYC. The Solution: A serverless developer platform that connects any API to any blockchain. It abstracts away the oracle network, letting devs run custom off-chain logic.

  • Key Benefit: Enables DePIN, parametric insurance, and RWA onboarding by fetching any external data.
  • Key Benefit: Pay-per-use model eliminates the need to run your own oracle node infrastructure.
1000+
API Endpoints
<10s
Execution Time
02

EigenLayer & Restaking: The Security Primitive

The Problem: New physical infrastructure networks (AVSs) must bootstrap their own validator sets and trust, a capital-intensive and slow process. The Solution: Restaking pooled Ethereum security. Projects like EigenDA and Omni use this to secure data availability and cross-chain messaging.

  • Key Benefit: ~$15B in TVL provides instant, cryptoeconomic security for new networks.
  • Key Benefit: Unlocks modular security, allowing infra protocols to focus on core tech, not validator recruitment.
$15B+
TVL Secured
200+
Active AVSs
03

The Graph: The Indexing & Query Layer

The Problem: Raw blockchain data is unusable for applications. Querying historical DePIN device states or complex RWA holdings is slow and expensive. The Solution: A decentralized protocol for indexing and querying blockchain data via GraphQL. It turns chain data into a queryable API.

  • Key Benefit: Sub-second queries for complex data relationships (e.g., "show me all sensors in region X with temp > Y").
  • Key Benefit: Data integrity via decentralized indexing, preventing single points of failure for critical infrastructure apps.
30k+
Subgraphs
1B+
Queries/Day
04

Axelar & CCIP: The Interoperability Backbone

The Problem: Physical infrastructure is fragmented. A sensor on Chain A cannot natively trigger a payment or action on Chain B. The Solution: General message passing protocols that enable cross-chain smart contract calls. This is the plumbing for multi-chain DePIN and RWA systems.

  • Key Benefit: Universal interoperability connects any asset or data point across 50+ chains, unlike app-specific bridges.
  • Key Benefit: Programmable composability allows for complex, cross-chain logic flows essential for automated physical systems.
50+
Connected Chains
$2B+
Value Secured
05

Helium & Hivemapper: The Proof-of-Physical-Work Template

The Problem: How do you cryptographically verify that real-world work (providing WiFi, mapping roads) was done without a trusted third party? The Solution: Light Hardware + Cryptographic Proofs. Devices cryptographically sign work, with proofs verified on-chain for token rewards.

  • Key Benefit: Creates crypto-native business models where infrastructure deployment is incentivized via tokens, not capex.
  • Key Benefit: Data sovereignty - contributors own and can monetize the data they generate (e.g., mapping, connectivity).
1M+
Hotspots Deployed
100M+
KM Mapped
06

Espresso Systems & AltLayer: The Shared Sequencing Primitive

The Problem: Rollups and L2s for infrastructure are siloed, preventing cross-rollup composability and creating MEV opportunities. The Solution: Decentralized shared sequencers that order transactions across multiple rollups, enabling synchronous cross-rollup communication.

  • Key Benefit: Atomic composability across infrastructure-specific rollups (e.g., energy, compute, storage) for complex transactions.
  • Key Benefit: MEV resistance & fairness through decentralized sequencing, critical for equitable physical resource allocation.
<2s
Finality
10+
Rollups Supported
counter-argument
THE INFRASTRUCTURE TRAP

Counterpoint: Isn't This Premature Optimization?

Standardizing physical infrastructure on-chain is not premature; it is the prerequisite for escaping the current cycle of fragmented, unscalable systems.

Premature optimization is a luxury we lost in 2021. The current state of on-chain physical infrastructure is not a lack of optimization but a complete absence of a foundational layer. Projects like Helium and Hivemapper built bespoke, isolated networks because no shared protocol existed, leading to massive duplication of effort and security models.

The TCP/IP analogy is exact. Before TCP/IP, every computer network vendor (IBM, DEC) used proprietary protocols. The internet scaled only after a common internetwork layer abstracted the underlying hardware. Today's DePIN projects are the IBMs, building their own 'SNA' for every sensor and radio.

Fragmentation destroys composability. A smart contract cannot natively verify a Hivemapper image hash or a Helium hotspot location without custom, trusted oracles. This is the antithesis of programmable trust. A standard data availability and verification layer, akin to Celestia for physical data, is the missing primitive.

Evidence: Look at DeFi's evolution. Uniswap v1 required custom pools for every token pair. The ERC-20 standard and the AMM constant-product formula created a composable explosion. We are pre-ERC-20 for physical assets. Standardization is not premature; it is the bottleneck.

risk-analysis
THE FRAGILITY OF A MONOCULTURE

What Could Go Wrong? The Bear Case for Standardization

Standardizing the on-chain physical stack creates systemic risk; a single exploit could cascade across the entire ecosystem.

01

The Single Point of Failure

A universal standard for oracles or RPCs becomes the ultimate honeypot. A critical bug in the consensus mechanism or data attestation layer wouldn't just break one app—it would invalidate $100B+ in DeFi TVL across every integrated chain. The 2022 Wormhole hack ($325M) would be a warm-up.

$100B+
TVL at Risk
1 Bug
To Break All
02

Innovation Stagnation & Protocol Capture

Standards ossify. Once a stack like Chainlink's CCIP or a dominant AVS framework (e.g., EigenLayer) is entrenched, it becomes economically irrational to build alternatives. This creates protocol capture, where upgrades are dictated by a single entity's roadmap, stifling the permissionless innovation that spawned DeFi and L2s in the first place.

0 New
Major Forks
>70%
Market Share
03

The Regulatory Kill Switch

A standardized stack makes censorship trivial. If a dominant sequencer set (e.g., from Espresso or Radius) or oracle network is deemed compliant by regulators, they can be forced to censor transactions or freeze assets across all connected chains with a single order. This centralizes the very attack vector crypto was built to defeat.

1 Order
To Censor All
100%
Compliance Risk
04

Economic Centralization & Rent Extraction

Standards create natural monopolies. The entity controlling the reference implementation (be it an L1 foundation or a corporate-led consortium) becomes a toll collector. They can impose rent-seeking fees on every cross-chain message or data point, extracting value from the entire ecosystem and recreating the Web2 platform economics we aimed to escape.

10-30%
Fee Take
Oligopoly
Market Structure
05

The Complexity Black Hole

Abstraction layers hide risk. A "simple" standard for intent-based bridging (e.g., UniswapX, Across) or automated MEV capture bundles immense complexity into a black box. When it fails—and it will—no one can audit it. This leads to silent insolvencies and undetectable exploits, as seen in the cross-chain bridge collapse epidemic (~$2.5B lost).

$2.5B
Bridge Losses
0 Visibility
Into Risk
06

The Interoperability Illusion

Standardization doesn't guarantee compatibility—it guarantees lock-in. Competing standards (e.g., IBC vs. LayerZero vs. CCIP) will fragment the landscape, creating walled gardens that are harder to bridge than the isolated chains they replaced. The result is more complexity, not less, as apps must support multiple "standard" stacks.

3+
Competing Stacks
Increased
Dev Overhead
takeaways
WHY ON-CHAIN PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS A STANDARD

TL;DR for Busy Builders

The multi-trillion dollar physical economy is trapped in legacy rails. To bring it on-chain, we need a composable, secure, and verifiable protocol stack.

01

The Oracle Problem is a Protocol Problem

Current oracle designs like Chainlink and Pyth are built for DeFi price feeds, not for complex, stateful real-world assets (RWAs). They lack a standard for data attestation and dispute resolution across supply chains.

  • Key Benefit 1: Standardized attestation layers enable cross-protocol RWA composability.
  • Key Benefit 2: Formalized slashing and insurance mechanisms create cryptoeconomic security for physical events.
~$10B+
RWA TVL
1000x
Data Complexity
02

Fragmented State Kills Composability

Today, a shipping container's location, a warehouse inventory, and a carbon credit are siloed in incompatible systems (IoT, ERPs, private chains). This prevents atomic "ship-and-pay" or "prove-and-trade" transactions.

  • Key Benefit 1: A unified state layer acts as a shared ledger for physical events, similar to how TCP/IP enables packet routing.
  • Key Benefit 2: Enables intent-based settlement for RWAs, mirroring the UX of UniswapX and Across for digital assets.
-70%
Settlement Friction
Atomic
Multi-Asset Trades
03

Without ZK, There is No Trust

Proving a real-world event occurred (e.g., a delivery, an energy transfer) without revealing proprietary business logic requires zero-knowledge cryptography. Current systems rely on trusted committees.

  • Key Benefit 1: ZK attestations provide cryptographic proof of physical state changes, moving beyond social consensus.
  • Key Benefit 2: Enables privacy-preserving compliance, where regulators can verify proofs without seeing underlying data.
Trustless
Verification
~5s
Proof Generation
04

The TCP/IP Stack Analogy

Just as the internet required standardized layers (Link, IP, TCP, Application), on-chain physical infra needs its own stack: a Physical Data Layer, a State Reconciliation Layer, and a Settlement & Dispute Layer.

  • Key Benefit 1: Clear separation of concerns allows for specialized innovation at each layer (e.g., specialized oracles, ZK co-processors).
  • Key Benefit 2: Creates a composable primitive that protocols like Chainlink CCIP, LayerZero, and Hyperlane can build upon for cross-chain RWA messaging.
Interop
By Design
Modular
Architecture
ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team