Interoperable quest protocols dismantle walled gardens by standardizing user engagement data on-chain. This creates a portable, composable asset from previously siloed activity.
airdrop-strategies-and-community-building
Blog
The Future of Loyalty: Interoperable Quest Protocols
An analysis of how quest protocols are evolving from isolated marketing tools into a foundational layer for composable, portable user loyalty and reputation across the crypto ecosystem.
introduction
THE SHIFT
Introduction
Loyalty programs are evolving from closed, extractive systems into open, interoperable networks built on quest protocols.
Protocols like Galxe and Layer3 abstract the quest infrastructure, allowing brands to deploy campaigns while users own their proof-of-participation. This inverts the traditional power dynamic.
The core innovation is data portability. A quest completed for Optimism becomes a verifiable credential usable in an Aave governance proposal or a friend.tech key gating mechanism.
Evidence: Galxe has processed over 15 million credential claims, demonstrating the demand for programmable, on-chain reputation beyond a single application.
thesis-statement
THE INTEROPERABLE GRAPH
The Core Thesis
Loyalty programs will converge into a unified, interoperable quest protocol layer that commoditizes user engagement.
Quest protocols are infrastructure. They are not marketing campaigns. Protocols like Galxe and Layer3 abstract the logic for issuing, tracking, and verifying on-chain and off-chain actions into a standard API. This creates a composable loyalty primitive that any application can plug into.
Interoperability kills walled gardens. The current model of siloed points is a data liability. An interoperable quest graph, built on standards from Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) or Verax, allows reputation and proof-of-engagement to become portable assets. A user's Galxe OAT from one chain proves history on another.
The value accrues to the protocol layer. Applications will compete on utility, not lock-in. The quest protocol layer becomes the settlement network for attention, capturing fees from issuers (brands, DAOs) who pay to access a pre-verified user graph. This mirrors how Uniswap captured value from token swaps, not token issuance.
Evidence: 15M+ quests completed. Galxe has facilitated over 15 million credential issuances. This scale demonstrates the existing demand for programmable engagement, which a unified standard will explode by removing integration friction.
key-trends
THE FUTURE OF LOYALTY: INTEROPERABLE QUEST PROTOCOLS
Key Trends Driving Adoption
Traditional loyalty programs are broken. Interoperable quest protocols are turning fragmented points into composable, on-chain assets.
01
The Problem: Loyalty Silos
Every brand's points program is a walled garden. Points are illiquid, non-transferable, and expire. This creates ~$200B in dead capital trapped in corporate balance sheets, with user engagement plummeting below 15% annual redemption rates.
- Zero Interoperability: Can't use airline miles for a coffee.
- High Admin Overhead: ~30% of program cost is legacy infrastructure.
$200B
Trapped Value
<15%
Redemption Rate
02
The Solution: On-Chain Reputation Graphs
Protocols like Galxe, RabbitHole, and Layer3 map user actions to verifiable, portable credentials. Completing a quest mints a soulbound token (SBT) or NFT, creating a persistent, composable reputation layer.
- Portable Proof-of-Skill: Your DeFi history becomes collateral for a loan.
- Sybil-Resistant Airdrops: Projects like EigenLayer use this for operator selection.
10M+
Credentials Issued
-90%
Sybil Cost
03
The Mechanism: Cross-Chain State Proofs
Interoperability requires proving quest completion across chains. This is solved by oracle networks (Chainlink, Pyth) for off-chain data and light clients / ZK proofs for on-chain verification (see Polygon zkEVM, zkSync).
- Universal Proof Ledger: A single proof can be verified on Ethereum, Solana, and Arbitrum.
- ~2s Finality: Near-instant cross-chain credential recognition.
~2s
Proof Finality
<$0.01
Verify Cost
04
The Business Model: Programmable Treasury
Brands no longer manage points databases. They deploy smart contract treasuries that auto-distribute rewards (ERC-20 tokens, NFTs) via quest completion. This turns marketing spend into programmable capital with real-time ROI analytics.
- Dynamic Rewards: Adjust incentives based on on-chain KPIs.
- Direct Liquidity: Rewards are instantly tradable on DEXs like Uniswap.
50%+
Marketing Efficiency
24/7
Market Open
05
The Endgame: Composable Loyalty Derivatives
Loyalty points become the base layer for a derivatives market. Protocols like Pendle Finance allow users to tokenize and trade future point streams. A DAO could bundle user loyalty flows into a yield-bearing vault.
- Points Futures: Hedge or speculate on a brand's engagement.
- Capital Efficiency: Unlock present value of future loyalty rewards.
10x
Capital Efficiency
New Asset Class
Market Creation
06
The Risk: Regulatory Ambiguity
When points become liquid, programmable assets, they attract regulatory scrutiny. The SEC's Howey Test looms. Protocols must architect for compliance, using soulbound tokens (SBTs) for non-financial reputation or working within existing money transmitter licenses.
- Legal Wrappers: Ensuring quest rewards are not deemed securities.
- Privacy Tech: Using zk-proofs (e.g., Aztec) to anonymize engagement data.
High
Regulatory Risk
Critical
Design Priority
INTEROPERABLE QUEST PROTOCOLS
Protocol Landscape & On-Chain Metrics
Comparison of leading protocols enabling cross-chain questing and on-chain loyalty programs.
| Metric / Feature | Layer3 (Galxe) | EigenLayer (Karate Combat) | Hyperliquid L1 (Moondream) |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Architecture | Application-Specific Layer 3 (Arbitrum) | Restaking-Powered AVS | Purpose-Built Appchain (Cosmos SDK) |
Native Interoperability | EVM via Arbitrum Nitro | EigenDA & Actively Validated Services | Native IBC & Custom Bridge |
Avg. Quest Completion Cost | $0.15 - $0.40 | $0.05 - $0.15 (subsidized) | $0.01 - $0.03 |
On-Chain Proof Storage | Galxe Passport (SBT) | EigenLayer Operator Node | Hyperliquid Sequencer |
Programmable Reward Logic | |||
Direct Protocol Revenue Share | 15-30% fee on OAT mints | AVS rewards to node operators | 100% to quest issuer (gas only) |
Avg. Daily Active Quests (30d) | 1200+ | 45+ | 12+ |
Integration with DeFi Primitives | Uniswap, Aave, Compound via Galxe OATs | EigenPie, Kelp DAO restaking | Perps DEX, Lend/borrow on Hyperliquid |
deep-dive
THE INTEROPERABLE STACK
The Technical Architecture of Composable Loyalty
Composable loyalty requires a modular technical stack that separates quest logic, credential issuance, and reward settlement across chains.
Quest logic is off-chain. The core application logic for defining and verifying user actions lives off-chain in a centralized or decentralized server, similar to RabbitHole or Galxe. This design choice prioritizes developer flexibility and low-latency verification over on-chain finality, which is unnecessary for most social or DeFi quests.
Credentials are on-chain attestations. Verified quest completions must be issued as non-transferable tokens (SBTs) or verifiable credentials on a public ledger. Standards like EIP-4973 (Account-bound Tokens) or Verax's attestation registry create a portable, user-owned proof of achievement that is the atomic unit of composability.
Reward settlement is chain-agnostic. The final reward—whether tokens, NFTs, or access—is delivered via intent-based bridges like Across or Socket. This separates the credential's provenance (e.g., on Ethereum) from the reward's destination (e.g., on Base), enabling a single credential to trigger multiple, cross-chain rewards without user bridging.
Evidence: Galxe has issued over 20 million on-chain credentials (OATs) across 15+ chains, demonstrating the demand for portable proof. Protocols like LayerZero enable the verification of these credentials across any connected chain, making the loyalty graph chain-agnostic.
risk-analysis
INTEROPERABLE QUEST PROTOCOLS
The Bear Case: Risks & Vulnerabilities
The promise of portable, on-chain reputation is undermined by fundamental attack vectors and economic misalignment.
01
The Sybil Attack Is The Protocol
Quest completion is the primary value accrual mechanism, making it the ultimate Sybil honeypot. Current anti-Sybil solutions like Gitcoin Passport or Worldcoin are either gameable or introduce centralization.\n- Cost of Attack: Sybil farming can be automated for less than the value of the quest reward.\n- Data Pollution: A flood of low-signal, farmed credentials renders the entire reputation graph useless.
>90%
Farmed Quests
$0.01
Cost to Spoof
02
The Oracle Problem in Disguise
Verifying off-chain real-world actions (e.g., "attend event," "watch video") requires trusted oracles, reintroducing centralization. Protocols like Galxe or Layer3 rely on centralized attestors.\n- Censorship Risk: Oracles can blacklist users or quests arbitrarily.\n- Data Integrity: A compromised oracle invalidates all downstream credentials and rewards.
1-of-N
Failure Points
100%
Trust Assumption
03
Liquidity Fragmentation & Vampire Attacks
Quest rewards (tokens, NFTs) are locked in protocol-specific silos, creating illiquid, worthless junk. New protocols will constantly vampire-attack existing ones to bootstrap users, leading to perpetual churn.\n- User Fatigue: Constant migration for diminishing rewards erodes participation.\n- Protocol Lifespan: Median protocol survival may be <12 months in a hyper-competitive landscape.
-99%
Reward Value
<12mo
Protocol Lifespan
04
Regulatory Capture of On-Chain Identity
Portable reputation becomes a KYC/AML compliance nightmare. Governments will target the aggregation point—the interoperability layer—to enforce sanctions. Protocols like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) could be forced to censor.\n- Permissioned Graphs: Interoperability devolves into a whitelist of approved attestors.\n- Protocol Neutrality: The core value prop of censorship resistance is eliminated.
100%
Censorship Surface
Govt. Order
Single Point of Failure
05
Economic Misalignment: Issuers vs. Completers
Quest issuers (projects) want cheap, high-signal user attention. Completers want maximum reward for minimum effort. This creates a race to the bottom in quest quality and reward value.\n- Adverse Selection: Only low-value "farm and dump" users are attracted.\n- ROI Negative: The cost of issuing meaningful quests exceeds the value of acquired users.
-200%
Campaign ROI
0.1%
Retention Rate
06
The Interoperability Bottleneck
Standardization efforts (e.g., EIP-7121, Farcaster Frames) create a single point of technical failure. A bug in the shared schema or verification library compromises every connected protocol.\n- Systemic Risk: A vulnerability in EAS or Verax could invalidate billions of attestations.\n- Innovation Tax: New credential types are bottlenecked by slow standardization processes.
1 Bug
To Break All
6-24mo
Std. Lag Time
future-outlook
THE INTEROPERABLE LAYER
Future Outlook: The Loyalty Graph
Quest protocols will converge into a unified data standard, creating a portable reputation layer for users and protocols.
The Loyalty Graph is a public good. It is a composable, on-chain record of user engagement across all quest platforms like Galxe, Layer3, and RabbitHole. This creates a portable reputation asset, decoupling user history from any single application.
Standardization enables cross-protocol composability. A common schema, like an ERC-7215 for quest completion, allows protocols to query a user's entire history. A DeFi protocol can offer better rates based on a Galxe quest score, without direct integration.
Data becomes a yield-bearing asset. Users own their graph and can permission its use. Protocols like Rabbithole pay to access verified, high-value user cohorts, creating a data marketplace where users earn for their attention.
Evidence: The Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) provides the primitive for this. Projects like Coinbase's Base are already using EAS to issue on-chain credentials, demonstrating the demand for portable, verifiable reputation.
takeaways
LOYALTY INFRASTRUCTURE
Key Takeaways for Builders & Investors
Quest protocols are becoming the programmable middleware for user acquisition and retention, shifting from closed gardens to open, composable systems.
01
The Problem: Fragmented User Graphs
Every dApp builds its own loyalty silo, forcing users to fragment their on-chain identity and history. This creates high acquisition costs and prevents cross-protocol reputation.
- Key Benefit 1: Interoperable quests create a portable, verifiable user graph.
- Key Benefit 2: Enables sybil-resistant airdrops and reputation-based access across ecosystems like Ethereum, Solana, and Base.
-70%
CAC Potential
10x+
Data Utility
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Quest Routing
Instead of forcing users through rigid steps, let them declare a goal (e.g., 'Provide $1000 DeFi liquidity'). Protocols like UniswapX and CowSwap pioneered this for swaps; quest systems like Galxe and Layer3 are next.
- Key Benefit 1: ~50% higher completion rates by abstracting complexity.
- Key Benefit 2: Automatically routes users through the most efficient on-chain pathways, similar to Across or LayerZero for bridging.
~50%
Higher Completion
Auto-Route
Complexity
03
The New Business Model: Loyalty-as-a-Service (LaaS)
Quest protocols are evolving from marketing tools into critical infrastructure. The revenue shifts from one-off campaign fees to a take-rate on all user actions routed through the system.
- Key Benefit 1: Predictable, recurring revenue from protocol partnerships.
- Key Benefit 2: First-mover advantage in owning the graph of on-chain user intent and behavior.
SaaS-Like
Revenue Model
$1B+
TAM Potential
04
The Technical Moats: Proof Aggregation & ZK
The winning infrastructure will be defined by its ability to cheaply and trustlessly verify complex, cross-chain user actions. This is a cryptography race.
- Key Benefit 1: ZK-proofs for quest completion (see RISC Zero, Succinct) enable privacy and scale.
- Key Benefit 2: Aggregation layers that batch proofs for ~90% lower verification costs on L1s.
~90%
Lower Cost
ZK-Proofs
Core Tech
05
The Investor Play: Back the Railroads, Not the Towns
Invest in the interoperable protocol layer that all loyalty programs will build upon, not individual quest-issuing dApps. This is analogous to investing in AWS over early 2000s e-commerce sites.
- Key Benefit 1: Non-correlated risk from any single dApp's success.
- Key Benefit 2: Captures value from the entire ecosystem's growth, similar to how The Graph indexes all chains.
Infra Bet
Investment Thesis
Ecosystem
Value Capture
06
The Endgame: Autonomous On-Chain Growth Loops
The final stage is a self-reinforcing system where quest completion data automatically triggers rewards, governance rights, and new quests via smart contracts—no marketing team required.
- Key Benefit 1: Near-zero marginal cost for user acquisition and engagement.
- Key Benefit 2: Creates protocol-owned growth that is defensible and composable, a core primitive for the on-chain economy.
~$0
Marginal CAC
Auto-Growth
System State
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall