DAO operations are financially unsustainable. Every proposal, vote, and treasury payout executes as a separate on-chain transaction, creating prohibitive gas fees and network congestion for active communities.
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog
Why Batch Transactions Will Revolutionize DAO Operations
ERC-4337's user operations enable atomic, multi-protocol transaction bundles. This is a fundamental upgrade for DAO treasury management, governance execution, and operational efficiency.
introduction
THE COST OF COORDINATION
Introduction
Batch transactions solve the fundamental scaling and cost inefficiencies that cripple on-chain DAO governance today.
Transaction batching is the scaling primitive. It aggregates multiple user actions into a single on-chain settlement, collapsing gas costs per user and enabling complex multi-step proposals that are currently impossible.
This is not just gas optimization. Batching enables atomic execution, eliminating the risk of partial proposal failure and creating enforceable execution paths for DAOs using tools like Safe{Wallet} and Gnosis Zodiac.
Evidence: A DAO with 100 members paying 1 ETH each for a grant would spend ~$300k in gas on mainnet. A single batched transaction reduces that cost by over 95%.
key-trends
WHY BATCHING CHANGES EVERYTHING
The DAO Execution Bottleneck
DAO governance is broken by slow, expensive, and insecure sequential execution. Batch transactions are the atomic upgrade.
01
The 7-Day Voting, 1-Week Execution Cycle
Passing a proposal is just the start. Sequential execution of multi-step operations (e.g., treasury rebalancing across Uniswap, Aave, Compound) creates weeks of operational delay and massive execution risk from stale prices.\n- Eliminates stale execution windows by bundling dependent actions.\n- Reduces governance fatigue from endless follow-up votes for minor adjustments.
-90%
Time to Execute
>1 Week
Delay Eliminated
02
Gas Death by a Thousand Transactions
A DAO paying for 50 individual swaps, approvals, and transfers on Ethereum can incur >$100k in gas fees. Batch processing via systems like Safe{Wallet} Batched Transactions or EIP-4337 Bundlers aggregates these into a single on-chain operation.\n- Cuts total gas costs by 60-80% by paying base fee once.\n- Enables micro-transactions previously economically impossible for DAO treasuries.
-75%
Gas Costs
$100k+
Potential Savings
03
The Atomicity & Security Guarantee
Without batching, a 10-step treasury operation can fail at step 7, leaving funds in a corrupted state. Batch execution provides all-or-nothing atomicity, a concept critical to protocols like Compound and Aave.\n- Prevents partial failure states that require emergency governance intervention.\n- Enables complex DeFi strategies with guaranteed rollback on any error, enhancing security.
100%
Atomic Guarantee
0
Corrupted States
04
UniswapX as a Precedent
UniswapX's off-chain intent-based routing and on-chain settlement is a batch execution primitive. A DAO can express a complex intent ("swap X for Y across best venues") fulfilled as a single, optimized transaction.\n- Abstracts complexity from DAO operators and multisig signers.\n- Leverages specialized solvers (like CowSwap, 1inch Fusion) for optimal price execution in one tx.
1 TX
Complex Intent
Best Price
Guaranteed
05
The MEV Extraction Problem
Public, sequential DAO transactions are a free buffet for MEV bots. Batching obfuscates intent and compresses the extractable value window. Solutions like Flashbots SUAVE aim to democratize this.\n- Protects treasury value from frontrunning and sandwich attacks.\n- Turns a cost center into a revenue stream via optimized block space bundling.
-90%
MEV Leakage
Revenue
Potential Flip
06
From Governance to Autonomous Agents
Batch execution is the enabling layer for DAO-controlled autonomous agents. Instead of voting on low-level calls, DAOs approve high-level policies executed by agentic frameworks (e.g., OpenAI-powered keepers, Olas Network).\n- Shifts DAO focus to strategy over micromanagement.\n- Enables real-time reaction to market conditions within pre-approved guardrails.
24/7
Autonomous Ops
Strategic
Focus Shift
DAO OPERATIONS
Cost & Complexity: Before vs. After Batching
Quantifies the operational impact of transaction batching for DAO treasury management and governance, comparing traditional sequential execution against aggregated solutions like Safe{Wallet} and Biconomy.
| Metric / Capability | Sequential Execution (Before) | Transaction Batching (After) | Aggregator SDK (Biconomy, Gelato) |
|---|---|---|---|
Avg. Gas Cost per Governance Vote | $8-15 | $0.50-2.00 | $0.10-0.50 (subsidized) |
Time to Execute 10 Treasury Payouts | 10-30 minutes | < 60 seconds | < 30 seconds |
Failed Transaction Risk (Revert) | High (per TX) | Atomic (all-or-nothing) | Atomic with gasless retries |
Multi-chain Operation Complexity | Manual per chain | Single signature, multi-chain broadcast | Abstracted via Relayer Network |
Required Signer Attention (Gnosis Safe) | 10 transactions | 1 transaction | 1 user operation (ERC-4337) |
Gas Optimization Strategy | Manual fee bidding | Aggregated calldata & compression | Sponsored meta-transactions |
Integration with Snapshot / Tally | Manual execution step | Direct execution via Zodiac module | Automated execution via relayer |
deep-dive
THE EXECUTION LAYER
How ERC-4337 UserOps Unlock Atomic DAO Actions
ERC-4337's UserOperation batching transforms DAO governance from a multi-step, trust-heavy process into a single, atomic transaction.
Batch Execution is Atomic: A single UserOperation bundles multiple contract calls. This eliminates the risk of partial execution in DAO proposals, where a treasury transfer succeeds but a token swap fails, leaving funds stranded. The entire action either completes or reverts.
Replaces Multi-Sig Bottlenecks: Traditional Gnosis Safe operations require sequential, manual approvals across multiple signers, creating days of latency. A UserOperation from a smart account representing the DAO executes the entire approved intent in one on-chain transaction.
Enables Complex Strategies: This atomicity unlocks DeFi composability for treasuries. A single proposal can instruct a vault to withdraw from Aave, bridge funds via Across, and provide liquidity on Uniswap V3—all as one uncorruptible state change.
Evidence: The Safe{Core} Protocol and Zodiac modules are already integrating with ERC-4337, allowing existing DAO multi-sigs to delegate execution to smart accounts that can batch UserOperations, moving governance on-chain.
case-study
FROM VOTING LAG TO EXECUTION VELOCITY
Real-World DAO Use Cases for Transaction Bundles
DAOs are crippled by sequential, manual execution. Transaction bundles enable atomic, multi-step operations that unlock new governance models.
01
The Multi-Chain Treasury Manager
DAOs like Aave and Uniswap manage assets across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon. Rebalancing is a manual, multi-day nightmare.
- Atomic Cross-Chain Rebalancing: Bundle a vote result with a LayerZero or Axelar message to move liquidity in one step.
- Cost & Risk Collapse: Eliminate $100k+ in manual execution risk and slash gas by batching approvals, swaps, and bridges.
- Real-Time Strategy: Enables reactive treasury management against market volatility.
-90%
Execution Risk
1 Block
Settlement Time
02
The Grant Committee Automator
Programs like Uniswap Grants or Compound Grants require multi-step disbursals: vote, stream setup, token transfer.
- End-to-End Automation: Bundle a successful Snapshot vote with a Sablier stream creation and ERC-20 transfer in one atomic transaction.
- Eliminate Admin Keys: Remove the trusted multisig operator; execution is trustlessly encoded in the passed proposal.
- Scalability: Process dozens of grants per epoch without operational overhead.
10x
Throughput
$0
Admin Ops Cost
03
The Protocol Parameter Updater
Updating Aave interest rate curves or Compound collateral factors requires separate, risky governance calls for each asset.
- Atomic System Upgrades: Bundle updates for 10+ market parameters into a single, all-or-nothing transaction.
- Guaranteed Consistency: Prevents partial failures that create arbitrage opportunities and system instability.
- Rapid Iteration: Enables complex, coordinated parameter tuning for DeFi 2.0 protocols like Frax Finance.
1 Tx
For N Changes
~500ms
Update Latency
04
The MEV-Resistant Governance Executor
Passed proposals with profitable arbitrage (e.g., listing a new Uniswap pool) are front-run, stealing value from the DAO.
- Private Execution via SUAVE: Bundle proposal execution with a Flashbots SUAVE-enabled private transaction.
- Capture Value, Not Leak It: The DAO itself can capture the MEV generated by its own governance actions.
- Integrity Guarantee: Prevents malicious actors from manipulating execution order for profit.
+5-20%
Value Capture
0
Leaked MEV
counter-argument
THE OPERATIONAL REALITY
The Skeptic's Corner: Centralization & Complexity
Batch transactions solve DAO governance latency by aggregating intent, but introduce new vectors for centralization and systemic risk.
Batch transactions centralize execution power. A single relayer or sequencer (like Ethereum's PBS builders) aggregates and executes bundled proposals, creating a single point of failure and potential censorship. This mirrors the centralization risks seen in intent-based systems like UniswapX.
Complexity creates systemic fragility. Batching logic, cross-chain settlement via LayerZero or Axelar, and failure handling add layers where a bug in one proposal can invalidate an entire batch. This is the DAO equivalent of reorg risk.
The trade-off is latency for liveness. Traditional DAO voting is slow but asynchronous; batching is fast but synchronous. This forces a choice between governance speed and operational resilience, a tension also seen in optimistic vs. zk-rollup designs.
Evidence: The 2022 Nomad bridge hack exploited a batch verification flaw, where a single invalid proof corrupted all pending transactions, causing a $190M loss. Batch processing amplifies the impact of singular failures.
takeaways
THE BATCHING IMPERATIVE
TL;DR for Protocol Architects
DAO governance is a bottleneck of sequential, gas-inefficient transactions. Batch execution is the atomic operation that fixes it.
01
The Problem: Governance Paralysis
Multi-step treasury operations (e.g., claim rewards, swap, re-stake) require multiple proposals and on-chain votes. This creates weeks of latency and exposes DAOs to price volatility between steps.\n- Sequential execution kills agility\n- High proposal fatigue reduces voter turnout\n- Manual ops are a critical security risk
2-4 weeks
Cycle Time
5-10x
Gas Waste
02
The Solution: Atomic Multi-Call Proposals
Bundle governance-approved intents into a single, atomic transaction via a multicall contract. Inspired by Uniswap's Universal Router and Gnosis Safe's batched transactions.\n- Atomic success/failure for complex logic\n- Single vote authorizes entire operation\n- Gas savings of 30-70% via shared overhead
1 Tx
Multi-Step Op
-60%
Avg. Gas Cost
03
The Enabler: Intent-Based Settlement
Move from transaction specification to outcome specification. Let specialized solvers (e.g., CowSwap, UniswapX) compete to fulfill the batch most efficiently.\n- MEV recapture for the DAO treasury\n- Optimal routing across DEXs and bridges like Across\n- Abstracts complexity from non-technical delegates
$M+
MEV Saved
Best Price
Guaranteed
04
The Architecture: Modular Execution Layer
Separate the voting layer (e.g., OpenZeppelin Governor) from a dedicated, upgradeable execution layer. Use EIP-4337 Account Abstraction for sponsored gas and session keys.\n- Upgrade logic without governance fork\n- Gasless voting and execution\n- Time-locked execution with emergency cancel
Zero
Voter Gas
Modular
Security
05
The Killer App: Automated Treasury Management
Programmatic rebalancing, yield harvesting, and cross-chain allocations become feasible. Think Yearn Vaults but governed by DAO vote, not a single multisig.\n- Dynamic AMM LP management\n- Scheduled compound/rebalance operations\n- Institutional-grade operational security
24/7
Yield Opt.
+200-500 bps
APY Boost
06
The Risk: Centralized Sequencing
The batch proposer/sequencer becomes a powerful actor. Mitigate with decentralized sequencer sets (like Espresso or Astria), fraud proofs, and forced inclusion lists.\n- Censorship resistance is non-negotiable\n- Liveness guarantees required for critical ops\n- Auditable execution traces are mandatory
1-of-N
Trust Model
Seconds
Challenge Window
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall