Users are liquidity providers. Every transaction requiring a user to fund gas is a failed abstraction. This model forces users to become on-chain liquidity managers, a role they do not want and are not good at.
account-abstraction-fixing-crypto-ux
Blog
Why 'User Pays' is an Antiquated Model for Blockchain UX
The expectation that users must hold and manage native tokens for gas is a primary adoption barrier. This analysis argues that sponsored transactions, powered by Account Abstraction and Paymasters, are becoming the standard for competitive dApp UX.
introduction
THE UX TAX
Introduction
The 'user pays' model is a primary bottleneck preventing mainstream blockchain adoption.
The abstraction layer is missing. Web2 users never think about server costs; Web3 users are their own accountants. The success of account abstraction (ERC-4337) and gas sponsorship by protocols like Biconomy proves demand for this shift.
Fee markets are adversarial. In a traditional gas auction, users compete against bots and MEV searchers, creating a negative-sum experience. Systems like EIP-1559 smoothed payments but did not change the fundamental payer.
Evidence: Over 90% of failed transactions on Ethereum are due to insufficient gas, a direct result of this antiquated model.
key-trends
WHY 'USER PAYS' IS AN ANTIQUATED MODEL
The Sponsored Transaction Tipping Point
The direct payment of gas fees is a primary UX bottleneck, creating friction for onboarding and composability. Sponsored transactions, where a third party pays the fee, are becoming the standard for seamless interaction.
01
The Abstraction Layer
Protocols like ERC-4337 Account Abstraction and Solana's Versioned Transactions decouple execution from fee payment. This enables:
- Session Keys for gasless app interactions
- Batch Transactions reducing costs by ~30-40%
- Social Recovery without seed phrase friction
10M+
AA Wallets
-40%
Gas Cost
02
The Paymaster Economy
ERC-4337's Paymaster contract allows dApps, wallets, or brands to sponsor user gas, often in stablecoins or any ERC-20. This creates:
- User Acquisition Funnels with zero-friction onboarding
- Stablecoin Gas Markets, insulating users from ETH volatility
- Conditional Sponsorship based on user actions or loyalty
$0
User Gas
100%
Coverage
03
The Intent-Based Gateway
Systems like UniswapX, CowSwap, and Across use intents and sponsored settlements. Users sign a desired outcome, and a filler network competes to fulfill it, paying gas. This enables:
- MEV Protection via private order flow
- Cross-Chain Swaps without native gas tokens
- Guaranteed Execution with no failed transaction costs
~500ms
Quote Latency
$10B+
Settled Volume
04
The Infrastructure Play
Providers like Stackup, Biconomy, and Candide operate relayers and bundlers, abstracting gas for developers. They compete on:
- Relayer Latency sub-500ms for bundle inclusion
- Fee Market Optimization using private mempools
- Multi-Chain Support across EVM, Solana, Starknet
<500ms
Bundle Latency
10+
Chains
05
The Regulatory Shield
Sponsored transactions create a clear legal distinction: the user is not purchasing a volatile commodity (ETH) to interact. This provides:
- Consumer Protection via predictable, app-defined costs
- Compliance Pathways for regulated entities entering DeFi
- Tax Clarity by separating utility fee from asset speculation
0 ETH
User Liability
Stable
Cost Basis
06
The Network Effect Trap
Chains that fail to implement first-class sponsored transaction support will see developer and user drain. The tipping point is reached when:
- Top 10 dApps default to gasless onboarding
- Wallets like MetaMask & Phantom embed native paymasters
- L2s like Arbitrum & Optimism subsidize fees for growth
Top 10
dApps
100M+
Users
deep-dive
THE INCENTIVE MISMATCH
The Economic Logic of Sponsored UX
The 'user-pays' gas model is a primary bottleneck for mainstream blockchain adoption, creating a misalignment between protocol growth and user experience.
The user-pays model fails because it externalizes the cost of user acquisition onto the user. Every new user faces a cognitive and financial tax before deriving any value, which directly suppresses growth metrics for the underlying protocol.
Sponsored transactions invert this logic. Applications like Pimlico's Account Abstraction stack and Base's onchain summer demonstrate that paying for user gas is a customer acquisition cost with a measurable ROI, not an expense.
The economic shift is from toll roads to malls. A toll road (user-pays) extracts value from every journey. A mall (sponsored UX) subsidizes entry to capture the value of commerce inside, a model proven by EIP-4337 bundlers and Visa's gas sponsorship.
Evidence: After implementing gas sponsorship, Base saw a 5x increase in new smart account creation. Protocols that treat gas as a marketing budget outcompete those that treat it as a revenue stream.
THE PAYMASTER LANDSCAPE
Gas Sponsorship: A Protocol Arms Race
Comparison of dominant models for abstracting gas fees, a critical UX battleground for onchain adoption.
| Key Dimension | ERC-4337 Smart Accounts (e.g., Biconomy, Alchemy) | Application-Specific Sponsorship (e.g., dYdX, Friend.tech) | Intent-Based Relayers (e.g., UniswapX, Across) |
|---|---|---|---|
User Pays Gas? | |||
Sponsor Recoupment Model | Paymaster staked & reimbursed | Protocol treasury subsidy | Optimistic fulfillment via order flow |
Typical Latency for User | < 2 sec | < 1 sec | 2-5 sec (cross-chain) |
Primary Revenue Source | User/developer fees | Protocol revenue | MEV & liquidity spreads |
Cross-Chain Native? | |||
Requires Smart Contract Wallet? | |||
Max Sponsor Cost per Tx (Est.) | $0.10 - $0.50 | $1.00 - $5.00+ | $0.05 - $0.20 |
Key Architectural Dependency | EntryPoint contract & bundlers | Protocol's validator set | Solvers & offchain auction |
counter-argument
THE UX PARADIGM SHIFT
The Sybil Defense: Why Spam Isn't the Problem You Think
The 'user pays' model for transaction fees is a legacy constraint that modern blockchains are solving with subsidization and intent-based architectures.
The spam problem is solved. Modern L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism process millions of transactions daily for a fraction of a cent. The marginal cost of computation is negligible, making 'spam' a non-issue for networks with sufficient scale.
User-pays is a UX bottleneck. Requiring users to hold native tokens for fees creates onboarding friction. Protocols like Pimlico and Biconomy abstract gas via ERC-20 payments and sponsored transactions, shifting the cost to applications.
The real cost is state growth. The primary constraint is blob storage on Ethereum, not execution. Validiums and systems like EigenDA address this by moving data off-chain, decoupling execution cost from data availability cost.
Intent-based architectures win. Frameworks like UniswapX and CowSwap use fillers who compete to pay fees for user orders. The user experience becomes gasless and MEV-protected, eliminating the pay-to-broadcast model entirely.
takeaways
WHY 'USER PAYS' IS ANTIQUATED
TL;DR for Builders and Investors
The gas fee model is a UX dead-end. The next wave of adoption requires abstracting all costs and complexity from the end-user.
01
The Problem: Friction Kills Product-Market Fit
Every transaction requiring wallet confirmation and token bridging has a >90% drop-off rate. You're not building for the ~1M active DeFi users, but for the next 100M who expect apps to work, not wallets.
- Onboarding Friction: Users must acquire native gas tokens before any interaction.
- Cognitive Load: Managing multiple L2s and their respective gas currencies is a full-time job.
- Failed Transactions: Unpredictable gas spikes lead to dead ends and support tickets.
>90%
Drop-off Rate
~1M
Active DeFi Users
02
The Solution: Intent-Based Abstraction & Sponsorship
Shift from imperative transactions ('how') to declarative intents ('what'). Let specialized solvers (like in UniswapX and CowSwap) compete to fulfill user goals, with gas paid by the dApp or protocol via account abstraction (ERC-4337) or meta-transactions.
- Sponsor Pays: DApps absorb gas costs as a customer acquisition cost, enabled by Paymasters.
- Cross-Chain Intents: Users sign a message; systems like Across and LayerZero handle routing and execution.
- Batch Processing: Aggregators like Biconomy bundle user ops, reducing effective cost by 10-100x.
10-100x
Cost Reduction
ERC-4337
Standard
03
The New Business Model: Subsidize to Capture Value
The winning strategy is not to charge users per transaction, but to embed costs into the service and capture value elsewhere. This is the AWS free tier or Google search model applied to blockchain.
- Protocol Revenue Shift: Monetize via take-rates on volume, not user gas.
- Developer SDKs: Infrastructure like Stackup, Alchemy, and Pimlico offer sponsor gas as a service.
- VC Mandate: Fund teams building abstracted UX, not another wallet with gas estimation.
$10B+
TVL in Intent Systems
AWS Model
Analogy
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall